Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378566
Synthesis of Lactones and Lactams from Vinylcyclopropane by Palladium- Catalyzed Nucleophilic Allylation
Publication History
Received: 18 May 2014
Accepted after revision: 15 July 2014
Publication Date:
11 August 2014 (online)
Abstract
A palladium-catalyzed nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes with vinylcyclopropane in the presence of diethylzinc proceeded to provide homoallyl alcohols with anti stereoselectivity. Aldimines prepared from aldehyde and primary amines in situ underwent a similar nucleophilic allylation to give homoallylamines with syn stereoselectivity. The resulting homoallyl alcohols and homoallylamines could be converted by treatment with a tetranuclear zinc cluster into γ-vinyl-δ-valerolactones and γ-vinyl-δ-valerolactams, respectively.
#
Activated cyclopropanes are important and efficient key intermediates in modern organic synthesis.[1] In particular, cycloaddition and ring expansion reactions of vinylcyclopropanes are powerful tools for the construction of highly functionalized heterocycles and unsaturated hydrocarbons.[2] Recently, we developed a multicomponent coupling reaction of alkynes and dimethylzinc with vinylcyclopropane promoted by a Ni catalyst (Scheme [1]).[3] In this case, vinylcyclopropane served as an allylnickel species, undergoing insertion of alkynes followed by transmetalation with dimethylzinc to construct octadiene frameworks with high regio- and stereoselectivity.


Pd-catalyzed allylation is one of the most useful and convenient methods for the synthesis of important complex molecules containing physiologically active scaffolds.[4] We previously demonstrated that a combination of a Pd(0) catalyst and diethylzinc or triethylborane effectively promotes oxidative addition of allyl alcohols to form a π-allylpalladium intermediate.[5] Interestingly, π-allylpalladium can undergo umpolung upon addition of diethylzinc and triethylborane to serve as an allyl anion equivalent in situ, allowing nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes and aldimines to afford homoallyl alcohols and homoallylamines, respectively (Scheme [2]).[6]


The combination of Pd(0) catalyst and diethylzinc or triethylborane accelerates amphiphilic allylations with allyl alcohols as allyl cation and allyl anion equivalents, depending on the nucleophiles and electrophiles in situ.
Herein, we demonstrate a successful extension of the Pd(0) catalyst and diethylzinc system to nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes and aldimines with vinylcyclopropane derived from dimethyl malonate and 1,4-dihalo-2-butene to form homoallyl alcohols and homoallylamines (Scheme [3]). Furthermore, these products can be converted into γ-vinyl-δ-valerolactones and γ-vinyl-δ-valerolactams by treatment with a tetranuclear zinc cluster.


Table [1] shows the results of nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes with dimethyl 2-ethenylcyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylate in the presence of a Pd(0) catalyst promoted by diethylzinc at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere.[7] Among the various Pd catalysts, and using diethylzinc and triethylborane as promoters, the combination of Pd(acac)2 and PPh3 with diethylzinc gave the best results. Table [1] shows the results of allylation of various aldehydes, such as aromatic, α,β-unsaturated, and aliphatic aldehydes. Benzaldehyde underwent nucleophilic allylation with dimethyl 2-ethenylcyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylate to provide homoallyl alcohol 1a in 72% yield as a single isomer with anti stereoselectivity along with the cyclized product 2a as a by-product in a 2:1 ratio (entry 1, Table [1]). p-Chlorobenzaldehyde participated in nucleophilic allylation to afford the homoallyl alcohol 1b in excellent yield with high stereoselectivity (entry 2, Table [1]). p-Tolualdehyde and 2-naphthylaldehyde showed similar results and gave the desired products in good to reasonable yields (entries 3 and 4, Table [1]). Dihydrocinnamaldehyde gave the desired product 1e in 39% yield, but lactone 2e was obtained in 60% yield as a major product. sec-Alkylaldehyde participated in the similar nucleophilic allylation to afford homoallyl alcohol 1f in 54% yield along with lactone 2f in 36% yield. Pivalaldehyde provided a trace amount of homoallyl alcohol 1g, instead, lactone 2g was obtained in 62%, exclusively (entry 7, Table [1]). The nucleophilicity of the alkoxides of homoallyl alcohols derived from aliphatic aldehydes seems to enhance the intramolecular esterification leading to γ-vinyl-δ-lactones 2.
a The reaction was carried out in the presence of aldehyde (1 mmol), vinylcyclopropane (1.2 mmol), Pd(acac)2 (0.05 mmol), Ph3P (0.1 mmol), and Et2Zn (2.4 mmol; 1 M hexane solution) in anhyd THF (1 mL) at r.t. for 48 h under nitrogen. All of the homoallyl alcohols 1 were obtained as a single isomer, whereas lactones 2 were obtained as diastereomeric mixture in 1:1 to 2:1 ratios.
A similar nucleophilic allylation reaction could be used for the synthesis of homoallylamines and δ-lactams. The result of reactions using various kinds of aromatic and aliphatic aldimines prepared from aldehydes and primary amines are summarized in Table [2]. The reaction was conducted as follows: in situ formation of aldimines from primary amines and aldehyde by two azeotropic distillations of a mixture of THF–water (30 min reflux in 1 mL of THF), exposure of the aldimines to a mixture of Pd(acac)2, Ph3P, and vinylcyclopropane, and addition of diethylzinc with stirring at room temperature. As was the case for aldimines prepared from benzaldehyde and aromatic amines, the reaction was compatible with both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing aromatic rings of primary amines.
a The reaction was carried out in the presence of aldimine which was prepared from aldehyde (1 mmol) and amine (1.05 mmol) in THF (1 mL) at reflux (removal of H2O by azeotropic distillation), 2-vinylcyclopropane (1.2 mmol), Pd(acac)2 (0.05 mmol), Ph3P (0.1 mmol), and Et2Zn (2.4 mmol; 1 M hexane solution) in anhyd THF (1 mL) at r.t. for 48 h under nitrogen. All of the lactams 4 were obtained as a diastereoisomeric mixture in a 2:1 ratio.
Homoallylamines 3a–3c were produced with syn stereoselectivity along with lactams 4a–4c in a 2:1 ratio (entries 1–3, Table [2]). Aldimines from aliphatic amines such as benzylamine and n-hexylamine could be used as substrates for a similar nucleophilic allylation reaction. However, homoallylamines 3 were not obtained at all; instead, lactams 4d and 4e were produced exclusively (entries 4 and 5, Table [2]). Homoallylamines derived from aliphatic amines could be readily converted into lactams 4 by intramolecular lactamization under the reaction conditions owing to the greater nucleophilicity of the amino groups. Although p-chlorobenzaldehyde and aliphatic aldehyde could be also used as aldehydes for nucleophilic allylation, aldimine prepared from n-hexanal and p-anisidine selectively afforded homoallylamine 3g as a sole product (entries 6 and 7, Table [2]).
The homoallyl alcohols 1 and homoallylamines 3 resulting from Pd-catalyzed nucleophilic allylation with vinylcyclopropane could be converted into lactones and lactams (Table [3]).[8] Mashima and Ohshima reported excellent conversion of esters from a mixture of alcohols and carboxylic acids promoted by a tetranuclear zinc cluster.[9] Under similar conditions for esterification by a zinc cluster, homoallyl alcohols and homoallylamines isolated from the reactions detailed in Tables 1 and 2 could be cyclized to afford lactones and lactams under xylene reflux conditions accompanied by decarboxylation. Homoallyl alcohols as single isomers of 1a and 1b led to γ-vinyl-δ-lactones 5a and 5b as single isomers (entries 1 and 2, Table [3]). Homoallylamines 3a, 3b, and 3g also underwent the intramolecular cyclization to construct lactams 6a, 6b, and 6g in reasonable ways (entries 3–5, Table [3]).
a The reaction was carried out in the presence of homoallyl alcohol 1 or homoallylamine 3 (0.3 mmol), and Zn4(OCOCF3)6O (0.0038 mmol) in xylene (1 mL) at reflux under nitrogen for 24 h.


The structures of the products were determined based on coupling constants from 1H NMR spectral data and NOE experiments. Selected data for the nOe observed by the irradiation at the protons indicated in bold face are illustrated in Figure [1]. The configurations of the lactones 5 and lactams 6 were complementary to each other; that is, the nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes and aldimines with vinylcyclopropane showed the opposite stereoselectivity, providing anti-homoallyl alcohols and syn-homoallylamines.
A plausible reaction mechanism for Pd-catalyzed nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes and aldimines with vinylcyclopropane is illustrated in Scheme [4]. An allyl anion equivalent generated from vinylcyclopropane and diethylzinc via umpolung of π-allylpalladium intermediate reacts with the aldehyde via the six-membered transition state I to avoid steric repulsion between the aldehyde substituents and the Et group or ligands on the Zn atom. Thus, homoallyl alcohols 1 are obtained with anti stereoselectivity. In contrast to the results obtained for aldehydes, aldimines undergo nucleophilic allylation through the intermediate II to avoid steric repulsion between substituents on the nitrogen atom and the Et group or the ligands on the zinc atom, resulting predominantly in the selective formation of syn-isomer 3. An alternative structural feature associated with the six-membered allylzinc species which affects its interaction with aldehydes and aldimines is likely to rationalize the opposite stereoselectivity as well as the nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes and aldimines with allylmetal species.[10]


In summary, we have demonstrated the Pd-catalyzed nucleophilic allylation of aldehydes and aldimines with dimethyl 2-ethenylcyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylate promoted by diethylzinc to form homoallyl alcohols and homoallylamines, respectively.[11] Furthermore, these products were converted into γ-vinyl-δ-valerolactones and γ-vinyl-δ-valerolactams, accelerated by condensation with a tetranuclear zinc cluster as a Lewis acid. This transformation is useful for efficient medicinal synthesis of physiologically active molecules such as hydroxy acids, amino acids, δ-valerolactones, and δ-valerolactams.
#
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).
Supporting Information
- for this article is available online at http://www.thieme-connect.com.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/products/ejournals/journal/
10.1055/s-00000083.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a He Z, Yudin AK. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 5829
- 1b Matsuda T, Tsuboi T, Murakami M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 12596
- 1c Aïssa C, Fürstner A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 14836
- 1d Pohlhaus PD, Sanders SD, Parsons AT, Li W, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 8642
- 1e Shi M, Tang X.-Y, Yang Y.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 5311
- 1f Rao W, Chan PW. H. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 10486
- 1g Mauleón P, Krinsky JL, Toste FD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 4513
- 1h Taniguchi H, Ohmura T, Suginome M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 11298
- 1i Sapeta K, Kerr MA. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 2081
- 1j Saya L, Bhargava G, Navarro MA, Gulías M, López F, Fernández I, Gastedo L, Mascareñas JL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 9886
- 1k Masarwa A, Marek I. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 9712
- 1l Jiang G.-J, Fu X.-F, Li Q, Yu Z.-X. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 692
- 1m Zhu W, Fang J, Liu Y, Ren J, Wang Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 2032
- 1n Bonderoff SA, Grant TN, West FG, Tremblay M. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2888
- 1o Schinkel M, Wallbaum J, Kozhushkov J, Kozhushkov SI, Marek I, Ackermann L. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 4482
- 2a Brownman RK, Johnson JS. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 573
- 2b Sumida Y, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 4677
- 2c Ikeda S.-I, Obata H, Tsuchida E, Shirai N, Odashima K. Organometallics 2008; 27: 1645
- 2d Li C.-F, Xiao W.-J, Alper H. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 888
- 2e Moran J, Smith AG, Carris RM, Johnson JS, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 18618
- 2f Tombe R, Kurahashi T, Matsubara S. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1791
- 3a Mori T, Nakamura T, Kimura M. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2266
- 3b Mori T, Nakamura T, Kimura M. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3552
- 3c Mori T, Nakamura T, Onodera G, Kimura M. Synthesis 2012; 44: 2333
- 4a Trost BM. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002; 50: 1
- 4b Trost BM. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 5813
- 4c Tsuji J In Palladium Reagents and Catalysts . John Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 2004
- 4d Tamaru Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 2647
- 4e Muzart J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 3077
- 4f Bras JL, Muzart J. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 1170
- 5a Horino Y, Naito M, Kimura M, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 3113
- 5b Kimura M, Horino Y, Mukai R, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 10401
- 5c Kimura M, Futamata M, Shibata K, Tamaru Y. Chem. Commun. 2003; 234
- 5d Kimura M, Mukai R, Tanigawa N, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron 2003; 59: 7767
- 5e Mukai R, Horino Y, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y, Kimura M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 11138
- 5f Kimura M, Fukasaka M, Tamaru Y. Heterocycles 2006; 67: 535
- 5g Kimura M, Fukasaka M, Tamaru Y. Synthesis 2006; 3611
- 5h Kimura M, Mukai R, Tamaki T, Horino Y, Tamaru Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 4122
- 5i Kimura M, Tamaki T, Nakata M, Tohyama K, Tamaru Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 5803
- 5j Kimura M, Kohno T, Toyoda K, Mori T. Heterocycles 2010; 82: 281
- 5k Fukushima M, Takushima D, Satomura H, Onodera G, Kimura M. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 8019
- 5l Takushima D, Fukushima M, Satomura H, Onodera G, Kimura M. Heterocycles 2012; 86: 171
- 6a Kimura M, Tomizawa T, Horino Y, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 3627
- 6b Kimura M, Shimizu M, Shibata K, Tazoe M, Tamaru Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 3392
- 6c Shimizu M, Kimura M, Tamaru Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2005; 11: 6629
- 6d Shimizu M, Kimura M, Watanabe T, Tamaru Y. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 637
- 6e Kimura M, Shimizu M, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 3709
- 6f Yamaguchi Y, Hashimoto M, Tohyama K, Kimura M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 913
- 7 See the Supporting Information.
- 8 In the absence of Zn cluster catalyst, no lactonization and lactamization proceeded at all. These cyclizations required Zn cluster catalyst as a promoter to provide lactones and lactams from homoallyl alcohols and homoallylamines, respectively. Simple lactonization or lactamization conditions using acid catalysts and dehydration–condensation agents were ineffective.
- 9a Iwasaki T, Maegawa Y, Hayashi Y, Ohshima T, Mashima K. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 5147
- 9b Ohshima T, Iwasaki T, Maegawa Y, Yoshiyama A, Mashima K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 2944
- 9c Sniady A, Durham A, Morreale MS, Marcinek A, Szafert S, Lis T, Brzezinska KR, Iwasaki T, Ohshima T, Mashima K, Dembinski R. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 5881
- 10a Hirabayashi R, Ogawa C, Sugiura M, Kobayashi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 9493
- 10b Kobayashi S, Ogawa C, Konishi H, Sugiura M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 6610
- 11 General Procedure for the Nucleophilic Allylation of Aldehyde with Vinylcyclopropane (Entry 1, Table 1): To a solution of Pd(acac)2 (15.2 mg, 0.05 mmol), and Ph3P (26.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in anhyd THF (2 mL) were successively added vinylcyclopropane (221.0 mg, 1.2 mmol), benzaldehyde (106.1 mg, 1 mmol), and diethylzinc (2.4 mmol, 1.0 M hexane solution) via syringe under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 48 h. The mixture was diluted with EtOAc (30 mL) and washed with 2 M HCl, and then brine. The extract was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo and the residual oil was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (hexane–EtOAc, 2:1) to give 1a (210.5 mg, 72%; Rf 0.63; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1) and 2a (54.8 mg, 21%; Rf 0.5; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1). Dimethyl 2-[2-(Hydroxyphenylmethyl)but-3-en-1-yl]malonate (1a): IR (neat): 3524 (br), 3064 (m), 3030 (m), 1750 (s), 1732 (s), 1640 (m), 921 (m), 765 (m) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.80 (ddd, J = 14.3, 11.8, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.94 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.0, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.11 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.38 (dddd, J = 11.8, 9.3, 7.1, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.38 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.67 (s, 6 H), 4.50 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.13 (dd, J = 17.5, 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.26 (dd, J = 10.2, 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.63 (ddd, J = 17.5, 10.2, 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.27–7.34 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 29.7, 30.9, 49.6, 50.3, 52.4, 52.5, 120.0, 126.8, 127.9, 128.4, 137.2, 141.7, 169.4, 169.9. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C16H20O5: 292.1311; found: 292.1311. Methyl Tetrahydro-2-oxo-6-phenyl-5-vinyl-2H-pyran-3-carboxylate (2a): obtained as a mixture of diastereomers in a 2:1 ratio. IR (neat): 3035 (w), 2954 (m), 1732 (s), 1643 (m), 1263 (m), 1070 (m), 1002 (m), 925 (m), 702 (s) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3: δ (major isomer) = 2.15 (ddd, J = 13.9, 9.8, 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.44 (ddd, J = 13.9, 11.3, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.80–2.89 (m, 1 H), 3.80 (dd, J = 7.3, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.83 (s, 3 H), 4.99 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.08 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.09 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.56 (ddd, J = 17.2, 10.5, 7.0 Hz, 1 H) 7.26–7.36 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (2:1 mixture of diastereomers) = 28.2, 29.4, 41.7, 43.6, 45.8, 47.8, 52.9, 85.9, 86.5, 118.2, 118.3, 127.1, 127.3, 128.5, 128.8, 128.9, 134.9, 135.1, 137.3, 137.6, 166.2, 166.7, 169.4, 169.5. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C15H16O4: 260.1049; found: 260.1047. Nucleophilic Allylation of Aldimine with Vinylcyclopropane (Entry 1, Table 2): A solution of benzaldehyde (106.1 mg, 1 mmol) and p-anisidine (129.3 mg, 1.05 mmol) in anhyd THF (1 mL) was refluxed for 30 min under nitrogen. The solvent was removed by distillation under atmospheric pressure of nitrogen (azeotropic removal of H2O). The azeotropic distillation of THF (1 mL)/H2O was repeated twice. A mixture of Pd(acac)2 (15.2 mg, 0.05 mmol) and triphenylphoshine (26.