Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1560527
One-Pot Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Synthesis of Fluorenones via Decarboxylative Cyclization
Publication History
Received: 31 August 2015
Accepted after revision: 05 October 2015
Publication Date:
19 November 2015 (online)
Abstract
A one-pot palladium-catalyzed synthesis of fluoronones via decarboxylative cyclization is reported. This protocol offers good yields and tolerates a broad range of functional groups. Based on the extensive experimental data, we propose a plausible decarboxylative insertion mechanism.
#
Key words
palladium-catalyzed - decarboxylative insertion - C–C cleavage - control experiment - mechanismFluorenones are prominent structural motifs of many electronic and optical materials[1] and bioactive natural products.[2] Thus, intense efforts have focused on the development of novel methods to synthesize these compounds. Traditionally, they are synthesized by Friedel–Crafts acylation,[3] remote metalation,[4] and oxidation of fluorenes[5] or fluorenols.[6] Recently, some new metal-catalyzed strategies are reported, including radical cyclization,[7] coupling reactions of arylpalladium,[8] carbonylation,[9] and decarboxylation.[10]
Although diverse successful synthesis of fluorenones has been afforded, the scope of carbonyl source reported were always focused on acyl substrates and CO. More recently, carboxylic acids,[11] organic nitrile,[12] and aldoxime[13] were developed as new novel carbonyl source to attach fluorenones. In the catalytic system of organic nitrile[12] or aldoxime,[13] the carbonyl group was derived from the hydrolysis of C=N bonds. On the other hand, metal-catalyzed insertion of isocyanide[14] could form the similar C=N bonds, which inspired us that isocyanide may be a new carbonyl source in the synthesis of fluorenones. Herein, a one-pot palladium(II)-catalyzed synthesis of fluorenones via decarboxylative cyclization using tert-butyl isocyanide as a new carbonyl source is reported (Scheme [1]). The control experiments suggested a decarboxylative insertion mechanism.
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), tert-butyl isocyanide (1 mmol), catalyst (5 mol%), oxidant (1 mmol), DMSO (50% aq) 3 mL, 140 °C for 24 h.
b Isolated yields.


We initiated our studies by using 2-phenylbenzoic acid (1a) and tert-butyl isocyanide as a model substrate (Table [1], entry 1), which was treated with 5 mol% of Pd(OAc)2 in DMSO (50% aq) at 140 °C for 24 hours. However, very poor yield (<5%) of 3a was afforded (Table [1], entry 1). When two equivalents of AgOAc were added, the yield increased to 38% (Table [1], entry 2), which suggested that oxidants might increase the yield. After studying other oxidants carefully, Ag2CO3 showed the best activity (Table [1], entries 3–7). The addition of acid or base did not give good results (Table [1], entries 8 and 9). Subsequently, screening of other palladium catalysts, Pd(OTf)2 gave the best catalytic efficiency, increasing the yield of 3a to 80% (Table [1], entries 10–12). The use of other solvents or increasing the amount of loading catalyst and additive led to no significant improvement on the yield (Supporting Information, SI-Tables 1, 2).


Encouraged by the preliminary results, we tried to explore the functional-group tolerance for the synthesis of fluorenones. The reaction showed a good tolerance to many functional groups, including electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups (Scheme [2, 3a–p, e]. g., Me, OMe, Cl, Br, F, CF3). Benzoic acids with electron-donating groups on the 4- or/and 3-positions afforded the corresponding products in good to excellent yields (3a–e,g,m). But 2-substituted substrate resulted in a poor yield (3f, 36%), which might be due to steric hindrance. Notably, halogen substituents could also be tolerated in moderate yields (3h–j), which provided opportunities for further functionalization. However, benzoic acids with strong electron-withdrawing groups (3k,p) showed poor activity. In general, benzoic acids with electron-donating groups gave the better yields. Hetero- or nonaromatic substrates showed no activity (3q–t).
