Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1690130
Rhodium(III)-Catalyzed Cyclopropanation of Unactivated Olefins Initiated by C–H Activation
We thank the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS, Grant No. GM80442) for support.
Publication History
Received: 23 May 2019
Accepted after revision: 11 July 2019
Publication Date:
22 July 2019 (online)
Abstract
We have developed a rhodium(III)-catalyzed cyclopropanation of unactivated olefins initiated by an alkenyl C–H activation. A variety of 1,1-disubstituted olefins undergo efficient cyclopropanation with a slight excess of alkene stoichiometry. A series of mechanistic interrogations implicate a metal carbene as an intermediate.
#
The synthesis of cyclopropane-containing molecules has intrigued synthetic organic chemists for years because of their prevalence in synthetic targets[1] as well as their susceptibility as reactive intermediates.[2] A plethora of robust methods have been developed to afford cyclopropane motifs from alkenes. Generally, Simmons–Smith and diazo decomposition are regarded as the two most powerful methods for the cyclopropanation of alkenes.[3] [4] Simmons–Smith-type reactions are well-established to deliver cyclopropanes from unactivated olefins with high stereoselectivity; however, these methods are limited by the substitution pattern of the carbenoid reagent[5] and the stoichiometric use of zinc.[6] Rhodium-catalyzed diazo decomposition[7] has also provided complimentary reactivity to access stereodefined cyclopropanes[7] with a more diverse substitution pattern albeit with a notable shortcoming: many of these methods require the use of high-energy diazo compounds.[8]
N-Enoxyphthalimides constitute valuable alternatives to potentially explosive diazo compounds and pyrophoric organozinc reagents due to the mild conditions and the allure of C–H functionalization reactions (Scheme [1]).[9]


Our initial report in 2014 showed that aryl N-enoxyphthalimides undergo C–H activation and smoothly undergo [2+1] annulation with activated olefins bearing electron-withdrawing groups, affording trans-cyclopropanes in good yield and diastereoselectivity.[10] In a follow-up report, we demonstrated that tuning the electronic properties of the cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligand as well as the phthalimide ring affords access to the cis-cyclopropane scaffold.[11] N-Enoxyphthalimides are also competent reagents for 1,2-carboamination of activated alkenes.[12] Cramer and co-worker have rendered the trans-cyclopropanation reaction asymmetric by employing their chiral Cp ligand to provide trans-cyclopropanes in high e.r.[13] Most recently, we reported a strategy for a directed cyclopropanation of allylic alcohols.[14] The pendant hydroxyl group is necessary for both reactivity and diastereocontrol. In an effort to expand the scope of this transformation, we set out to examine cyclopropanation of unactivated olefins.
A slight modification of our previously developed reaction conditions proved optimal for a general method: [Cp*CF3RhCl2]2 as a pre-catalyst in the presence of 2 equivalents of CsOAc in TFE at room temperature affords cyclopropane 3 in good yield. Importantly, a stoichiometry of 1 equivalent of N-enoxyphthalimide 1 and 1.2 equivalents of unactivated olefin 2 is sufficient (Scheme [2]).


We began by examining 3-methylenepentane as a coupling partner and found modest reactivity as cyclopropane 3aa was afforded in 40% yield. A number of exocyclic alkenes proved to be excellent participants in this reaction giving a wide range of [2.n]spirocyclic ketones. We interrogated the effect of different size carbocycles ranging from four- to eight-membered rings (3ab–af). Notably, methylenecyclohexane gives [2.5]spirocycle 3ad in near quantitative yield. Both tosyl- and Boc-protected methylene piperidines display good reactivity affording cyclopropane 3ag in 72% and 3ah in 84% yield, respectively. Cyclopropanation of a methylene cyclohexane bearing a substituent at the 4-position proceeds efficiently, delivering cyclopropane 3ai in 97% yield and good diastereoselectivity (8.6:1 d.r.).[16]


Varying para- (3bd–dd) and meta- (3ed–gd) arene substitution on the enoxyphthalimide is tolerated, with each substrate displaying excellent yields. ortho-Fluorine-containing enoxyphthalimide delivers cyclopropane 3hd in 59% yield (Scheme [3]). Naphthyl enoxyphthalimide gives cyclopropane 3id in 67% yield. Finally, an alkyl-substituted N-enoxyphthalimide is also a competent substrate, affording cyclopropane 3jd in 98% yield.


Finally, we sought to interrogate the mechanism of this reaction (Scheme [4]). Subjecting 1a to the reaction conditions using TFE-d 1 leads to no deuterium incorporation upon re-isolation of 1a (Scheme [4], eq. 1) In another experiment, we subjected 1a and 2c to the reaction conditions again with TFE-d 1 that gives cyclopropane 3ac′ in 85% yield. From the analysis of the product, we observed a reversible deuterium exchange event at the α-position (54% D incorporation, Scheme [4], eq. 2). We next probed the role of the phthalimide ring by subjecting 1a to 2 equivalents of CsOAc in TFE and observed the formation of dioxazoline 4 in 59% yield, indicating TFE opens the phthalimide ring (Scheme [4], eq. 3). Finally, we subjected 4 to 2c and the reaction conditions. However, only trace product was observed indicating 4 does not significantly contribute as a competent reaction intermediate (Scheme [4], eq. 4). On the basis of these mechanistic experiments, we propose the mechanism shown in Scheme [5].


First, the pre-catalyst undergoes salt metathesis with CsOAc to form the active catalyst I. Concurrently, 1 is opened by the solvent to give II which then intercepts I, before dioxazoline 4 formation, and undergoes C–H activation via concerted metalation–deprotonation to afford intermediate III. At this stage, we believe intermediate III displays enolic character to reversibly wash in deuterium before ligand exchange of 2. After exchanging acetic acid for alkene that gives intermediate V, we propose the formation of a Rh-carbene, intermediate V, via cleavage of the N–O bond. Intermediate V then gives way to the desired cyclopropane product.
In summary, we have developed a Rh(III)-catalyzed cyclopropanation protocol for N-enoxyphthalimides and unactivated olefins. The N-enoxyphthalimide has been shown to undergo C–H activation that leads to a proposed metal carbene to induce a [2+1] annulation with alkenes that give a diverse range of cyclopropyl ketones in mild conditions.
#
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0039-1690130.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Chen DY.-K, Pouwer RH, Richard J.-A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 4631
- 1b Talele TT. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 59: 8712
- 2a Banwell MG, Edwards AJ, Jolliffe KA, Smith JA, Hamel E, Verdier-Pinard P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003; 1: 296
- 2b Newhouse TR, Kaib PS. J, Gross AW, Corey EJ. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1591
- 3a Doyle MP, Forbes DC. Chem. Rev. 1998; 98: 911
- 3b Davies HM. L, Antoulinakis EG. Org. React. 2004; 57: 1
- 4a Lebel H, Marcoux J.-F, Molinaro C, Charette AB. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 977
- 4b Charette AB, Beauchemin A. Org. React. 2004; 58: 1
- 5a Friedrich EC, Biresaw G. J. Org. Chem. 1982; 47: 1615
- 5b Stahl K.-J, Hertzsch W, Musso H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1985; 1474
- 5c Roberts C, Walton JC. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1985; 841
- 5d Motherwell WB, Roberts LR. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992; 1582
- 6a Dolbier JrW. R, Burkholder CR. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 589
- 6b Ilchenko NO, Hedberg M, Szabó KJ. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 1056
- 6c Werth J, Uyeda C. Chem. Sci. 2018; 9: 1604
- 7a Muthusamy S, Gunanathan C. Synlett 2003; 1599
- 7b Hilt G, Galbiati F. Synthesis 2006; 3589
- 7c Lindsay VN. G, Lin W, Charette AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 16383
- 7d Lindsay VN. G, Nicolas C, Charette AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 8972
- 7e Negretti S, Cohen CM, Chang JJ, Guptill GM, Davies HM. L. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 7415
- 7f Lehner V, Davies HM. L, Reiser O. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 4722
- 7g Sun G.-J, Gong J, Kang Q. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 796
- 7h Tindall DJ, Werlé C, Goddard R, Philipps P, Farès C, Fürstner A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 1884
- 7i Lindsay VN. G. Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed Cyclopropanation. In Rhodium Catalysis in Organic Synthesis: Methods and Reactions. Tanaka K. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2018: 433
- 8a Doyle MP, Hu W, Phillips IM, Moody CJ, Pepper AG, Slawin AG. Z. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001; 343: 112
- 8b Doyle MP, Hu W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001; 343: 299
- 8c Gharpure SJ, Shukla MK, Vijayasree U. Org. Lett. 2010; 11: 5466
- 8d Vanier SF, Larouche G, Wurz RP, Charette AB. Org. Lett. 2009; 12: 672
- 8e Nani RR, Reisman SE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 7304
- 8f Gu H, Huang S, Lin X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 1154
- 9a Doyle MP, Duffy R, Ratnikov M, Zhou L. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 704
- 9b Colby DA, Tsai AS, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012; 45: 814
- 9c Piou T, Rovis T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018; 51: 170
- 10 Piou T, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 11292
- 11 Piou T, Romanov-Michailidis F, Ashley MA, Romanova-Michaelides M, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 9587
- 12a Piou T, Rovis T. Nature 2015; 527: 86
- 12b Zhang Y, Liu H, Tang L, Tang H.-J, Wang L, Zhu C, Feng C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 10695
- 13 Duchemin C, Cramer N. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 2773
- 14 Phipps EJ. T, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 6807
- 15 General Procedure N-Enoxyphthalimide (0.1 mmol), catalyst [Cp*CF3RhCl2]2 (5 mol%, 0.005 mmol, 3.7 mg), and CsOAc (2 equiv, 0.2 mmol, 38.5 mg) were weighed in a 1-dram vial with a magnetic stir bar. TFE (0.2 M, 500 μL) was added followed by alkene (1.2 equiv, 0.12 mmol). The vial was sealed with a screw cap and stirred at room temperature for 12 h. Upon completion judged by TLC, the crude solution was diluted with EtOAc and partitioned with the addition of DI water. The aqueous layer was extracted three times with EtOAc, and the combined organic extracts were filtered through a pad of Celite® and Na2SO4 then concentrated. The crude residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 19:1) to afford the cyclopropane product.Compound 3ad: Purified by flash chromatography eluting with 5% EtOAc in hexanes; 21.0 mg, 98% yield, colorless oil, R f = 0.73 (4:1 hexanes/EtOAc). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.06–7.97 (m, 2 H), 7.59–7.51 (m, 1 H), 7.51–7.43 (m, 2 H), 2.51 (dd, J = 7.3, 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.70–1.39 (m, 10 H), 1.19 (dt, J = 12.6, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 0.95 (dd, J = 7.4, 4.0 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.4, 139.1, 132.5, 128.6, 128.2, 38.0, 35.6, 32.2, 28.48, 26.3, 26.2, 26.0, 21.5. IR (neat): 2921, 2850, 1664, 1447, 1396, 1216, 980, 718, 689 cm–1. LRMS (ESI APCI): m/z calcd for C15H18O [M + H]: 215.1; found: 215.1.
- 16a Corey EJ, Chaykovsky M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965; 87: 1353
- 16b Carlson RG, Behn NS. J. Org. Chem. 1967; 32: 1363
- 16c Bellucci G, Chiappe C, Lo Moro G, Ingrosso G. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 6214
For a recent selection of many diazo decomposition reactions, see:
For a recent selection of Simmons–Smith-type reactions, see:
Regarding exo-methylene alkenes:
For selected recent examples of Rh-catalyzed cyclopropanations, see:
Diastereoselectivity assigned by analogy to other three-membered rings formed from 4-substituted-exocyclic alkenes:
-
References and Notes
- 1a Chen DY.-K, Pouwer RH, Richard J.-A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 4631
- 1b Talele TT. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 59: 8712
- 2a Banwell MG, Edwards AJ, Jolliffe KA, Smith JA, Hamel E, Verdier-Pinard P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003; 1: 296
- 2b Newhouse TR, Kaib PS. J, Gross AW, Corey EJ. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1591
- 3a Doyle MP, Forbes DC. Chem. Rev. 1998; 98: 911
- 3b Davies HM. L, Antoulinakis EG. Org. React. 2004; 57: 1
- 4a Lebel H, Marcoux J.-F, Molinaro C, Charette AB. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 977
- 4b Charette AB, Beauchemin A. Org. React. 2004; 58: 1
- 5a Friedrich EC, Biresaw G. J. Org. Chem. 1982; 47: 1615
- 5b Stahl K.-J, Hertzsch W, Musso H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1985; 1474
- 5c Roberts C, Walton JC. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1985; 841
- 5d Motherwell WB, Roberts LR. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992; 1582
- 6a Dolbier JrW. R, Burkholder CR. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 589
- 6b Ilchenko NO, Hedberg M, Szabó KJ. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 1056
- 6c Werth J, Uyeda C. Chem. Sci. 2018; 9: 1604
- 7a Muthusamy S, Gunanathan C. Synlett 2003; 1599
- 7b Hilt G, Galbiati F. Synthesis 2006; 3589
- 7c Lindsay VN. G, Lin W, Charette AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 16383
- 7d Lindsay VN. G, Nicolas C, Charette AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 8972
- 7e Negretti S, Cohen CM, Chang JJ, Guptill GM, Davies HM. L. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 7415
- 7f Lehner V, Davies HM. L, Reiser O. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 4722
- 7g Sun G.-J, Gong J, Kang Q. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 796
- 7h Tindall DJ, Werlé C, Goddard R, Philipps P, Farès C, Fürstner A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 1884
- 7i Lindsay VN. G. Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed Cyclopropanation. In Rhodium Catalysis in Organic Synthesis: Methods and Reactions. Tanaka K. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2018: 433
- 8a Doyle MP, Hu W, Phillips IM, Moody CJ, Pepper AG, Slawin AG. Z. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001; 343: 112
- 8b Doyle MP, Hu W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001; 343: 299
- 8c Gharpure SJ, Shukla MK, Vijayasree U. Org. Lett. 2010; 11: 5466
- 8d Vanier SF, Larouche G, Wurz RP, Charette AB. Org. Lett. 2009; 12: 672
- 8e Nani RR, Reisman SE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 7304
- 8f Gu H, Huang S, Lin X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 1154
- 9a Doyle MP, Duffy R, Ratnikov M, Zhou L. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 704
- 9b Colby DA, Tsai AS, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012; 45: 814
- 9c Piou T, Rovis T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018; 51: 170
- 10 Piou T, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 11292
- 11 Piou T, Romanov-Michailidis F, Ashley MA, Romanova-Michaelides M, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 9587
- 12a Piou T, Rovis T. Nature 2015; 527: 86
- 12b Zhang Y, Liu H, Tang L, Tang H.-J, Wang L, Zhu C, Feng C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 10695
- 13 Duchemin C, Cramer N. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 2773
- 14 Phipps EJ. T, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 6807
- 15 General Procedure N-Enoxyphthalimide (0.1 mmol), catalyst [Cp*CF3RhCl2]2 (5 mol%, 0.005 mmol, 3.7 mg), and CsOAc (2 equiv, 0.2 mmol, 38.5 mg) were weighed in a 1-dram vial with a magnetic stir bar. TFE (0.2 M, 500 μL) was added followed by alkene (1.2 equiv, 0.12 mmol). The vial was sealed with a screw cap and stirred at room temperature for 12 h. Upon completion judged by TLC, the crude solution was diluted with EtOAc and partitioned with the addition of DI water. The aqueous layer was extracted three times with EtOAc, and the combined organic extracts were filtered through a pad of Celite® and Na2SO4 then concentrated. The crude residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 19:1) to afford the cyclopropane product.Compound 3ad: Purified by flash chromatography eluting with 5% EtOAc in hexanes; 21.0 mg, 98% yield, colorless oil, R f = 0.73 (4:1 hexanes/EtOAc). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.06–7.97 (m, 2 H), 7.59–7.51 (m, 1 H), 7.51–7.43 (m, 2 H), 2.51 (dd, J = 7.3, 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.70–1.39 (m, 10 H), 1.19 (dt, J = 12.6, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 0.95 (dd, J = 7.4, 4.0 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.4, 139.1, 132.5, 128.6, 128.2, 38.0, 35.6, 32.2, 28.48, 26.3, 26.2, 26.0, 21.5. IR (neat): 2921, 2850, 1664, 1447, 1396, 1216, 980, 718, 689 cm–1. LRMS (ESI APCI): m/z calcd for C15H18O [M + H]: 215.1; found: 215.1.
- 16a Corey EJ, Chaykovsky M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965; 87: 1353
- 16b Carlson RG, Behn NS. J. Org. Chem. 1967; 32: 1363
- 16c Bellucci G, Chiappe C, Lo Moro G, Ingrosso G. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 6214
For a recent selection of many diazo decomposition reactions, see:
For a recent selection of Simmons–Smith-type reactions, see:
Regarding exo-methylene alkenes:
For selected recent examples of Rh-catalyzed cyclopropanations, see:
Diastereoselectivity assigned by analogy to other three-membered rings formed from 4-substituted-exocyclic alkenes:









