Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1380150
Facile Synthesis of Cyanoarenes from Quinones by Reductive Aromatization of Cyanohydrin Intermediates
Publication History
Received: 18 December 2014
Accepted after revision: 14 January 2015
Publication Date:
19 February 2015 (online)
Abstract
A novel synthesis of cyanoarenes from quinones by using PCl3 as the reagent for reductive aromatization of cyanohydrin intermediates is reported. In situ IR spectroscopic measurements were conducted to monitor the reactions and to develop a convenient one-pot protocol. 1,4-Dicyanobenzene and 9,10-dicyanoanthracene were prepared by the new procedure.
#
Quinones, and in particular 1,4-benzoquinones, are frequently used as building blocks in organic synthesis due to their widespread availability and their modifiability by numerous reactions.[1] In recent years, modification by nucleophilic attack of acetylides at the carbonyl functionalities of quinones and subsequent reductive aromatization (mostly) using SnCl2 (Scheme [1, a]) has gained significant attention in organic synthesis, particularly in the field of organic functional materials.[2] TIPS-pentacene, to name just one of the most prominent compounds synthesized by this approach, is a frequently used and well-investigated material for organic field-effect transistors.[3]


The corresponding introduction of cyanides instead of acetylides has not been described in the literature, although theoretical calculations suggest that cyano substituents increase the electron affinity, reduce the internal reorganization energy and promote the π-stacking of molecules.[4] These properties render cyanoarenes particularly promising for (n-type) organic semiconductors. The development of a facile and cheap synthesis of these compounds from quinones therefore represents a major benefit to a broad field of organic chemistry. Using quinones as reactants enables the preparation of many compounds from available substrates; on the other hand, it allows for substitution patterns that are difficult to realize using alternative methods.[5]
Unlike lithium acetylides, cyanides favor 1,4-addition to benzoquinones over 1,2-addition. This problem can be overcome by the application of trimethylsilyl cyanide (TMSCN) for the synthesis of stable (silylated) cyanohydrins. Following a protocol for the mild and efficient preparation of cyanohydrins in acetonitrile[6] using CsF as catalyst, but carrying out the reaction at lower temperatures of 0 °C, resulted in a 1:1 cis/trans isomeric mixture of 1a,b (Scheme [1, b]). The isomer ratio was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy after evaporation of the solvent. The 1H NMR signals of the trans isomer 1b were published recently in a crystallographic report,[7] which allowed assignment of the signals to the respective isomers.
The rapid reaction using 3 equivalents of TMSCN and 20 mol% CsF was monitored by in situ IR spectroscopic measurements (Figure [1], top left). To follow the conversion of the starting material, the carbonyl vibrational bands were integrated in a range of 1730 cm–1 to 1628 cm–1. Cyanohydrin formation was monitored by plotting the area of a newly appearing peak at 1138 cm–1 to 1100 cm–1 (intermediate peak).


Direct reductive aromatization of 1a,b towards target compound 2 (Scheme [1, b]) using SnCl2 (or Zn) proved to be impossible. This reaction yields 4-cyanophenol, as was previously described when applying SmI2 as reducing agent in a similar reaction.[8] Deprotection of 1a,b and following reductive aromatization may appear to be a suitable solution to this problem, but results in the back-formation of 1,4-benzoquinone.
Inspired by the work of Yamaguchi et al,[9] we applied POCl3 in anhydrous pyridine for aromatization toward 2, and product formation was indeed observed. However, we obtained a significant amount of aromatic by-product that we were not able to separate efficiently from 2 using column chromatography. This by-product was attributed to a chlorinated dicyanobenzene based on GC–MS measurements. We assume chlorination (substitution of an O-TMS group) followed by a similar elimination–rearrangement step as described for the reaction of 3,6-dimethoxy-3,6-dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene to methoxyxylenes[10] to be responsible for the formation of this by-product.
Based on these results and due to the reducing properties of PCl3,[11] we tested it as a reagent for reductive aromatization. Indeed, addition of PCl3 to a solution of crude 1a,b in acetonitrile afforded 2 if two small drops of DMF were added (153 mg, 30% yield). Only a very small amount of the aforementioned by-product was observed (larger amounts of DMF resulted in increased by-product formation). Conversion was again monitored by in situ IR spectroscopic measurements (Figure [1], top right). The lower peak area at the starting point of the reaction is explained by precipitation of the intermediate product when the reaction was cooled to 0 °C for addition of DMF and PCl3. The reaction was then allowed to warm to room temperature, resulting in increased solubility and, thus, in an increased intermediate product peak area in the early stage of the aromatization reaction.
As the reaction progressed, precipitation at the IR probe was observed, which led to a deviation of the measured values (Figure [1], grey lines) from the expected results (Figure [1], dotted lines). However, an estimation of the reaction time as 90 minutes turned out to be consistent with GC–MS measurements.
Furthermore, we were able to synthesize 2 in a convenient one-pot reaction without isolating the intermediate compounds 1a,b. TMSCN was added only until the carbonyl vibrational bands disappeared completely, thus 2.0 equivalents TMSCN was added, followed by another two additions of 0.1 equivalent each (Figure [1], bottom). After stirring for 10 minutes, two drops of DMF and 1.0 equivalent of PCl3 were added and the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. After 1.5 hours, the reaction was diluted with dichloromethane and filtered directly through a pad of silica using dichloromethane as eluent. Evaporation of the solvent afforded 1,4-dicyanobenzene (2) in a yield of 30%.[12]
A greater excess of TMSCN turned out to inhibit aromatization in one-pot reactions. However, if the solvent and excessive TMSCN were evaporated in vacuo, the reaction not only proceeded in acetonitrile, but also in dichloromethane and in THF. Application of other reducing agents such as phosphorous acid, diethyl phosphite, trimethyl phosphite, sodium metabisulfite and sodium sulfite instead of PCl3 did not result in any product formation.
To investigate the applicability of the reaction conditions to larger and less soluble substrates, we synthesized 9,10-dicyanoanthracene (3) from 9,10-anthraquinone (Scheme [2]). In situ IR spectroscopic measurements were not suitable for monitoring the reaction progress due to the above-mentioned low solubility. However, according to GC–MS measurements, cyanohydrin formation was complete after five hours and aromatization was complete overnight. Yields of 27% were achieved after workup. Larger amounts of DMF (0.5 equiv) were added to allow for a one-pot synthesis despite a larger excess of TMSCN (1.0 equiv excess). This is possible in the synthesis of 3, since by-product formation by rearrangement as for 2 is not feasible.


In conclusion, the developed protocol is notable due to its convenience and straightforwardness. For the first time, reductive aromatization of cyanohydrins to dicyanoarenes has been demonstrated. One-pot conversion to the respective arenes has also been demonstrated for both 1,4-benzoquinone, which is prone to 1,4-addition and rearrangements, and for 9,10-anthraquinone, which is characterized by low solubility in acetonitrile.
#
Acknowledgment
We thank Brigitte Holzer, Paul Kautny and Philipp Skrinjar for NMR experiments. Esther Knittl and Felix Biegger are acknowledged for support with solid-phase ATR-IR measurements.
Supporting Information
- including complete experimental and instrumental details for the synthesis and characterization
is available online at http://dx.doi.org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0034-1380150.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a The Chemistry of the Quinonoid Compounds. Vol. 2. Patai S, Rappoport Z. Wiley; Chichester: 1988
- 1b Nawrat CC, Moody CJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 2056
- 1c Kutyrev AA, Moskva VV. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1991; 60: 72
- 1d Abraham I, Joshi R, Pardasani P, Pardasani RT. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2011; 22: 385
- 2a Lin Y.-Z, Huang CH, Chang YJ, Yeh C.-W, Chin T.-M, Chi K.-M, Chou P.-T, Watanabe M, Chow TJ. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 262
- 2b Ghosh KR, Saha SK, Gao JP, Wang ZY. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 716
- 2c Glöcklhofer F, Lumpi D, Stöger B, Fröhlich J. New J. Chem. 2014; 38: 2229
- 2d Porz M, Paulus F, Höfle S, Lutz T, Lemmer U, Colsmann A, Bunz UH. F. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013; 34: 1611
- 2e Liu D, Xu X, Su Y, He Z, Xu J, Miao Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 6222
- 2f Ichihara K, Kawai H, Togari Y, Kikuta E, Kitagawa H, Tsuzuki S, Yoza K, Yamanaka M, Kobayashi K. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 3685
- 2g Takeda T, Tobe Y. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 7841
- 2h Lehnherr D, Waterloo AR, Goetz KP, Payne MM, Hampel F, Anthony JE, Jurchescu OD, Tykwinski RR. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 3660
- 2i Liang Z, Tang Q, Mao R, Liu D, Xu J, Miao Q. Adv. Mater. 2011; 23: 5514
- 2j Qu H, Chi C. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 3360
- 3a Anthony JE, Brooks JS, Eaton DL, Parkin SR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 9482
- 3b Shim H, Kumar A, Cho H, Yang D, Palai AK, Pyo S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014; 6: 17804
- 3c Gnoli A, Ustunel H, Toffoli D, Yu L, Catone D, Turchini S, Lizzit S, Stingelin N, Larciprete R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014; 118: 22522
- 3d Basu S, Adriyanto F, Wang Y.-H. Nanotechnology 2014; 25: 085201
- 3e Giri G, Verploegen E, Mannsfeld SC. B, Atahan-Evrenk S, Kim DH, Lee SY, Becerril HA, Aspuru-Guzik A, Toney MF, Bao Z. Nature (London) 2011; 480: 504
- 3f Hamilton R, Smith J, Ogier S, Heeney M, Anthony JE, McCulloch I, Veres J, Bradley DD. C, Anthopoulos TD. Adv. Mater. 2009; 21: 1166
- 3g Lee SH, Choi MH, Han SH, Choo DJ, Jang J, Kwon SK. Org. Electron. 2008; 9: 721
- 3h Kim DH, Lee DY, Lee HS, Lee WH, Kim YH, Han JI, Cho K. Adv. Mater. 2007; 19: 678
- 3i Lim JA, Lee WH, Lee HS, Lee JH, Park YD, Cho K. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008; 18: 229
- 3j Sheraw CD, Jackson TN, Eaton DL, Anthony JE. Adv. Mater. 2003; 15: 2009
- 4a Katsuta S, Miyagi D, Yamada H, Okujima T, Mori S, Nakayama K.-I, Uno H. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1454
- 4b Kuo M.-Y, Chen H.-Y, Chao I. Chem. Eur. J. 2007; 13: 4750
- 4c Liu C.-C, Mao S.-W, Kuo M.-Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010; 114: 22316
- 4d Kaur I, Jia W, Kopreski RP, Selvarasah S, Dokmeci MR, Pramanik C, McGruer NE, Miller GP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 16274
- 5 Akar KB, Çakmak O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 312
- 6 Kim SS, Rajagopal G, Song DH. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004; 689: 1734
- 7 Glöcklhofer F, Fröhlich J, Stöger B, Weil M. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E 2014; 70: 77
- 8 Olson SH, Danishefsky SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994; 35: 7901
- 9 Yamaguchi S, Hanafusa T. Chem. Lett. 1985; 14: 689
- 10 Thibblin A. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 7427
- 11 Wiberg E, Wiberg N, Holleman AF. Inorganic Chemistry: 1st English Edition. Academic Press; San Diego: 2001: 705
- 12 General Procedure (One-Pot): 1,4-Benzoquinone (1.0 equiv) was dissolved in MeCN (1 M) and added to a suspension of CsF (0.2 equiv) in MeCN (0.2 M) at 0 °C. The reaction was carefully purged with argon and TMSCN (2.0 equiv) was added dropwise, followed by another two additions after 4 min (0.1 equiv) and 6 min (0.1 equiv). After 10 min of total stirring time, DMF (2 small drops) and PCl3 (1.0 equiv) were added. The reaction was allowed to warm to r.t. and stirred for 90 min. The resulting suspension was diluted with CH2Cl2 and filtered through a pad of silica using CH2Cl2 as the eluent. Evaporation of the solvent afforded 1,4-dicyanobenzene (2) as a white solid (30% yield).
-
References and Notes
- 1a The Chemistry of the Quinonoid Compounds. Vol. 2. Patai S, Rappoport Z. Wiley; Chichester: 1988
- 1b Nawrat CC, Moody CJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 2056
- 1c Kutyrev AA, Moskva VV. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1991; 60: 72
- 1d Abraham I, Joshi R, Pardasani P, Pardasani RT. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2011; 22: 385
- 2a Lin Y.-Z, Huang CH, Chang YJ, Yeh C.-W, Chin T.-M, Chi K.-M, Chou P.-T, Watanabe M, Chow TJ. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 262
- 2b Ghosh KR, Saha SK, Gao JP, Wang ZY. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 716
- 2c Glöcklhofer F, Lumpi D, Stöger B, Fröhlich J. New J. Chem. 2014; 38: 2229
- 2d Porz M, Paulus F, Höfle S, Lutz T, Lemmer U, Colsmann A, Bunz UH. F. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013; 34: 1611
- 2e Liu D, Xu X, Su Y, He Z, Xu J, Miao Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 6222
- 2f Ichihara K, Kawai H, Togari Y, Kikuta E, Kitagawa H, Tsuzuki S, Yoza K, Yamanaka M, Kobayashi K. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 3685
- 2g Takeda T, Tobe Y. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 7841
- 2h Lehnherr D, Waterloo AR, Goetz KP, Payne MM, Hampel F, Anthony JE, Jurchescu OD, Tykwinski RR. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 3660
- 2i Liang Z, Tang Q, Mao R, Liu D, Xu J, Miao Q. Adv. Mater. 2011; 23: 5514
- 2j Qu H, Chi C. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 3360
- 3a Anthony JE, Brooks JS, Eaton DL, Parkin SR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 9482
- 3b Shim H, Kumar A, Cho H, Yang D, Palai AK, Pyo S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014; 6: 17804
- 3c Gnoli A, Ustunel H, Toffoli D, Yu L, Catone D, Turchini S, Lizzit S, Stingelin N, Larciprete R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014; 118: 22522
- 3d Basu S, Adriyanto F, Wang Y.-H. Nanotechnology 2014; 25: 085201
- 3e Giri G, Verploegen E, Mannsfeld SC. B, Atahan-Evrenk S, Kim DH, Lee SY, Becerril HA, Aspuru-Guzik A, Toney MF, Bao Z. Nature (London) 2011; 480: 504
- 3f Hamilton R, Smith J, Ogier S, Heeney M, Anthony JE, McCulloch I, Veres J, Bradley DD. C, Anthopoulos TD. Adv. Mater. 2009; 21: 1166
- 3g Lee SH, Choi MH, Han SH, Choo DJ, Jang J, Kwon SK. Org. Electron. 2008; 9: 721
- 3h Kim DH, Lee DY, Lee HS, Lee WH, Kim YH, Han JI, Cho K. Adv. Mater. 2007; 19: 678
- 3i Lim JA, Lee WH, Lee HS, Lee JH, Park YD, Cho K. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008; 18: 229
- 3j Sheraw CD, Jackson TN, Eaton DL, Anthony JE. Adv. Mater. 2003; 15: 2009
- 4a Katsuta S, Miyagi D, Yamada H, Okujima T, Mori S, Nakayama K.-I, Uno H. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1454
- 4b Kuo M.-Y, Chen H.-Y, Chao I. Chem. Eur. J. 2007; 13: 4750
- 4c Liu C.-C, Mao S.-W, Kuo M.-Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010; 114: 22316
- 4d Kaur I, Jia W, Kopreski RP, Selvarasah S, Dokmeci MR, Pramanik C, McGruer NE, Miller GP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 16274
- 5 Akar KB, Çakmak O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 312
- 6 Kim SS, Rajagopal G, Song DH. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004; 689: 1734
- 7 Glöcklhofer F, Fröhlich J, Stöger B, Weil M. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E 2014; 70: 77
- 8 Olson SH, Danishefsky SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994; 35: 7901
- 9 Yamaguchi S, Hanafusa T. Chem. Lett. 1985; 14: 689
- 10 Thibblin A. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 7427
- 11 Wiberg E, Wiberg N, Holleman AF. Inorganic Chemistry: 1st English Edition. Academic Press; San Diego: 2001: 705
- 12 General Procedure (One-Pot): 1,4-Benzoquinone (1.0 equiv) was dissolved in MeCN (1 M) and added to a suspension of CsF (0.2 equiv) in MeCN (0.2 M) at 0 °C. The reaction was carefully purged with argon and TMSCN (2.0 equiv) was added dropwise, followed by another two additions after 4 min (0.1 equiv) and 6 min (0.1 equiv). After 10 min of total stirring time, DMF (2 small drops) and PCl3 (1.0 equiv) were added. The reaction was allowed to warm to r.t. and stirred for 90 min. The resulting suspension was diluted with CH2Cl2 and filtered through a pad of silica using CH2Cl2 as the eluent. Evaporation of the solvent afforded 1,4-dicyanobenzene (2) as a white solid (30% yield).