To gain some preliminary insight into the reaction mechanism, control experiments were employed as shown in Scheme [3]. Firstly, the reaction of 1a under standard conditions in the absence of isocyanide afforded 69% yield of xenene (Scheme [3], eq. 1). However, using the deuterated solvent (DMSO-d 6/D2O = 1:1) gave the appropriate deuterated xenene with D/H = 6.3:3.7 (Scheme [3], eq. 2). Secondly, the parallel reaction of 1a–d [5] in the absence of isocyanide at 140 °C and 50 °C afforded the appropriate deuterated xenene with D/H = 8.7:1.3 and D/H = 9.1:0.9, respectively (Scheme [3], eq. 3 and eq. 4). These results suggests a decarboxylation insertion mechanism via C–H activation.[15]
Based upon the experimental and literature results,[14] [15] a plausible mechanism is proposed in Scheme [4]. Firstly, the decarboxylation insertion of 1a catalyzed by the palladium/silver catalyst via two possible paths (path 1 or 2) generated intermediate III.[15] Subsequently, the domino elimination and hydrolysis of III (path a or path b) generated 3a to finish the catalytic cycle.[14]




In summary, we have developed a one-pot palladium(II)-catalyzed synthesis of fluorenones via decarboxylative cyclization using tert-butyl isocyanide as a new carbonyl source.[16] [17] This direct C–COOH cleavage and C–H activation is suitable for a broad range of substrates. The control experiments suggested a possible decarboxylative insertion mechanism. Further studies concerning the detailed mechanism and the broader scope of substrates are currently under way in our laboratory.
#
Acknowledgment
This work was supported financially by the Scientific Research Foundation of the Education Department of Liaoning Province (L2015383) and the Doctoral Start-Up Fund of Shenyang University of Technology (No. 521422).
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0035-1560527.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Shultz DA, Sloop JC, Washington G. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 9104
- 1b Usta H, Facchetti A, Marks TJ. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1385
- 1c Scherf U, List EJ. W. Adv. Mater. 2002; 14: 477
- 1d Oldridge L, Kastler M, Müllen K. Chem. Commun. 2006; 885
- 2a Talapatra SK, Bose S, Mallik AK, Talapatra B. Tetrahedron 1985; 41: 2765
- 2b Fan C, Wang W, Wang Y, Qin G, Zhao W. Phytochemistry 2001; 57: 1255
- 2c Wu XY, Qin GW, Fan DJ, Xu RS. Phytochemistry 1994; 36: 477
- 2d Perry PJ, Read MA, Davies RT, Gowan SM, Reszka AP, Wood AA, Kelland LR, Neidle S. J. Med. Chem. 1999; 42: 2679
- 2e Tierney MT, Grinstaff MW. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 5355
- 3a Barluenga J, Trincado M, Rubio E, González JM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 3140
- 3b Chinnagolla RK, Jeganmohan M. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5246
- 3c Shabashov D, Maldonado JR. M, Daugulis O. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 7818
- 3d Reim S, Lau M, Langer P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 6903
- 4a Tilly D, Samanta SS, De A, Castanet A.-S, Mortier J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 827
- 4b Tilly D, Fu J.-M, Zhao B.-P, Alessi M, Castanet A.-S, Snieckus V, Mortier J. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 68
- 4c Alessi M, Larkin AL, Ogilvie KA, Green LA, Lai S, Lopez S, Snieckus V. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 1588
