Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-45153
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Two New Anti-Tumor Promoting Serratane-Type Triterpenoids from the Stem Bark of Picea jezoensis var. jezoensis
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for High Technology from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, JapanDr. Reiko Tanaka
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
4-20-1 Nasahara
Takatsuki
Osaka 569-1094
Japan
Phone: and Fax: +81-726-90-1084
Email: tanakar@gly.oups.ac.jp
Publication History
Received: May 15, 2003
Accepted: August 10, 2003
Publication Date:
09 January 2004 (online)
Abstract
Two new serratane-type triterpenoids, 1 and 2, were isolated from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis Carr. var. jezoensis (Pinaceae). Their structures were determined to be 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (1) and 13β, l4β-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (2) on the basis of spectroscopic methods and partial syntheses. Compounds 1 and 2 and their acetates were screened as potential anti-tumor promoters by using the in vitro short-term 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA)-induced Epstein-Barr virus early antigen (EBV-EA) activation assay. IC50 value evaluation showed that compound 1 was more effective than others. In addition, compounds 1 and 2 were examined for anti-tumor promoting activities in a two-stage carcinogenesis assay of mouse skin tumors induced by 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) as an initiator and TPA as a promoter. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibited significant anti-tumor promoting effects on mouse skin carcinogenesis.
Key words
3β-Methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol - 13β,14β-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol - Picea jezoensis var. jezoensis - Pinaceae - 2D NMR - in vitro EBV-EA activation assay - in vivo two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis test
Introduction
Chemoprevention is regarded as one of the efficient strategies for cancer prevention [1]. Inhibition of the tumor promotion stage in multistage chemical carcinogenesis has been regarded as the most promising method for cancer chemoprevention [2]. In the search for cancer chemopreventive agents, the inhibitory effects on Epstein-Barr virus early antigen (EBV-EA) induction by the tumor promoter, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA), have been studied as a primary screening test [3]. In our search for naturally occurring cancer chemopreventive agents, the stem bark of Picea jezoensis Carr. var. jezoensis (Japanese name: Ezomatsu) (Pinaceae) was selected for detailed investigation. In previous papers, we had reported a considerable number of serratane-type triterpenenoids from this stem bark [4], [5], [6], [7]. Recently we reported two novel compounds, jezananals A and B from this bark [8]. Among them, 13α,14α-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (3) showed significant anti-tumor promoting activity in the in vivo two-stage mouse-skin carcinogenesis assay using 7,12-dimethylbenz[α]anthracene (DMBA) as an initiator and TPA as a tumor promoter [9].
Therefore, serratane-type triterpenoids were considered to represent appropriate lead compounds to develop more potent agents with anti-tumor promoting activity for clinical use. In our further search for naturally occurring cancer chemopreventive agents, a detailed investigation of this stem bark was carried out.[]

Material and Methods
#General experimental procedures
Melting points were measured with a Yanagimoto micro-melting point apparatus without correction. Optical rotations were determined with a JASCO DIP-IOOO digital polarimeter. IR spectra were recorded using a Perkin-Elmer 1720X FTIR spectrophotometer. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were obtained on a Varian INOVA 500 spectrometer with standard pulse sequences, operating at 500 MHz and 125 MHz, respectively. CDCl3 was used as the solvent and Me4Si (TMS) as the internal standard. EI-MS were recorded on a Hitachi 4000H double-focusing mass spectrometer (70 eV). Column chromatography was carried out over silica gel (70 - 230 mesh, Merck) and medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) was carried out with silica gel (230 - 400 mesh, Merck). TLC and preparative TLC were carried out on Merck silica gel F254 plates.
#Plant material
Cuticles of P. jezoensis (Sieb. et Zucc.) Carr. var. jezoensis were collected at ca. 1000 m in the mountains of Hidaka town, Saryu district, Hokkaido, Japan, in June 2001. A voucher specimen (PJJ-01-01) is deposited at the Herbarium of the Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
#Extraction and isolation
The freshly chopped cuticles (12 kg) of P. jezoensis var. jezoensis were extracted with CHCl3 (20 L) employing an automatic percolator for 7 days at 50 °C. The CHCl3 solution was evaporated under reduced pressure and the resulting dark green residue (685.0 g) was subjected to silica gel (13 kg) column chromatography. Elution of the column with CHCl3 afforded residues A (39.3 g), B (67.2 g), C (28.9 g), D (71.0 g), E (51.6 g), and F (23.8 g), from fractions 1 - 13, 14 - 26, 27 - 30, 31 - 40, 41 - 60 and 61 - 74 (each 2 L). Elution was continued with CHCl3-EtOAc (5 : 1) to give residues G (60.1 g), H (52.9 g) and I (12.6 g) from fractions 75 - 83, 84 - 90 and 91 - 105 (each 2 L). Further elution with EtOAc gave a residue J (83.1 g) from fractions 106 - 111 (each 2 L). Recrystallization of residue E gave 3β-methoxyserrat-14-en-21β-ol (4) (33.8 g), and the filtrate (17.8 g) of compound 4 was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel (600 g) using n-hexane-CHCl3 (1 : 1) and afforded a crystalline solid (fractions 48 - 52, 2.032 g) (each 300 mL), which was subjected to MPLC with n-hexane-EtOAc (10 : 1) followed by recrystallization from MeOH-CHCl3 to give compound 1 (1.518 g). Repeated column chromatography of residue G on silica gel (2 kg) eluting with CHCl3-EtOAc (10 : 1) afforded a crystalline solid (fractions 38 - 55, 1.220 g) (each 500 mL), which was subjected to MPLC using n-hexane-EtOAc (10 : 1) to give crude compound 2 (fractions 77 - 83, 312 mg) and recrystallized from MeOH-CHCl3 to give compound 2 (246 mg).
