Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1610502
Efficient Synthesis of Indole Derivatives Containing the Tetrazole Moeity Utilizing an Ugi-Azide Post-Transformation Strategy
We thank the National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD, Project No. 963388) for financial support.
Publication History
Received: 04 April 2018
Accepted after revision: 29 June 2018
Publication Date:
26 July 2018 (online)
Dedicated to Prof. Bernhard Breit on the occasion of his birthday
Abstract
An efficient strategy has been developed for the synthesis of indole derivatives containing the tetrazole moiety using a AuCl3-catalyzed cyclization reaction. The precursors of the cycloadduct were easily prepared by an Ugi-azide 4-CR in methanol at room temperature. The merit of this protocol lies in its operational simplicity, readily available starting materials, high yields of product, and good functional group tolerance.
#
Key words
Ugi-azide post-transformation strategy - metal catalyzed alkyne cyclization - heterocyclization - indole - tetrazoleIndoles have attracted a great deal of interest due to their presence in natural products and pharmaceutical compounds with extensive biological properties such as anticancer, antibacterial, antifungal, and antimicrobial activity.[1] The presence of the indole scaffold in many natural sources such as serotonin, tryptophan, and plant growth hormones underlines the importance of these compounds.[1] Moreover, synthetic indole derivatives possess the potential to be integrated in technical applications, such as ion sensors, organic-light emitting diodes (OLEDs) or organic field-effect transistors (OFETs).[2]
There are several different strategies for the synthesis of indoles.[3] [4] [5] [6] Among these synthetic approaches, the heterocyclization of 2-alkynylanilines to 2-substituted indoles remains the most commonly employed strategy.[7] Different transition metals have exploited in order to carry out this cyclization including Cu,[8,9] Pd,[10] [11] [12] Ag, [13] Au,[14] [15] [16] and In[17] catalysts.
On the other hand, tetrazole derivatives have attracted considerable attention due to their distinct structural features and their notable biological activities.[18] Tetrazoles are bioisosteres of carboxylic acids and are often used as a replacement for carboxylic acid groups. The tetrazole skeleton is a constituent of a range of drugs including losartan and valsartan that demonstrate antihypertensive activities (Figure [1]).[19] It has been reported that the attachment of an indole moiety to the tetrazole nucleus enhances its antimicrobial activity. These hybrid compounds also have peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) activity and can be used for lowering triglycerides and blood sugar (Figure [1]).[20]


Several methods for the synthesis of tetrazoles have been reported in the literature.[21] Synthesis of tetrazoles through the classical Ugi-azide four-component reaction (UA-4CR) has a wide scope with regard to the starting materials.[22]
The combination of the Ugi-azide four-component reaction with post-transformational reactions has become a useful tool for generating complex and diverse molecular libraries with novel properties.[23] In a continuation of our previous research work on the design of post-transformation reactions, [24] we report herein an efficient approach to 2-aryl-indoles containing a tetrazole moiety through AuCl3-catalyzed cyclization. The precursors of the cycloadduct were easily prepared through Ugi-azide reaction of 2-(phenylacetylenyl)aniline, trimethylsilylazide, isocyanides, and carbonyl compounds (Scheme [1]).


![]() |
||
Entry |
Lewis acid |
Yield (%) |
1 |
AuCl3(3%) |
78 |
2 |
AuCl3(5%) |
85 |
4 |
InCl3 (10%) |
66 |
5 |
ZrO2 |
– |
6 |
AgNO3 |
– |
7 |
CuI |
– |
8 |
Pd(OAc)2 |
– |
The 2-(phenylethynyl)aniline (1) was efficiently prepared by the reported procedure.[25] Next, the four-component reaction of 2-(phenylethynyl)aniline (1), trimethylsilyl azide (2), cyclohexanone (3a), and cyclohexyl isocyanide (4a) was selected as the model reaction for the screening of suitable reaction conditions. The reaction was carried out in methanol at ambient temperature and product 5a was formed in 75% yield (Table [1]). The structure of the Ugi-azide product was confirmed using spectroscopic analysis.
Next, the heterocyclization reaction of 5a was investigated using different Lewis acid catalysts to access the indole skeleton 6a. Different attempts were made at the heterocyclization using copper(I) iodide, silver nitrate, zirconium dioxide, and palladium acetate but the reaction did not proceed. However, performing the reaction using InCl3 (10%) or AuCl3 (5%) resulted in the desired product 6a in 66% and 85% yields, respectively (Table [1], entries 2 and 3). The use of 3% AuCl3 decreased the yield to 78% (Table [1], entry 1). Spectroscopic analysis of 6a confirmed the formation of the indole moiety. The absence of the acetylenic carbons at δ = 85.0 and 95.0 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum confirmed the cyclization and the C-3 in the indole ring was observed at δ = 108.0 ppm.
With the optimized reaction conditions established, we explored the scope of our methodology using various carbonyl substrates and isocyanides. The reaction conditions were found to be compatible with a range of aromatic aldehydes and ketones (Scheme [2]).
In addition to the spectroscopic analyses, X-ray crystallographic analysis of 6d confirmed the formation of the desired product (Figure [2]).[26] The orientation of the tetrazole ring with the indole ring is interesting, the torsion angle is 54° and the 2-aryl group in position 2 is not coplanar with the indole motif.




To confirm the importance of this strategy, palladium acetate-catalyzed cyclization of O-(phenylethynyl)-N-ethoxycarbonylanilide for the synthesis of 2-phenylindole was attempted. However, the subsequent Ugi-azide reaction of the 2-phenylindole with cyclohexanone, cyclohexylisocyanide, and trimethylsilyl azide did not take place and the starting materials remained (Scheme [3]). This result confirms the importance of the reaction sequence disclosed herein.


A mechanistic rationale for the cyclization reaction is outlined in Scheme [4]. The Lewis acidic Au(III) coordinates to the alkynyl moiety of 5a–i, and the resulting electron-deficient triple bond in I undergoes intramolecular nucleophilic attack by the poorly basic nitrogen atom of the free amine moiety leading to the intermediate II via a 5-endo-dig cyclization in preference to a 4-exo-dig mode of cyclization, the latter being disfavored according to Baldwin’s rules. Finally, protiodemetallation during the workup affords cyclized 6a–i (Scheme [4]).


In conclusion, we have developed an efficient method for the synthesis of functionalized 2-phenyl indoles containing the tetrazole skeleton. The reaction proceeds through AuCl3 catalyzed cyclization of Ugi-azide products containing an alkyne moiety. Good to high yields and simplicity of the reaction are features of the procedure.
#
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0037-1610502.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Eicher T. Hauptmann S. Speicher A. Indoles: The Chemistry of Heterocycles. 3rd ed. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2012
- 1b Katritzky AR. Pozharskii AF. Handbook of Heterocyclic Chemistry . Chap. 4 Pergamon; Oxford: 2000
- 1c Joule JA. In Science of Synthesis (Houben-Weyl Methods of Molecular Transformations). Thomas EJ. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2000. 10 361
- 1d Li JJ. Gribble GW. In Palladium in Heterocyclic Chemistry . Chap. 3 Pergamon; Oxford: 2000
- 1e Gribble GW. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000; 1045
- 1f Gribble GW. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II . Katritzky AR. Rees CW. Scriven EF. V. Pergamon Press; Oxford, UK: 1996. Vol. 2 207
- 1g Sundberg RJ. Indoles 1996
- 1h Evans BE. Rittle KE. Bock MG. Di Pardo RM. Freidinger RM. Whitter WL. Lundell GF. Veber DF. Anderson PS. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1988; 31: 2235
- 1i Salas JA. Méndez C. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009; 13: 152
- 1j Butler MS. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 162
- 1k Shiri M. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 3508
- 2 Janosik T. Wahlström N. Bergman J. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 9159
- 3 Li J. Cook JM. In Name Reactions in Heterocyclic Chemistry . Li JJ. Corey E. Wiley and Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2005
- 4 Gribble GW. Indole Ring Synthesis: From Natural Products to Drug Discovery . Wiley and Sons; New York: 2016
- 5 Krüger K. Tillack A. Beller M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008; 350: 2153
- 6a Bartoli G. Dalpozzo R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 4728
- 6b Taber DF. Tirunahari PK. Tetrahedron 2011; 67: 7195
- 7a Kondo Y. Kojima S. Sakamoto T. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 6507
- 7b Ezquerra J. Pedregal C. Lamas C. Barluenga J. Pérez M. García-Martín MA. González JM. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 5804
- 7c Kondo Y. Kojima S. Sakamoto T. Heterocycles 1996; 43: 2741
- 7d Ilies L. Isomura M. Yamauchi S.-I. Nakamura T. Nakamura E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 23
- 8 Ye Y. Cheung KP. S. He L. Tsui GC. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 1676
- 9 Song S. Huang M. Li W. Zhu X. Wan Y. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 451
- 10 Li J. Li C. Yang S. An Y. Wu W. Jiang H. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 2875
- 11 Sheng J. Li S. Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 578
- 12a Campagne JM. Prim D. Marque S. Wehbe J. Gaucher A. Michaux J. Terrasson V. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 5332
- 12b Cacchi S. Fabrizi G. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 215
- 12c Newman SG. Lautens M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 11416
- 12d Fang Y.-Q. Lautens M. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 538
- 13a Hao WJ. Wu YN. Gao Q. Wang SL. Tu SJ. Jiang B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 4767
- 13b Yang L. Ma Y. Song F. You J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 3024
- 13c Liu J. Xie X. Liu Y. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 11794
- 13d Han X. Lu X. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 3336
- 14a Arcadi A. Pietropaolo E. Alvino A. Michelet V. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2766
- 14b La-Venia A. Testero SA. Mischne MP. Mata EG. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 2514
- 15 Arcadi A. Bianchi G. Marinelli F. Synthesis 2004; 610
- 16 Brand JP. Chevalley C. Waser J. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011; 7: 565
- 17 Sakai N. Annak K. Fujita A. Sato A. Konakahara T. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 4160
- 18 Ostrovskii VA. Trifonov RE. Popova EA. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2012; 61: 768
- 19a Kaushik N. Attri P. Kumar N. Kim C. Verma K. Choi E. Molecules 2013; 18: 6620
- 19b Wei C.-X. Bian M. Gong G.-H. Molecules 2015; 20: 5528
- 19c Foley C. Shaw A. Hulme C. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 4904
- 20a Mahindroo N. Huang C.-F. Peng Y.-H. Wang C.-C. Liao C.-C. Lien T.-W. Chittimalla SK. Huang W.-J. Chai C.-H. Prakash E. Chen C.-P. Hsu T.-A. Peng C.-H. Lu I.-L. Lee L.-H. Chang Y.-W. Chen W.-C. Chou Y.-C. Chen C.-T. Goparaju CM. V. Chen Y.-S. Lan S.-J. Yu M.-C. Chen X. Chao Y.-S. Wu S.-Y. Hsieh H.-P. J. Med. Chem. 2005; 48: 8194
- 20b Mahindroo N. Wang C.-C. Liao C.-C. Huang C.-F. Lu I.-L. Lien T.-W. Peng Y.-H. Huang W.-J. Lin Y.-T. Hsu M.-C. Lin C.-H. Tsai C.-H. Hsu JT.-A. Chen X. Lyu P-C. Chao Y.-S. Wu S.-Y. Hsieh H.-P. J. Med. Chem. 2006; 49: 1212
- 21a Artamonova T. Zhivich A. Dubinsk MII. Koldobskii G. Synthesis 1996; 1428
- 21b Duncia JV. Pierce ME. Santella III JB. J. Org. Chem. 1991; 56: 2395
- 21c Deady LW. Devine SM. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2004; 41: 549
- 21d Dömling A. Wang W. Wang K. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 3083
- 21e Zarganes-Tzitzikas T. Patil P. Khoury K. Herdtweck E. Dömling A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 51
- 21f Gunawan S. Ayaz M. De Moliner F. Frett B. Kaiser C. Patrick N. Xu Z. Hulme C. Tetrahedron 2012; 68: 5606
- 21g Medda F. Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 5593
- 21h Shmatova OI. Nenajdenko VG. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 9214
- 21i Zhao T. Boltjes A. Herdtweck E. Dömling A. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 639
- 21j El Kaïm L. Grimaud L. Pravin P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 4752
- 21k Ayaz M. Xu Z. Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3406
- 21l Yerande SG. Newase KM. Singh B. Boltjes A. Dömling A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3263
- 21m Sarvary A. Maleki A. Mol. Diversity 2014; 19: 189
- 22a Ramezanpour S. Balalaie S. Rominger F. Alavijeh NS. Bijanzadeh HR. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 10718
- 22b Nikbakht A. Ramezanpour S. Balalaie S. Rominger F. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 6790
- 23a Zhu J. Wang Q. Wang M. Multicomponent Reactions in Organic Synthesis . Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2015
- 23b Orru RV. A. Ruijter E. Synthesis of Heterocycles via Multicomponent Reactions I . Springer; Berlin: 2010
- 23c Orru RV. A. Ruijter E. Synthesis of Heterocycles via Multicomponent Reactions II . Springer; Berlin: 2010
- 23d Sharma UK. Sharma N. Vachhani DD. Van der Eycken EV. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 1836
- 24a Balalaie S. Shamakli M. Nikbakht A. Alavijeh NS. Rominger F. Rostamizadeh S. Bijanzadeh HR. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 5737
- 24b Ghabraie E. Balalaie S. Mehrparvar S. Rominger F. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 7926
- 24c Maghari S. Ramezanpour S. Balalaie S. Darvish F. Rominger F. Bijanzadeh HR. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 6450
- 24d Balalaie S. Vaezghaemi A. Zarezadeh N. Rominger F. Bijanzadeh HR. Synlett 2018; 29: 1095
- 25 Reactions and Syntheses: In the Organic Chemistry Laboratory . 2nd ed. Tietze LF. Eicher T. Diederichsen U. Speicher A. Schützenmeister N. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2015
- 26 HRMS data were collected using an Apex-QC-FT- ICR instrument with ESI. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 5a–i 2-(Phenylethynyl)aniline in MeOH (5 ml) and cyclohexanone (1 mmol) were stirred at room temperature for 2 h, then the requisite isocyanide (1 mmol) and trimethylsilyl azide were added. The mixture was stirred for 24 h until the reaction was completed. Then, the desired product was either filtered off as a white solid filtered for 5a–e (ketone derivatives) or purified using column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc, 9:1) for 5f–i (aldehyde derivatives). The yields were in the range of 75–92%. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 6a–i The products 5a–i (1mmol) and AuCl3 (5 mol%, 15 mg) were added to a reaction flask containing toluene (10 mL). After 12 h the toluene was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude products were purified by silica gel chromatography (n-hexane/EtOAc, 7:1) to obtain the indole derivatives. N-[4-(tert-Butyl)-1-(1-cyclohexyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl) cyclohexyl]-2-(phenylethynyl) aniline (5d) Colorless solid; yield 440 mg, (80%); Rf = 0.45 (PE/EtOAc 3:1); mp 142–146 °C. IR (KBr): ν = 1586, 2197, 3377 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.84 (s, 9 H, t-Bu), 1.16–1.34 (m, 4 H, HCyclohexyl), 1.42–1.68 (m, 5 H, HCyclohexyl), 1.73–1.93 (m, 8 H, HCyclohexyl), 2.87–2.91 (m, 2 H, HCyclohexyl), 4.72 (m, 1 H, CHN), 5.07 (s, 1 H, NH), 6.08 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-Ar), 6.63 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-Ar), 6.86–6.92 (dt, 1 H, J = 7.2, 1.5 Hz, H-Ar), 7.3(dd, 1 H, J = 8.1, 1.2 Hz, H-Ar), 7.34–7.43(m, 3 H, H-Ar), 7.53–7.56 (m, 2 H, H-Ar) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 23.7, 24.8, 25.6, 27.5, 32.4, 33.5, 39.0, 47.6, 54.4, 59.2, 85.6, 95.7, 108.8, 111.8, 118.0, 123.0, 128.6, 128.7, 129.9, 131.3, 132.1, 145.4, 153.3 ppm. 1-[4-(tert-Butyl)-1-(1-cyclohexyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl) cyclohexyl]-2-phenyl-1H-indole (6d) Colorless solid; yield 417.6 mg (87%); Rf = 0.38 (PE/EtOAc, 3:1); mp 178–181 °C. IR (KBr): ν = 1453, 1611, 2940 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.78 (s, 9 H, t-Bu), 0.88–1.56 (m, 17 H, HCyclohexyl), 2.10–2.30 (m, 2 H, HCyclohexyl), 3.10–3.15 (m, 1 H, HCyclohexyl), 6.47 (s, 1 H, H-3 indole), 6.82 (t, 1 H, J = 8.4 Hz, H-Ar), 6.89(dt, 1 H, J = 7.2, 1.2 Hz, H-Ar), 7.01 (t, 1 H, J = 7.2, H-Ar), 7.46–7.59(m, 6 H, H-Ar) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1, 23.9, 24.7, 25.3, 25.4, 26.9, 27.4, 31.2, 32.3, 32.8, 38.1, 38.6, 46.9, 47.0, 58.1, 62.5, 108.1, 112.4, 120.5, 121.3, 122.6, 124.0, 126.0, 128.3, 128.4, 137.1, 137.5, 140.9, 156.4 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C31H40N5 [M + H]+: 482.3272; found: 482.3288; C31H39N5Na [M + Na]+: 504.3097; found: 504.3106. Colorless crystal (polyhedron), dimensions 0.130 × 0.120 × 0.050 mm3, crystal system triclinic, space group P, Z = 2, a = 10.4530(5) Å, b = 12.9781(6) Å, c = 13.3411(6) Å, α = 108.2879(14)°, β = 112.3234(14)°, γ = 100.5989(14)°, V = 1491.99(12) Å3, ρ = 1.189 g cm–3, T = 200(2) K, θ max= 22.980°, raduiation Mo Kα, λ = 0.71073 Å, 0.5° ω scans with CCD area detector, covering the asymmetric unit in reciprocal space with a mean redundancy of 3.1 and a completeness of 98.3% to a resoltion of 0.91 Å, 12857 reflections measured, 4082 unique (R (int) = 0.0380), 2672 observed (I > 2σ(I)), intensities were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects, an empirical scaling and absorption correction was applied using SADABS based on the Laue symmetry of the reciprocal space, μ = 0.09 mm–1, T min = 0.93, T max = 0.96, structure refined against F 2 with a full-matrix least-squares algorithm using the SHELXL-2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2014) software, 393 parameters refined, hydrogen atoms were treated using appropriate riding models, goodness of fit 1.05 for observed reflections, final residual values R1(F) = 0.052, wR(F2) = 0.125 for observed reflections, residual electron density –0.21 to 0.14 eÅ–3. 27CCDC 1551544 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures.
- 27 Sheldrick GM. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct. Chem. 2015; 71: 3
For other references, see:
-
References and Notes
- 1a Eicher T. Hauptmann S. Speicher A. Indoles: The Chemistry of Heterocycles. 3rd ed. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2012
- 1b Katritzky AR. Pozharskii AF. Handbook of Heterocyclic Chemistry . Chap. 4 Pergamon; Oxford: 2000
- 1c Joule JA. In Science of Synthesis (Houben-Weyl Methods of Molecular Transformations). Thomas EJ. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2000. 10 361
- 1d Li JJ. Gribble GW. In Palladium in Heterocyclic Chemistry . Chap. 3 Pergamon; Oxford: 2000
- 1e Gribble GW. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000; 1045
- 1f Gribble GW. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II . Katritzky AR. Rees CW. Scriven EF. V. Pergamon Press; Oxford, UK: 1996. Vol. 2 207
- 1g Sundberg RJ. Indoles 1996
- 1h Evans BE. Rittle KE. Bock MG. Di Pardo RM. Freidinger RM. Whitter WL. Lundell GF. Veber DF. Anderson PS. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1988; 31: 2235
- 1i Salas JA. Méndez C. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009; 13: 152
- 1j Butler MS. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 162
- 1k Shiri M. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 3508
- 2 Janosik T. Wahlström N. Bergman J. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 9159
- 3 Li J. Cook JM. In Name Reactions in Heterocyclic Chemistry . Li JJ. Corey E. Wiley and Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2005
- 4 Gribble GW. Indole Ring Synthesis: From Natural Products to Drug Discovery . Wiley and Sons; New York: 2016
- 5 Krüger K. Tillack A. Beller M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008; 350: 2153
- 6a Bartoli G. Dalpozzo R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 4728
- 6b Taber DF. Tirunahari PK. Tetrahedron 2011; 67: 7195
- 7a Kondo Y. Kojima S. Sakamoto T. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 6507
- 7b Ezquerra J. Pedregal C. Lamas C. Barluenga J. Pérez M. García-Martín MA. González JM. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 5804
- 7c Kondo Y. Kojima S. Sakamoto T. Heterocycles 1996; 43: 2741
- 7d Ilies L. Isomura M. Yamauchi S.-I. Nakamura T. Nakamura E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 23
- 8 Ye Y. Cheung KP. S. He L. Tsui GC. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 1676
- 9 Song S. Huang M. Li W. Zhu X. Wan Y. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 451
- 10 Li J. Li C. Yang S. An Y. Wu W. Jiang H. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 2875
- 11 Sheng J. Li S. Wu J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 578
- 12a Campagne JM. Prim D. Marque S. Wehbe J. Gaucher A. Michaux J. Terrasson V. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 5332
- 12b Cacchi S. Fabrizi G. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 215
- 12c Newman SG. Lautens M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 11416
- 12d Fang Y.-Q. Lautens M. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 538
- 13a Hao WJ. Wu YN. Gao Q. Wang SL. Tu SJ. Jiang B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 4767
- 13b Yang L. Ma Y. Song F. You J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 3024
- 13c Liu J. Xie X. Liu Y. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 11794
- 13d Han X. Lu X. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 3336
- 14a Arcadi A. Pietropaolo E. Alvino A. Michelet V. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2766
- 14b La-Venia A. Testero SA. Mischne MP. Mata EG. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 2514
- 15 Arcadi A. Bianchi G. Marinelli F. Synthesis 2004; 610
- 16 Brand JP. Chevalley C. Waser J. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011; 7: 565
- 17 Sakai N. Annak K. Fujita A. Sato A. Konakahara T. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 4160
- 18 Ostrovskii VA. Trifonov RE. Popova EA. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2012; 61: 768
- 19a Kaushik N. Attri P. Kumar N. Kim C. Verma K. Choi E. Molecules 2013; 18: 6620
- 19b Wei C.-X. Bian M. Gong G.-H. Molecules 2015; 20: 5528
- 19c Foley C. Shaw A. Hulme C. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 4904
- 20a Mahindroo N. Huang C.-F. Peng Y.-H. Wang C.-C. Liao C.-C. Lien T.-W. Chittimalla SK. Huang W.-J. Chai C.-H. Prakash E. Chen C.-P. Hsu T.-A. Peng C.-H. Lu I.-L. Lee L.-H. Chang Y.-W. Chen W.-C. Chou Y.-C. Chen C.-T. Goparaju CM. V. Chen Y.-S. Lan S.-J. Yu M.-C. Chen X. Chao Y.-S. Wu S.-Y. Hsieh H.-P. J. Med. Chem. 2005; 48: 8194
- 20b Mahindroo N. Wang C.-C. Liao C.-C. Huang C.-F. Lu I.-L. Lien T.-W. Peng Y.-H. Huang W.-J. Lin Y.-T. Hsu M.-C. Lin C.-H. Tsai C.-H. Hsu JT.-A. Chen X. Lyu P-C. Chao Y.-S. Wu S.-Y. Hsieh H.-P. J. Med. Chem. 2006; 49: 1212
- 21a Artamonova T. Zhivich A. Dubinsk MII. Koldobskii G. Synthesis 1996; 1428
- 21b Duncia JV. Pierce ME. Santella III JB. J. Org. Chem. 1991; 56: 2395
- 21c Deady LW. Devine SM. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2004; 41: 549
- 21d Dömling A. Wang W. Wang K. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 3083
- 21e Zarganes-Tzitzikas T. Patil P. Khoury K. Herdtweck E. Dömling A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 51
- 21f Gunawan S. Ayaz M. De Moliner F. Frett B. Kaiser C. Patrick N. Xu Z. Hulme C. Tetrahedron 2012; 68: 5606
- 21g Medda F. Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 5593
- 21h Shmatova OI. Nenajdenko VG. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 9214
- 21i Zhao T. Boltjes A. Herdtweck E. Dömling A. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 639
- 21j El Kaïm L. Grimaud L. Pravin P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 4752
- 21k Ayaz M. Xu Z. Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3406
- 21l Yerande SG. Newase KM. Singh B. Boltjes A. Dömling A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3263
- 21m Sarvary A. Maleki A. Mol. Diversity 2014; 19: 189
- 22a Ramezanpour S. Balalaie S. Rominger F. Alavijeh NS. Bijanzadeh HR. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 10718
- 22b Nikbakht A. Ramezanpour S. Balalaie S. Rominger F. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 6790
- 23a Zhu J. Wang Q. Wang M. Multicomponent Reactions in Organic Synthesis . Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2015
- 23b Orru RV. A. Ruijter E. Synthesis of Heterocycles via Multicomponent Reactions I . Springer; Berlin: 2010
- 23c Orru RV. A. Ruijter E. Synthesis of Heterocycles via Multicomponent Reactions II . Springer; Berlin: 2010
- 23d Sharma UK. Sharma N. Vachhani DD. Van der Eycken EV. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 1836
- 24a Balalaie S. Shamakli M. Nikbakht A. Alavijeh NS. Rominger F. Rostamizadeh S. Bijanzadeh HR. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 5737
- 24b Ghabraie E. Balalaie S. Mehrparvar S. Rominger F. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 7926
- 24c Maghari S. Ramezanpour S. Balalaie S. Darvish F. Rominger F. Bijanzadeh HR. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 6450
- 24d Balalaie S. Vaezghaemi A. Zarezadeh N. Rominger F. Bijanzadeh HR. Synlett 2018; 29: 1095
- 25 Reactions and Syntheses: In the Organic Chemistry Laboratory . 2nd ed. Tietze LF. Eicher T. Diederichsen U. Speicher A. Schützenmeister N. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2015
- 26 HRMS data were collected using an Apex-QC-FT- ICR instrument with ESI. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 5a–i 2-(Phenylethynyl)aniline in MeOH (5 ml) and cyclohexanone (1 mmol) were stirred at room temperature for 2 h, then the requisite isocyanide (1 mmol) and trimethylsilyl azide were added. The mixture was stirred for 24 h until the reaction was completed. Then, the desired product was either filtered off as a white solid filtered for 5a–e (ketone derivatives) or purified using column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc, 9:1) for 5f–i (aldehyde derivatives). The yields were in the range of 75–92%. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 6a–i The products 5a–i (1mmol) and AuCl3 (5 mol%, 15 mg) were added to a reaction flask containing toluene (10 mL). After 12 h the toluene was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude products were purified by silica gel chromatography (n-hexane/EtOAc, 7:1) to obtain the indole derivatives. N-[4-(tert-Butyl)-1-(1-cyclohexyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl) cyclohexyl]-2-(phenylethynyl) aniline (5d) Colorless solid; yield 440 mg, (80%); Rf = 0.45 (PE/EtOAc 3:1); mp 142–146 °C. IR (KBr): ν = 1586, 2197, 3377 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.84 (s, 9 H, t-Bu), 1.16–1.34 (m, 4 H, HCyclohexyl), 1.42–1.68 (m, 5 H, HCyclohexyl), 1.73–1.93 (m, 8 H, HCyclohexyl), 2.87–2.91 (m, 2 H, HCyclohexyl), 4.72 (m, 1 H, CHN), 5.07 (s, 1 H, NH), 6.08 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-Ar), 6.63 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-Ar), 6.86–6.92 (dt, 1 H, J = 7.2, 1.5 Hz, H-Ar), 7.3(dd, 1 H, J = 8.1, 1.2 Hz, H-Ar), 7.34–7.43(m, 3 H, H-Ar), 7.53–7.56 (m, 2 H, H-Ar) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 23.7, 24.8, 25.6, 27.5, 32.4, 33.5, 39.0, 47.6, 54.4, 59.2, 85.6, 95.7, 108.8, 111.8, 118.0, 123.0, 128.6, 128.7, 129.9, 131.3, 132.1, 145.4, 153.3 ppm. 1-[4-(tert-Butyl)-1-(1-cyclohexyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl) cyclohexyl]-2-phenyl-1H-indole (6d) Colorless solid; yield 417.6 mg (87%); Rf = 0.38 (PE/EtOAc, 3:1); mp 178–181 °C. IR (KBr): ν = 1453, 1611, 2940 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.78 (s, 9 H, t-Bu), 0.88–1.56 (m, 17 H, HCyclohexyl), 2.10–2.30 (m, 2 H, HCyclohexyl), 3.10–3.15 (m, 1 H, HCyclohexyl), 6.47 (s, 1 H, H-3 indole), 6.82 (t, 1 H, J = 8.4 Hz, H-Ar), 6.89(dt, 1 H, J = 7.2, 1.2 Hz, H-Ar), 7.01 (t, 1 H, J = 7.2, H-Ar), 7.46–7.59(m, 6 H, H-Ar) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1, 23.9, 24.7, 25.3, 25.4, 26.9, 27.4, 31.2, 32.3, 32.8, 38.1, 38.6, 46.9, 47.0, 58.1, 62.5, 108.1, 112.4, 120.5, 121.3, 122.6, 124.0, 126.0, 128.3, 128.4, 137.1, 137.5, 140.9, 156.4 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C31H40N5 [M + H]+: 482.3272; found: 482.3288; C31H39N5Na [M + Na]+: 504.3097; found: 504.3106. Colorless crystal (polyhedron), dimensions 0.130 × 0.120 × 0.050 mm3, crystal system triclinic, space group P, Z = 2, a = 10.4530(5) Å, b = 12.9781(6) Å, c = 13.3411(6) Å, α = 108.2879(14)°, β = 112.3234(14)°, γ = 100.5989(14)°, V = 1491.99(12) Å3, ρ = 1.189 g cm–3, T = 200(2) K, θ max= 22.980°, raduiation Mo Kα, λ = 0.71073 Å, 0.5° ω scans with CCD area detector, covering the asymmetric unit in reciprocal space with a mean redundancy of 3.1 and a completeness of 98.3% to a resoltion of 0.91 Å, 12857 reflections measured, 4082 unique (R (int) = 0.0380), 2672 observed (I > 2σ(I)), intensities were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects, an empirical scaling and absorption correction was applied using SADABS based on the Laue symmetry of the reciprocal space, μ = 0.09 mm–1, T min = 0.93, T max = 0.96, structure refined against F 2 with a full-matrix least-squares algorithm using the SHELXL-2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2014) software, 393 parameters refined, hydrogen atoms were treated using appropriate riding models, goodness of fit 1.05 for observed reflections, final residual values R1(F) = 0.052, wR(F2) = 0.125 for observed reflections, residual electron density –0.21 to 0.14 eÅ–3. 27CCDC 1551544 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures.
- 27 Sheldrick GM. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct. Chem. 2015; 71: 3
For other references, see:












