Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379009
Synthesis of Tenuifolin through Intramolecular Nicholas Reaction
Publication History
Received: 30 June 2014
Accepted after revision: 30 July 2014
Publication Date:
08 September 2014 (online)
Abstract
The synthesis of the Cinnamomum homosesquiterpenoid tenuifolin has been accomplished by way of an intramolecular Nicholas reaction of the [Co2(CO)6] complex of an alkyne-substituted biaryl for construction of the seven-membered ring. The cyclization features the reaction of a nonactivated arene ring with the propargyldicobalt cation to give the dibenzocycloheptyne-Co2(CO)6.
#
Key words
alkynes - total synthesis - carbocation - fused-ring systems - electrophilic aromatic substitution - transition metalsThe Cinnamomum homosesquiterpenoids are a series of dibenzocycloheptenemethanol derivatives that include tenuifolin (1), subamol (2), reticuol (3), burmanol (4), and several glycosidic subavenosides (Figure [1]). They have been isolated recently from several trees of the genus Cinnamomum, which have been used in folk medicine.[1] The sesquiterpenoid tenuifolin itself has been isolated from the stems of Cinnamomum tenuifolium and Cinnamomum reticulatum, and has been shown to possess weak activity against the prostate tumor cell line LNCaP.[1a] [b] Reticuol has also shown inhibitory activity towards microsome CYP3A4.[1c]


Synthetic studies towards members of this group of compounds have been limited. The first total synthesis of tenuifolin was reported recently by Wu and co-workers; this synthesis centered on a PIFA-mediated oxidative biaryl coupling to afford the seven-membered ring of the dibenzocycloheptene.[2] The other members of this class of compounds have not been the subject of published synthetic work.
Our group has developed several protocols for the synthesis of seven-membered-ring systems based on cycloheptynedicobalt complexes,[3] [4] and recently applied this approach to the synthesis of dibenzocycloheptanes and allocolchicines by way of intramolecular Nicholas reaction chemistry (Equation 1).[5–7] These reactions normally involve a very electron-rich arene [R1 = electron-donating group(s)] attacking the propargyldicobalt cation (5 → 6), which is appropriate because the bimolecular reactions of propargyldicobalt cations require a partner with a nucleophilicity greater than that of m-xylene for successful reaction.[8] Conversely, the corresponding approach to tenuifolin or subamol would involve attack of a considerably less electron-rich arene ring site (meta- to methoxy) on the propargyldicobalt cation. Given that (1) this approach would test the reactivity limits of Nicholas reaction based dibenzocycloheptane synthesis, (2) this is a distinct ring-closure approach to the tenuifolins relative to the work of Wu, and (3) there is a paucity of synthetic work in the Cinnamomum dibenzocycloheptanoids in general, we began a programme to investigate the viability of applying the intramolecular Nicholas reaction approach to this group of compounds. Here we describe our synthesis of tenuifolin (1) based on this chemistry.


The intramolecular Nicholas reaction approach relies on the prior construction of an alkyne-substituted biaryl substrate. The initial biaryl formation was accomplished by Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling[9] of 4-methoxyphenylboronic acid (7) and 6-bromo-1,3-benzodioxole-5-carboxaldehyde (8); this proceeded smoothly and afforded the intended biaryl 9 in 91% yield (Equation 2). Extension of the aldehyde function in 9 to a propargylic alcohol was then accomplished by the application of Corey–Fuchs chemistry.[10] Subjecting 9 to CBr4 and PPh3 afforded the dibromoalkene 10, which was not purified rigorously but subjected reaction with n-BuLi (2.5 equiv) followed by the addition of paraformaldehyde at low temperature; subsequent workup afforded the intended propargyl alcohol 11 in good yield (86%) over two steps (Scheme [1]).




Before complexation of the alkyne function with dicobalt octacarbonyl, the alcohol function was converted into the corresponding acetate. Complexation of the propargyl acetate then afforded the intended product 12 in 92% yield over the two steps.
When complex 12 was subjected to a cyclization reaction with BF3·OEt2 (3 equiv, 5 × 10–3 M) a reaction proceeded over four hours to give dibenzocycloheptynedicobalt complex 13 (see Equation 3). However, the reaction produced some baseline material on TLC and the maximum yield obtained under these conditions was 61%. In some cases, the addition of DIPEA has been shown to reduce decomposition in intramolecular Nicholas reaction chemistry;[5] in this case, addition of DIPEA (1.5 equiv) to the reaction mixture caused the rate of cyclization to decrease slightly but resulted in an increase in the yield to 73% over a period of six hours (Equation 3). Despite the relatively electron-poor C-ring, this rate of cyclization reaction was roughly in line with other dibenzocycloheptynedicobalt derivatives synthesized previously by our group.[5]


Reductive decomplexation of dibenzocycloheptynedicobalt complex 13 was accomplished by a two-step procedure involving hydrosilylation mediated by Et3SiH and bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene, followed by addition of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at 0 °C to induce protodesilylation of the intermediate vinylsilane mixture;[5] [11] this produced the intended alkene 14 in 83% yield (Equation 4). Some care was required in the TFA addition step because extended reaction times or higher temperatures resulted in reduced yield, likely due to competing deprotection of the methylenedioxy group.


Conversion of 14 into tenuifolin required considerable experimentation. Hydroboration-oxidation resulted in the smooth formation of ketone 15 (76% yield; Scheme [2]). All attempts to convert 15 into a vinyllithium by way of its tosylhydrazone and subsequent Shapiro reaction[12] resulted in gross decomposition. Wittig reaction on 15 afforded exo-methylene-substituted 16 (70% yield), and epoxidation of the latter with dimethyldioxirane (DMDO)[13] gave 17 (72% yield). This epoxide could be opened by zinc(II) iodide and benzylamine[14] to give tenuifolin 1, but the product was obtained in unacceptably low yield (19%).


Ultimately, it was found that the most effective route towards tenuifolin involved an initial bromination–dehydrobromination protocol employing Br2 and t-BuOK, respectively, to give brominated dibenzocycloheptene 18 in 86% yield (Scheme [3]). Direct attempts to incorporate the CH2OH function or its acetate by Stille or Suzuki–Miyaura protocols[15] [16] resulted in predominant reduction to 14. Conversely, metal–halogen exchange employing t-BuLi, followed by addition of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) gave formylated 19 in 70% yield, along with some 14 (26%).[17] A less efficient, but still synthetically useful alternative proved to be cyclopropanation with dichlorocarbene to afford 20 (93% yield), followed by base-induced (NaOEt, THF–EtOH) ring opening and subsequent acetal hydrolysis[18] to give 19 in 53% yield. Aldehyde 19 was then subjected to reduction with diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) to readily afford tenuifolin (1; 87% yield; Equation 5).




In summary, we have synthesized tenuifolin in 23% overall yield over 12 steps,[19] with construction of the seven-membered ring by way of intramolecular Nicholas reaction chemistry. This cyclization has been accomplished successfully on the least electron-rich nucleophilic arene partner that has been attempted in benzocycloheptynedicobalt formation to date. This general approach is likely to be amenable to other Cinnamomum dibenzocycloheptanoids, and investigation towards their syntheses is in progress and will be reported in due course.
#
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to NSERC (Canada), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and the Ontario Innovation Trust (OIT) for support of this research.
Supporting Information
- for this article is available online at http://www.thieme-connect.com.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/products/ejournals/journal/
10.1055/s-00000083.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Lin R.-J, Cheng M.-J, Huang J.-C, Lo W.-L, Yeh Y.-T, Yen C.-M, Lu C.-M, Chen C.-Y. J. Nat. Prod. 2009; 72: 1816
- 1b Lin IJ, Yeh HC, Cham TM, Chen CY. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2011; 47: 43
- 1c Subehan S, Kadota S, Tezuka Y. Planta Med. 2008; 74: 1474
- 1d Chen C.-Y, Yang W.-L, Hsui Y.-R. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010; 24: 423
- 1e Chia Y.-C, Yeh H.-C, Yeh Y.-T, Chen C.-Y. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2011; 47: 220
- 1f Chen C.-Y, Hong Z.-L, Yang W.-L, Wub M.-H, Huang J.-C, Lee J.-Y. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012; 26: 1218
- 1g Lin H.-C, Lee S.-S. J. Nat. Prod. 2012; 75: 1735
- 1h Chen H.-L, Yang W.-L, Li Y.-P, Kang Y.-F, Wu H.-M, Chen C.-L, Chen C.-T, Chen W.-Y, Chen S.-Y, Chen C.-Y. J. Med. Med. Sci. 2012; 3: 90
- 1i Lee C.-H, Kuo C.-N, Chen H.-L, Chen C.-Y. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013; 27: 988
- 2a Tang C, Li Z, Wang Y, Xu J, Kong L, Yao H, Wu X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 3275
- 2b See also: Hackelöer K, Schnakenburg G, Waldvogel SR. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 6314
- 3a Green JR. Synlett 2012; 23: 1271
- 3b Green JR. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 6053
- 3c Amiralaei S, Green JR. Chem. Commun. 2008; 4971
- 3d Ding Y, Green JR. Synlett 2005; 271
- 3e Green JR. Synlett 2001; 353
- 3f Lu Y, Green JR. Synlett 2001; 243
- 3g Patel MM, Green JR. Chem. Commun. 1999; 509
- 3h Green JR. Chem. Commun. 1998; 1751
- 4a Schreiber SL, Sammakia T, Crowe WE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986; 108: 3128
- 4b Iwasawa N, Satoh H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 7951
- 4c Tanino K, Shimizu T, Miyama M, Kuwajima I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 6116
- 4d Iwasawa N, Sakurada F, Iwamoto M. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 871
- 4e Tanino K, Kondo F, Shimizu T, Miyashita M. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 2217
- 4f Carbery DR, Reignier S, Myatt JW, Miller ND, Harrity JP. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 2584
- 4g Tanino K, Onuki K, Asano K, Miyashita M, Nakamura T, Takahashi Y, Kuwajima I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 1498
- 4h Young DG. J, Burlison JA, Peters U. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 3494
- 4i Golovko LJ, Hope-Weeks MJ, Mays MJ, McPartlin M, Sloan AM, Woods AD. New J. Chem. 2004; 28: 527
- 4j Iwasawa N, Inaba K, Nakayama S, Aoki M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 7447
- 4k Olier C, Gastaldi S, Christie SD. R, Bertrand MP. Synlett 2007; 423
- 4l Inaba K, Takaya J, Iwasawa N. Chem. Lett. 2007; 36: 474
- 4m For the corresponding ethers, see: Baba T, Huang G, Isobe M. Tetrahedron 2003; 59: 6851; and references therein
- 4n For the corresponding amides, see: Closser KD, Quintal MM, Shea KM. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 74: 2680
- 5a Djurdjevic S, Yang F, Green JR. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 8241
- 5b Djurdjevic S, Green JR. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 5505
- 6a Kann N. Curr. Org. Chem. 2012; 16: 322
- 6b Shea KM In Name Reactions for Homologations . Li JJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2009. Part 1 284
- 6c Diaz DD, Betancort JM, Martín VS. Synlett 2007; 343
- 6d Teobald BJ. Tetrahedron 2002; 58: 4133
- 6e Green JR. Curr. Org. Chem. 2001; 5: 809
- 7a Nicholas KM, Pettit R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1972; 44: C21
- 7b Connor RE, Nicholas KM. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977; 125: C21
- 7c Lockwood RF, Nicholas KM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977; 4163
- 7d Nicholas KM. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987; 20: 207
- 8a Kuhn O, Rau H, Mayr H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 900
- 8b Mayr H, Kempf B, Ofial AR. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003; 36: 66
- 8c There is anecdotal evidence that suggests entropic factors assist similar intramolecular reactions of related complexes.
- 9a Wolfe JP, Nakhia JS In Name Reactions for Homlogations . Li JJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2009. Part 1 163
- 9b Valente C, Organ MG In Boronic Acids . Hall DG. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2011. 2nd ed. 213
- 10a Eymery F, Iorga B, Savignac P. Synthesis 2000; 185
- 10b Chalifoux WA, Tykwinski RR. Chem. Rec. 2006; 6: 169
- 10c Han X In Name Reactions for Homlogations . Li JJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2009. Part 1 393
- 11 Kira K, Tanda H, Hamajima A, Baba T, Takai S, Isobe M. Tetrahedron 2002; 58: 6485
- 12a Chamberlin AR, Bloom SH. Org. React. 1990; 39: 1
- 12b Wolfe JP In Name Reactions for Functional Group Transformation . Li JJ, Corey EJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2007: 405
- 13 Murray RW, Singh M. Org. Synth. 1997; 74: 91
- 14 Campbell MM, Abbas N, Sainsbury M. Tetrahedron 1985; 41: 5637
- 15 Use of Bu3SnCH2OH/Pd(PPh3)4 afforded tenuifolin in modest yield (35%).
- 16a Kosugi M, Sumiya T, Ohhashi K, Sano H, Migita T. Chem. Lett. 1985; 997
- 16b Murai N, Yonaga M, Tanaka K. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 1278
- 17 Attempted use of paraformaldehyde as electrophile gave largely decomposed material, along with small amounts of 14.
- 18 Crossland I. Org. Synth. 1981; 60: 6
- 19 By comparison, the synthetic route developed by Yao, Wu and co-workers (see ref. 2a) gave 15% overall yield in seven steps.
For recent Nicholas reaction reviews, see:
For the original Nicholas publications, see:
-
References and Notes
- 1a Lin R.-J, Cheng M.-J, Huang J.-C, Lo W.-L, Yeh Y.-T, Yen C.-M, Lu C.-M, Chen C.-Y. J. Nat. Prod. 2009; 72: 1816
- 1b Lin IJ, Yeh HC, Cham TM, Chen CY. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2011; 47: 43
- 1c Subehan S, Kadota S, Tezuka Y. Planta Med. 2008; 74: 1474
- 1d Chen C.-Y, Yang W.-L, Hsui Y.-R. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010; 24: 423
- 1e Chia Y.-C, Yeh H.-C, Yeh Y.-T, Chen C.-Y. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2011; 47: 220
- 1f Chen C.-Y, Hong Z.-L, Yang W.-L, Wub M.-H, Huang J.-C, Lee J.-Y. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012; 26: 1218
- 1g Lin H.-C, Lee S.-S. J. Nat. Prod. 2012; 75: 1735
- 1h Chen H.-L, Yang W.-L, Li Y.-P, Kang Y.-F, Wu H.-M, Chen C.-L, Chen C.-T, Chen W.-Y, Chen S.-Y, Chen C.-Y. J. Med. Med. Sci. 2012; 3: 90
- 1i Lee C.-H, Kuo C.-N, Chen H.-L, Chen C.-Y. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013; 27: 988
- 2a Tang C, Li Z, Wang Y, Xu J, Kong L, Yao H, Wu X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 3275
- 2b See also: Hackelöer K, Schnakenburg G, Waldvogel SR. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 6314
- 3a Green JR. Synlett 2012; 23: 1271
- 3b Green JR. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 6053
- 3c Amiralaei S, Green JR. Chem. Commun. 2008; 4971
- 3d Ding Y, Green JR. Synlett 2005; 271
- 3e Green JR. Synlett 2001; 353
- 3f Lu Y, Green JR. Synlett 2001; 243
- 3g Patel MM, Green JR. Chem. Commun. 1999; 509
- 3h Green JR. Chem. Commun. 1998; 1751
- 4a Schreiber SL, Sammakia T, Crowe WE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986; 108: 3128
- 4b Iwasawa N, Satoh H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 7951
- 4c Tanino K, Shimizu T, Miyama M, Kuwajima I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 6116
- 4d Iwasawa N, Sakurada F, Iwamoto M. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 871
- 4e Tanino K, Kondo F, Shimizu T, Miyashita M. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 2217
- 4f Carbery DR, Reignier S, Myatt JW, Miller ND, Harrity JP. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 2584
- 4g Tanino K, Onuki K, Asano K, Miyashita M, Nakamura T, Takahashi Y, Kuwajima I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 1498
- 4h Young DG. J, Burlison JA, Peters U. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 3494
- 4i Golovko LJ, Hope-Weeks MJ, Mays MJ, McPartlin M, Sloan AM, Woods AD. New J. Chem. 2004; 28: 527
- 4j Iwasawa N, Inaba K, Nakayama S, Aoki M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 7447
- 4k Olier C, Gastaldi S, Christie SD. R, Bertrand MP. Synlett 2007; 423
- 4l Inaba K, Takaya J, Iwasawa N. Chem. Lett. 2007; 36: 474
- 4m For the corresponding ethers, see: Baba T, Huang G, Isobe M. Tetrahedron 2003; 59: 6851; and references therein
- 4n For the corresponding amides, see: Closser KD, Quintal MM, Shea KM. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 74: 2680
- 5a Djurdjevic S, Yang F, Green JR. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 8241
- 5b Djurdjevic S, Green JR. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 5505
- 6a Kann N. Curr. Org. Chem. 2012; 16: 322
- 6b Shea KM In Name Reactions for Homologations . Li JJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2009. Part 1 284
- 6c Diaz DD, Betancort JM, Martín VS. Synlett 2007; 343
- 6d Teobald BJ. Tetrahedron 2002; 58: 4133
- 6e Green JR. Curr. Org. Chem. 2001; 5: 809
- 7a Nicholas KM, Pettit R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1972; 44: C21
- 7b Connor RE, Nicholas KM. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977; 125: C21
- 7c Lockwood RF, Nicholas KM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977; 4163
- 7d Nicholas KM. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987; 20: 207
- 8a Kuhn O, Rau H, Mayr H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 900
- 8b Mayr H, Kempf B, Ofial AR. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003; 36: 66
- 8c There is anecdotal evidence that suggests entropic factors assist similar intramolecular reactions of related complexes.
- 9a Wolfe JP, Nakhia JS In Name Reactions for Homlogations . Li JJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2009. Part 1 163
- 9b Valente C, Organ MG In Boronic Acids . Hall DG. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2011. 2nd ed. 213
- 10a Eymery F, Iorga B, Savignac P. Synthesis 2000; 185
- 10b Chalifoux WA, Tykwinski RR. Chem. Rec. 2006; 6: 169
- 10c Han X In Name Reactions for Homlogations . Li JJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2009. Part 1 393
- 11 Kira K, Tanda H, Hamajima A, Baba T, Takai S, Isobe M. Tetrahedron 2002; 58: 6485
- 12a Chamberlin AR, Bloom SH. Org. React. 1990; 39: 1
- 12b Wolfe JP In Name Reactions for Functional Group Transformation . Li JJ, Corey EJ. Wiley; Hoboken: 2007: 405
- 13 Murray RW, Singh M. Org. Synth. 1997; 74: 91
- 14 Campbell MM, Abbas N, Sainsbury M. Tetrahedron 1985; 41: 5637
- 15 Use of Bu3SnCH2OH/Pd(PPh3)4 afforded tenuifolin in modest yield (35%).
- 16a Kosugi M, Sumiya T, Ohhashi K, Sano H, Migita T. Chem. Lett. 1985; 997
- 16b Murai N, Yonaga M, Tanaka K. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 1278
- 17 Attempted use of paraformaldehyde as electrophile gave largely decomposed material, along with small amounts of 14.
- 18 Crossland I. Org. Synth. 1981; 60: 6
- 19 By comparison, the synthetic route developed by Yao, Wu and co-workers (see ref. 2a) gave 15% overall yield in seven steps.
For recent Nicholas reaction reviews, see:
For the original Nicholas publications, see:

















