Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1561602
Indium(III) Chloride Promoted Highly Efficient Tandem Rearrangement–α-Addition Strategy towards the Synthesis of α-Hydroxyamides
Publication History
Received: 20 October 2015
Accepted after revision: 10 March 2016
Publication Date:
07 April 2016 (online)
Abstract
A new tandem process is reported that provides access to α-hydroxyamides from epoxides for the first time. Herein, we explore InCl3-mediated tandem rearrangement of epoxides to aldehydes and α-addition of TosMIC to in situ derived aldehydes. An unprecedented C–C bond-forming reaction is disclosed that features mild conditions, high yields, and shorter reaction times.
#
Key words
C–C bond formation - indium(III) chloride - epoxides - TosMIC - tandem rearrangement - α-additionThe α-hydroxyamides are useful building blocks for the synthesis of biologically active natural products,[1] especially depsipeptide compounds.[2] They have been identified as inhibitors of methionine aminopeptidase-2 and HIV protease, potent antitumor activity, and play an important role in medicinal chemistry.[3] Due to the significance of this core, the convenient formation of this moiety has attracted much attention in recent years. Classically, α-hydroxyamides have been synthesized by condensation of lactic acid with an amine and the most direct method is the Passerini-type reaction.[4] [5] [6] Since the early studies by Passerini,[7] Ugi, and co-workers[8] the power of α-addition reaction in constructing polyfunctional molecules has been well appreciated. The Passerini-type reaction, that is, reaction of aldehydes with isocyanides under acid-free conditions attracts chemists for wider applications. Although the Lewis acid mediated α-addition of isocyanides to aldehydes has been well studied,[9] most of these methods suffer from formation of undesired products and moreover, catalyst turnover for conventional Lewis acid catalysis requires the cleavage of the Lewis acid from the product.[10] Later on, dramatic improvement has been reported in the enantioselective α-addition of isocyanides to aldehydes.[11]
Bearing a formally divalent carbon, isocyanides are capable of engaging in carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions known as α-additions. p-Toluenesulfonylmethyl isocyanide (TosMIC), a unique isocyanide is widely used in the synthesis of heterocycles.[12] It is a densely functionalized building block with three functional groups that can engage in a multitude of reactions. In the course of our research aimed at expanding the TosMIC chemistry,[13] [14] we attempted InCl3-mediated nucleophilic ring-opening of epoxides with TosMIC. However, our results revealed the addition of TosMIC to epoxide does not form the expected product 3a but affords instead the α-hydroxyamides 2a–k through unprecedented tandem rearrangement of epoxides to aldehydes and subsequent α-addition of TosMIC to aldehydes (Scheme [1]). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of synthesis of α-hydroxyamides directly from epoxides. Moreover, a full investigation on the literature reveals that TosMIC has not been used as an isonitrile component in most of the α-additions of isocyanides to aldehydes reported thus far. A few reported formation of byproducts along with the desired product when TosMIC was employed as a nucleophile in this reaction.[11b]


First, we examined the reaction of the styrene oxide (1a) with TosMIC using various Lewis acids (Table [1]). Neither BF3·OEt2 nor CuI gave the product (Table [1], entries 1 and 6). But the other Lewis acids like Zn(OTf)2, FeCl3, Cu(OTf)2, and RuCl3 gave lower yields (Table [1], entries 2, 4, 5, and 7). InCl3 was found to be effective to furnish the product 2a in less reaction time and high yield. It was also found that THF–H2O (9:1) was the optimal solvent for this reaction. To determine the optimal catalyst loading the reaction using styrene oxide with TosMIC was conducted with varying amounts of InCl3 (Table [2]). A maximum yield of 90% was obtained with 50 mol% of catalyst (Table [2], entry 4). Increase in catalyst loading to 100 mol% did not have any significant effect on the yield of the product (Table [2], entry 5). Particularly noteworthy was the dependence of reaction outcome on addition of water which facilitates easy hydrolysis. The reaction provided the α-substituted alcohol product 2a instead of the expected β-substituted alcohol product 3a, that is, the nucleophilic oxirane ring opening with isonitrile functionality of TosMIC. Although the nucleophilic ring opening of the epoxide is well established, the α-substituted alcohol synthesis remains typically limited.[15]
a Reaction conditions: epoxide (1.0 equiv), TosMIC (1.0 equiv), Lewis acid (0.5 equiv), and solvent.
b The yields refer to isolated products purified by column chromatography.
c The best yield was obtained in THF–H2O (9:1).
Entry |
InCl3 |
Time (min) |
Yield (%)a |
1 |
0 |
60 |
– |
2 |
10 |
60 |
71 |
3 |
30 |
60 |
82 |
4 |
50 |
30 |
90 |
5 |
100 |
30 |
90 |
a Yields refer to pure isolated products.
The spectral analysis revealed 2a as the predominant product. Thus, the 1H NMR spectrum of product 2a shows characteristic N–H as a broad singlet at δ = 7.55 ppm, methylene protons at δ = 4.65 ppm as a doublet (J = 6.97 Hz), CH–OH at δ = 4.21 ppm, two C–H protons as doublet of doublets at δ = 3.04 and 2.62 ppm, and all other protons resonated at their appropriate values. The possible formation of 3a was discounted in view of the 1H NMR analysis of 2a wherein CH–OH proton appeared at δ = 4.21 ppm. The same proton which otherwise would have appeared down-field shifted in 3a than reported herein. Further, the formation of 2a was unambiguously demonstrated by 13C NMR analysis, and the IR spectrum revealed characteristic stretching frequencies at 3319 and 1675 cm–1 due to N–H and C=O functional groups. Observation of α-substituted alcohols in these reactions can be explained by tandem rearrangement of epoxide to aldehyde[16] followed by α-addition of TosMIC to aldehyde. While the rearrangement and α-additions are known separately, a simple method capable of effecting both elementary steps has not been identified. Indeed, the significance of this novel protocol is that it performs both operations in a single pot to afford α-hydroxyamides from easily accessed epoxides and TosMIC. To our delight, the test reaction between benzaldehyde 4 and TosMIC furnished the corresponding α-hydroxyamide 4a in high yield, which itself has the ability to open a new era of InCl3-mediated Passerini-type reaction under mild conditions. In Scheme [2, a] plausible mechanism for InCl3-mediated facile synthesis of α-hydroxyamides is outlined. Even though, the Lewis acid mediated rearrangement of epoxide to aldehyde is already known in the literature, in order to find the aldehyde formation, two parallel reactions of styrene oxide with and without addition of TosMIC were performed under standard conditions.[17a] Identification of aldehyde was done by comparing both the reaction sets, the reaction mixture without TosMIC showed the corresponding aldehyde,[17b] which was also seen in the reaction mixture wherein TosMIC was present which was further consumed (analysis by TLC) to give the α-hydroxyamide product. Moreover, the 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture showed a triplet at δ = 9.73 ppm (J = 2.32 Hz) indicating the aldehyde formation as an intermediate (see Supporting Information).


Encouraged by these results, we next turned our attention to investigate the scope of the reaction. Generally, various epoxides (Table [3], entries 1a–k) containing different substituents underwent the reaction under the standard conditions to give the corresponding α-hydroxyamides (2a–k) as the sole products. It indicates InCl3-mediated isomerization of epoxides proceeded with complete regioselectivity. InCl3 is a mild Lewis acid for complete regioselective transformation and has a great functional-group tolerance.
1-Aryl-, 1,1-diaryl-, 1,1-dialkyl-, and aryl-substituted epoxides underwent rearrangement to the corresponding aryl-substituted acetaldehydes by exclusive hydride shift (Table [3], entries 1 and 4–12). On the other hand, as observed in the rearrangement of stilbene oxide, that is, 1,2-diaryl epoxide, phenyl migration predominates the hydrogen shift (Table [3], entry 3). The formation of 2f (Table [3], entry 7) can be explained by the rearrangement of α-pinene oxide to the expected aldehyde.[18] However, the reaction with 1l, which is a nonaromatic epoxide has proven unsuccessful (Table [3], entry 13). Presumably, the incipient carbocation formed by the initial cleavage of epoxide is much less stabilized in alkyl-substituted epoxide compared to the aryl-substituted one. But in case of 2f and 2k the product formation can be explained by better stabilization of carbocation on the tertiary center. These reactions are usually fast and high-yielding. The spectral data of products 2b–k further established the conclusive formation of the α-substituted alcohol product. However, the present protocol did not furnish the desired product when tert-butyl isonitrile and cyclohexyl isonitrile were used as isonitrile components. The reason for this may be attributed to the higher nucleophilicity of these compounds compared to TosMIC.[19]
a Reaction conditions: epoxide (1.0 equiv), TosMIC (1.0 equiv), InCl3 (0.5 equiv), and THF–H2O (9:1).
b All the products were characterized from spectral data.
c Isolated yields after purification by column chromatography.
d The products 2d,f,i were obtained as diastereomeric mixtures.
e Formation of unisolable products is observed.
f Not detected.
In general ketones are less reactive than aldehydes towards nucleophilic attack. A simple method for the α-addition of isocyanides to carbonyl compounds is still lacking. For instance, the susceptibility of the reaction with ketone, that is, cyclohexanone (Table [2], entry 14) under the same reaction conditions was next examined. It is noteworthy to mention that the reaction of TosMIC with 5 under the present conditions proceeded smoothly to afford 5a in good yield. As far as we know, this is the first example of α-addition of TosMIC to ketone.
In conclusion, we have described for the first time a tandem protocol that provides efficient synthesis of α-hydroxyamides directly from epoxides.[20] A mechanistically novel reaction pathway for the construction of C–C bond formation was disclosed. Considering the mild reaction conditions, tolerance of various functional groups, easy availability of substrates, high regioselectivity, and shorter reaction times, the methodology described here undoubtedly will find new applications in future synthetic endeavors. The products obtained by the present protocol are densely functionalized and can act as unique building blocks.
#
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to DST (GAP 0485), New Delhi for generous financial support. The authors K.L. and D.M. thank UGC, New Delhi for financial support in the form of a fellowship.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0035-1561602.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Konda Y, Onda M, Hirano A, Ömura S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1980; 28: 2987
- 1b Suda H, Takita T, Aoyagi T, Umezawa H. J. Antibiot. 1976; 29: 100
- 1c Yokoi K, Nagaoka K, Nakashima T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1986; 34: 4554
- 1d Perry NB, Blunt JW, Munro MH. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 4850
- 2a Süssmuth R, Müller J, Von Döhren H, Molnár I. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011; 28: 99
- 2b Pelay-Gimeno M, Tulla-Puche J, Albericio F. Mar. Drugs 2013; 11: 1693
- 2c Fukuda T, Arai M, Tomoda H, Ömura S. J. Antibiot. 2004; 57: 117
- 2d Tomoda H, Nishida H, Huang X.-H, Masuma R, Kim YK, Ömura S. J. Antibiot. 1992; 45: 1207
- 2e Shiomi K, Matsui R, Kakei A, Yamaguchi Y, Masuma R, Hatano H, Arai N, Isozaki M, Tanaka H, Kobayashi S, Turberg A, Ömura S. J. Antibiot. 2010; 63: 77
- 3a Ahmad S, Ashfaq A, Alam M, Bisacchi GS, Chen P, Cheng PT. W, Greytok JA, Hermsmeier MA, Lin P.-F, Lis KA, Merchant Z, Mitt T, Skoog M, Spergel SH, Tino JA, Vite GD, Colonno RJ, Zahler R, Barrish JC. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995; 5: 1729
- 3b Sheppard GS, Wang J, Kawai M, BaMaung NY, Craig RA, Erickson SA, Lynch L, Patel J, Yang F, Searle XB, Lou P, Park C, Kim KH, Henkin J, Lesniewski R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004; 14: 865
- 3c Schenck HA, Lenkowski PW, Mukherjee IC, Kob SH, Stables JP, Patel MK, Brown ML. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004; 12: 979
- 3d Kuduk SD, Chang RK, DiPardo RM, Di Marco CN, Murphy KL, Ransom RW, Reiss DR, Tang C, Prueksaritanont T, Pettibone DJ, Bock MG. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008; 18: 5107
- 4a Soeta T, Kojima Y, Ukaji Y, Inomata K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 2557
- 4b Alcaide B, Almendros P, Aragoncillo C, Callejo R, Ruiz MP. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 10154
- 5a Lumma WC. J. Org. Chem. 1981; 46: 3668
- 5b Mullen LB, Sutherland JD. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 8063
- 5c He P, Wu J, Nie Y.-B, Ding M.-W. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 8563
- 6a Kumar JS, Jonnalagadda SC, Mereddy VR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 779
- 6b Ramazani A, Mahyari A, Lashgari H, Sleopokura K, Lis T. Helv. Chim. Acta 2011; 94: 611
- 6c Sela T, Vigalok A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012; 354: 2407
- 6d Bayat M, Nasri S, Hosseini H, Hassanzadeh F. Monatsh. Chem. 2012; 143: 801
- 6e Yamada T, Hirose T, Ömura S, Sunazuka T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 296
- 7a Passerini M. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1921; 51: 126
- 7b Passerini M, Ragni G. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1931; 61: 964
- 8a Ugi I, Meyr R, Fetzer U, Steinbrückner C. Angew. Chem. 1959; 71: 386
- 8b Ugi I, Steinbrückner C. Angew. Chem. 1960; 72: 267
- 9a Müller E, Zeeh B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1966; 696: 72
- 9b Müller E, Zeeh B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1968; 715: 47
- 9c Saegusa T, Taka-Ishi N, Fujii H. Tetrahedron 1968; 24: 3795
- 9d Yanai H, Oguchi T, Taguchi T. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 3927
- 10a Schiess M, Seebach D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1983; 66: 1618
- 10b Seebach D, Adam G, Gees T, Schiess M, Weigand W. Chem. Ber. 1988; 121: 507
- 10c Carofiglio T, Cozzi PG, Floriani C, Chiesi-Villa A, Rizzoli C. Organometallics 1993; 12: 2726
- 11a Denmark SE, Fan Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 7825
- 11b Denmark SE, Fan Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 9667
- 12a Van Leusen D, Van Leusen AM. Org. React. 2001; 57: 417
- 12b Ramana Reddy VV. Synlett 2005; 363
- 12c Kaur T, Wadhwa P, Sharma A. RSC Adv. 2011; 1: 100
- 13a Radha Krishna P, Dayaker G, Narasimha Reddy PV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 5977
- 13b Radha Krishna P, Rao LK. Synlett 2007; 83
- 13c Radha Krishna P, Ramana Reddy VV, Sharma GV. M. Synlett 2003; 1619
- 13d Sharma GV. M, Radha Krishna P. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004; 8: 1187
- 13e Radha Krishna P, Ramana Reddy VV, Srinivas R. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 9871
- 14a Radha Krishna P, Raja Sekhar E, Prapurna YL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 9048
- 14b Radha Krishna P, Raja Sekhar E. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008; 350: 2871
- 14c Radha Krishna P, Lakshmi Prapurna Y. Synlett 2009; 2613
- 15a Nielsen DK, Doyle AG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 6056
- 15b Jiang N, Hu QY, Reid CS, Lu YF, Li CJ. Chem. Commun. 2003; 2318
- 15c Banerjee M, Roy UK. P, Sinha PS. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005; 690: 1422
- 16a Picione J, Mahmood SJ, Gill A, Hilliard M, Hossain MM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 2681
- 16b Ranu BC, Jana U. J. Org. Chem. 1998; 63: 8212
- 16c Suda K, Nakajima S.-I, Satoh Y, Takanami T. Chem. Commun. 2009; 1255
- 17a As suggested by one of the reviewers, a control experiment was conducted as evidence to the aldehyde formation from epoxide.
- 17b The aldehyde was identified by comparison of its spectral data as reported in: Chowdhury AD, Ray R, Lahiri GK. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 5497
- 18 Lewis JB, Hedrick GW. J. Org. Chem. 1965; 30: 4271
- 19 Tumanov VV, Tishkov AA, Mayr H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 3563
- 20 General Experimental Procedure (Table 3, Entry 1) A solution of styrene oxide (120 mg, 1.0 mmol), TosMIC (195 mg, 1.0 mmol), and InCl3 (110 mg, 0.5 mmol) in THF–H2O (9:1, 2 mL) was stirred at ambient temperature until completion (TLC). The resulting solution was partitioned between an equimolar ratio of Et2O (2 × 20 mL), the combined organic layers were washed with brine (1 × 20 mL), dried (Na2SO4), evaporated under vacuum, and the residue thus obtained was purified by column chromatography (silica gel 60–120 mesh, EtOAc–n-hexane, 3.0:7.0) to afford 2a. 2-Hydroxy-3-phenyl-N-(tosylmethyl)propanamide (2a) Yellow solid (290 mg, 90% yield), mp 125–127 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.78 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.56 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.39–7.15 (m, 7 H), 4.65 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.19 (dd, J = 9.4, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.04 (dd, J = 13.9, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.62 (dd, J = 14.0, 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.44 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.6, 145.5, 136.6, 133.7, 129.9, 129.4, 128.9, 128.7, 127.1, 72.8, 59.9, 40.5, 21.7. ESI-MS: m/z = 334 [M + H]+. HRMS: m/z calcd for C17H19O4NNaS [M + Na]+: 356.0927; found: 356.09226.
Catalytic reactions:
BF3·OEt2 or AlCl3 catalysis:
BF3·OEt2 catalysis:
In(OTf)3-catalyzed direct alkylative Passerini reaction of alcohols:
TiCl4-promoted Passerini reaction:
Catalytic asymmetric reaction:
-
References and Notes
- 1a Konda Y, Onda M, Hirano A, Ömura S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1980; 28: 2987
- 1b Suda H, Takita T, Aoyagi T, Umezawa H. J. Antibiot. 1976; 29: 100
- 1c Yokoi K, Nagaoka K, Nakashima T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1986; 34: 4554
- 1d Perry NB, Blunt JW, Munro MH. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 4850
- 2a Süssmuth R, Müller J, Von Döhren H, Molnár I. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011; 28: 99
- 2b Pelay-Gimeno M, Tulla-Puche J, Albericio F. Mar. Drugs 2013; 11: 1693
- 2c Fukuda T, Arai M, Tomoda H, Ömura S. J. Antibiot. 2004; 57: 117
- 2d Tomoda H, Nishida H, Huang X.-H, Masuma R, Kim YK, Ömura S. J. Antibiot. 1992; 45: 1207
- 2e Shiomi K, Matsui R, Kakei A, Yamaguchi Y, Masuma R, Hatano H, Arai N, Isozaki M, Tanaka H, Kobayashi S, Turberg A, Ömura S. J. Antibiot. 2010; 63: 77
- 3a Ahmad S, Ashfaq A, Alam M, Bisacchi GS, Chen P, Cheng PT. W, Greytok JA, Hermsmeier MA, Lin P.-F, Lis KA, Merchant Z, Mitt T, Skoog M, Spergel SH, Tino JA, Vite GD, Colonno RJ, Zahler R, Barrish JC. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995; 5: 1729
- 3b Sheppard GS, Wang J, Kawai M, BaMaung NY, Craig RA, Erickson SA, Lynch L, Patel J, Yang F, Searle XB, Lou P, Park C, Kim KH, Henkin J, Lesniewski R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004; 14: 865
- 3c Schenck HA, Lenkowski PW, Mukherjee IC, Kob SH, Stables JP, Patel MK, Brown ML. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004; 12: 979
- 3d Kuduk SD, Chang RK, DiPardo RM, Di Marco CN, Murphy KL, Ransom RW, Reiss DR, Tang C, Prueksaritanont T, Pettibone DJ, Bock MG. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008; 18: 5107
- 4a Soeta T, Kojima Y, Ukaji Y, Inomata K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 2557
- 4b Alcaide B, Almendros P, Aragoncillo C, Callejo R, Ruiz MP. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 10154
- 5a Lumma WC. J. Org. Chem. 1981; 46: 3668
- 5b Mullen LB, Sutherland JD. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 8063
- 5c He P, Wu J, Nie Y.-B, Ding M.-W. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 8563
- 6a Kumar JS, Jonnalagadda SC, Mereddy VR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 779
- 6b Ramazani A, Mahyari A, Lashgari H, Sleopokura K, Lis T. Helv. Chim. Acta 2011; 94: 611
- 6c Sela T, Vigalok A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012; 354: 2407
- 6d Bayat M, Nasri S, Hosseini H, Hassanzadeh F. Monatsh. Chem. 2012; 143: 801
- 6e Yamada T, Hirose T, Ömura S, Sunazuka T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 296
- 7a Passerini M. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1921; 51: 126
- 7b Passerini M, Ragni G. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1931; 61: 964
- 8a Ugi I, Meyr R, Fetzer U, Steinbrückner C. Angew. Chem. 1959; 71: 386
- 8b Ugi I, Steinbrückner C. Angew. Chem. 1960; 72: 267
- 9a Müller E, Zeeh B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1966; 696: 72
- 9b Müller E, Zeeh B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1968; 715: 47
- 9c Saegusa T, Taka-Ishi N, Fujii H. Tetrahedron 1968; 24: 3795
- 9d Yanai H, Oguchi T, Taguchi T. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 3927
- 10a Schiess M, Seebach D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1983; 66: 1618
- 10b Seebach D, Adam G, Gees T, Schiess M, Weigand W. Chem. Ber. 1988; 121: 507
- 10c Carofiglio T, Cozzi PG, Floriani C, Chiesi-Villa A, Rizzoli C. Organometallics 1993; 12: 2726
- 11a Denmark SE, Fan Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 7825
- 11b Denmark SE, Fan Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 9667
- 12a Van Leusen D, Van Leusen AM. Org. React. 2001; 57: 417
- 12b Ramana Reddy VV. Synlett 2005; 363
- 12c Kaur T, Wadhwa P, Sharma A. RSC Adv. 2011; 1: 100
- 13a Radha Krishna P, Dayaker G, Narasimha Reddy PV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 5977
- 13b Radha Krishna P, Rao LK. Synlett 2007; 83
- 13c Radha Krishna P, Ramana Reddy VV, Sharma GV. M. Synlett 2003; 1619
- 13d Sharma GV. M, Radha Krishna P. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004; 8: 1187
- 13e Radha Krishna P, Ramana Reddy VV, Srinivas R. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 9871
- 14a Radha Krishna P, Raja Sekhar E, Prapurna YL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 9048
- 14b Radha Krishna P, Raja Sekhar E. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008; 350: 2871
- 14c Radha Krishna P, Lakshmi Prapurna Y. Synlett 2009; 2613
- 15a Nielsen DK, Doyle AG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 6056
- 15b Jiang N, Hu QY, Reid CS, Lu YF, Li CJ. Chem. Commun. 2003; 2318
- 15c Banerjee M, Roy UK. P, Sinha PS. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005; 690: 1422
- 16a Picione J, Mahmood SJ, Gill A, Hilliard M, Hossain MM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 2681
- 16b Ranu BC, Jana U. J. Org. Chem. 1998; 63: 8212
- 16c Suda K, Nakajima S.-I, Satoh Y, Takanami T. Chem. Commun. 2009; 1255
- 17a As suggested by one of the reviewers, a control experiment was conducted as evidence to the aldehyde formation from epoxide.
- 17b The aldehyde was identified by comparison of its spectral data as reported in: Chowdhury AD, Ray R, Lahiri GK. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 5497
- 18 Lewis JB, Hedrick GW. J. Org. Chem. 1965; 30: 4271
- 19 Tumanov VV, Tishkov AA, Mayr H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 3563
- 20 General Experimental Procedure (Table 3, Entry 1) A solution of styrene oxide (120 mg, 1.0 mmol), TosMIC (195 mg, 1.0 mmol), and InCl3 (110 mg, 0.5 mmol) in THF–H2O (9:1, 2 mL) was stirred at ambient temperature until completion (TLC). The resulting solution was partitioned between an equimolar ratio of Et2O (2 × 20 mL), the combined organic layers were washed with brine (1 × 20 mL), dried (Na2SO4), evaporated under vacuum, and the residue thus obtained was purified by column chromatography (silica gel 60–120 mesh, EtOAc–n-hexane, 3.0:7.0) to afford 2a. 2-Hydroxy-3-phenyl-N-(tosylmethyl)propanamide (2a) Yellow solid (290 mg, 90% yield), mp 125–127 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.78 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.56 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.39–7.15 (m, 7 H), 4.65 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.19 (dd, J = 9.4, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.04 (dd, J = 13.9, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.62 (dd, J = 14.0, 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.44 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.6, 145.5, 136.6, 133.7, 129.9, 129.4, 128.9, 128.7, 127.1, 72.8, 59.9, 40.5, 21.7. ESI-MS: m/z = 334 [M + H]+. HRMS: m/z calcd for C17H19O4NNaS [M + Na]+: 356.0927; found: 356.09226.
Catalytic reactions:
BF3·OEt2 or AlCl3 catalysis:
BF3·OEt2 catalysis:
In(OTf)3-catalyzed direct alkylative Passerini reaction of alcohols:
TiCl4-promoted Passerini reaction:
Catalytic asymmetric reaction:






