3β-Methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-o1 (1): Colorless prisms; m. p. 257 - 259 °C (from MeOH-CHCl3); [α]D 23.5: + 59.1 (c 0.28, CHCl3); HR-El-MS: m/z = 456.3965 [M]+ (calcd. for C31H52O2 : 456.3965); lR (KBr) νmax = 3497 (OH), 2960, 2850, 1457, 1383, 1224, 1201, 1181, 1098, 991, 963 cm-1; 1H- and l3C-NMR, see Table [1]. El-MS: m/z (rel. int.) = 456 (100) [M+], 441 (66), 438 (42), 423 (41), 409 (7), 391 (14), 285 (8), 255 (17), 221 (73), 203 (57), 189 (69), 135 (42), 121 (31).
3β-Methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-yl acetate (la): Compound 1 (25 mg) was acetylated as usual (Ac2O-pyridine, 1 : 1, 2 mL) to yield a crystalline solid. Purification by PTLC (CHCl3-MeOH, 30 : 1) afforded a corresponding monoacetate (1a), m. p. 206 - 209 °C (from MeOH-CHCl3); [α]D 23.5: -9.7 (c 0.11, CHCl3); HR-El-MS: m/z = 498.4072 [M+] (calcd. for C33H54O3 : 498.4070); lR (KBr): νmax = 1727, 1246 cm-1 (OAc); 1H- and 13C-NMR: see Table [1]. El-MS: m/z (rel. int.): = 498 (42) [M]+, 438 (36),423 (75), 221 (52), 203 (100), 189 (90), 121 (35).
Conversion of 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (1) to 3β-methoxyserrat-14-en-21β-ol (4): Compound 4 (140.1 mg) was acetylated as usual to give a corresponding mono-acetate (4a) (147.0 mg). A solution of compound 4a (100 mg) in glacial HOAc (30 mL) was added H2SO4 (3.0 mL) under ice cooling, and the mixture was kept at room temperature for 16 h. Then, the mixture was poured into ice/water, and the resulting precipitate was extracted with CHCl3 (100 mL × 3). The CHCl3 extract was neutralized with 5 % NaOH solution, washed with H2O, and dried over Na2SO4. Evaporation of CHCl3 yielded a crystalline solid (94.8 mg) which was subjected to MPLC (230 - 400 mesh, silica gel, Merck) using n-hexane:EtOAc (20 : 1) to give 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-yl acetate (4b) (fractions 13 - 25, 85.5 mg). Compound 4b (70 mg) was hydrolyzed with KOH (200 mg) in MeOH (30 mL) at 80 °C in 8 h. Work-up at usual gave a residue (64.2 mg) which was purified by MPLC using n-hexane : EtOAc (10 : 1) to afford 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (4c) (fractions 37 - 47, 62.5 mg), and 4c was identified by direct comparison with an authentic sample of 1.
13β,14β-Epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (2): Colorless prisms; m. p. 264 - 267 °C (from MeOH-CHCl3); [α]D 23.5: + 4.7 (c 0.11, CHCl3); HR-El-MS: m/z = 472.3913 [M+] (calcd. for C31H52O3 : 472.3914); lR (KBr): νmax = 3500 (OH), 2963, 2937, 2874, 1460, 1385 and 1365 (gem. dimethyl), 1221, 1182, 1103, 1078, 1070, 995, 976 cm-1; 1H- and l3C-NMR: see Table [2]. El-MS: m/z (rel. int.) = 472 (1) [M+], 454 (1), 421 (3), 367 (1), 319 (1), 287 (4), 269 (8), 221 (6), 189 (11) 154 (19), 136 (100), 121 (45).
13β,14β-Epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-yl acetate (2a): Compound 2 (15 mg) was acetylated as usual (Ac2O-pyridine, 1 : 1, 2 mL) to yield a crystalline solid, which was recrystallized from MeOH-CHCl3 to give a corresponding monoacetate (2a), m. p. 205 - 207 °C (from MeOH-CHCl3); [α]D 23.5: -18.9 (c 0.11, CHCI3); HR-El-MS: m/z = 514.4015 [M+] (calcd for C33H54O4 : 514.4020); lR (KBr): νmax = 1728, 1244 cm-1 (OAc); 1H- and l3C-NMR: see Table [2]; El-MS: m/z (rel. int.) = 514 (6) [M+], 496 (10), 454 (22), 436 (9), 421 (68), 221 (6), 136 (100), 121 (47).
