Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1707246
Direct Deoxygenative Intramolecular Acylation of Biarylcarboxylic Acids
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21971108, 21971111, 21702098, 21732003 and 21672099), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20190006), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 020514380176), Jiangsu Six Peak Talent Project, and start-up funds from Nanjing University for financial support.
Publication History
Received: 23 June 2020
Accepted after revision: 19 July 2020
Publication Date:
21 August 2020 (online)
Published as part of the Cluster Radicals – by Young Chinese Organic Chemists
Abstract
A photocatalyzed intramolecular cyclization is developed for the synthesis of fluorenones. In this photoredox reaction, triphenylphosphine is used as an inexpensive and effective deoxygenative reagent for biarylcarboxylic acids to give acyl radicals, which quickly undergo intramolecular radical cyclization. Reactions in the presence of air and continuous flow photoredox technology demonstrate the generality and practicality of this process.
#
Key words
photocatalytic - deoxygenation - triphenylphosphine - radical cyclization - flow chemistryFluorenone is a cornerstone in photoelectric materials and biologically active molecules (Figure [1]).[1] Recently, fluorenones have been successfully applied as hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) catalysts in organic synthesis.[2] Hence, the construction of the fluorenone skeleton is of significant importance and has gained considerable attention. They are typically prepared via the classical Friedel–Crafts acylation of the corresponding acids,[3] however, the method suffers from the use of strong and excess acids, poor functional group tolerance and incompatibility with electron-rich arenes. Recently, when using strong oxidants as HAT reagents, such as K2S2O4 and t-BuOOH, aldehydes and α-keto acids have been found to undergo dehydrogenation or decarboxylation to generate nucleophilic acyl radicals, triggering the desired transformation.[4] Alternatively, cycloaddition reactions,[5] oxidation of fluorenones or fluorenes[6] and cyclocarbonylation[7] can also be used to prepare fluorenones. However, high temperatures and the use of excess oxidants are disadvantages of these processes.


Carboxylic acids are abundant in nature and have been successfully used as acyl precursors.[8] In 2014, a rhodium-catalyzed intramolecular acylation of 2-aryl acids was developed to synthesize fluorenones through an acylrhodium species at a temperature of 160 °C (Scheme [1, a]).[9] During the last decade, photoredox catalysis has proven to be a valuable and powerful method for the development of new chemical reactions that involve single-electron transfer (SET) processes.[10] Previously, our group developed a photoredox catalytic decarboxylation of anhydrides generated from biarylcarboxylic acids and dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC).[11] Recently, our group disclosed the first direct and practical deoxygenation of acids (as acyl sources) with triphenylphosphine.[12] This powerful strategy has been applied in direct deoxygenative ketone synthesis, deoxygenative deuteration and deoxygenative arylation. Similar deoxygenative pathways were also applied in organic transformations by Doyle[13] and others.[14] As ongoing research, we report a photoredox intramolecular cyclization of biarylcarboxylic acids using cheap and stable Ph3P as a deoxygenation reagent (Scheme [1, b]). This study provides a practical and straightforward protocol for the preparation of fluorenone scaffolds under air conditions, and further enhances its utility in synthetic applications utilizing continuous flow synthesis.


We started our investigations on the direct deoxygenative acylation with 2-phenylbenzoic acid (1a) as a model substrate. The optimized reaction conditions were determined to be Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 (2 mol%) as the photocatalyst, PPh3 (3.0 equiv) as the deoxygenative reagent, together with K2CO3 (0.75 equiv) as the inorganic base in DCE under blue LEDs at room temperature (Table [1], entry 1). The target product, 9H-fluoren-9-one (2a), was obtained in 70% isolated yield. Replacing Ph3P with Ph2POMe or P(OEt)3 resulted in none of the desired product being detected (entries 2 and 3). Other inorganic base led to lower yields (entries 4 and 5). A lower oxidation potential photocatalyst, Ir[dF(Me)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 [1/2 E red (*IrIII/IrII) = +0.97 V vs SCE; τ = 1.2 μs],[15] resulted in a slightly decreased yield (entry 6). Control experiments showed that PPh3, air, light and the photocatalyst all play a crucial role in the reaction (entries 7–9).
a Standard reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 (2 mol%), Ph3P (3.0 equiv), K2CO3 (0.75 equiv), DCE (2 mL), 2 blue LEDs (45 W), 24 h, rt, under air.
b Isolated yield; nd = not detected.


With optimized reaction conditions in hand, the scope of the reaction was investigated. The versatility of this cyclization reaction with different substrates and the generality of the strategy is demonstrated by the examples shown in Figure [2].[16] Acids 1 with substituents on the Ar2 ring were initially examined in this cyclization reaction and they can afford the desired products (2a–2o) in moderate to good yields. Substrates with electron-donating substituents [methyl (1b), methoxy (1c) and tert-butyl (1d)] or with an electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl substituent (1h) were found to undergo efficient intramolecular acylation to give the corresponding products 2b–d,h. Biarylcarboxylic acids with halogen substituents (1e–g,n) also reacted in good yields. Two disubstituted substrates (1i,j) also showed good activity, whilst acid 1k with an ortho-Cl substituent was also compatible. When a halogen was located at the meta-position of the Ar2 ring (1n), the reaction proceeded smoothly with good regioselectivity to afford product 2n. In addition, an acid with an electron-withdrawing group (1l) on the Ar1 ring gave a higher yield of the corresponding product 2l compared with an acid possessing an electron-donating group (1m) on the same aryl ring. Heteroaromatic acid 1o was converted into the desired fluorenone 2o in an acceptable 64% yield.
Continuous flow technology has attracted more and more attention in recent years,[17] and shows some significant advantages over conventional batch reactions, including the in situ formation and direct use of reaction intermediates, convenience of temperature control, increased reaction contact area, and ease of amplification. Hence, the model reactant 1a was used to study this intramolecular cyclization reaction under continuous flow conditions. The direct deoxygenative intramolecular acylation can be scaled up to 1 mmol with lower loading of the photocatalyst by the use of continuous micro-tubing reactors,[18] which leads to enhanced utility in synthetic applications (Scheme [2]).


To gain further insight into the cyclization, a radical-trapping experiment was conducted (Scheme [3]). In the presence of the radical inhibitor 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO), the reaction was completely inhibited and none of the desired product 2a was observed. Moreover, the corresponding acyl radical was trapped by TEMPO, which indicates that this transformation may involve radical intermediates.


Based on previous work[4c] [f] [12a] and the radical-trapping experiment with TEMPO, a plausible reaction mechanism is proposed (Scheme [4]). Under irradiation, the photoexcited catalyst *Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 [E 1/2 red (*IrIII/IrII) = +1.21 V vs SCE)] goes through a single-electron transfer (SET) process with PPh3 to give the radical cation 4, which quickly reacts with carboxylate anion 5 to produce the phosphoryl radical 6. Next, β-selective C(acyl)–O bond cleavage results in triphenylphosphine oxide being released. Subsequent cyclization then leads to the formation of intermediate 7. Under air, O2 can oxidize [IrII] to its ground state and close the photocatalytic cycle. The resulting O2 •– species would then oxidize 7 to give the final product 2a.


In summary, a green, mild and simple method to access fluorenone derivatives is described. A number of substituted fluorenones[17] have been synthesized via this process, which may have potential as luminescent materials. Continuous flow chemistry[18] was successfully applied in this deoxygenative intramolecular acylation, showing the potential for scale-up and possible industrialization of the process. Further studies on the cyclization of aliphatic carboxylic acids are underway in our laboratory.
#
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0040-1707246.
- Supporting Information
-
References
- 1a Krueger RF. M, Gerald D. Science 1970; 169: 1213
- 1b Uckert F, Tak Y.-H, Müllen K, Bässler H. Adv. Mater. 2000; 12: 905
- 1c Qin C, Islam A, Han L. J. Mater. Chem. 2012; 22: 19236
- 1d Gao H, Wang S, Qi Y, He G, Qiang B, Wang S, Zhang H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019; 29: 126724
- 1e Patel A, Shaikh M, Chikhalia K. Tetrahedron 2019; 75: 236
- 2 Davidsen JM, Bartley DM, Townsend CA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 1749
- 3a Gore PH. Chem. Rev. 1955; 55: 229
- 3b Wade LG. Jr, Acker KJ, Earl RA, Osteryoung RA. J. Org. Chem. 1979; 44: 3724
- 3c Shabashov D, Maldonado JR. M, Daugulis O. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 7818
- 3d Motiwala HF, Vekariya RH, Aube J. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 5484
- 4a Seo S, Slater M, Greaney MF. Org. Lett. 2012; 51: 2650
- 4b Shi Z, Glorius F. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 829
- 4c Wertz S, Leifert D, Studer A. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 928
- 4d Laha JK, Jethava KP, Patel S, Patel KV. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 76
- 4e Laha JK, Patel KV, Dubey G, Jethava KP. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 2199
- 4f Tang J, Zhao S, Wei Y, Quan Z, Huo C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 1589
- 5a Atienza C, Mateo C, de Frutos Ó, Echavarren AM. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 153
- 5b Rodríguez D, Martínez-Esperón MF, Navarro-Vázquez A, Castedo L, Domínguez D, Saá C. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 3842
- 6a Bei X, Hagemeyer A, Volpe A, Saxton R, Turner H, Guram AS. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 8626
- 6b Catino AJ, Nichols JM, Choi H, Gottipamula S, Doyle MP. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5167
- 6c Yang G, Zhang Q, Miao H, Tong X, Xu J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 263
- 7a Campo MA, Larock RC. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 3675
- 7b Campo MA, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 5616
- 7c Liu L, Qiang J, Bai S, Li Y, Miao C, Li J. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017; 31: e3817
- 7d Konishi H, Futamata S, Wang X, Manabe K. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1805
- 7e Wei B, Zhang D, Chen YH, Lei A, Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 15631
- 8a Banerjee A, Lei Z, Ngai M.-Y. Synthesis 2019; 51: 303
- 8b Ruan L, Chen C, Zhang X, Sun J. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 38: 3155
- 8c Raviola C, Protti S, Ravelli D, Fagnoni M. Green Chem. 2019; 21: 748
- 9 Fukuyama T, Maetani S, Miyagawa K, Ryu I. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 3216
- 10a Shaw MH, Twilton J, MacMillan DW. C. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 6898
- 10b Twilton J, Le C, Zhang P, Shaw MH, Evans RW, MacMillan DW. C. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017; 1: 0052 ; DOI: 10.1038/s41570-017-0052
- 10c Xu W, Ma J, Yuan XA, Dai J, Xie J, Zhu C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 10357
- 10d Zhou N, Yuan XA, Zhao Y, Xie J, Zhu C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 3990
- 10e Xu W, Wang W, Liu T, Xie J, Zhu C. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 4867
- 10f Xie J, Li J, Wurn T, Weingand V, Sung H.-L, Rominger F, Rudolph M, Hashmi AS. K. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 841
- 10g Wei Y, Zhou Q, Tan F, Lu L, Xiao W. Synthesis 2019; 51: 3021
- 10h Ma J, Xu W, Xie J. Sci. China Chem. 2020; 63: 187
- 10i Zhu C, Dong J, Liu X, Gao L, Zhao Y, Xie J, Li S, Zhu C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 12817
- 10j Yu X.-Y, Chen J.-R, Xiao W.-J. Chem. Rev. 2020;
- 11 Ruzi R, Zhang M, Ablajan K, Zhu C. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 12834
- 12a Zhang M, Xie J, Zhu C. Nat. Commun. 2018; 9: 3517
- 12b Zhang M, Yuan XA, Zhu C, Xie J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 312
- 12c Ruzi R, Liu K, Zhu C, Xie J. Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 3312
- 12d Ruzi R, Ma J, Yuan X.-A, Wang W, Wang S, Zhang M, Dai J, Xie J, Zhu C. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 12724
- 13a Stache EE, Ertel AB, Rovis T, Doyle AG. ACS Catal. 2018; 8: 11134
- 13b Martinez Alvarado JI, Ertel AB, Stegner A, Stache EE, Doyle AG. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9940
- 14a Jiang H, Mao G, Wu H, An Q, Zuo M, Guo W, Xu C, Sun Z, Chu W. Green Chem. 2019; 21: 5368
- 14b Mao R, Bera S, Cheseaux A, Hu X. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 9555
- 14c Zhang L, Si X, Yang Y, Witzel S, Sekine K, Rudolph M, Rominger F, Hashmi AS. K. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 6118
- 14d Xia P, Ye Z, Hu Y, Song D, Xiang H, Chen X, Yang H. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 2658
- 15 Day JI, Teegardin K, Weaver J, Chan J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016; 20: 1156
- 16
Fluorenones 2a–o; General Procedure Biarylcarboxylic acid 1 (0.1 mmol), Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 (2.3 mg, 0.02 mmol), Ph3P (78.6 mg, 0.3 mmol), K2CO3 (10.4 mg, 0.075 mmol) and DCE (2 mL) were added to a 10 mL Schlenk tube equipped
with a magnetic stir bar. The tube was placed at a distance of ~5 cm from 2 blue LEDs
(45 W) under air, and the resulting solution was stirred for 24 h. After the reaction
was complete (monitored by TLC), the mixture was concentrated under vacuum to remove
DCE and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc
= 20:1 to 5:1) to afford the product 2. 9H-Fluoren-9-one (2a) Compound 2a (12.6 mg, 70%) was synthesized using the general procedure and isolated as a yellow
solid; mp 81–82 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.53–7.47 (m, 4 H), 7.29 (td,
J = 7.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 180.0 (100) [M+]. 2-Methyl-9H-fluoren-9-one (2b) Compound 2b (14 mg, 72%) was synthesized using the general procedure and isolated as a yellow
solid; mp 90–91 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.63 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.47–7.44 (m, 3 H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 2 H), 2.37 (s, 3 H). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 194.1 (100) [M+].
- 17 Rehm T. Chem. Eur. J. 2020;
- 18
Flow Chemistry; General Procedure Biarylcarboxylic acid 1a (198 mg, 1 mmol), PPh3 (786 mg, 3 mmol), K2CO3 (69 mg, 0.5 mmol, 120 mesh), and Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 (11.7 mg, 0.01 mmol) were placed in a round-bottom flask (100 mL). DCE (30 mL) was
added under air and the mixture was pumped at a rate of 82 mL min–1 using a peristaltic pump under irradiation with 2 blue LEDs (45 W). After 8.5 h,
the reaction was complete. The mixture was concentrated under vacuum to remove DCE
and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc = 20:1
to 5:1) to afford the product 2a.
-
References
- 1a Krueger RF. M, Gerald D. Science 1970; 169: 1213
- 1b Uckert F, Tak Y.-H, Müllen K, Bässler H. Adv. Mater. 2000; 12: 905
- 1c Qin C, Islam A, Han L. J. Mater. Chem. 2012; 22: 19236
- 1d Gao H, Wang S, Qi Y, He G, Qiang B, Wang S, Zhang H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019; 29: 126724
- 1e Patel A, Shaikh M, Chikhalia K. Tetrahedron 2019; 75: 236
- 2 Davidsen JM, Bartley DM, Townsend CA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 1749
- 3a Gore PH. Chem. Rev. 1955; 55: 229
- 3b Wade LG. Jr, Acker KJ, Earl RA, Osteryoung RA. J. Org. Chem. 1979; 44: 3724
- 3c Shabashov D, Maldonado JR. M, Daugulis O. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 7818
- 3d Motiwala HF, Vekariya RH, Aube J. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 5484
- 4a Seo S, Slater M, Greaney MF. Org. Lett. 2012; 51: 2650
- 4b Shi Z, Glorius F. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 829
- 4c Wertz S, Leifert D, Studer A. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 928
- 4d Laha JK, Jethava KP, Patel S, Patel KV. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 76
- 4e Laha JK, Patel KV, Dubey G, Jethava KP. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 2199
- 4f Tang J, Zhao S, Wei Y, Quan Z, Huo C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 1589
- 5a Atienza C, Mateo C, de Frutos Ó, Echavarren AM. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 153
- 5b Rodríguez D, Martínez-Esperón MF, Navarro-Vázquez A, Castedo L, Domínguez D, Saá C. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 3842
- 6a Bei X, Hagemeyer A, Volpe A, Saxton R, Turner H, Guram AS. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 8626
- 6b Catino AJ, Nichols JM, Choi H, Gottipamula S, Doyle MP. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5167
- 6c Yang G, Zhang Q, Miao H, Tong X, Xu J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 263
- 7a Campo MA, Larock RC. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 3675
- 7b Campo MA, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 5616
- 7c Liu L, Qiang J, Bai S, Li Y, Miao C, Li J. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017; 31: e3817
- 7d Konishi H, Futamata S, Wang X, Manabe K. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1805
- 7e Wei B, Zhang D, Chen YH, Lei A, Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 15631
- 8a Banerjee A, Lei Z, Ngai M.-Y. Synthesis 2019; 51: 303
- 8b Ruan L, Chen C, Zhang X, Sun J. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 38: 3155
- 8c Raviola C, Protti S, Ravelli D, Fagnoni M. Green Chem. 2019; 21: 748
- 9 Fukuyama T, Maetani S, Miyagawa K, Ryu I. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 3216
- 10a Shaw MH, Twilton J, MacMillan DW. C. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 6898
- 10b Twilton J, Le C, Zhang P, Shaw MH, Evans RW, MacMillan DW. C. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017; 1: 0052 ; DOI: 10.1038/s41570-017-0052
- 10c Xu W, Ma J, Yuan XA, Dai J, Xie J, Zhu C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 10357
- 10d Zhou N, Yuan XA, Zhao Y, Xie J, Zhu C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 3990
- 10e Xu W, Wang W, Liu T, Xie J, Zhu C. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 4867
- 10f Xie J, Li J, Wurn T, Weingand V, Sung H.-L, Rominger F, Rudolph M, Hashmi AS. K. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 841
- 10g Wei Y, Zhou Q, Tan F, Lu L, Xiao W. Synthesis 2019; 51: 3021
- 10h Ma J, Xu W, Xie J. Sci. China Chem. 2020; 63: 187
- 10i Zhu C, Dong J, Liu X, Gao L, Zhao Y, Xie J, Li S, Zhu C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 12817
- 10j Yu X.-Y, Chen J.-R, Xiao W.-J. Chem. Rev. 2020;
- 11 Ruzi R, Zhang M, Ablajan K, Zhu C. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 12834
- 12a Zhang M, Xie J, Zhu C. Nat. Commun. 2018; 9: 3517
- 12b Zhang M, Yuan XA, Zhu C, Xie J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 312
- 12c Ruzi R, Liu K, Zhu C, Xie J. Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 3312
- 12d Ruzi R, Ma J, Yuan X.-A, Wang W, Wang S, Zhang M, Dai J, Xie J, Zhu C. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 12724
- 13a Stache EE, Ertel AB, Rovis T, Doyle AG. ACS Catal. 2018; 8: 11134
- 13b Martinez Alvarado JI, Ertel AB, Stegner A, Stache EE, Doyle AG. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9940
- 14a Jiang H, Mao G, Wu H, An Q, Zuo M, Guo W, Xu C, Sun Z, Chu W. Green Chem. 2019; 21: 5368
- 14b Mao R, Bera S, Cheseaux A, Hu X. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 9555
- 14c Zhang L, Si X, Yang Y, Witzel S, Sekine K, Rudolph M, Rominger F, Hashmi AS. K. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 6118
- 14d Xia P, Ye Z, Hu Y, Song D, Xiang H, Chen X, Yang H. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 2658
- 15 Day JI, Teegardin K, Weaver J, Chan J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016; 20: 1156
- 16
Fluorenones 2a–o; General Procedure Biarylcarboxylic acid 1 (0.1 mmol), Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 (2.3 mg, 0.02 mmol), Ph3P (78.6 mg, 0.3 mmol), K2CO3 (10.4 mg, 0.075 mmol) and DCE (2 mL) were added to a 10 mL Schlenk tube equipped
with a magnetic stir bar. The tube was placed at a distance of ~5 cm from 2 blue LEDs
(45 W) under air, and the resulting solution was stirred for 24 h. After the reaction
was complete (monitored by TLC), the mixture was concentrated under vacuum to remove
DCE and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc
= 20:1 to 5:1) to afford the product 2. 9H-Fluoren-9-one (2a) Compound 2a (12.6 mg, 70%) was synthesized using the general procedure and isolated as a yellow
solid; mp 81–82 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.53–7.47 (m, 4 H), 7.29 (td,
J = 7.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 180.0 (100) [M+]. 2-Methyl-9H-fluoren-9-one (2b) Compound 2b (14 mg, 72%) was synthesized using the general procedure and isolated as a yellow
solid; mp 90–91 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.63 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.47–7.44 (m, 3 H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 2 H), 2.37 (s, 3 H). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 194.1 (100) [M+].
- 17 Rehm T. Chem. Eur. J. 2020;
- 18
Flow Chemistry; General Procedure Biarylcarboxylic acid 1a (198 mg, 1 mmol), PPh3 (786 mg, 3 mmol), K2CO3 (69 mg, 0.5 mmol, 120 mesh), and Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 (11.7 mg, 0.01 mmol) were placed in a round-bottom flask (100 mL). DCE (30 mL) was
added under air and the mixture was pumped at a rate of 82 mL min–1 using a peristaltic pump under irradiation with 2 blue LEDs (45 W). After 8.5 h,
the reaction was complete. The mixture was concentrated under vacuum to remove DCE
and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc = 20:1
to 5:1) to afford the product 2a.