- 4d Tilly D, Samanta SS, Castanet A.-S, De A, Mortier J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 174
- 4e Tilly D, Samanta SS, Faigl F, Mortier J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 8347
- 5a Yang G, Zhang Q, Miao H, Tong X, Xu J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 263
- 5b Catino AJ, Nichols JM, Choi H, Gottipamula S, Doyle MP. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5167
- 6a Liu T.-P, Liao Y.-X, Xing C.-H, Hu Q.-S. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2452
- 6b Bei X, Hagemeyer A, Volpe A, Saxton R, Turner H, Guram AS. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 8626
- 7a Shi Z, Glorius F. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 829
- 7b Wertz S, Leifert D, Studer A. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 928
- 7c Seo S, Slater M, Greaney MF. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 2650
- 7d Lockner JW, Dixon DD, Risgaard R, Baran PS. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 5628
- 8a Zhang X, Larock RC. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 3973
- 8b Waldo JP, Zhang X, Shi F, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 6679
- 8c Pletnev AA, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 9428
- 8d Paul S, Samanta S, Ray JK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 5604
- 9 Campo MA, Larock RC. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 3675
- 10 Seo S, Slater M, Greaney MF. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 2650
- 11 Fukuyama T, Maetani S, Miyagawa K, Ryu I. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 3216
- 12 Wan J.-C, Huang J.-M, Jhan Y.-H, Hsieh J.-C. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2742
- 13 Sun C.-L, Liu N, Li B.-J, Yu D.-G, Wang Y, Shi Z.-J. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 184
- 14a Hong X.-H, Wang H, Qian G, Tan Q, Xu B. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 3228
- 14b Zhu C, Xie W, Falck JR. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 12591
- 15a Wang C, Rakshit S, Glorius F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 14006
- 15b Zhou D.-B, Wang G.-W. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 1260
- 16 A mixture of 1 (0.5 mmol), DMSO (50% aq, 3 mL), Pd(OTf)2 (5 mol%), and Ag2CO3 (2 equiv) was stirred at 140 °C under air atmosphere for 24 h. The reaction mixture was washed H2O, and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the corresponding products (3a–i,17 3k–m,17 3o–p 17 according to the literature). 3-Bromo-9H-fluoren-9-one (3j) Yield: 59%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.52–7.47 (m, 3 H), 7.35–7.31 (m, 1 H), 7.25 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.3, 146.1, 143.1, 140.9, 134.8, 134.3, 132.3, 129.8, 128.9, 125.3, 124.5, 120.9, 120.5. HRMS: m/z calcd for C13H7BrO: 259.0981; found: 259.0980 3-Fluoro-6-methoxy-9H-fluoren-9-one (3n) Yield: 62%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.53–7.49 (m, 1 H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.16 (s, 1 H), 7.02 (m, 2 H), 6.83 (m, 1 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 191.7, 167.2 (d, J = 254 Hz), 147.3 (d, J = 10.2 Hz), 145.8, 143.2 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 132.3, 130.3, 126.2 (d, J = 10.2 Hz), 124.2, 121.4, 115.3 (d, J = 22.8 Hz), 108.2 (d, J = 24.4 Hz), 56.5. HRMS: m/z calcd for C14H9FO2: 228.2185; found: 228.2189.