Preparation of 13β,14β-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (2) from 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (4c): A solution of m-CPBA (100 mg) in dry CHCl3 (5 mL) was gradually added over a solution of 4c (100 mg) in dry CHCl3 (10 mL) under stirring at room temperature and allowed to stand for 24 h. Work-up as usual yielded a residue (97 mg), which was subjected to MPLC with n-hexane-EtOAc (10 : 1) to give compounds 4e (4 mg) (fractions 7 - 8) and 4d (89 mg) (fractions 25 - 40). The synthetic compounds 4d and 4e were identified as natural compounds 3 and 2, respectively, by direct comparison.
#Inhibition of EBV -EA activation test
EBV-EA positive serum from a patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was a gift from Dr. Y. Zaizen, Department of Biochemistry, Oita Medicinal University. The EBV genome-carrying lymphoblastoid cells (Raji cells derived from Burkitts lymphoma) were cultured in 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) in RPMI-1640 medium (Nissui). Spontaneous activation of EBV-EA in our sub-line Raji cells was less than 0.1 %. The inhibition of EBV-EA activation was assayed using Raji cells (virus non-producer type) as described previously [9]. The indicator cells (Raji cells, 1 × 106/mL) were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h in 1 mL of a medium containing n-butyric acid (4 mmol), TPA [32 pmol = 20 ng in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)], as inducer and various amounts of test compound in 5 μL DMSO. Smears were made from the cell suspension, and the activated cells that were stained by EBV-EA positive serum from NPC patients were detected by an indirect immunofluorescence technique [2]. In each assay, at least 500 cells were counted, the number of stained cells were counted, and the number of stained cells (positive cells) present recorded. Triplicate assays were performed for each compound. The average EBV-EA induction of the test compounds was expressed as a relative ratio to the control experiment (100 %) which was carried out only with n-butyric acid (4 mmol) plus TPA (32 pmol). EBV-EA induction was ordinarily around 35 %. The viability of treated Raji cells was assayed by Trypan blue staining methods.
#Two-stage mouse-skin carcinogenesis test
Specific pathogen-free female ICR mice (6 weeks old, body weight approx. 30 g) were obtained from Japan SLC Inc., Shizuok, Japan, and the animals were housed, 5 per polycarbonate cage, in a temperature-controlled room at 24 ± 2 °C and given food and water ad libitum throughout the experiment. Animals were divided into three experimental groups containing 15 mice each. The back (2 × 8 cm2) of each mouse was shaved with surgical clippers, and the mice were topically treated with DMBA (100 μg, 390 nmol) in acetone (0.1 mL) as an initiating treatment. One week after the initiation, papilloma formation was promoted twice weekly by the application of TPA (1 μg, 1.7 nmol) in acetone (0.1 mL) to the skin. Group 1 received the TPA treatment alone, and groups II and III received a topical application of compounds 1 and 2 (85 nmol), in acetone (0.1 mL), respectively, 1 h before the TP A treatment. The incidence and numbers of papillomas were monitored weekly for 20 weeks.
#Results and Discussion
#Structure determination of 1 and 2
The molecular formula of compound 1 was assigned as C31H52O2 (M+; m/z = 456.3965) by HR-EI-MS. The IR spectrum showed a hydroxy (νmax = 3497 cm-1) absorption. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra of 1 (Table [1]) exhibited seven tertiary methyls, eleven methylenes, three methines, five quaternary carbons, a secondary hydroxy group [δH = 3.44 (1H, t); δC = 75.8 (d)], a secondary methoxy group [δH = 2.63 (dd), 3.35 (3H, s); δC = 57.5 (q), 88.6 (d)] and a tetrasubstituted double bond [δC = 129.6 (s), 143.1 (s)]. Acetylation of 1 gave a monoacetate (la), C33H54O3 (M+; m/z = 498.4072), in which the hydroxymethine proton signal was shifted to δ = 4.68 (t). In the 1H-1H COSY spectra of 1, H-12α (δH = 1.73) was related only to H-11α, H-11β and H-12β, and H-12β (δH = 2.26) was related only to H-11α, H-11β and H-12α. In the NOESY spectrum of 1, significant NOEs were observed between H-3α with H-5α and Me-23, and between H-21α with Me-29 and Me-30, which suggested that the methoxy group had C-3β and the hydroxy group had C-21β configurations. All these data suggested that the structure of 1 should be 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol. In order to confirm this structure, we tried the synthesis of 1 from 3β-methoxyserrat-14-en-21β-ol (4), which is the most abundant triterpenoid of this stem bark. Isomerization of 3β-methoxyserrat-14-en-21β-yl acetate (4a) with conc. H2SO4/HOAc furnished the corresponding 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-yl acetate (4b) in almost quantitative yield, and then hydrolysis gave the corresponding alcohol 4c. The above synthetic 4b and 4c were identical with la and 1 in all respects. To the best of our knowledge, other serrat-13-ene derivatives isolated so far are 3α-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol from the bark of Picea sitchensis (Sitka sparuce) [10] and 21α-methoxyserrat-13-en-3-one from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis Carr. var. hondoensis [11] and P. jezoensis Carr. var. jezoensis [7].
