Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719864
DABSO – A Reagent to Revolutionize Organosulfur Chemistry
J.A.A. is grateful to the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Doctoral Training in Synthesis for Biology and Medicine (EP/L015838/1) for a studentship, generously supported by AstraZeneca, Diamond Light Source, the Defense Science and Technology Laboratory, Evotec, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Syngenta, Takeda, UCB and Vertex.
Abstract
The introduction of easy-to-handle SO2 surrogates has transformed the field of sulfur chemistry, enabling methodologies utilizing SO2 to be carried out without specialized apparatus, and paving the way for the development of new procedures. This review highlights some of the varied and significant developments associated with one of the most prominent SO2 surrogates: DABSO.
1 Introduction
2 DABSO
3 Reactions with Nucleophilic Reagents
4 Metal-Catalyzed Reactions
4.1 Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions
4.2 Other Transition-Metal Catalysis
5 Radical Reactions
5.1 Aryldiazonium Salts
5.2 Other Aryl Radical Precursors
5.3 Alkyl Radical Precursors
6 Conclusion
# 1
Introduction


Although cheap and abundant gaseous SO2 can be used in many interesting reactions for the synthesis of high-value compounds, the challenges associated with handling SO2 gas, such as the use of specialized equipment, high toxicity and environmental concerns, have prevented the wide adoption of such methodologies and have hindered their further development. The requirement to use a large excess of SO2 can also be detrimental due to overreaction, or reaction and catalyst poisoning.
The introduction of easier to handle surrogates for SO2 means that many of these challenges can be avoided or mitigated.[1] This has resulted in a resurgence in the development of new methodologies incorporating SO2 into high-value products.
# 2
DABSO
The Lewis acidity of the sulfur atom in SO2 enables the formation of 1:1 charge-transfer complexes with Lewis bases such as amines. The interaction between ammonia and SO2 had been noted on several occasions in the 19th century, but it was not until 1900 that the products of this interaction were isolated and studied.[2] A wide variety of amine–SO2 charge-transfer complexes have since been prepared, and their structures and properties studied using a wide variety of techniques.[3] Prior to 2010, however, reports of their synthetic uses were scarce, and even fewer of those incorporated the SO2 motif into the product to give valuable sulfinyl- or sulfonyl-containing products.[4]
The bench-stable Lewis adduct formed between 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) and two molecules of SO2, DABCO·(SO2)2, henceforth referred to as DABSO, was first prepared by Mello and Santos in order to study its Raman spectrum.[5] DABSO can be readily prepared by refluxing DABCO in liquid SO2 (Scheme [1]),[6] although alternative preparations have been developed using the Karl Fischer reagent[7] or by using sodium sulfite as the source of SO2.[8] It is available commercially from multiple vendors. Due to its ease of preparation, favorable physical properties, and high proportion (>50%) of its molecular weight as SO2, DABSO was identified as an ideal choice to study the use of amine–SO2 Lewis adducts as SO2 surrogates.


# 3
Reactions with Nucleophilic Reagents
In order to demonstrate the utility of DABSO in synthetic organic chemistry, Willis and co-workers reported its use as a replacement for gaseous SO2 in a series of reactions.[9] Organometallic reagents had previously been used in reactions with gaseous SO2 for the synthesis of sulfinates and their derivatives.[10] Willis and co-workers demonstrated that aryl or alkyl Grignard reagents could be combined with DABSO to give a sulfinate salt intermediate (Scheme [2], A). Reaction with sulfuryl chloride to give a sulfonyl chloride followed by addition of an amine gave sulfonamide products. Yields were comparable to those obtained by Barrett and co-workers[10b] following a similar synthetic sequence using the gaseous reagent, and the reactions with DABSO could be achieved without a large excess of SO2.


Rudkevich and co-workers previously demonstrated that sulfamides could be prepared using iodine and pyridine in combination with SO2 gas.[11] It was proposed that these reactions involved the in situ formation of sulfuryl iodide (SO2I2), which then reacts with 2 molecules of aniline. Willis and co-workers demonstrated that DABSO can be effectively used in the same transformation with comparable yields, but only 2 equivalents of DABSO were needed, whereas previously it is estimated that ~100 equivalents of SO2 were required (Scheme [2], B).[9]
Willis and co-workers also demonstrated that cheletropic reactions are possible by employing DABSO instead of SO2 gas in the synthesis of a sulfolene using 2,3-dimethylbutadiene (Scheme [2], C).[9] Bischoff and Martial later showed that cheletropic additions using DABSO could be accelerated by the addition of Lewis acids such as BF3·OEt2.[12]
Waldmann and co-workers showed that in situ generated aryllithium reagents can be used to generate lithium sulfinates by reaction with DABSO, which can be oxidatively chlorinated using N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) to afford a sulfonyl chloride that in turn reacts with an amine to give a sulfonamide product (Scheme [3], A).[13] An alternative two-step procedure was developed by Willis and co-workers to prepare sulfonamides. The sulfinate intermediate is prepared from Grignard reagents, organolithium or organozinc nucleophiles and DABSO. Free amine and aqueous sodium hypochlorite are then added to form an electrophilic N-chloroamine intermediate, which reacts with the sulfinate to give a sulfonamide product (Scheme [3], B).[14]


Sulfone products can also be obtained from organometallic reagents by further reaction of in situ prepared sulfinate salts. The Willis group demonstrated this reactivity by using alkyl halides, epoxides or diaryliodonium salts to synthesize sulfones from Grignard or organolithium reagents (Scheme [4], A).[15] Rocke and co-workers also prepared sulfone products, but used organozinc reagents to prepare the intermediate sulfinate salt (Scheme [4], B).[16] Waser and Chen prepared alkynyl sulfones from Grignard reagents using ethynyl-benziodoxolone (EBX) reagents as alkynyl electrophiles (Scheme [4], C).[17]


Sulfinates derived from aryllithium addition to DABSO have been used in a Pd-catalyzed coupling with aryl halides to give sulfones in a one-pot procedure (Scheme [5]).[18] XantPhos-type ligands were found to be key for reactivity in the Pd-catalyzed step, as previously demonstrated by Cacchi and co-workers,[19] but in this one-pot procedure, aryl–aryl exchange between the sulfinate and XantPhos was observed as a side reaction. Electron-poor XantPhos analogues containing 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl groups were found to prevent this side reaction, allowing the desired sulfones to be formed in good yields.


Methods utilizing organometallic reagents have also been used for the synthesis of S(IV) functional groups, including sulfoxides and sulfinamides. The Willis group generated sulfinates from organometallic addition to DABSO, and subsequent reaction with trimethylsilyl chloride (TMS-Cl) gave a sulfinate silyl ester (Scheme [6], A).[20] This electrophilic intermediate then reacts with a second organometallic nucleophile to give unsymmetrical sulfoxide products in a one-pot procedure. A related procedure, also developed by the Willis group, prepares sulfinyl chlorides from sulfinates using thionyl chloride (Scheme [6], B).[21] These electrophilic intermediates are then reacted with amine nucleophiles to give sulfinamide products.


Zhang and co-workers disclosed an AlCl3-promoted Friedel–Crafts-type reaction of arenes and DABSO to give sulfinates (Scheme [7], A).[22] Formation of an SO2-AlCl3 adduct was proposed to enable nucleophilic attack from the arene to give the sulfinate product. Electron-rich arenes performed best in this transformation, with electron-poor arenes giving no reaction.


Wu and co-workers prepared γ-keto sulfones from cyclopropanols, DABSO and Michael acceptors (Scheme [7], B).[23] It was found that the reaction did not proceed via a radical process, but instead a sulfinate intermediate was observed, which undergoes a Michael addition to give a sulfone. Reaction of the sulfinate intermediate with C-electrophiles to give other γ-keto sulfones was also later demonstrated.[24]
Tsai and co-workers showed that sulfonamide products could be prepared from N-tosylhydrazones (Scheme [7], C).[25] The mechanism remains unclear, but was shown to proceed through a non-radical pathway. The N-tosylhydrazone could also be prepared in situ from a ketone, and the reaction was shown to be compatible with primary and secondary amines.
# 4
Metal-Catalyzed Reactions
SO2 can act as a versatile ligand for metals. Its amphoteric nature due to a high-lying HOMO capable of electron-donation as well as a low-lying LUMO enabling back-donation, results in efficient binding to soft metal centers.[26] The first transition-metal-SO2 complex was identified in 1938,[27] and the structural and spectroscopic properties of these complexes have been well-studied since.[28]
The molecular orbital properties and transition-metal coordination modes of SO2 are notably similar to those of carbon monoxide.[26b] Metal-catalyzed carbonylations, involving migratory insertion of CO into a metal–carbon bond, are widely used methodologies.[29] However, reports of the analogous use of gaseous SO2 are scarce. Migratory insertion of SO2 into metal–carbon bonds has been demonstrated previously. Klein demonstrated the first migratory insertion to give a palladium-sulfinato complex intermediate in a hydrosulfination reaction utilizing ethylene and SO2, giving a mix of vinyl sulfone products (Scheme [8], A).[30] Other examples of metal-catalyzed reactions of SO2 and alkenes have also been reported,[31] and an example of sulfinic acid synthesis from an aryldiazonium salt was reported by Keim and Pelzer (Scheme [8], B).[32] These examples demonstrate the potential for the use of metal catalysis for the synthesis of valuable sulfonyl-derived products.


The relative lack of metal-catalyzed reactions using gaseous SO2, aside from challenges associated with handling the toxic gas, may be a result of the poisoning of metal catalysts due to the use of a large excess of gaseous SO2. The use of SO2 surrogates allow for precise control of SO2 loading, and consequently, following the introduction of DABSO, new metal-catalyzed sulfinylation reactions were reported.
4.1Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions
In the first reported synthetic use of DABSO, Willis and co-workers introduced a metal-catalyzed sulfonylative reaction of aryl halides (Scheme [9]).[6] [33] In this three-component Pd-catalyzed reaction, aryl halides, DABSO and hydrazines were coupled to give N-aminosulfonamides. It was noted that low DABSO loading was shown to improve the yield, supporting the hypothesis that high SO2 loading could hamper reactivity due to catalyst poisoning. Primary sulfonamides could be prepared from a dibenzylated N-aminosulfonamide via a 2-step deprotection sequence, extending the utility of this transformation. The reaction was later demonstrated to work on large scale.[34] This method was subsequently extended to prepare benzosultams from 2-(2-iodoalkenyl)aryl bromides by subjecting the alkenyl N-aminosulfonamide to a further Pd-catalyzed cyclization step.[35]


Alternative substrates have also been used to prepare N-aminosulfonamide products using Pd catalysis. Wu and Ye used Pd catalysis to prepare N-aminosulfonamides from arylboronic acids (Scheme [10], A).[36] No ligand was required, and a balloon of O2 was used to complete the catalytic cycle. Additionally, the authors demonstrated good functional group compatibility. Wu and co-workers later demonstrated that aryl iodides could be generated in situ using gold(III) catalysis (Scheme [10], B).[37] The subsequent Pd-catalyzed sulfonylation reaction proceeded effectively to give N-aminosulfonamide products in one-pot from unactivated arenes. The reaction was shown to perform best with electron-rich arenes, although electron-poor examples were demonstrated, albeit with low yields.


In order to deliver a versatile method for the preparation of diverse sulfonyl derivatives, the Willis group and a team from Pfizer independently developed Pd-catalyzed syntheses of aryl sulfinates from aryl halides. The Willis group used DABSO (Scheme [11]),[38] whereas the group from Pfizer used K2S2O5 as an alternative SO2 surrogate.[39] The Willis group used a Pd(OAc)2/PAd2Bu catalytic system, and it was noted that their reaction solvent, isopropanol, could also act as the reductant, removing the requirement for an additional reducing agent such as sodium formate to maintain Pd(0)/Pd(II) turnover. Both aryl iodide and bromide substrates could be used, although iodides were found to give higher yields. From the sulfinate intermediate, sulfones were prepared using various C-based electrophiles, and sulfonamides were prepared via the addition of amines to in situ generated sulfonyl chlorides, demonstrating the versatility of the reaction. Willis later demonstrated that the in situ preparation of an N-chloroamine using sodium hypochlorite could be used to access sulfonamide products without the formation of a sulfonyl chloride intermediate.[40] Lautens and co-workers showed that cyclic sulfonated products could be prepared through a Pd-catalyzed intramolecular Heck reaction followed by a Pd-catalyzed reaction with DABSO to prepare a sulfinate, from which sulfones, sulfonamides and sulfonyl fluorides were obtained.[41]


Sulfonyl fluorides are valuable products. They are hydrolytically stable, but under the correct conditions can undergo sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange (SuFEx) ‘click chemistry’ reactions.[42] Willis and co-workers used the preparation of sulfonyl fluoride products employing NFSI to showcase a new catalyst system for the synthesis of aryl sulfinates, this time focusing on improving yields for aryl bromide substrates (Scheme [12], A).[43] Key to the improved system was the use of AmPhos as the ligand, which can also be used as part of a preformed Pd/AmPhos complex, giving an improved yield of sulfinate, whilst avoiding the generation of reduction side products. Willis and co-workers later expanded upon this work in the preparation of cyclic alkenylsulfonyl fluorides from alkenyl triflate substrates (Scheme [12], B).[44] The varied reactivity of these cyclic alkenylsulfonyl fluoride products was demonstrated in a series of functionalizations.


Willis and co-workers used arylboronic acids under ligand-free palladium catalysis to provide a new redox-neutral route to aryl sulfinates (Scheme [13], A).[45] This method could be used to access a broad range of sulfonyl-containing products, including sulfones and sulfonamides in a one-pot procedure. It was noted that the sulfones could be prepared in one-step by inclusion of the electrophile in the Pd-catalyzed sulfination step. This method required a significantly reduced reaction time compared to those using aryl halides as starting materials.


Pentafluorophenyl (PFP) sulfonate esters, stable alternatives to sulfonyl chlorides, were prepared by Willis and co-workers in a two-step procedure (Scheme [13], B).[46] The intermediate sulfinate was prepared using previously optimized Pd-catalyzed conditions from arylboronic acids or aryl halides. This was followed by a copper-catalyzed oxidative step to prepare the PFP sulfonate esters using pentafluorophenol. The utility of PFP sulfonate esters as electrophiles was demonstrated by the preparation of a selection of sulfonamides, sulfonyl fluorides and sulfonate esters. In a related procedure, Tu and co-workers prepared aryl sulfonamides via the Cu-catalyzed coupling of sulfinates with O-benzoyl hydroxylamines (Scheme [13], C).[47]
# 4.2
Other Transition-Metal Catalysis
Due to the high cost and relative scarcity of palladium, the development of catalytic methods using less expensive and readily available first row transition-metal catalysts is important. Wang and co-workers developed an alternative procedure for the preparation of N-aminosulfonamides from triethoxysilane reagents using Cu catalysis and an XPhos ligand under oxidative conditions (Scheme [14], A).[48] Notably, this method is compatible with alkyl substrates, where the aforementioned Pd-catalyzed methods are only compatible with aryl or alkenyl substrates. Later, Wu and co-workers developed methods for the preparation of sulfones from triethoxysilanes using copper or cobalt catalysis (Scheme [14], B).[49]


Willis and co-workers showed that Ni catalysis with a 3,4,7,8-tetramethylphenanthroline (tmphen) ligand could be used to prepare sulfinates from boronic acids (Scheme [15]).[50] This methodology was compatible with a broad scope of boronic acids, and a wide variety of sulfonyl-derived products were prepared in this one-pot, two-step procedure. Similarly, the use of ruthenium(II) catalysts was demonstrated by Turks and Gulbe for the synthesis of aryl sulfinates and their derivatives.[51]


Whilst the aforementioned methods provide new routes to sulfinate intermediates, multiple reaction steps are generally needed for the preparation of sulfonyl-derived products. Willis and Chen developed an approach analogous to carbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura couplings to access biaryl sulfones (Scheme [16], A).[52] An electron-rich bipyridine ligand was needed in order to obtain high yields, and the authors also noted that the addition of a stoichiometric amount of NaBF4 interrupted the coupling to give a sulfinate salt, providing an alternative to previous palladium-catalyzed methods. Cantat and co-workers later developed a sulfonylative Hiyama coupling from triethoxysilanes to prepare biaryl sulfone products (Scheme [16], B).[53]


Willis and co-workers also developed a 3-component synthesis of sulfonamides from arylboronic acids, DABSO and amines in a sulfonylative Chan–Lam-type coupling (Scheme [17]).[54] An electron-rich bipyridine ligand was again found to be important, and addition of a base gave an improved yield. The authors demonstrated a broad scope for the boronic acid and amine components, including a selection of pharmaceutically relevant fragments.


#
# 5
Radical Reactions
Addition of C-centered radicals to sulfur dioxide to give sulfonyl radicals is well established in synthetic chemistry, with methods from Reed[55a] and later Meerwein exploiting radical addition to gaseous SO2 to prepare sulfonyl chlorides from alkanes and aryldiazonium salts respectively (Scheme [18], A).[55b]


Sulfonyl radicals derived from alternative precursors such as sulfinate salts, or sulfonyl chlorides, have also been utilized for the preparation of sulfonyl products (Scheme [18], B).[56]
The introduction of solid surrogates of SO2, as well as modern methods for the generation of radicals from various precursors, has resulted in a rapid development of new methods for the synthesis of sulfonyl-derived products.[57]
5.1Aryldiazonium Salts
During the development of a Pd-catalyzed aminosulfonylation of aryldiazonium salts, Wu and co-workers noticed that the reaction proceeded efficiently in the absence of the catalyst. Based on experimental and computational studies, it was found to be operating via a radical pathway (Scheme [19]).[58] The reaction was proposed to proceed via the initial formation of a hydrazine–SO2 charge-transfer complex, from which electrostatic interactions between this complex and the diazonium salt are proposed to initiate the transformation by homolytic cleavage of the S–N bond, single-electron transfer (SET) and loss of N2 to give an aryl radical and a hydrazine radical cation. The aryl radical adds to SO2 to give a sulfonyl radical, which combines with the hydrazine radical to give the N-aminosulfonamide product. A broad range of hydrazines and aryldiazonium salts were compatible with the methodology and subsequent methods utilizing N-aminosulfonamides as precursors to other sulfonyl products have been developed.[59]


Subsequently, Wu and co-workers demonstrated that a similar reaction could also be carried out starting from anilines (Scheme [20], A).[60] The in situ preparation of aryldiazonium salts using tert-butyl nitrite (tBuONO) and BF3·OEt2 as a Lewis acidic additive was followed by addition of DABSO to give N-aminosulfonamide products. Yields were found to be comparable to those using the aryldiazonium salt starting materials.


Radical methodologies utilizing SO2 can also be used to prepare structurally complex sulfonyl-containing molecules. For example, 2-allyloxyaniline or its diazonium salt derivative can be used to prepare cyclized products via aryl radical generation, intramolecular 5-exo-trig cyclization and subsequent alkyl radical addition to SO2 (Scheme [20], B).[61]
The addition of sulfonyl radicals to alkenes and alkynes has been previously used for the synthesis of sulfone products. Feng and co-workers used a combination of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) and tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI) to give aryl radicals (Scheme [21], A),[62] whereas Wu and co-workers used a Cu(II) catalyst to generate aryl radicals (Scheme [21], B).[63] In both methods, aryl radical addition to DABSO and subsequent sulfonyl radical addition to an alkene followed by oxidation gives a cationic intermediate. Deprotonation of this cation, or iodide addition and elimination, gave vinyl or allyl sulfone products.


During the development of a synthesis of 3-sulfonated coumarins, Wu and co-workers noticed in a control experiment that a copper catalyst was not necessary for the transformation (Scheme [22]).[64] In their proposed mechanism the DABCO–SO2 charge-transfer complex could undergo homolytic cleavage of the S–N bond and SET to give an aryl radical, similar to the mechanism proposed using hydrazines. This new metal-free method proceeded to give the 3-sulfonated coumarins by sulfonyl radical addition to an alkyne, spirocyclization onto an arene, oxidation, rearrangement and deprotonation to give the 3-sulfonated coumarin product.


Following these studies, the combination of aryldiazonium salts and DABSO has been extensively used for the preparation of sulfone products. Sulfonyl radical addition to alkenes or alkynes gives β-sulfonyl radicals, which can then be quenched by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT),[65] or by reaction with in situ generated radicals (Scheme [23], A).[66]


A SET step can be used to prepare a carbocation intermediate, from which deprotonation gives alkene or alkyne products (Scheme [23], B). The DABCO radical cation, derived from radical generation, can be used in this SET step,[64] but copper catalysts or photocatalysts have also been employed to facilitate this process.[67] Using this reaction framework, Wu and co-workers demonstrated that sulfonyl radical addition to silyl enol ethers, SET to generate a carbocation, and desilylation could be used to prepare β-keto sulfones.[68]
Several methods have also been used to prepare β-functionalized sulfones via addition of nucleophiles to cation intermediates (Scheme [23], C).[69] Intramolecular nucleophile addition can also be used to prepare cyclized products,[70] and the combination of several radical addition and cyclization steps has been used to prepare complex sulfonyl-containing molecules.[71]
Methods involving the trapping of sulfonyl radicals with other in situ generated radicals provides an alternative route to sulfonyl-containing products.[72] An example reported by Wu and co-workers uses in situ generated alkoxy radicals to prepare O-aminosulfonates, and further demonstrated their utility in the synthesis of sulfonamides (Scheme [24]).[73]


Metal catalysts can also be used to capture the sulfonyl radical intermediate. For example, Wu and co-workers employed a copper catalyst in the synthesis of aryl sulfonamides using N-chloroamines (Scheme [25]).[74] The proposed mechanism involves oxidative addition of the N-chloroamine to give a Cu(III) intermediate. Subsequent capture of the sulfonyl radical gives a proposed Cu(IV) intermediate, from which reductive elimination gives the sulfonamide product. This method provides the sulfonamide product in one step, but has been shown to only be compatible with secondary chloroamines. Sulfonyl radical capture by metal catalysts has also been used to prepare sulfones,[75] sulfonate esters,[76] and sulfonyl fluorides.[77]


# 5.2
Other Aryl Radical Precursors
Whilst a large body of research has been carried out using aryldiazonium salts, their relative instability and potentially explosive nature means the development of methods utilizing alternative radical precursors is desirable.
Aryl radicals can also be generated from C–X bond homolysis using UV light. Wu and co-workers demonstrated the preparation of N-aminosulfonamides from aryl halides, DABSO, hydrazines and TBAI (Scheme [26], A).[78] Aryl chlorides, bromides and iodides were compatible with the methodology, and this chemistry was also found to be compatible with alkyl halides. A 5-exo-tet cyclization prior to SO2 capture has also been used to prepare cyclized products.[79] Additionally, Wu and co-workers demonstrated the use of aryl/alkyl halides in the preparation of sulfone products.[80]




In the presence of oxygen and copper, aryl radicals can be prepared from aryl hydrazines with loss of N2. Han and co-workers used aryl hydrazines for the preparation of aryl sulfonamides via capture of the sulfonyl radical with copper and reductive elimination with an amine (Scheme [26], B).[81] The reaction was compatible with primary and secondary amines, and both electron-rich and electron-poor aryl hydrazines were tolerated. A related radical generation to prepare β-hydroxysulfones from sulfonyl radical addition to alkenes and coupling with a peroxyl radical was later reported.[82]
Aryl radicals can be generated from diaryliodonium salts by oxidative quenching of an excited photocatalyst. Wu and co-workers exploited this to prepare thiophosphates from diarylphosphine oxides using an Ir photocatalyst (Scheme [27], A).[83] Related methods were developed for the preparation of sulfones.[84] Photoinduced catalyst-free methods were also elaborated for the generation of aryl radicals from diaryliodonium salts.[85] Manolikakes and co-workers found that a photocatalyst was not required during their synthesis of sulfonylated coumarins (Scheme [27], B).[85a] The authors proposed that visible-light-induced SET from a charge-transfer complex that forms between DABSO and diaryliodonium salts generates aryl radicals.[85b]
# 5.3
Alkyl Radical Precursors
The preparation of diverse alkyl sulfonyl derivatives using the aforementioned methods is challenging due to poor reactivity or poor functional group tolerance. Recent developments in the generation of alkyl radicals under mild conditions in combination with DABSO has enabled the development of several new methodologies for the preparation of alkylsulfonyl products.
Reductive quenching of an excited photocatalyst can be used to generate radicals from potassium trifluoroborate salts. Wu and co-workers used this methodology with DABSO to form sulfonyl radicals, and addition to electron-poor alkenes followed by reduction and protonation gave alkyl sulfone products (Scheme [28]).[86] Wu and co-workers later reported related procedures to prepare sulfones from trifluoroborate salts using alkynes and allyl halides.[87]


Alkyl radicals can also be generated from 4-substituted Hantzsch esters by reductive quenching of an excited photocatalyst. Wu and co-workers used this process in combination with DABSO and vinyl azides (Scheme [29]).[88] Addition of a sulfonyl radical to the vinyl azide, followed by loss of N2 and reduction gives enamine products. This transformation was shown to be compatible with both primary and secondary radicals, and variation of the aryl component of the vinyl azide was also tolerated. Sulfonyl radicals derived from 4-substituted Hantzsch esters could also be combined with electron-deficient alkenes to provide other sulfone products.[89]


Vicinal di- or trifluoroalkylation and hydrosulfination of alkynes was explored by Wu and co-workers. For example, they developed a difluoromethylation procedure using a photocatalyst to prepare difluoroalkyl radicals from ethyl 2-bromo-2,2-difluoroacetate (Scheme [30], A).[90] SET from hydrazine to Togni’s reagent generates trifluoromethyl radicals, which add to the alkyne and then to DABSO to give a sulfonyl radical. Combination with the previously formed hydrazine radical gave an N-aminosulfonamide product (Scheme [30], B).[91]


Liu and co-workers developed a related process using SET from zinc to generate the fluoroalkyl radicals (Scheme [30], C).[92] Addition to an alkene or alkyne followed by trapping with a sulfonyl radical anion or addition to SO2 and reduction by zinc gives a sulfinate product. The authors demonstrated compatibility with a wide variety of functional groups, using a diverse selection of fluoroalkyl bromides, and prepared a variety of sulfonyl fluorides and sulfones to demonstrate the versatility of this transformation.
Willis and co-workers developed a method for the synthesis of alkyl sulfinates and their derivatives from Katritzky pyridinium salts (Scheme [31]).[93] This method forms alkyl radicals by photo- or thermally induced SET from an EDA (electron donor–acceptor) complex formed between a Katritzky salt, a Hantzsch ester and an amine additive. This method was shown to have good functional group tolerance, and conditions were developed for use with α-secondary, α-primary and benzylic starting materials. The versatility of the procedure was demonstrated through the preparation of a variety of sulfones, sulfonamides, and sulfonyl fluorides.


Larionov and co-workers developed a decarboxylative route to sulfinates from carboxylic acids (Scheme [32]).[94] Based on DFT computational studies, the mechanism is proposed to proceed through the formation of a hydrogen-bonded complex between the carboxylic acid and an acridine photocatalyst. Photoexcitation results in proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET), generating an alkyl radical with loss of CO2. Alkyl radical addition and subsequent HAT from the dihydropyridine intermediate gives a sulfinic acid intermediate. Then copper-catalyzed S–N bond formation with either electrophilic N-centered coupling partners, or nucleophilic coupling partners in the presence of an oxidant, gives a sulfonamide or sulfonyl azide product. The authors demonstrated that the methodology was compatible with a broad variety of carboxylic acids and amines.


Gong and co-workers developed a photocatalyzed asymmetric C–H functionalization of alkanes (Scheme [33]).[95] The photocatalyst is excited to its triplet state, and subsequent HAT from an alkane provides the alkyl radical, which is trapped by DABSO to give a sulfonyl radical. The chiral Ni complex coordinates to the α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazole, blocking one face to attack by the sulfonyl radical. Sulfonyl radical addition sets the stereochemistry, and SET and proton transfer provides the enantioenriched sulfone products. This methodology was shown to be compatible with benzylic, secondary and primary substrates, giving moderate to good yields, high regioselectivity, and good enantioselectivity of up to 95% ee.


Formation of an EDA complex with DABSO and O-aryl oximes can enable generation of an N-centered radical by photoinduced SET and N–O bond homolysis. In a report from Wu and co-workers, a 5-exo-tet cyclization followed by addition to DABSO and then to silyl enol ethers gave sulfonated 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrroles (Scheme [34], A).[96] Another method from Wu and co-workers uses 1,5-H-abstraction, followed by addition to DABSO and cyclization to give 1H-benzo[d][1,2]thiazine 2,2-dioxide products.[97]


Metal-catalyzed SET can be used to generate N-centered radicals from N-acyl oximes by N–O bond homolysis. Ring opening results in a C-centered radical, and addition to SO2 then generates a sulfonyl radical. Wu and co-workers used this method with a variety of radical traps, such as 2H-azirine,[98] to prepare sulfone products containing a nitrile functional group (Scheme [34], B).[99]
#
# 6
Conclusion
Whilst gaseous SO2 is cheap and widely available, and the molecular orbital properties of SO2 enable a variety of reactivity, its synthetic use has been limited. The introduction of DABSO as an SO2 surrogate has enabled the rapid development of a broad range of new methods for the preparation of valuable pharmaceutically relevant products. These include the versatile syntheses of many diverse functional groups, or the preparation of complex sulfonyl-containing products. Whilst other SO2 surrogates, such as inorganic metal sulfites, are also used by synthetic organic chemists, DABSO remains a popular choice, and new methods continue to be reported in the literature.
#
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
References
- 1a Ye S, Yang M, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 4145
- 1b Patel BK, Sahoo AK, Dahiya A, Rakshit A. SynOpen 2021; 5: 232
- 1c Emmett EJ, Willis MC. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015; 4: 602
- 2a Divers E, Ogawa M. J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 1900; 77: 327
- 2b Divers E, Ogawa M. J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 1901; 79: 1099
- 3a Burg AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1943; 65: 1629
- 3b Christian SD, Grundnes J. Nature 1967; 214: 1111
- 3c Hata T, Kinumaki S. Nature 1964; 203: 1378
- 3d Faria DL. A, Santos PS. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1988; 19: 471
- 3e Kanamueller JM. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1971; 33: 4051
- 3f Santos PS, Lieder R. J. Mol. Struct. 1986; 144: 39
- 3g Byrd WE. Inorg. Chem. 1962; 1: 762
- 3h Oh JJ, Labarge MS, Matos J, Kampf JW, Hillig KW, Kuczkowski RL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 4732
- 3i Wong MW, Wiberg KB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 7527
- 3j De Faria DL. A, Santos PS. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1987; 25: 592
- 4 Eugene F, Langlois B, Laurent E. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 2599
- 5 Santos PS, Mello MT. S. J. Mol. Struct. 1988; 178: 121
- 6 Nguyen B, Emmett EJ, Willis MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 16372
- 7 Bischoff L, Martial L. Org. Synth. 2013; 90: 301
- 8 Van Mileghem S, De Borggraeve WM. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2017; 21: 785
- 9 Woolven H, González-Rodríguez C, Marco I, Thompson AL, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 4876
- 10a Hamada T, Yonemitsu O. Synthesis 1986; 852
- 10b Pandya R, Murashima T, Tedeschi L, Barrett AG. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 8274
- 10c Wu J.-P, Emeigh J, Su X.-P. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 1223
- 10d Truce WE, Lyons JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951; 73: 126
- 11 Leontiev AV, Rasika Dias HV, Rudkevich DM. Chem. Commun. 2006; 2887
- 12 Martial L, Bischoff L. Synlett 2015; 26: 1225
- 13 Waldmann C, Schober O, Haufe G, Kopka K. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2954
- 14 Deeming AS, Russell CJ, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 1168
- 15 Deeming AS, Russell CJ, Hennessy AJ, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 150
- 16 Rocke BN, Bahnck KB, Herr M, Lavergne S, Mascitti V, Perreault C, Polivkova J, Shavnya A. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 154
- 17 Chen CC, Waser J. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 736
- 18 Emmett EJ, Hayter BR, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 12679
- 19 Cacchi S, Fabrizi G, Goggiamani A, Parisi LM, Bernini R. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 5608
- 20 Lenstra DC, Vedovato V, Ferrer Flegeau E, Maydom J, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 2086
- 21 Lo PK. T, Oliver GA, Willis MC. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 5753
- 22 Wang T, Wang F, Shen J, Pang T, Ren Y, Wu B, Zhang X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018; 59: 1183
- 23 Zhang C, Huang J, Ye S, Tang J, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 13852
- 24 Zhang C, Zhang C, Tang J, Ye S, Ma M, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021; 363: 3109
- 25 Tsai AS, Curto JM, Rocke BN, Dechert-Schmitt A.-MR, Ingle GK, Mascitti V. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 508
- 26a Mingos DM. P. Transition Met. Chem. 1978; 3: 1
- 26b Li J, Rogachev AY. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015; 17: 1987
- 27 Gleu K, Breuel W, Rehm K. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1938; 235: 201
- 28a Vaska L, Bath SS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966; 88: 1333
- 28b Vaska L, Catone DL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966; 88: 5324
- 28c Levison JJ, Robinson SD. Chem. Commun. (London) 1967; 198
- 28d Kubas GJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994; 27: 183
- 28e Schenk WA. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987; 26: 98
- 28f Kubas GJ. Inorg. Chem. 1979; 18: 182
- 29a Barnard CF. J. Organometallics 2008; 27: 5402
- 29b Brennführer A, Neumann H, Beller M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 4114
- 30 Klein HS. Chem. Commun. (London) 1968; 377
- 31a Keim W, Herwig J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993; 1592
- 31b Herwig J, Keim W. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994; 222: 381
- 31c Keim W, Herwig J, Pelzer G. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 422
- 31d Wojcinski LM, Boyer MT, Sen A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998; 270: 8
- 31e Dzhemilev UM, Kunakova RV. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993; 455: 1
- 32 Pelzer G, Keim W. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999; 139: 235
- 33 Emmett EJ, Richards-Taylor CS, Nguyen B, Garcia-Rubia A, Hayter BR, Willis MC. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 4007
- 34 Richards-Taylor CS, Blakemore DC, Willis MC. Chem. Sci. 2014; 5: 222
- 35 Richards-Taylor CS, Willis MC. Tetrahedron 2021; 83: 131988
- 36 Ye S, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 7753
- 37 Ye S, Wang H, Xiao Q, Ding Q, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014; 356: 3225
- 38 Emmett EJ, Hayter BR, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 10204
- 39 Shavnya A, Coffey SB, Smith AC, Mascitti V. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 6226
- 40 Willis M, Flegeau E, Harrison J. Synlett 2015; 27: 101
- 41 Bajohr J, Diallo AG, Whyte A, Gaillard S, Renaud J.-L, Lautens M. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 2797
- 42a Dong J, Krasnova L, Finn MG, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 9430
- 42b Barrow AS, Smedley CJ, Zheng Q, Li S, Dong J, Moses JE. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019; 48: 4731
- 43 Davies AT, Curto JM, Bagley SW, Willis MC. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 1233
- 44 Lou TS. B, Bagley SW, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 18859
- 45 Deeming AS, Russell CJ, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 747
- 46 Vedovato V, Talbot EP. A, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 5493
- 47 Zhu H, Shen Y, Deng Q, Huang C, Tu T. Chem. Asian J. 2017; 12: 706
- 48 Wang X, Xue L, Wang Z. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 4056
- 49a Zheng D, Chen M, Yao L, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 985
- 49b Zheng D, Mao R, Li Z, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 359
- 50 Lo PK. T, Chen Y, Willis MC. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 10668
- 51 Gulbe K, Turks MR. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 5660
- 52 Chen Y, Willis MC. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 3249
- 53 Adenot A, Anthore-Dalion L, Nicolas E, Berthet J.-C, Thuéry P, Cantat T. Chem. Eur. J. 2021; 27: 18047
- 54 Chen Y, Murray PR. D, Davies AT, Willis MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 841
- 55a Reed CF. US 2046090A, 1936
- 55b Meerwein H, Dittmar G, Göllner R, Hafner K, Mensch F, Steinfort O. Chem. Ber. 1957; 90: 841
- 56 Dong DQ, Han QQ, Yang SH, Song JC, Li N, Wang ZL, Xu XM. ChemistrySelect 2020; 5: 13103
- 57a Qiu G, Zhou K, Gao L, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 691
- 57b Hofman K, Liu N.-W, Manolikakes G. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 11852
- 57c Ye S, Li X, Xie W, Wu J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 1274
- 58 Zheng D, An Y, Li Z, Wu J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 2451
- 59a Liu X, Li W, Zheng D, Fan X, Wu J. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 3359
- 59b Zheng D, Kuang Y, Wu J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 10370
- 59c Sheng J, Li Y, Qiu G. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 95
- 60 Zheng D, Li Y, An Y, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 8886
- 61 An Y, Zheng D, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 11746
- 62 Fan W, Su J, Shi D, Feng B. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 6740
- 63 Mao R, Yuan Z, Zhang R, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 1498
- 64 Zheng D, Yu J, Wu J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 11925
- 65 Das P, Das S, Varalaxmi K, Jana R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021; 363: 575
- 66a Zhang J, An Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 9477
- 66b Zhou K, Zhang J, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 7459
- 66c Kumar M, Ahmed R, Singh M, Sharma S, Thatikonda T, Singh PP. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 716
- 66d Jakkampudi S, Sakkani N, Zhao JC. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021; 76: 153229
- 67a Herrera F, Luna A, Almendros P. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 9490
- 67b Zhu T.-H, Zhang X.-C, Zhao K, Loh T.-P. Org. Chem. Front. 2019; 6: 94
- 67c Zhu TH, Zhang XC, Cui XL, Zhang ZY, Jiang H, Sun SS, Zhao LL, Zhao K, Loh TP. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019; 361: 3593
- 68 Liu T, Zheng D, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Chem. Asian J. 2017; 12: 465
- 69a Xiang Y, Kuang Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 6996
- 69b Yu J, Mao R, Wang Q, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 617
- 69c He F.-S, Wu Y, Zhang J, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2940
- 69d Zong Y, Lang Y, Yang M, Li X, Fan X, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 1935
- 70a Zhang J, Zhou K, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 813
- 70b Zhou K, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 1121
- 70c Liu T, Zheng D, Li Z, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 865
- 70d Zhou K, Zhang J, Qiu G, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 275
- 70e He FS, Cen X, Yang S, Zhang J, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2437
- 71a Wang H, Sun S, Cheng J. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 5844
- 71b Liu T, Zheng D, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 1079
- 71c Wang Y, Deng L, Zhou J, Wang X, Mei H, Han J, Pan Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1060
- 71d Wang H, Wang B, Sun S, Cheng J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2547
- 71e Wang X, Li Y, Qiu G, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2555
- 71f Zhang J, Zhang F, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 3891
- 71g Chen H, Liu M, Qiu G, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019; 361: 146
- 71h Yao Y, Yin Z, He F.-S, Qin X, Xie W, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2021; 57: 2883
- 72a Zhou K, Chen M, Yao L, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 371
- 72b Li G, Gan Z, Kong K, Dou X, Yang D. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019; 361: 1808
- 72c Nair AM, Kumar S, Halder I, Volla CM. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 5897
- 73 Liu T, Zheng D, Li Z, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 2653
- 74 Zhang F, Zheng D, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 1167
- 75a Liu T, Zhou W, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 6638
- 75b Li G.-H, Dong D.-Q, Deng Q, Yan S.-Q, Wang Z.-L. Synthesis 2019; 51: 3313
- 76a Wang Y, Deng L, Deng Y, Han J. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 4674
- 76b Idris MA, Lee S. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 4516
- 77 Liu Y, Yu D, Guo Y, Xiao J.-C, Chen Q.-Y, Liu C. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 2281
- 78 Li Y, Zheng D, Li Z, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 574
- 79 Zhou K, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 865
- 80a Gong X, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 2999
- 80b Zhou K, Liu JB, Xie W, Ye S, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 2554
- 80c Ye S, Zhou K, Rojsitthisak P, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2020; 7: 14
- 81 Du B, Wang Y, Sha W, Qian P, Mei H, Han J, Pan Y. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017; 6: 153
- 82 Zhang J, Xie W, Ye S, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2019; 6: 2254
- 83 Gong X, Chen J, Liu J, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 2221
- 84a Sun D, Yin K, Zhang R. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 1335
- 84b Breton-Patient C, Naud-Martin D, Mahuteau-Betzer F, Piguel S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 6653
- 85a Chen Z, Liu N.-W, Bolte M, Ren H, Manolikakes G. Green Chem. 2018; 20: 3059
- 85b Liu N.-W, Chen Z, Herbert A, Ren H, Manolikakes G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 5725
- 86 Liu T, Li Y, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 3605
- 87a Liu T, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 3153
- 87b Ye S, Li X, Xie W, Wu J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2019; 8: 893
- 88 Wang X, Li H, Qiu G, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 2062
- 89 Wang X, Yang M, Xie W, Fan X, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 6010
- 90 Xiang Y, Li Y, Kuang Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 1032
- 91 Li Y, Xiang Y, Li Z, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 1493
- 92 Liu Y, Lin Q, Xiao Z, Zheng C, Guo Y, Chen Q.-Y, Liu C. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 1824
- 93 Andrews JA, Pantaine LR. E, Palmer CF, Poole DL, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 8488
- 94 Nguyen VT, Haug GC, Nguyen VD, Vuong NT. H, Arman HD, Larionov OV. Chem. Sci. 2021; 12: 6429
- 95 Cao S, Hong W, Ye Z, Gong L. Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 2377
- 96 Mao R, Yuan Z, Li Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 8176
- 97 Li Y, Mao R, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 4472
- 98 Zhang J, Yang M, Liu J.-B, He F.-S, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 3225
- 99 Tu X, Huang J, Xie W, Zhu T, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2021; 8: 1789
Corresponding Author
Publication History
Received: 01 November 2021
Accepted after revision: 24 November 2021
Article published online:
20 January 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1a Ye S, Yang M, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 4145
- 1b Patel BK, Sahoo AK, Dahiya A, Rakshit A. SynOpen 2021; 5: 232
- 1c Emmett EJ, Willis MC. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015; 4: 602
- 2a Divers E, Ogawa M. J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 1900; 77: 327
- 2b Divers E, Ogawa M. J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 1901; 79: 1099
- 3a Burg AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1943; 65: 1629
- 3b Christian SD, Grundnes J. Nature 1967; 214: 1111
- 3c Hata T, Kinumaki S. Nature 1964; 203: 1378
- 3d Faria DL. A, Santos PS. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1988; 19: 471
- 3e Kanamueller JM. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1971; 33: 4051
- 3f Santos PS, Lieder R. J. Mol. Struct. 1986; 144: 39
- 3g Byrd WE. Inorg. Chem. 1962; 1: 762
- 3h Oh JJ, Labarge MS, Matos J, Kampf JW, Hillig KW, Kuczkowski RL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 4732
- 3i Wong MW, Wiberg KB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 7527
- 3j De Faria DL. A, Santos PS. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1987; 25: 592
- 4 Eugene F, Langlois B, Laurent E. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 2599
- 5 Santos PS, Mello MT. S. J. Mol. Struct. 1988; 178: 121
- 6 Nguyen B, Emmett EJ, Willis MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 16372
- 7 Bischoff L, Martial L. Org. Synth. 2013; 90: 301
- 8 Van Mileghem S, De Borggraeve WM. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2017; 21: 785
- 9 Woolven H, González-Rodríguez C, Marco I, Thompson AL, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 4876
- 10a Hamada T, Yonemitsu O. Synthesis 1986; 852
- 10b Pandya R, Murashima T, Tedeschi L, Barrett AG. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 8274
- 10c Wu J.-P, Emeigh J, Su X.-P. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 1223
- 10d Truce WE, Lyons JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951; 73: 126
- 11 Leontiev AV, Rasika Dias HV, Rudkevich DM. Chem. Commun. 2006; 2887
- 12 Martial L, Bischoff L. Synlett 2015; 26: 1225
- 13 Waldmann C, Schober O, Haufe G, Kopka K. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2954
- 14 Deeming AS, Russell CJ, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 1168
- 15 Deeming AS, Russell CJ, Hennessy AJ, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 150
- 16 Rocke BN, Bahnck KB, Herr M, Lavergne S, Mascitti V, Perreault C, Polivkova J, Shavnya A. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 154
- 17 Chen CC, Waser J. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 736
- 18 Emmett EJ, Hayter BR, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 12679
- 19 Cacchi S, Fabrizi G, Goggiamani A, Parisi LM, Bernini R. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 5608
- 20 Lenstra DC, Vedovato V, Ferrer Flegeau E, Maydom J, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 2086
- 21 Lo PK. T, Oliver GA, Willis MC. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 5753
- 22 Wang T, Wang F, Shen J, Pang T, Ren Y, Wu B, Zhang X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018; 59: 1183
- 23 Zhang C, Huang J, Ye S, Tang J, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 13852
- 24 Zhang C, Zhang C, Tang J, Ye S, Ma M, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021; 363: 3109
- 25 Tsai AS, Curto JM, Rocke BN, Dechert-Schmitt A.-MR, Ingle GK, Mascitti V. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 508
- 26a Mingos DM. P. Transition Met. Chem. 1978; 3: 1
- 26b Li J, Rogachev AY. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015; 17: 1987
- 27 Gleu K, Breuel W, Rehm K. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1938; 235: 201
- 28a Vaska L, Bath SS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966; 88: 1333
- 28b Vaska L, Catone DL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966; 88: 5324
- 28c Levison JJ, Robinson SD. Chem. Commun. (London) 1967; 198
- 28d Kubas GJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994; 27: 183
- 28e Schenk WA. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987; 26: 98
- 28f Kubas GJ. Inorg. Chem. 1979; 18: 182
- 29a Barnard CF. J. Organometallics 2008; 27: 5402
- 29b Brennführer A, Neumann H, Beller M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 4114
- 30 Klein HS. Chem. Commun. (London) 1968; 377
- 31a Keim W, Herwig J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993; 1592
- 31b Herwig J, Keim W. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994; 222: 381
- 31c Keim W, Herwig J, Pelzer G. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 422
- 31d Wojcinski LM, Boyer MT, Sen A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998; 270: 8
- 31e Dzhemilev UM, Kunakova RV. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993; 455: 1
- 32 Pelzer G, Keim W. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999; 139: 235
- 33 Emmett EJ, Richards-Taylor CS, Nguyen B, Garcia-Rubia A, Hayter BR, Willis MC. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 4007
- 34 Richards-Taylor CS, Blakemore DC, Willis MC. Chem. Sci. 2014; 5: 222
- 35 Richards-Taylor CS, Willis MC. Tetrahedron 2021; 83: 131988
- 36 Ye S, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 7753
- 37 Ye S, Wang H, Xiao Q, Ding Q, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014; 356: 3225
- 38 Emmett EJ, Hayter BR, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 10204
- 39 Shavnya A, Coffey SB, Smith AC, Mascitti V. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 6226
- 40 Willis M, Flegeau E, Harrison J. Synlett 2015; 27: 101
- 41 Bajohr J, Diallo AG, Whyte A, Gaillard S, Renaud J.-L, Lautens M. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 2797
- 42a Dong J, Krasnova L, Finn MG, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 9430
- 42b Barrow AS, Smedley CJ, Zheng Q, Li S, Dong J, Moses JE. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019; 48: 4731
- 43 Davies AT, Curto JM, Bagley SW, Willis MC. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 1233
- 44 Lou TS. B, Bagley SW, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 18859
- 45 Deeming AS, Russell CJ, Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 747
- 46 Vedovato V, Talbot EP. A, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 5493
- 47 Zhu H, Shen Y, Deng Q, Huang C, Tu T. Chem. Asian J. 2017; 12: 706
- 48 Wang X, Xue L, Wang Z. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 4056
- 49a Zheng D, Chen M, Yao L, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 985
- 49b Zheng D, Mao R, Li Z, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 359
- 50 Lo PK. T, Chen Y, Willis MC. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 10668
- 51 Gulbe K, Turks MR. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 5660
- 52 Chen Y, Willis MC. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 3249
- 53 Adenot A, Anthore-Dalion L, Nicolas E, Berthet J.-C, Thuéry P, Cantat T. Chem. Eur. J. 2021; 27: 18047
- 54 Chen Y, Murray PR. D, Davies AT, Willis MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 841
- 55a Reed CF. US 2046090A, 1936
- 55b Meerwein H, Dittmar G, Göllner R, Hafner K, Mensch F, Steinfort O. Chem. Ber. 1957; 90: 841
- 56 Dong DQ, Han QQ, Yang SH, Song JC, Li N, Wang ZL, Xu XM. ChemistrySelect 2020; 5: 13103
- 57a Qiu G, Zhou K, Gao L, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 691
- 57b Hofman K, Liu N.-W, Manolikakes G. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 11852
- 57c Ye S, Li X, Xie W, Wu J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 1274
- 58 Zheng D, An Y, Li Z, Wu J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 2451
- 59a Liu X, Li W, Zheng D, Fan X, Wu J. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 3359
- 59b Zheng D, Kuang Y, Wu J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 10370
- 59c Sheng J, Li Y, Qiu G. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 95
- 60 Zheng D, Li Y, An Y, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 8886
- 61 An Y, Zheng D, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 11746
- 62 Fan W, Su J, Shi D, Feng B. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 6740
- 63 Mao R, Yuan Z, Zhang R, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 1498
- 64 Zheng D, Yu J, Wu J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 11925
- 65 Das P, Das S, Varalaxmi K, Jana R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021; 363: 575
- 66a Zhang J, An Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 9477
- 66b Zhou K, Zhang J, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 7459
- 66c Kumar M, Ahmed R, Singh M, Sharma S, Thatikonda T, Singh PP. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 716
- 66d Jakkampudi S, Sakkani N, Zhao JC. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021; 76: 153229
- 67a Herrera F, Luna A, Almendros P. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 9490
- 67b Zhu T.-H, Zhang X.-C, Zhao K, Loh T.-P. Org. Chem. Front. 2019; 6: 94
- 67c Zhu TH, Zhang XC, Cui XL, Zhang ZY, Jiang H, Sun SS, Zhao LL, Zhao K, Loh TP. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019; 361: 3593
- 68 Liu T, Zheng D, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Chem. Asian J. 2017; 12: 465
- 69a Xiang Y, Kuang Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 6996
- 69b Yu J, Mao R, Wang Q, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 617
- 69c He F.-S, Wu Y, Zhang J, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2940
- 69d Zong Y, Lang Y, Yang M, Li X, Fan X, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 1935
- 70a Zhang J, Zhou K, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 813
- 70b Zhou K, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 1121
- 70c Liu T, Zheng D, Li Z, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 865
- 70d Zhou K, Zhang J, Qiu G, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 275
- 70e He FS, Cen X, Yang S, Zhang J, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2437
- 71a Wang H, Sun S, Cheng J. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 5844
- 71b Liu T, Zheng D, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 1079
- 71c Wang Y, Deng L, Zhou J, Wang X, Mei H, Han J, Pan Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1060
- 71d Wang H, Wang B, Sun S, Cheng J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2547
- 71e Wang X, Li Y, Qiu G, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2555
- 71f Zhang J, Zhang F, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 3891
- 71g Chen H, Liu M, Qiu G, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019; 361: 146
- 71h Yao Y, Yin Z, He F.-S, Qin X, Xie W, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2021; 57: 2883
- 72a Zhou K, Chen M, Yao L, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 371
- 72b Li G, Gan Z, Kong K, Dou X, Yang D. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019; 361: 1808
- 72c Nair AM, Kumar S, Halder I, Volla CM. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 5897
- 73 Liu T, Zheng D, Li Z, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 2653
- 74 Zhang F, Zheng D, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 1167
- 75a Liu T, Zhou W, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 6638
- 75b Li G.-H, Dong D.-Q, Deng Q, Yan S.-Q, Wang Z.-L. Synthesis 2019; 51: 3313
- 76a Wang Y, Deng L, Deng Y, Han J. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 4674
- 76b Idris MA, Lee S. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 4516
- 77 Liu Y, Yu D, Guo Y, Xiao J.-C, Chen Q.-Y, Liu C. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 2281
- 78 Li Y, Zheng D, Li Z, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 574
- 79 Zhou K, Xia H, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 865
- 80a Gong X, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 2999
- 80b Zhou K, Liu JB, Xie W, Ye S, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 2554
- 80c Ye S, Zhou K, Rojsitthisak P, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2020; 7: 14
- 81 Du B, Wang Y, Sha W, Qian P, Mei H, Han J, Pan Y. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017; 6: 153
- 82 Zhang J, Xie W, Ye S, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2019; 6: 2254
- 83 Gong X, Chen J, Liu J, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 2221
- 84a Sun D, Yin K, Zhang R. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 1335
- 84b Breton-Patient C, Naud-Martin D, Mahuteau-Betzer F, Piguel S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 6653
- 85a Chen Z, Liu N.-W, Bolte M, Ren H, Manolikakes G. Green Chem. 2018; 20: 3059
- 85b Liu N.-W, Chen Z, Herbert A, Ren H, Manolikakes G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 5725
- 86 Liu T, Li Y, Lai L, Cheng J, Sun J, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 3605
- 87a Liu T, Ding Y, Fan X, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 3153
- 87b Ye S, Li X, Xie W, Wu J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2019; 8: 893
- 88 Wang X, Li H, Qiu G, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 2062
- 89 Wang X, Yang M, Xie W, Fan X, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 6010
- 90 Xiang Y, Li Y, Kuang Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 1032
- 91 Li Y, Xiang Y, Li Z, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 1493
- 92 Liu Y, Lin Q, Xiao Z, Zheng C, Guo Y, Chen Q.-Y, Liu C. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 1824
- 93 Andrews JA, Pantaine LR. E, Palmer CF, Poole DL, Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 8488
- 94 Nguyen VT, Haug GC, Nguyen VD, Vuong NT. H, Arman HD, Larionov OV. Chem. Sci. 2021; 12: 6429
- 95 Cao S, Hong W, Ye Z, Gong L. Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 2377
- 96 Mao R, Yuan Z, Li Y, Wu J. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 8176
- 97 Li Y, Mao R, Wu J. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 4472
- 98 Zhang J, Yang M, Liu J.-B, He F.-S, Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 3225
- 99 Tu X, Huang J, Xie W, Zhu T, Wu J. Org. Chem. Front. 2021; 8: 1789





































































