Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1773524
Ring-Opening Reactions of Donor–Acceptor Cyclopropanes with Some Enolizable Azaheterocyclic Thiones: S- versus N-Attack
This work was in part supported by the University of Lodz within the IDUB-Grant (to G.M.). M.K. thanks the Bio-Med-Chem Doctoral School of the Uniwersytet Łódzki and Łodź Institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences for a stipend.
This work is dedicated to Professor Mieczysław Mąkosza (Warsaw) on the occasion of his 90th birthday
Abstract
We report ring-opening reactions of donor–acceptor (D–A) cyclopropanes with a variety of five- and six-membered enolizable azaheterocyclic thiones, using Sc(OTf)3 as catalyst in dichloromethane. The majority of these systems reacted through nucleophilic S-attack at the donor position of the cyclopropane. 5-Mercapto-1,3,4-triazoles were shown to give the products of formal N-attack, and systems bearing two external C-S bonds could react with two equivalents of D–A cyclopropane to generate difunctionalized azaheterocycles.
#
Donor–acceptor (D–A) cyclopropanes have been a system of significant interest in the past decade.[1] Their inherent zwitterionic nature, coupled with their stability despite their relatively high ring-strain (115.4 kJmol–1)[2] makes them desirable C3 synthons. Activation of these systems is most commonly achieved through chelation with Lewis acids, although organocatalysis,[3] Brønsted base catalysis,[4] electrochemistry,[5] and radical reactions[6] have all been explored. Reactivity of D–A cyclopropanes in a variety of cycloadditions,[7] rearrangements,[8] and ring-opening reactions[9] has been explored with many carbon- and heterocycle-based systems. In particular, sulfur[10] and nitrogen[11] nucleophiles have been of interest, and our groups have developed methods in recent years for [3+2], [3+4], and [3+8] cycloadditions of nonenolizable thioketones with D–A cyclopropanes.[12] Most recently, we reported ring-opening nucleophilic addition of enolizable 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 1 with D–A cyclopropanes 2 (Scheme [1], A).[13] In that work, we also observed an interesting, previously unreported, thermal rearrangement, allowing for the S-attack products to rearrange to the formal N-attack products. Based on this observation, we looked to further exploit this reactivity with a broader palette of enolizable azaheterocyclic thiones, including both five-membered (compounds of type 4–7) and six-membered (compounds of type 14) species (Scheme [1], B).


Various azaheterocyclic thiones have been extensively studied,[14] and they are known to find uses in coordination chemistry,[15] agrochemistry,[16] and medicinal chemistry.[17] In solution, the enolizability of these structures means that a mixture of the mercapto 1 and thione 1′ forms is present (Scheme [2], A).[14] The ability of these azaheterocyclic thiones 1′ to tautomerize to the mercapto forms 1 is considered key to their reactivity with D–A cyclopropanes 2; this was shown when we combined dihydro-2H-imidazole-2-thione 3, D–A cyclopropane 2a, and a Lewis acid (ScOTf3) and observed no reaction (Scheme [2], B). This is in stark contrast to our earlier studies of thioketone systems, where the C=S bond reacted across the cyclopropane yielding thiolanes.[12]


We initiated our studies by interrogating the reactivity of enolizable imidazole-2-thiones 4 with D–A cyclopropanes 2a–c, using Sc(OTf)3 as the Lewis acid catalyst (Scheme [3]).[18]


To our delight, products of S-attack were observed, albeit in mediocre yield, when using a cyclopropane 2a bearing a phenyl donor and N-methyl (4a), N-phenyl (4b), and N-benzyl (4c) substituted dimethyl imidazole-2-thiones. Changing the dimethyl imidazole backbone to diphenyl substitution allowed us to obtain the target N-benzyl variant 7d also in a good yield (79%), whereas an N-cyclohexyl group (in 4f) allowed only 32% yield. Installation of an electron-donating methoxy group in the para-position of the N-phenyl group, coupled with only a single phenyl-substituted imidazole backbone (in 4g), afforded an excellent yield (85%) of product 7g. An electron-poorer p-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl donor substituent on the cyclopropane 2b was also well tolerated, furnishing the ring-opened compound 7h in 60% yield. Moving to other five-membered azaheterocycles, we found that excellent yields could be obtained for the reactions of 1,3,4-triazole and benzo[d]oxazole-derived thiones 5 and 6, respectively, with D–A cyclopropane 2a, and an almost quantitative yield (98%) was obtained for the reaction of benzo[d]oxazole-2(3H)-thione (6) with the β-naphthyl-bearing D–A cyclopropane 2c. In all these cases, we exclusively observed the products of S-attack at the donor position, and the thermal rearrangement previously observed with mercapto-1H-tetrazoles was not seen to occur for these substrates. This was further confirmed by heating a sample of pure 7a in CH2Cl2 for 24 h.
Turning our attention to 5-methyl-2-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole (10a), we observed differing behavior depending on the donor group present. NMR studies run in deuterated solvents showed that all three cyclopropanes 2a,d,e initially reacted to form the S-insertion products 11. Phenyl-substituted derivative 11a was isolated chromatographically with no isomerization in 91% yield; however, the S-attack products 11b and 11c, bearing the more electron-donating 4-MeC6H4 and thien-2-yl donors, respectively, could not be isolated but underwent isomerization upon heating or chromatography using silica gel. The respective N-insertion products 12b and 12c could be isolated chromatographically in mediocre yields (Scheme [4]).


Interestingly, 2,5-bismercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole (10b) was able to react with two equivalents of D–A cyclopropane 2a, one being opened by nucleophilic S-attack and the second by nucleophilic N-attack (see the Supporting Information, Figure S15, multiplets A and C). In this case the yield of isolated products was also significantly higher, with 69% of the disubstituted azaheterocycle 14 found in the isolated material as a ca. 1:1 mixture of diastereoisomers which were identified as the ‘mixed’ N,S-insertion products. Notably, in a control experiment complete conversion of the starting cyclopropane 2a was observed after only 15 min. At this early stage in the reaction, a third compound was observed in the crude NMR, which is tentatively believed to be the double S,S-insertion product 13 (see the Supporting Information, Figure S15). Apparently, the initially formed S,S-insertion product 13 underwent complete isomerization during the chromatographic workup. In addition, thermal isomerization of the latter was confirmed by heating the solution at 70 °C (Scheme [5]).


Notably, a second isomerization process leading to the dithione isomer did not take place. The observed results suggest that in the case of 2a the ring opening initially occurs via competitive S- and N-insertion, thereby demonstrating the ambident reactivity of the bis(mercapto)-substituted 1,3,4-thiadiazole ring 10b (Scheme [5]).
Extension of our method to six-membered enolizable heterocyclic thiones 15 was also possible (Scheme [6]). 2-Mercaptopyridine (15a) was transformed to the respective sulfane 16a in good yield. Pyrimidine-2-thiol (15b) afforded the ring-opened product 16b in an excellent 92% yield; however, entry 16c shows that the 4-hydroxy derivative (thiouracyl) 15c produced in a slow reaction satisfactory yield (55%) after heating of the reaction mixture (8 days, CHCl3 as a solvent) to 80 °C. Interestingly, changing the hydroxy group for a thiol (pyrimidine-2,4-dithiol, dithiouracyl) 15d allowed for significantly improved reactivity; two equivalents of D–A cyclopropane 2a reacted with this substrate, both undergoing ring opening through S-attack exclusively, giving disulfane-substituted pyrimidine 17 in good yield (67%) and a dr of ca 1:1. This result differs from 2,5-bismercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole 10b, where the initial products found in the control experiment suggested the first step of the ring opening occurring through competitive S- and N-attack (see Scheme [6]).


In summary, we have presented reactions of several enolizable azaheterocyclic thiones with D–A cyclopropanes, leading to ring-opened products. The use of five- and six-membered heterocycles was well tolerated, and systems with two external C–S (or C=S) bonds were shown to react with two equivalents of D–A cyclopropane, generating the N,S-product as a ca. 1:1 mixture of diastereomers. Initial formation of the exclusive S-products was also observed in the case of 2-mercapto-5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole and their tendency to isomerize to the N-product was dependent on the cyclopropane’s donor substituent. Notably, variation of the substituents on the heterocycle and the donor group of the cyclopropanes was tolerated, albeit with some variation in yields. The nature of the azaheterocycle was shown to influence whether S-attack or N-attack is preferred.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
G.A.O. thanks Heinrich F. von Köller and Silas E. Wittmer (both University of Freiburg) for assisting in the synthesis of starting materials.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055s-0043-1773524.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Reissig H.-U, Zimmer R. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 1151
- 1b Yu M, Pagenkopf BL. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 321
- 1c Carson CA, Kerr MA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 3051
- 1d Cavitt MA, Phun LH, France S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 804
- 1e Schneider TF, Kaschel J, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5504
- 1f Werz DB, Biju AT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 3385
- 1g Singh P, Varshnaya RK, Dey R, Banerjee P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020; 362: 1447
- 2 Gordon MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 7419
- 3a Sparr C, Gilmour R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 8391
- 3b Halskov KS, Kniep F, Lauridsen VH, Iversen EH, Donslund BS, Jørgensen KA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 1685
- 3c Levens A, Ametovski A, Lupton DW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 16136
- 3d Sanchez-Diez E, Vesga DL, Reyes E, Uria U, Carrillo L, Vicario JL. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 1270
- 3e Wallbaum J, Garve LK. B, Jones PG, Werz DB. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 18756
- 4a Blom J, Vidal-Albalat A, Jørgensen J, Barløse CL, Jessen KS, Iversen MV, Jørgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 11831
- 4b McLeod DA, Thøgersen MK, Barløse CL, Skipper ML, Obregón EB, Jørgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022; 61: e202206096
- 5a Kolb S, Petzold M, Brandt F, Jones PG, Jacob CR, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 15928
- 5b Kolb S, Ahlburg NL, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 5549
- 5c Oliver GA, Kolb S, Werz DB. Synlett 2023; 35: 963
- 6 Garve LK. B, Barkawitz P, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5804
- 7a Ivanova OA, Budynina EM, Grishin YK, Trushkov IV, Verteletskii PV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 1107
- 7b Goldberg AF. G, O’Connor NR, Craig RA. II, Stoltz BM. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5314
- 7c Zhu W, Fang J, Liu Y, Ren J, Wang Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 2032
- 7d Chakrabarty S, Chatterjee I, Wibbeling B, Daniliuc CG, Studer A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5964
- 7e Garve LK. B, Petzold M, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 564
- 7f Wang Z.-H, Zhang H.-H, Wang D.-M, Xu P.-F, Luo Y.-C. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53: 8521
- 7g Xu P.-W, Liu J.-K, Shen L, Cao Z.-Y, Zhao X.-L, Yan J, Zhou J. Nat. Commun. 2017; 8: 1619
- 7h Chagarovskiy AO, Vasin VS, Kuznetsov VV, Ivanova OA, Rybakov VB, Shumsky AN, Makhova NN, Trushkov IV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 10338
- 7i Kreft A, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2059
- 7j Kreft A, Lücht A, Grunenberg J, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 1955
- 7k Petzold M, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 6225
- 7l Oliver GA, Loch MN, Augustin AU, Steinbach P, Sharique M, Tambar UK, Jones PG, Bannwarth C, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 25825
- 7m Jacob A, Barkawitz P, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 3028
- 7n Ahlburg NL, Hergert O, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023; 62: e202214390
- 7o Borisov DD, Platonov DN, Sokolov NA, Novikov RA, Tomilov YV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024; 63: e202410081
- 8a Schneider TF, Kaschel J, Awan SI, Dittrich B, Werz DB. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 11276
- 8b Kaschel J, Schmidt CD, Mumby M, Kratzert D, Stalke D, Werz DB. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 4403
- 8c Sabbatani J, Maulide N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 6780
- 8d Ivanova OA, Chagarovskiy AO, Shumsky AN, Krasnobrov VD, Levina II, Trushkov IV. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 543
- 8e Shim SY, Choi Y, Ryu DH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 11184
- 9a Lifchits O, Charette AB. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 2809
- 9b Lifchits O, Alberico D, Zakharian I, Charette AB. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 6838
- 9c Ivanov KL, Villemson EV, Budynina EM, Ivanova OA, Trushkov IV, Melnikov MY. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 4975
- 9d Kaicharla T, Roy T, Thangaraj M, Gonnade RG, Biju AT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 10061
- 9e Das S, Daniliuc CG, Studer A. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 5576
- 9f Wallbaum J, Garve LK. B, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 98
- 9g Konik YA, Elek GZ, Kaabel S, Järving I, Lopp M, Kananovich DG. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 8334
- 9h Lücht A, Patalag LJ, Augustin AU, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 10587
- 9i Singh K, Bera T, Jaiswal V, Biswas S, Mondal B, Das D, Saha J. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 710
- 9j Guin A, Rathod T, Gaykar RN, Roy T, Biju AT. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 2276
- 9k Deswal S, Guin A, Biju AT. Org. Lett. 2023; 25: 1643
- 9l Oliver GA, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2023; 25: 3568
- 9m von Köller HF, Jones PG, Werz DB. Chem. Eur. J. 2023; 29: e202203986
- 9n Harikumar S, Kandy LT. K, Guin A, Biju AT. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024; 22: 1834
- 9o Li H, Cheng W, Cunde WangC. J. Org. Chem. 2024; 89: 10333
- 10 Augustin AU, Werz DB. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021; 54: 1528
- 11 Budynina EM, Ivanov KL, Sorokin ID, Melnikov MY. Synthesis 2017; 49: 3035
- 12a Augustin AU, Sensse M, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 14293
- 12b Augustin AU, Merz JL, Jones PG, Mlostoń G, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9405
- 12c Mlostoń G, Kowalczyk M, Augustin AU, Jones PG, Werz DB. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020; 16: 1288
- 12d Mlostoń G, Kowalczyk M, Augustin AU, Jones PG, Werz DB. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 6250
- 12e Mlostoń G, Kowalczyk M, Palusiak M, Oliver GA, von Köller HF, Werz DB. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2024; 27: e202301182
- 13 Mlostoń G, Celeda M, Kowalczyk M, Oliver GA, Werz DB. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2024; 27: e202400831
- 14a Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II . Katritzky AR, Rees CW, Scriven EF. V. Pergamon Press; New York: 1996
- 14b Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry IV . Black D, Cossy J, Stevens C. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2022
- 15 Sinha S, Srivastava AK, Tripathi CM, Pandey OP, Sengupta SK. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2007; 87918
- 16a Tasaka A, Tamura N, Matsushita Y, Teranishi K, Hayashi R, Okonogi K, Itoh K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993; 41: 1035
- 16b Zhilitskaya LV, Shainyan BA, Yarosh NO. Molecules 2021; 26: 2190
- 17a Kazeminejad Z, Marzi M, Shiroudi A, Kouhpayeh SA, Farjam M, Zarenezhad E. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022; 4584846
- 17b Teixeira MM, Carvalho DT, Sousa E, Pinto E. Pharmaceuticals 2022; 15: 1427
- 18 Representative Procedure: Dimethyl 2-{2-phenyl-2-[(1,4,5-trimethyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)thio]ethyl}malonate (7a) To a magnetically stirred mixture of 2a (117 mg, 0.50 mmol) and cat. amounts of Sc(OTf)3 (ca. 10 mg) in 2 mL of dry CH2Cl2 (or CHCl3), a portion of 2-mercapto 1H-imidazole derivative 4a (78 mg, 0.55 mmol) was added and stirring was continued at r.t. for 20 h. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude product was purified by preparative layer chromatography using glass plates coated with silica and using a mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH (98:2) as an eluent. Analytically pure product 7a was isolated as a yellowish oil in 87% yield (163 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.98 (s, 3 H), 2.13 (s, 3 H), 2.54–2.59 (m, 1 H), 2.60–2.66 (m, 1 H), 2.91 (s, 3 H), 3.52 (dd, J = 8.0, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (s, 3 H), 3.69 (s, 3 H), 4.13 (dd, J = 9.0, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.00–7.02 (m, 2 H), 7.17–7.21 (m, 3 H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.4, 12.7, 30.6 (3 C), 33.6, 49.7, 52.0, 52.57, 52.63 (2 C), 126.1, 127.5, 127.7, 128.5, 134.3, 135.0, 140.1, 169.3, 169.3 (2 C) ppm. IR (neat): ν = 2952, 1718, 1587, 1435, 1386, 1267, 1237, 1203, 1151, 1047, 700 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C19H24N2O4S (376.47): C, 60.62; H, 6.42; N, 7.44; S 8.52. Found: C, 60.61; H, 6.44; N, 7.42; S, 8.56.
Corresponding Author
Publication History
Received: 24 November 2024
Accepted after revision: 04 February 2025
Article published online:
20 March 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Reissig H.-U, Zimmer R. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 1151
- 1b Yu M, Pagenkopf BL. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 321
- 1c Carson CA, Kerr MA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 3051
- 1d Cavitt MA, Phun LH, France S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 804
- 1e Schneider TF, Kaschel J, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5504
- 1f Werz DB, Biju AT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 3385
- 1g Singh P, Varshnaya RK, Dey R, Banerjee P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020; 362: 1447
- 2 Gordon MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 7419
- 3a Sparr C, Gilmour R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 8391
- 3b Halskov KS, Kniep F, Lauridsen VH, Iversen EH, Donslund BS, Jørgensen KA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 1685
- 3c Levens A, Ametovski A, Lupton DW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 16136
- 3d Sanchez-Diez E, Vesga DL, Reyes E, Uria U, Carrillo L, Vicario JL. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 1270
- 3e Wallbaum J, Garve LK. B, Jones PG, Werz DB. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 18756
- 4a Blom J, Vidal-Albalat A, Jørgensen J, Barløse CL, Jessen KS, Iversen MV, Jørgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 11831
- 4b McLeod DA, Thøgersen MK, Barløse CL, Skipper ML, Obregón EB, Jørgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022; 61: e202206096
- 5a Kolb S, Petzold M, Brandt F, Jones PG, Jacob CR, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 15928
- 5b Kolb S, Ahlburg NL, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 5549
- 5c Oliver GA, Kolb S, Werz DB. Synlett 2023; 35: 963
- 6 Garve LK. B, Barkawitz P, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5804
- 7a Ivanova OA, Budynina EM, Grishin YK, Trushkov IV, Verteletskii PV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 1107
- 7b Goldberg AF. G, O’Connor NR, Craig RA. II, Stoltz BM. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5314
- 7c Zhu W, Fang J, Liu Y, Ren J, Wang Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 2032
- 7d Chakrabarty S, Chatterjee I, Wibbeling B, Daniliuc CG, Studer A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5964
- 7e Garve LK. B, Petzold M, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 564
- 7f Wang Z.-H, Zhang H.-H, Wang D.-M, Xu P.-F, Luo Y.-C. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53: 8521
- 7g Xu P.-W, Liu J.-K, Shen L, Cao Z.-Y, Zhao X.-L, Yan J, Zhou J. Nat. Commun. 2017; 8: 1619
- 7h Chagarovskiy AO, Vasin VS, Kuznetsov VV, Ivanova OA, Rybakov VB, Shumsky AN, Makhova NN, Trushkov IV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 10338
- 7i Kreft A, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2059
- 7j Kreft A, Lücht A, Grunenberg J, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 1955
- 7k Petzold M, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 6225
- 7l Oliver GA, Loch MN, Augustin AU, Steinbach P, Sharique M, Tambar UK, Jones PG, Bannwarth C, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 25825
- 7m Jacob A, Barkawitz P, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 3028
- 7n Ahlburg NL, Hergert O, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023; 62: e202214390
- 7o Borisov DD, Platonov DN, Sokolov NA, Novikov RA, Tomilov YV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024; 63: e202410081
- 8a Schneider TF, Kaschel J, Awan SI, Dittrich B, Werz DB. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 11276
- 8b Kaschel J, Schmidt CD, Mumby M, Kratzert D, Stalke D, Werz DB. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 4403
- 8c Sabbatani J, Maulide N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 6780
- 8d Ivanova OA, Chagarovskiy AO, Shumsky AN, Krasnobrov VD, Levina II, Trushkov IV. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 543
- 8e Shim SY, Choi Y, Ryu DH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 11184
- 9a Lifchits O, Charette AB. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 2809
- 9b Lifchits O, Alberico D, Zakharian I, Charette AB. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 6838
- 9c Ivanov KL, Villemson EV, Budynina EM, Ivanova OA, Trushkov IV, Melnikov MY. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 4975
- 9d Kaicharla T, Roy T, Thangaraj M, Gonnade RG, Biju AT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 10061
- 9e Das S, Daniliuc CG, Studer A. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 5576
- 9f Wallbaum J, Garve LK. B, Jones PG, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 98
- 9g Konik YA, Elek GZ, Kaabel S, Järving I, Lopp M, Kananovich DG. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 8334
- 9h Lücht A, Patalag LJ, Augustin AU, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 10587
- 9i Singh K, Bera T, Jaiswal V, Biswas S, Mondal B, Das D, Saha J. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 710
- 9j Guin A, Rathod T, Gaykar RN, Roy T, Biju AT. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 2276
- 9k Deswal S, Guin A, Biju AT. Org. Lett. 2023; 25: 1643
- 9l Oliver GA, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2023; 25: 3568
- 9m von Köller HF, Jones PG, Werz DB. Chem. Eur. J. 2023; 29: e202203986
- 9n Harikumar S, Kandy LT. K, Guin A, Biju AT. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024; 22: 1834
- 9o Li H, Cheng W, Cunde WangC. J. Org. Chem. 2024; 89: 10333
- 10 Augustin AU, Werz DB. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021; 54: 1528
- 11 Budynina EM, Ivanov KL, Sorokin ID, Melnikov MY. Synthesis 2017; 49: 3035
- 12a Augustin AU, Sensse M, Jones PG, Werz DB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 14293
- 12b Augustin AU, Merz JL, Jones PG, Mlostoń G, Werz DB. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9405
- 12c Mlostoń G, Kowalczyk M, Augustin AU, Jones PG, Werz DB. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020; 16: 1288
- 12d Mlostoń G, Kowalczyk M, Augustin AU, Jones PG, Werz DB. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 6250
- 12e Mlostoń G, Kowalczyk M, Palusiak M, Oliver GA, von Köller HF, Werz DB. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2024; 27: e202301182
- 13 Mlostoń G, Celeda M, Kowalczyk M, Oliver GA, Werz DB. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2024; 27: e202400831
- 14a Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II . Katritzky AR, Rees CW, Scriven EF. V. Pergamon Press; New York: 1996
- 14b Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry IV . Black D, Cossy J, Stevens C. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2022
- 15 Sinha S, Srivastava AK, Tripathi CM, Pandey OP, Sengupta SK. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2007; 87918
- 16a Tasaka A, Tamura N, Matsushita Y, Teranishi K, Hayashi R, Okonogi K, Itoh K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993; 41: 1035
- 16b Zhilitskaya LV, Shainyan BA, Yarosh NO. Molecules 2021; 26: 2190
- 17a Kazeminejad Z, Marzi M, Shiroudi A, Kouhpayeh SA, Farjam M, Zarenezhad E. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022; 4584846
- 17b Teixeira MM, Carvalho DT, Sousa E, Pinto E. Pharmaceuticals 2022; 15: 1427
- 18 Representative Procedure: Dimethyl 2-{2-phenyl-2-[(1,4,5-trimethyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)thio]ethyl}malonate (7a) To a magnetically stirred mixture of 2a (117 mg, 0.50 mmol) and cat. amounts of Sc(OTf)3 (ca. 10 mg) in 2 mL of dry CH2Cl2 (or CHCl3), a portion of 2-mercapto 1H-imidazole derivative 4a (78 mg, 0.55 mmol) was added and stirring was continued at r.t. for 20 h. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude product was purified by preparative layer chromatography using glass plates coated with silica and using a mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH (98:2) as an eluent. Analytically pure product 7a was isolated as a yellowish oil in 87% yield (163 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.98 (s, 3 H), 2.13 (s, 3 H), 2.54–2.59 (m, 1 H), 2.60–2.66 (m, 1 H), 2.91 (s, 3 H), 3.52 (dd, J = 8.0, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (s, 3 H), 3.69 (s, 3 H), 4.13 (dd, J = 9.0, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.00–7.02 (m, 2 H), 7.17–7.21 (m, 3 H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.4, 12.7, 30.6 (3 C), 33.6, 49.7, 52.0, 52.57, 52.63 (2 C), 126.1, 127.5, 127.7, 128.5, 134.3, 135.0, 140.1, 169.3, 169.3 (2 C) ppm. IR (neat): ν = 2952, 1718, 1587, 1435, 1386, 1267, 1237, 1203, 1151, 1047, 700 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C19H24N2O4S (376.47): C, 60.62; H, 6.42; N, 7.44; S 8.52. Found: C, 60.61; H, 6.44; N, 7.42; S, 8.56.











