Effect of Posterior Laxity on Knee Flexion Angle After Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

It is still controversial whether anteroposterior laxity or posterior tibial slope (PTS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affects maximum flexion angle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between PTS and tibial anteroposterior laxity after TKA and to examine the effect of these factors on knee flexion angle after TKA. This study enrolled 96 knees in 80 patients undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA (CR-TKA). Anterior translation (AT) and posterior translation (PT) were measured separately at a flexion of 90 degrees using stress radiographs. Total anteroposterior translation (APT) was defined as the sum of AT and PT. PTS was measured in a lateral view. In univariate analysis, postoperative flexion angle was positively correlated with preoperative flexion (R = 0.51; p < 0.01), PT (R = 0.48; p < 0.01), and APT (R = 0.48; p < 0.01), whereas it was negatively correlated with body mass index (BMI; R = − 0.43; p < 0.01) and PTS (R = − 0.24; p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, postoperative flexion angle was negatively correlated with BMI (β = − 0.243; p < 0.01), whereas it was positively correlated with preoperative flexion (β = 0.406; p < 0.01) and PT (β = 0.279; p < 0.01). A negative correlation was found between PTS and PT (R = − 0.39, p < 0.01). An increase in posterior laxity at 90 degrees of flexion significantly increased postoperative flexion. An increase in PTS was associated with decreased posterior laxity; however, it had no effect on postoperative flexion.

Publication History

Received: 28 February 2025

Accepted: 17 June 2025

Article published online:
01 July 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 127-133
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 2 Higuchi H, Hatayama K, Shimizu M, Kobayashi A, Kobayashi T, Takagishi K. Relationship between joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different platforms. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (04) 997-1000
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 3 Nicholls RL, Schirm AC, Jeffcote BO, Kuster MS. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro. J Orthop Res 2007; 25 (11) 1506-1512
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 4 Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (01) 50-53
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 5 Jones DP, Locke C, Pennington J, Theis JC. The effect of sagittal laxity on function after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (05) 719-723
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 6 Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Sato J, Sakurai T, Toyabe SI. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (11) 3536-3542
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 7 Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR, Bae BH, Park SJ, Cho SG. In vivo stability of total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system. Int Orthop 2007; 31 (01) 45-48
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 8 Seon JK, Park SJ, Yoon TR, Lee KB, Moon ES, Song EK. The effect of anteroposterior laxity on the range of movement and knee function following a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (08) 1090-1095
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 9 van Hal CTH, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB, Jacobs WC. The anterior-posterior laxity after total knee arthroplasty inserted with a ligament tensor. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (08) 1019-1022
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 10 Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Toyabe S. Anteroposterior translation does not correlate with knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (02) 704-709
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 11 Matsumoto K, Ogawa H, Yoshioka H, Akiyama H. Postoperative anteroposterior laxity influences subjective outcome after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 1845-1849
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 12 Schuster AJ, von Roll AL, Pfluger D, Wyss T. Anteroposterior stability after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (07) 1113-1120
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 13 Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (03) 193-196
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 14 Chambers AW, Wood AR, Kosmopoulos V, Sanchez HB, Wagner RA. Effect of posterior tibial slope on flexion and anterior-posterior tibial translation in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (01) 103-106
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 15 Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (06) 889-896
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 16 Shi X, Shen B, Kang P, Yang J, Zhou Z, Pei F. The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (12) 2696-2703
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 17 Malviya A, Lingard EA, Weir DJ, Deehan DJ. Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (05) 491-498
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 18 Fujito T, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Oda K, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Influence of posterior tibial slope on kinematics after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (12) 3778-3782.e1
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 19 Seo SS, Kim CW, Kim JH, Min YK. Clinical results associated with changes of posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2013; 25 (01) 25-29
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 20 Antony J, Tetsworth K, Hohmann E. Influence of sagittal plane component alignment on kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (06) 1686-1691
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 21 Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (04) 626-629
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 22 Gadinsky NE, Ehrhardt JK, Urband C, Westrich GH. Effect of body mass index on range of motion and manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (08) 1194-1197
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 23 Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD. Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (02) 376-382
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 24 Fukagawa S, Matsuda S, Tashiro Y, Hashizume M, Iwamoto Y. Posterior displacement of the tibia increases in deep flexion of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (04) 1107-1114
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar