Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1752655
Nickel-Сatalyzed Carbon–Selenium Bond Formations under Mild Conditions
This work was financially supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia, Office of Sponsored Research (URF/1/4405).
Abstract
A nickel-catalyzed C–Se cross-coupling between aryl iodides and selenols is described. The newly developed catalytic methodology offers facile access to various unsymmetrical selenium-containing motifs. The reaction features excellent functional group tolerance, wide substrate scope, good efficiency, and operates under mild reaction conditions. Notably, this protocol could be readily scaled up to gram scale without the loss of yield.
#
Unsymmetrical aryl and alkyl selenides are a significant class of organic molecules due to their wide applications. These type of compounds have been successfully utilized in materials science,[1] polymer chemistry,[2] as well as catalysis.[3] Organoselenium compounds are particularly prevalent in pharmaceutical industry and they have been proven to possess antitumor,[4] anti-inflammatory,[5] and antimicrobial[6] activity. Over the past decades, substantial progress has been made for the incorporation of selenium into organic compounds and selenylation reactions based on transition-metal catalysis involving palladium[7] or copper[8] catalysts (Scheme [1a]) have been reported. Over the past decade, nickel catalysis has drawn great attention due to its low-cost and high efficiency.[9] Very recently, Xu, Yu, and co-workers realized the synthesis of various selenides by nickel-catalyzed intramolecular decarbonylative reaction of aryl selenoesters.[10] Also, Shao et al. reported a nickel-catalyzed cross-electrophile coupling of aryl iodides and benzeneselenosulfonates[11] (Scheme [1b]). These C–Se bond construction methods proceeded mainly under elevated temperature, in the presence of strong bases or stoichiometric amounts of metal reductant. Given the significance of selenium-containing moieties, the development of simple, mild, and efficient selenylation reactions is still of importance.


In light of increasing attention to environmentally friendly C–Se cross-coupling alternatives, Kundu comprehensively discussed recent advances on transition-metal free C–Se/Te bond-formation reactions, including unconventional methods such as microwave- and ultrasound-assisted synthesis and ball-milling strategies.[12] In particular, Laulhé[13] and Rueping[14] independently developed photoinduced C–Se cross-coupling reactions applying electron donor–acceptor (EDA) concept, accessing numerous diaryl selenides (Scheme [1c]). Although such transition-metal-free protocols represent a sustainable tool towards the synthesis of selenides, the limited substrate scope, and demand of pre-functionalized substrates (diazonium salts,[15] electrophilic aryl selenium halides,[16] or cyanides,[5] etc.) limit the practicality of these methodologies. However, if compared to most other methods transition-metal-catalyzed C–heteroatom bond-formation reactions are still advantageous due to their high efficiency, reliable catalytic reactivity, and good functional group tolerance.[17]
As a part of our continuing studies in the field of C–heteroatom bond construction,[18] we herein disclose a simple and robust nickel-catalyzed C–Se cross-coupling reaction from readily available aryl iodides (Scheme [1d]). This catalytic protocol offers efficient approach to access aryl–aryl and aryl–alkyl selenides under mild conditions with excellent functional group tolerance.
To test the feasibility of the nickel-catalyzed selenylation reaction, we commenced the optimization studies by choosing the reaction of 4-iodoanisole (1a) and phenylselenol (2a) as a model reaction (Table [1]). After extensive screening, the optimal reaction conditions were identified as follows: Ni(COD)2 as catalyst, L1 (4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dipyridyl) as ligand, DBU as base in MeCN at 40 °C for 12 h. Initially, when the reaction was conducted at room temperature, 82% yield of the desired product was obtained (entry 1). To our delight, the reaction at slightly elevated temperature (40 °C) increased the yield of 3a to 92% (entry 2).
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.40 mmol), 2a (0.20 mmol), DBU (2 equiv) in MeCN (1 mL) at rt for 12 h.
b GC Yields using dodecane as internal standard.
The reaction failed to work when Ni(II) catalysts such as NiCl2·dme and NiBr2·dtbbpy were applied (entries 3 and 4), indicating that Ni(0) species is crucial for this C–Se cross-coupling transformation. Changing the solvent from MeCN to DMA considerably decreased the yield, and solvents such as DMF, THF, and toluene showed no product formation (entries 5–8). When other bidentate ligands were utilized instead of the dtbbpy ligand, the reaction gave lower yields (entries 9–11), whereas the terpyridine ligand failed to provide product (entry 12). The use of K3PO4 as base furnished 3a in 80% yield (entry 13). However, application of other organic bases such as Et3N and BTMG dramatically diminished the reaction performance (entries 14, 15). The control experiments demonstrated that nickel, ligand, and base are all essential for the success of this new nickel-catalyzed selenylation protocol (entries 16–18).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we started the investigation of the reaction scope of this newly developed nickel-catalyzed C–Se cross-coupling protocol with different aryl iodides (Scheme [2]). Gratifyingly, a wide array of substrates bearing electron-donating (3a–g) groups showed good compatibility in this selenylation reaction. Remarkably, aryl iodides containing alkyl moieties (3h–j) provided the desired products in quantitative yields. Electron-deficient aryl iodides with functional groups such as ester (3k,l), nitrile (3m–o), and reactive aldehyde (3p) could be converted into the corresponding diarylselenide products smoothly. We were pleased to find that steric hindrance has small influence on the reaction efficiency (3f,o,r). Moreover, highly conjugated biphenyl aryl iodide and naphthyl iodide (3q,r) furnished the desired products in 97% and 80% yield, respectively. Notably, heterocyclic pyridine and thiophene substrates also underwent this selenylation reaction with moderate to good efficiency (3s–u,z). Importantly, this protocol can be successfully applied to various aryl/alkyl selenides as well (3t–ac). However, the aryl bromides and aryl chlorides failed to give the desired products.


To illustrate the applicability of this novel C–Se cross-coupling reaction, we conducted the gram-scale experiment of 1a and 2a with standard conditions (Scheme [3]). The diaryl selenide 3a was achieved in 82% yield (1.30 g).


A plausible mechanism for the nickel-catalyzed C–Se cross-coupling reaction is proposed in Scheme [4]. The catalytic cycle starts from the rapid oxidative addition of aryl iodide with the in situ formed Ni(0) catalyst A to generate a Ni(II) species B. Subsequently, transmetalation of intermediate B with deprotonated selenol takes place to give a new Ni(II) intermediate C, followed by reductive elimination to deliver the desired diaryl selenide product along with the regeneration of Ni(0) complex A; thus closing the catalytic cycle.


In summary, we report a nickel catalyzed C–Se bond construction reaction via the cross-coupling of aryl halides with aryl and alkyl selenides.[19] Different from previous reports on diaryl selenide synthesis, this new catalytic reaction features excellent tolerance towards different functional groups and general applicability. In addition, it exhibits high atom economy due to the minimal use of additives and proceeds under mild reaction conditions from readily available substrates.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0042-1752655.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1 Manjare ST, Kim Y, Churchill DG. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014; 47: 2985
- 2 Xu H, Cao W, Zhang X. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013; 46: 1647
- 3a He X, Wang X, Tse Y.-LS, Ke Z, Yeung Y.-Y. ACS Catal. 2021; 11: 12632
- 3b Jiang Q, Li H, Zhao X. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 8777
- 4 Zhang Q.-B, Ban Y.-L, Yuan P.-F, Peng S.-J, Fang J.-G, Wu L.-Z, Liu Q. Green Chem. 2017; 19: 5559
- 5a Kalaramna P, Goswami A. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 9317
- 5b Kalaramna P, Bhatt D, Sharma H, Goswami A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 4694
- 5c Mugesh G, du Mont W.-W, Sies H. Chem. Rev. 2001; 101: 2125
- 6 Kumar S, Sharma N, Maurya IK, Bhasin AK, Wangoo N, Brandao P, Félix V, Bhasin K, Sharma RK. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 123: 916
- 7a Senol E, Scattolin T, Schoenebeck F. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 9419
- 7b Nishiyama Y, Tokunaga K, Sonoda N. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 1725
- 8a Didehban K, Vessally E, Hosseinian A, Edjlali L, Khosroshahi ES. RSC Adv. 2018; 8: 291
- 8b Reddy VP, Kumar AV, Swapna K, Rao KR. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 951
- 8c Mukherjee N, Kundu D, Ranu BC. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 329
- 9a Zhu C, Yue H, Chu L, Rueping M. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 4051
- 9b Lee S.-C, Guo L, Rueping M. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 14984
- 9c Guo L, Rueping M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018; 51: 1185
- 9d Ishida N, Masuda Y, Imamura Y, Yamazaki K, Murakami M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 19611
- 9e Ishida N, Hori Y, Okumura S, Murakami M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 141: 84
- 9f Cornella J, Zarate C, Martin R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 8081
- 9g Masuda Y, Ishida N, Murakami M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 5822
- 9h Ishida N, Masuda Y, Ishikawa N, Murakami M. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017; 6: 669
- 9i Ishida N, Masuda Y, Sun F, Kamae Y, Murakami M. Chem. Lett. 2019; 48: 1042
- 9j Miura T, Miyakawa S, Nakamuro T, Murakami M. Chem. Lett. 2019; 48: 965
- 9k Tortajada A, Borjesson M, Martin R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021; 54: 3941
- 9l Yi L, Ji T, Chen K-Q, Chen X-Y, Rueping M. CCS Chem. 2022; 4: 9
- 10 Bai JH, Qi XJ, Sun W, Yu TY, Xu PF. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021; 363: 2084
- 11 Liu Y, Xing S, Zhang J, Liu W, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Yang K, Yang L, Jiang K, Shao X. Org. Chem. Front. 2022; 9: 1375
- 12 Kundu D. RSC Adv. 2021; 11: 6682
- 13 Pan L, Cooke MV, Spencer A, Laulhé S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2022; 364: 420
- 14 Zhu C, Zhumagazy S, Yue H, Rueping M. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 96
- 15a Kundu D, Ahammed S, Ranu BC. Green Chem. 2012; 14: 2024
- 15b Balaguez RA, Ricordi VG, Freitas CS, Perin G, Schumacher RF, Alves D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 1057
- 16a Jana S, Chakraborty A, Mondal S, Hajra A. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 77534
- 16b Thurow S, Penteado F, Perin G, Jacob R, Alves D, Lenardão E. Green Chem. 2014; 16: 3854
- 16c Freitas CS, Barcellos AM, Ricordi VG, Pena JM, Perin G, Jacob RG, Lenardao EJ, Alves D. Green Chem. 2011; 13: 2931
- 16d Zimmermann EG, Thurow S, Freitas CS, Mendes SR, Perin G, Alves D, Jacob RG, Lenardão EJ. Molecules 2013; 18: 4081
- 17 Beletskaya IP, Ananikov VP. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 1596
- 18a Zhu C, Yue H, Jia J, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 17810
- 18b Zhu C, Kale AP, Yue H, Rueping M. JACS Au 2021; 1: 1057
- 18c Zhu C, Yue H, Nikolaienko P, Rueping M. CCS Chem. 2020; 2: 179
- 18d Yue H, Zhu C, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 1371
- 18e Lee SC, Liao HH, Chatupheeraphat A, Rueping M. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 3608
- 18f Yue H, Zhu C, Shen L, Geng Q, Hock KJ, Yuan T, Cavallo L, Rueping M. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 4430
- 18g Dewanji A, Krach P, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 3566
- 18h Huang L, Ji T, Rueping M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 3532
- 19 General Procedure A dry 5 mL vial equipped with a stirring bar was charged with an aryl iodide 1 (0.4 mmol, 2 equiv), dtbbpy (5.4 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol%), Ni(COD)2 (5.5 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol%), and selenide salt 2 (if applied, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv, without the addition of DBU) in a glovebox. Anhydrous and degassed CH3CN (1.0 mL), phenylselenol (if applied, 21.4 μL, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), and DBU (59.7 μL, 0.4 mmol, 2 equiv) was added subsequently via syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h under 40 °C. After the reaction is completed, the mixture was concentrated under vacuum and the product was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using hexane/EtOAc as eluent. (4-Methoxyphenyl)(phenyl)selane (3a) Yield 90% (47.7 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.56 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.39–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 3 H), 6.92–6.89 (m, 2 H), 3.85 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 159.8, 136.6, 133.2, 130.9, 129.2, 126.5, 120.0, 115.2, 55.3. 4-(Cyclohexylselanyl)benzonitrile (3ac) Yield 72% (19 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.56 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.54–7.48 (m, 2 H), 3.46 (td, J = 10.1, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.07 (dd, J = 13.4, 4.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.79 (dt, J = 14.1, 4.3 Hz, 2 H), 1.69–1.64 (m, 1 H), 1.62–1.55 (m, 2 H), 1.45–1.31 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.2, 132.7, 132.1, 118.9, 109.9, 43.3, 34.0, 26.7, 25.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C13H15NSe [M+Na]+: 288.02619; found: 288.02628.
Corresponding Authors
Publication History
Received: 22 January 2023
Accepted after revision: 27 February 2023
Article published online:
31 March 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1 Manjare ST, Kim Y, Churchill DG. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014; 47: 2985
- 2 Xu H, Cao W, Zhang X. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013; 46: 1647
- 3a He X, Wang X, Tse Y.-LS, Ke Z, Yeung Y.-Y. ACS Catal. 2021; 11: 12632
- 3b Jiang Q, Li H, Zhao X. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 8777
- 4 Zhang Q.-B, Ban Y.-L, Yuan P.-F, Peng S.-J, Fang J.-G, Wu L.-Z, Liu Q. Green Chem. 2017; 19: 5559
- 5a Kalaramna P, Goswami A. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 9317
- 5b Kalaramna P, Bhatt D, Sharma H, Goswami A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 4694
- 5c Mugesh G, du Mont W.-W, Sies H. Chem. Rev. 2001; 101: 2125
- 6 Kumar S, Sharma N, Maurya IK, Bhasin AK, Wangoo N, Brandao P, Félix V, Bhasin K, Sharma RK. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 123: 916
- 7a Senol E, Scattolin T, Schoenebeck F. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 9419
- 7b Nishiyama Y, Tokunaga K, Sonoda N. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 1725
- 8a Didehban K, Vessally E, Hosseinian A, Edjlali L, Khosroshahi ES. RSC Adv. 2018; 8: 291
- 8b Reddy VP, Kumar AV, Swapna K, Rao KR. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 951
- 8c Mukherjee N, Kundu D, Ranu BC. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 329
- 9a Zhu C, Yue H, Chu L, Rueping M. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 4051
- 9b Lee S.-C, Guo L, Rueping M. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 14984
- 9c Guo L, Rueping M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018; 51: 1185
- 9d Ishida N, Masuda Y, Imamura Y, Yamazaki K, Murakami M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 19611
- 9e Ishida N, Hori Y, Okumura S, Murakami M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 141: 84
- 9f Cornella J, Zarate C, Martin R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 8081
- 9g Masuda Y, Ishida N, Murakami M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 5822
- 9h Ishida N, Masuda Y, Ishikawa N, Murakami M. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017; 6: 669
- 9i Ishida N, Masuda Y, Sun F, Kamae Y, Murakami M. Chem. Lett. 2019; 48: 1042
- 9j Miura T, Miyakawa S, Nakamuro T, Murakami M. Chem. Lett. 2019; 48: 965
- 9k Tortajada A, Borjesson M, Martin R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021; 54: 3941
- 9l Yi L, Ji T, Chen K-Q, Chen X-Y, Rueping M. CCS Chem. 2022; 4: 9
- 10 Bai JH, Qi XJ, Sun W, Yu TY, Xu PF. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021; 363: 2084
- 11 Liu Y, Xing S, Zhang J, Liu W, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Yang K, Yang L, Jiang K, Shao X. Org. Chem. Front. 2022; 9: 1375
- 12 Kundu D. RSC Adv. 2021; 11: 6682
- 13 Pan L, Cooke MV, Spencer A, Laulhé S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2022; 364: 420
- 14 Zhu C, Zhumagazy S, Yue H, Rueping M. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 96
- 15a Kundu D, Ahammed S, Ranu BC. Green Chem. 2012; 14: 2024
- 15b Balaguez RA, Ricordi VG, Freitas CS, Perin G, Schumacher RF, Alves D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 1057
- 16a Jana S, Chakraborty A, Mondal S, Hajra A. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 77534
- 16b Thurow S, Penteado F, Perin G, Jacob R, Alves D, Lenardão E. Green Chem. 2014; 16: 3854
- 16c Freitas CS, Barcellos AM, Ricordi VG, Pena JM, Perin G, Jacob RG, Lenardao EJ, Alves D. Green Chem. 2011; 13: 2931
- 16d Zimmermann EG, Thurow S, Freitas CS, Mendes SR, Perin G, Alves D, Jacob RG, Lenardão EJ. Molecules 2013; 18: 4081
- 17 Beletskaya IP, Ananikov VP. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 1596
- 18a Zhu C, Yue H, Jia J, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 17810
- 18b Zhu C, Kale AP, Yue H, Rueping M. JACS Au 2021; 1: 1057
- 18c Zhu C, Yue H, Nikolaienko P, Rueping M. CCS Chem. 2020; 2: 179
- 18d Yue H, Zhu C, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 1371
- 18e Lee SC, Liao HH, Chatupheeraphat A, Rueping M. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 3608
- 18f Yue H, Zhu C, Shen L, Geng Q, Hock KJ, Yuan T, Cavallo L, Rueping M. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 4430
- 18g Dewanji A, Krach P, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 3566
- 18h Huang L, Ji T, Rueping M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 3532
- 19 General Procedure A dry 5 mL vial equipped with a stirring bar was charged with an aryl iodide 1 (0.4 mmol, 2 equiv), dtbbpy (5.4 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol%), Ni(COD)2 (5.5 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol%), and selenide salt 2 (if applied, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv, without the addition of DBU) in a glovebox. Anhydrous and degassed CH3CN (1.0 mL), phenylselenol (if applied, 21.4 μL, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), and DBU (59.7 μL, 0.4 mmol, 2 equiv) was added subsequently via syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h under 40 °C. After the reaction is completed, the mixture was concentrated under vacuum and the product was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using hexane/EtOAc as eluent. (4-Methoxyphenyl)(phenyl)selane (3a) Yield 90% (47.7 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.56 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.39–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 3 H), 6.92–6.89 (m, 2 H), 3.85 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 159.8, 136.6, 133.2, 130.9, 129.2, 126.5, 120.0, 115.2, 55.3. 4-(Cyclohexylselanyl)benzonitrile (3ac) Yield 72% (19 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.56 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.54–7.48 (m, 2 H), 3.46 (td, J = 10.1, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.07 (dd, J = 13.4, 4.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.79 (dt, J = 14.1, 4.3 Hz, 2 H), 1.69–1.64 (m, 1 H), 1.62–1.55 (m, 2 H), 1.45–1.31 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.2, 132.7, 132.1, 118.9, 109.9, 43.3, 34.0, 26.7, 25.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C13H15NSe [M+Na]+: 288.02619; found: 288.02628.