- 17 Li H, Zhu R, Shi W, He K, Shi Z.-J. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 4850
-
References and Notes
- 1a Shultz DA, Sloop JC, Washington G. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 9104
- 1b Usta H, Facchetti A, Marks TJ. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1385
- 1c Scherf U, List EJ. W. Adv. Mater. 2002; 14: 477
- 1d Oldridge L, Kastler M, Müllen K. Chem. Commun. 2006; 885
- 2a Talapatra SK, Bose S, Mallik AK, Talapatra B. Tetrahedron 1985; 41: 2765
- 2b Fan C, Wang W, Wang Y, Qin G, Zhao W. Phytochemistry 2001; 57: 1255
- 2c Wu XY, Qin GW, Fan DJ, Xu RS. Phytochemistry 1994; 36: 477
- 2d Perry PJ, Read MA, Davies RT, Gowan SM, Reszka AP, Wood AA, Kelland LR, Neidle S. J. Med. Chem. 1999; 42: 2679
- 2e Tierney MT, Grinstaff MW. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 5355
- 3a Barluenga J, Trincado M, Rubio E, González JM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 3140
- 3b Chinnagolla RK, Jeganmohan M. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5246
- 3c Shabashov D, Maldonado JR. M, Daugulis O. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 7818
- 3d Reim S, Lau M, Langer P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 6903
- 4a Tilly D, Samanta SS, De A, Castanet A.-S, Mortier J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 827
- 4b Tilly D, Fu J.-M, Zhao B.-P, Alessi M, Castanet A.-S, Snieckus V, Mortier J. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 68
- 4c Alessi M, Larkin AL, Ogilvie KA, Green LA, Lai S, Lopez S, Snieckus V. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 1588
- 4d Tilly D, Samanta SS, Castanet A.-S, De A, Mortier J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 174
- 4e Tilly D, Samanta SS, Faigl F, Mortier J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 8347
- 5a Yang G, Zhang Q, Miao H, Tong X, Xu J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 263
- 5b Catino AJ, Nichols JM, Choi H, Gottipamula S, Doyle MP. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5167
- 6a Liu T.-P, Liao Y.-X, Xing C.-H, Hu Q.-S. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2452
- 6b Bei X, Hagemeyer A, Volpe A, Saxton R, Turner H, Guram AS. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 8626
- 7a Shi Z, Glorius F. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 829
- 7b Wertz S, Leifert D, Studer A. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 928
- 7c Seo S, Slater M, Greaney MF. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 2650
- 7d Lockner JW, Dixon DD, Risgaard R, Baran PS. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 5628
- 8a Zhang X, Larock RC. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 3973
- 8b Waldo JP, Zhang X, Shi F, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 6679
- 8c Pletnev AA, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 9428
- 8d Paul S, Samanta S, Ray JK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 5604
- 9 Campo MA, Larock RC. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 3675
- 10 Seo S, Slater M, Greaney MF. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 2650
- 11 Fukuyama T, Maetani S, Miyagawa K, Ryu I. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 3216
- 12 Wan J.-C, Huang J.-M, Jhan Y.-H, Hsieh J.-C. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2742
- 13 Sun C.-L, Liu N, Li B.-J, Yu D.-G, Wang Y, Shi Z.-J. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 184
- 14a Hong X.-H, Wang H, Qian G, Tan Q, Xu B. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 3228
- 14b Zhu C, Xie W, Falck JR. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 12591
- 15a Wang C, Rakshit S, Glorius F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 14006
- 15b Zhou D.-B, Wang G.-W. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 1260
- 16 A mixture of 1 (0.5 mmol), DMSO (50% aq, 3 mL), Pd(OTf)2 (5 mol%), and Ag2CO3 (2 equiv) was stirred at 140 °C under air atmosphere for 24 h. The reaction mixture was washed H2O, and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the corresponding products (3a–i,17 3k–m,17 3o–p 17 according to the literature). 3-Bromo-9H-fluoren-9-one (3j) Yield: 59%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.52–7.47 (m, 3 H), 7.35–7.31 (m, 1 H), 7.25 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.3, 146.1, 143.1, 140.9, 134.8, 134.3, 132.3, 129.8, 128.9, 125.3, 124.5, 120.9, 120.5. HRMS: m/z calcd for C13H7BrO: 259.0981; found: 259.0980 3-Fluoro-6-methoxy-9H-fluoren-9-one (3n) Yield: 62%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.53–7.49 (m, 1 H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.16 (s, 1 H), 7.02 (m, 2 H), 6.83 (m, 1 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 191.7, 167.2 (d, J = 254 Hz), 147.3 (d, J = 10.2 Hz), 145.8, 143.2 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 132.3, 130.3, 126.2 (d, J = 10.2 Hz), 124.2, 121.4, 115.3 (d, J = 22.8 Hz), 108.2 (d, J = 24.4 Hz), 56.5. HRMS: m/z calcd for C14H9FO2: 228.2185; found: 228.2189.
- 17 Li H, Zhu R, Shi W, He K, Shi Z.-J. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 4850