Compound 2 was assigned as C31H52O3 (M+; m/z = 472.3913) by HR-EI-MS. The IR spectrum showed a hydroxy (1: νmax = 3500 cm-1) absorption. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra of 1 (Table [2]) exhibited seven tertiary methyls, eleven methylenes, three methines, five quaternary carbons, a secondary hydroxy group [δH = 3.36 (1H, t); δC = 75.5 (d)], a secondary methoxy group [δH = 2.61 (dd), 3.35 (3H, s); δC = 57.5 (q), 88.5 (d)] and two sp 3 quaternary carbons combined with one oxygen atom [δC = 63.9 (s), 70.0 (s)]. Acetylation of 2 furnished a monoacetate (2a), C33H54O4 (M+; m/z = 514.4015), in which the hydroxymethine proton signal was shifted to δH = 4.69 (t). The DEPT and HMQC spectra of 2 showed the same carbon composition as 13α,14α-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (3) [7]. The difference between 2 and 3 is assumed to come from the bonding of the epoxy ring at C-13 and C-14, considering that these carbons in 2 appeared at δ = 70.0 (s, C-13) and 63.9 (s, C-14) whereas they appeared at δ = 72.9 (s, C-13) and 65.7 (s, C-14) in 3, and H-12α and H-12β appeared at δ = 2.52 (dd) and 0.98 (m) in 2 whereas they appeared at δ = 1.56 (m) and 2.14 (ddd) in 3 [7]. The HMBC spectrum of 2 (Table [2]) supported this assumption, accordingly, the structure of 2 was suggested as the epoxy epimer of 3. In the NOESY spectrum of 2 (Fig. [1]), significant NOEs were observed between H-12α (δH = 1.56) with H-9α and Me-28, between H-27α (δH = 1.62) with H-7α and H-9α, between H-3α (δH = 2.61) with H-5α and Me-23, and between H-21α (δH = 3.36) with Me-29 and Me-30. However, the cross peaks of H-12α, H-15α and H-17β which decide the conformation of the C and D rings of 2 were not observed clearly. The configuration of an epoxy ring and the conformation of the C, D rings were determined by employing the NOE difference experiment. Upon selective irradiation of the signal of H-12β (δH = 2.14), 1.71 %, 4.53 %, 3.45 % NOEs were observed for the signals of H-16α, H-16β and Me-28. Irradiation of the signal for H-15α (δH = 1.91) showed 1.91 %, 3.85 %, 1.97 %, 1.93 % and 0.87 % NOEs for H-12α, H-27α, H-27β, Me-28 and Me-29. Irradiation of the signal for H-17β (δH = 1.81) showed 1.40 %, 0.96 %, 2.56 % and 3.95 % NOEs for H-12α, H-19β, H-27β and Me-30. Thus, the stereostructure of 2 was established as shown in Fig. [1].
The El-MS of 2 showed the fragment ion peaks due to cleavage of the D and C rings at m/z = 287.2366 [C20H31O]+, 221.1902 [C15H25O]+, and 189.1654 [C14H21]+, 154.1358 [C10H18O]+, 136.1245 [C10H16]+, 121.1021 [C9H13]+, and the fragment pattern was close to that of 3 [7]. All these data indicated that the structure of 2 as 13β,14β-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol, which was confirmed by synthesis. Oxidation of synthetic 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (4c) (100 mg) with m-CPBA gave 13α,14α-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (4d) (89 mg) as a major product and the 13β,14β-epoxy epimer (4e) (6 mg) of 4d as a minor product, which was identical in all respects with 2. It is interesting to note that Picea jezoensis Carr. var. jezoensis produces both 13α,14α-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol and its 13β,14β-epoxy epimer in the plant organ.
1 | 1c | ||||
Position | δC | δH | NOESY | δC | δH |
Lα | 38,2 t | 0.85 m | 38.2 t | 0.86m | |
1β | 1.81 m | 11β | 1.80 m | ||
2α | 22.3 t | 1.79 m | 22.3 t | 1.80 m | |
2β | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |||
3α | 88.6 d | 2.63 dd (11.9, 4.1) | 5α, 23 | 88.5 d | 2.62 dd (11.9, 3,9) |
4 | 38.9 s | 37.0 s | |||
5α | 56.2 d | 0.78 m | 9α | 56.2 d | 0.78 m |
6α | 18.8 t | 1.49 m | 23 | 18.8 t | 1.48 m |
6β | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |||
7α | 44.9 t | 1.21 ddd (13,3, 13.3, 4.3) | 5α | 44.9 t | 1.23 ddd (13.3, 13.3, 4.1) |
7β | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |||
8 | 35.8 s | 35.7 s | |||
9α | 65.0 d | 0.91 d (11.9) | lα, 5α | 64.8 d | 0.92 dd (11.9, 1.8) |
10 | 38.3 s | 38.2 s | |||
11α | 21.6 t | 1.64 m | 1β, 9α | 21.5 t | 1.66 m |
11β | 1.03 m | 1.01 m | |||
12α | 28.2 t | 1.73 m | 9α, 27α, 28 | 28.1 t | 1.76 m |
12β | 2.26 dd (14.2, 7.8) | 19α, 19β | 2.25 dd (14.4, 8.0) | ||
13 | 143.1 s | 142.9 s | |||
14 | 129.6 s | 129.6 s | |||
15α | 36.1 t | 1.90 dd (17.8, 5.5) | 36.2 t | 1.90 m | |
15β | 2.07 m | 26 | 2.07 m | ||
16α | 19.2 t | 1.36 m | 28, 29 | 19.0 t | 1.52 m |
16β | 1.52 m | 30 | 1.34 m | ||
17β | 45.3 d | 1.52 m | 46.4 d | 1.52 m | |
18 | 38.4 s | 38.3 s | |||
19α | 29.5 t | 1.61 m | 30.1 t | 1.64 m | |
19β | 1.61 m | 1.46 m | |||
20α | 25.8 t | 1.98 dddd (12.6, 12.6, 5.5, 2.3) | 28, 29 | 23.4 t | 1.91 m |
20β | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |||
21α | 75.8 d | 3.44 t (2.8) | 29, 30 | 77.8 d | 4,68 t (2.7) |
22 | 37.7 s | 36.8 s | |||
23 | 28.0 q | 0.94 s | 6α | 28.0 q | 0.96 s |
24 | 16.1 q | 0.74 s | 23 | 16.1 q | 0.74 s |
25 | 16.3 q | 0.76 s | 2β, 11β, 26 | 16.3 q | 0.79 s |
26 | 19.4 q | 0.84 s | 7β, 11β, 15β, 17β | 19.2 q | 0.85 s |
27α | 52.8 t | 2.16 d (14.2) | 7α | 52.8 t | 2.16 d (14.2) |
27β | 1.35 d (14.2) | 1.37 d (14.2) | |||
28 | 19.2 q | 0.89 s | 12α, 16α, 19α, 20α | 19.2 q | 0.90 s |
29 | 22.2 q | 0.85 s | 16α, 16β | 27.6 q | 0.88 s |
30 | 28.0 q | 0.97 s | 16β, 29 | 21.8 q | 0.70 s |
OMe | 57.5 q | 3.35 s | 57.5 q | 3.35 s | |
OAc | 21.4 q | 2.06s | |||
171.0 s | |||||
a Assignments confirmed by H/H COSY, NOESY, HMQC and HMBC spectra. | |||||
b J values are given in Hz. |

Fig. 1 NOESY correlations of 2.
2 | 2a | ||||||
Position | δC | δH | HMBC (C → H) | COSY | δC | δH | |
lα | 38.3 t | 0.84m | 5α, 9α, 25 | 38.3 t | 0.84 m | ||
1β | 1.86 dt (16.2, 3.2) | lα,2β | 1.87 m | ||||
2α | 22.3 t | 1.78 m | lα, 2α, 2β | 22.3 t | 1.80 m | ||
2β | 1.42 m | 1α, 1β, 2α, 3α | 1.42 m | ||||
3α | 88.5 d | 2.61 dd (11.9, 4.3) | 23, 24, OMe | 88.5 d | 2.62 dd (11.7, 4.3) | ||
4 | 38.9 s | 3α, 5α, 23, 24 | 38.9 s | ||||
5α | 56.1 d | 0.67 dd (10.1, 3.9) | 23, 24, 25 | 6α, 6β | 56.1 d | 0.67 dd (10.5, 3.0) | |
6α | 18.1 t | 1.44 m | 5α | 5α, 7α | 18.1 t | 1.45 m | |
6β | 1.44 m | 5α, 7α | 1.45 m | ||||
7α | 45.0 t | 1.43 m | 27β | 44.9 t | 1.44 m | ||
7β | 1.14 td (13.3, 5.3) | 6α, 6β, 7α | 1.15 td (13.0, 3.0) | ||||
8 | 37.0 s | 7β, 9α, 27α | 36.9 s | ||||
9α | 61.7 d | 0.55 d (10.5) | 12β, 25, 26 | 11β | 61.4 d | 0.57 d (10.3) | |
10 | 38.3 s | 5α, 9α, 25 | 38.3 s | ||||
11α | 19.4 t | 1.50 m | 9α | 11β | 19.4 t | 1.51 m | |
11β | 1.32 m | 9α, 11α, 12α | 1.32 m | ||||
12α | 27.9 t | 1.56 m | 9α | 11α, 11β, 12β | 27.9 t | 1.55 m | |
12β | 2.14 ddd (14.6, 7.6, 1.8) | 11α, 12α | 2.12 ddd (15.1, 8.0, 2.5) | ||||
13 | 70.0s | 12β, 15α, 27α, 27β, 28 | 70.0 s | ||||
14 | 63.9 s | 12β, 15α, 27α, 27β | 63.7 s | ||||
15α | 31.2 t | 1.91 m | 17β | 15β, 16α, 16β | 31.1 t | ||
15β | 1.74 m | 15α, 16α, 16β | |||||
16α | 17.3 t | 1.28 m | 15β, 17α | 15α, 15β, 17β | 17.1 t | 1.26 m | |
16β | 1.28 m | 15α, 15β, 17β | 1.26 m | ||||
17β | 36.5 d | 1.81 dd (9.6, 5.0) | 28,29,30 | 16α, 16β | 37.6 d | 1.88 m | |
18 | 37.8 s | 19β, 28 | 37.3 s | ||||
19α | 27.4 t | 1.54 m | 28 | 19β, 20α | 28.0 t | 1.55 m | |
19β | 1.68 m | 19α, 20β | 1.55 m | ||||
20α | 25.3 t | 1.65 m | 19α, 19β, 20β | 22.9 t | 1.85 m | ||
20β | 1.89 m | 1.70 ddd (14.9, 6.9, 3.4) | |||||
21α | 75.5 d | 3.36 t (2.7) | 29, 30 | 77.4 d | 4.62 t (2.7) | ||
22 | 37.4 s | 29, 30 | 36.5 s | ||||
23 | 28.1 q | 0.95 s | 3α, 24 | 28.1 q | 0.95 s | ||
24 | 16.1 q | 0.73 s | 1α, 3α, 5α, 23 | 16.1 q | 0.77 s | ||
25 | 15.7 q | 0.77 s | lα, 9α | 15.7 q | 0.74 s | ||
26 | 21.9 q | 1.02 s | 7α, 7β, 9α, 27α | 22.0 q | 1.01 s | ||
27α | 53.8 t | 1.62 d (15.1) | 9α, 26 | 27β | 53.7 t | 1.63 d (15.1) | |
27β | 1.42 d (15.1) | 27α | 1.42 d (15.1) | ||||
28 | 16.7 q | 1.00 s | 19β | 16.7 q | 0.81 s | ||
29 | 22.0 q | 0.83 s | 30 | 21.7 q | 0.95 s | ||
30 | 28.5 q | 0.91 s | 29 | 28.0 q | 1.03 s | ||
OMe | 57.5 q | 3.35 s | 3α | 57.5 q | 3.35 s | ||
OAc | 21.4 q | 2.06 s | |||||
171.0s | |||||||
a Assignments confirmed by decoupling, H/H COSY, NOESY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra. | |||||||
b J values are given in Hz. |
In vitro EBV-EA activation
The primary screening test was carried out utilizing a short-term in vitro assay on EBV-EA activation. Table [3] lists inhibitory effects of compounds 1, la, 2 and 2a on the EBV-EA activation induced by TPA and the associated viability of Raji cells. The inhibitory effects of all compounds (1, 1a, 2, 2a) were stronger at every concentration than that of oleanolic acid [12] known as a representative anti-tumor promoting agent. All compounds exhibited dose-dependent inhibitory activities, and the viability percentages of Raji cells treated with the test compounds (1, la, 2, 2a) were 70 % at the highest concentration of 1000 mol ratio/TPA, suggesting that the cytotoxicities of all compounds were rather moderate against in vitro cell lines (Table [3]). Among them, compound 1 exhibited a stronger inhibitory activity than others (la, 2, 2a). The relative ratios of compound 1 with respect to TPA (100 %) were 0, 20.3, 74.1 and 89.7 % at the concentrations of 1000, 500, 100 and 10 mol ratio/TPA, respectively (Table [3]); meaning 100, 79.7, 25.9 and 10.3 % inhibition of the EBV-EA activation by TPA, respectively.
Compounds | EBV-EA positive cells (% viability) | ||||
Compound concentration (mol ratio/32 pmol TPA) | IC50 | ||||
1000 | 500 | 100 | 10 | (mol ratio/32 pmol TPA) | |
1 | 0 (70)b | 20.3 | 74.1 | 89.7 | 271 |
1a | 0 (70) | 27.5 | 78.0 | 91.5 | 290 |
2 | 0 (70) | 25.7 | 74.9 | 92.6 | 288 |
2a | 0 (70) | 27.0 | 78.4 | 94.7 | 291 |
Oleanolic acid | 12.7 (70) | 30.0 | 80.0 | 100 | 360 |
a Values represent percentages relative to the positive control value (100 %). | |||||
b Values in parentheses are the viability percentages of Raji cells. |
In vivo two-stage carcinogenesis test on mouse skin papillomas initiated by DMBA
The results of the in vitro experiments and structure-activity relationship of serratane-type triterpenoids prompted us to examine the effects of compounds 1 and 2 on the in vivo two-stage carcinogenesis bioassay on mouse skin using DMBA as an initiator and TPA as a promotor. The incidence (%) of papilloma-bearing mice and the average numbers of papillomas per mouse are presented in Figs. [2] and [3], respectively. No significant toxic effects, such as inflammation and lesional damages, on the areas of mouse skin topically treated with the test compounds were observed at the end of treatment except for the formation of papillomas, and also the body weight gains were not influenced during the treatment. As demonstrated in Fig. [2], the percentage of papilloma bearers in the control group (DMBA and TPA only) increased rapidly from week 6 and reached 100 % after week 9, whereas the treatment with compound 1 (85 nmol) along with DMBA/TPA inhibited the formation of papillomas until week 8 and reduced the percentage of papilloma-bearing mice to approximately 47 % during weeks 12 and 13 and thereafter 80 % over the period of week 20. On the other hand, the treatment with compound 2 (85 nmo1) along with DMBA/TPA inhibited the formation of papillomas until week 7 and reduced the percentage of papilloma-bearing mice to approximately 47 % during weeks 14 and 15 and thereafter 80 % over the period of week 20. As shown in Fig. [3], in the control group, the number of papillomas formed per mouse increased rapidly after week 6 and reached 10.0 papillomas/mouse at week 20. On the other hand, the mice treated with compound 1 or compound 2 bore 5.0 or 5.8 papillomas over the period of week 20, although the antitumor-promoting activities of compounds 1 and 2 seem to be weaker than that of 3. It is interesting to note that the 13α,14α-epoxyserratane framework is important to enhance the activity expression.

Fig. 2 Inhibition of TP A-induced tumor promotion by multiple application of 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (1) and 13β,14β- epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (2). All mice were initiated with DMBA (390 nmol) and promoted with 1.7 nmol of TP A, given twice weekly starting 1 week after initiation. Percentage of mice bearing papillomas. • control (TPA alone); TPA + 85 nmol of oleanolic acid; ▵ TPA + 85 nmol of 1; □ TPA + 85 nmol of 2.

Fig. 3 Inhibition of TP A-induced tumor promotion by multiple application of 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (1) and 13β, 14β-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (2). All mice were initiated with DMBA (390 nmol) and promoted with 1.7 nmol of TP A, given twice weekly starting 1 week after initiation. Average number of papillomas per mouse. • control (TPA alone); TPA + 85 nmol of oleanolic acid; ▵ TPA + 85 nmol of 1; □ TPA + 85 nmol of 2.
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Mr. Kiyoshi Matsubara (Green Ace co. Ltd, Hidaka, Hokkaido) for collection of the plant materials. Our thanks are also due to Mrs. Mihoyo Fujitake of this University for MS measurements.
#References
- 1 Berenblum I. The mechanism of carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1941; 1 807-14
- 2 Murakami A, Ohigashi H, Koshimizu K. Anti-tumor promotion with food phytochemicals: A strategy for cancer chemoprevention. Biosci Biotech Biochem. 1996; 60 1-8
- 3 Tokuda H, Ohigashi H, Koshimizu K, Ito Y. Inhibitory effects of ursolic acid and oleanolic acid on skin tumor promotion 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate. Cancer Letters. 1986; 33 279-85
- 4 Tanaka R, Senba H, Minematsu T, Muraoka O, Matsunaga S. 21α-Hydroxy-3β-methoxyserrat-14-en-30-al and other triterpenoids from the cuticle of Picea jezoensis . Phytochemistry. 1995; 38 1467-71
- 5 Tanaka R, Ohmori K, Minoura K, Matsunaga S. Two new epoxyserratanes from the cuticle of Picea jezoensis . J Nat Prod. 1996; 59 237-41
- 6 Tanaka R, Tsujimoto K, In Y, Matsunaga S. New methoxytriterpene dione from the cuticle of Picea jezoensis var. jezoensis . J Nat Prod. 1997; 60 319-22
- 7 Tanaka R, Tsujimoto K, In Y, Ishida T, Matsunaga S, Terada Y. Structure and stereochemistry of epoxyserratanes from the cuticle of Piceajezoensis var.jezoensis . J Nat Prod. 2001; 64 1044-7
- 8 Tanaka R, Tsujimoto K, In Y, Ishida T, Matsunaga S, Tokuda H, Muraoka O. Jezananals A and B: two novel skeletal triterpene aldehydes from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis var. jezoensis . Tetrahedron. 2002; 58 2505-12
- 9 Tanaka R, Ohtsu H, Iwamoto M, Minami T, Tokuda H, Nishino H, Matsunaga S, Yoshitake A. Cancer chemopreventive agents, labdane diterpenoids from the stem bark of Thuja standishii (Gord.) Carr. Cancer Letters. 2000; 161 165-70
- 10 Kutney J P, Rogers I H, Rowe J W. The neutral triterpenes of the bark of Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce). Tetrahedron. 1969; 25 3731-51
- 11 Tanaka R, Mun C, Usami Y, Matsunaga S. 3 - 0xo-serratene triterpenoids from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis Carr. hondoensis . Phytochemistry. 1994; 35 1517-22
- 12 Konoshima T, Takasaki M, Kozuka M, Tokuda H. Studies on inhibitors on skin-tumor promotion. 1. Inhibitory effects of triterpenes from Euphorbia polyandra on Epstein-Barr virus activation. J Nat Prod. 1987; 50 1167-70
Dr. Reiko Tanaka
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
4-20-1 Nasahara
Takatsuki
Osaka 569-1094
Japan
Phone: and Fax: +81-726-90-1084
Email: tanakar@gly.oups.ac.jp
References
- 1 Berenblum I. The mechanism of carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1941; 1 807-14
- 2 Murakami A, Ohigashi H, Koshimizu K. Anti-tumor promotion with food phytochemicals: A strategy for cancer chemoprevention. Biosci Biotech Biochem. 1996; 60 1-8
- 3 Tokuda H, Ohigashi H, Koshimizu K, Ito Y. Inhibitory effects of ursolic acid and oleanolic acid on skin tumor promotion 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate. Cancer Letters. 1986; 33 279-85
- 4 Tanaka R, Senba H, Minematsu T, Muraoka O, Matsunaga S. 21α-Hydroxy-3β-methoxyserrat-14-en-30-al and other triterpenoids from the cuticle of Picea jezoensis . Phytochemistry. 1995; 38 1467-71
- 5 Tanaka R, Ohmori K, Minoura K, Matsunaga S. Two new epoxyserratanes from the cuticle of Picea jezoensis . J Nat Prod. 1996; 59 237-41
- 6 Tanaka R, Tsujimoto K, In Y, Matsunaga S. New methoxytriterpene dione from the cuticle of Picea jezoensis var. jezoensis . J Nat Prod. 1997; 60 319-22
- 7 Tanaka R, Tsujimoto K, In Y, Ishida T, Matsunaga S, Terada Y. Structure and stereochemistry of epoxyserratanes from the cuticle of Piceajezoensis var.jezoensis . J Nat Prod. 2001; 64 1044-7
- 8 Tanaka R, Tsujimoto K, In Y, Ishida T, Matsunaga S, Tokuda H, Muraoka O. Jezananals A and B: two novel skeletal triterpene aldehydes from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis var. jezoensis . Tetrahedron. 2002; 58 2505-12
- 9 Tanaka R, Ohtsu H, Iwamoto M, Minami T, Tokuda H, Nishino H, Matsunaga S, Yoshitake A. Cancer chemopreventive agents, labdane diterpenoids from the stem bark of Thuja standishii (Gord.) Carr. Cancer Letters. 2000; 161 165-70
- 10 Kutney J P, Rogers I H, Rowe J W. The neutral triterpenes of the bark of Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce). Tetrahedron. 1969; 25 3731-51
- 11 Tanaka R, Mun C, Usami Y, Matsunaga S. 3 - 0xo-serratene triterpenoids from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis Carr. hondoensis . Phytochemistry. 1994; 35 1517-22
- 12 Konoshima T, Takasaki M, Kozuka M, Tokuda H. Studies on inhibitors on skin-tumor promotion. 1. Inhibitory effects of triterpenes from Euphorbia polyandra on Epstein-Barr virus activation. J Nat Prod. 1987; 50 1167-70
Dr. Reiko Tanaka
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
4-20-1 Nasahara
Takatsuki
Osaka 569-1094
Japan
Phone: and Fax: +81-726-90-1084
Email: tanakar@gly.oups.ac.jp


Fig. 1 NOESY correlations of 2.

Fig. 2 Inhibition of TP A-induced tumor promotion by multiple application of 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (1) and 13β,14β- epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (2). All mice were initiated with DMBA (390 nmol) and promoted with 1.7 nmol of TP A, given twice weekly starting 1 week after initiation. Percentage of mice bearing papillomas. • control (TPA alone); TPA + 85 nmol of oleanolic acid; ▵ TPA + 85 nmol of 1; □ TPA + 85 nmol of 2.

Fig. 3 Inhibition of TP A-induced tumor promotion by multiple application of 3β-methoxyserrat-13-en-21β-ol (1) and 13β, 14β-epoxy-3β-methoxyserratan-21β-ol (2). All mice were initiated with DMBA (390 nmol) and promoted with 1.7 nmol of TP A, given twice weekly starting 1 week after initiation. Average number of papillomas per mouse. • control (TPA alone); TPA + 85 nmol of oleanolic acid; ▵ TPA + 85 nmol of 1; □ TPA + 85 nmol of 2.