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in anhyd THF (2 mL) and vinylcyclopropane (221.0 mg, 1.2 mmol) dissolved in THF (1 mL) and diethylzinc (2.4 mmol, 1.0 M hexane solution) were successively added to the aldimine residue. The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 48 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (30 mL) and washed with sat. NaHCO3, and brine. The organic phase was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo to give a brown oil, which was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (hexane–EtOAc, 70:30) to give 3a (167 mg, 42%; Rf 0.5; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1) and 4a (172 mg, 47%; Rf 0.27; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1). Dimethyl 2-[(p-Methoxyphenylamino)phenylmethylbut-3-en-1-yl]malonate (3a): obtained as a mixture of diastereomers in a 4:1 ratio. IR (neat): 3404 (m), 3001 (m), 2953 (m), 2833 (m), 1750 (s), 1732 (s), 1508 (s), 1435 (s), 1159 (br), 1038 (s), 925 (m), 704 (s) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (major isomer) = 1.69 (ddd, J = 13.7, 11.3, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.32 (ddd, J = 13.7, 10.5, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.42–2.49 (m, 1 H), 3.37 (dd, J = 10.5, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.67 (s, 6 H), 3.72 (s, 3 H), 4.30 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.09 (dd, J = 17.1, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.17 (dd, J = 10.2, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.46 (ddd, J = 17.1, 10.2, 9.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.45 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.18–7.31 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (4:1 mixture of diastereomers) = 29.6, 30.4, 48.4, 49.1, 49.4, 49.5, 52.4, 52.5, 52.53, 55.56, 55.59, 51.0, 51.4, 114.6, 114.7, 114.74, 119.6, 127.8, 128.4, 128.6, 128.7, 128.8, 129.0, 132.8, 136.3, 137.2, 139.2, 140.5, 140.7, 141.1, 152.1, 152.3, 169.4, 169.6, 169.7, 169.8. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C23H27NO5: 397.1889; found: 397.1899. Methyl 1-(p-Methoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-6-phenyl-5-vinylpiperidine-3-carboxylate (4a): obtained as a mixture of diastereomers in a 2:1 ratio. IR (neat): 2955 (m), 2839 (m), 1738 (s), 1693 (s), 1514 (s), 1250 (s), 1033 (m), 833 (m) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (major isomer) = 2.09 (dt, J = 13.9, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.40–2.47 (m, 1 H), 2.74–2.84 (m, 1 H), 3.70 (s, 3 H), 3.76–3.81 (m, 1 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 4.69 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.18 (dt, J = 17.3, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.21 (dd, J = 10.5, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.92 (ddd, J = 17.3, 10.5, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.72 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.16–7.35 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3; 2:1 mixture of diastereomers): δ = 26.7, 29.1, 42.7, 45.3, 47.2, 49.5, 52.3, 52.5, 55.11, 55.14, 70.0, 70.5, 113.9, 114.1, 117.1, 117.2, 127.6, 127.7, 127.8, 127.9, 128.3, 128.35, 128.43, 128.7, 133.4, 134.3, 137.1, 137.3, 139.5, 140.1, 158.0, 158.1, 166.3, 167.1, 170.7, 171.8. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C22H23NO4: 365.1627; found: 366.1663.
For recent reviews, see:
-
References and Notes
- 1a He Z, Yudin AK. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 5829
- 1b Matsuda T, Tsuboi T, Murakami M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 12596
- 1c Aïssa C, Fürstner A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 14836
- 1d Pohlhaus PD, Sanders SD, Parsons AT, Li W, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 8642
- 1e Shi M, Tang X.-Y, Yang Y.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 5311
- 1f Rao W, Chan PW. H. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 10486
- 1g Mauleón P, Krinsky JL, Toste FD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 4513
- 1h Taniguchi H, Ohmura T, Suginome M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 11298
- 1i Sapeta K, Kerr MA. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 2081
- 1j Saya L, Bhargava G, Navarro MA, Gulías M, López F, Fernández I, Gastedo L, Mascareñas JL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 9886
- 1k Masarwa A, Marek I. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 9712
- 1l Jiang G.-J, Fu X.-F, Li Q, Yu Z.-X. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 692
- 1m Zhu W, Fang J, Liu Y, Ren J, Wang Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 2032
- 1n Bonderoff SA, Grant TN, West FG, Tremblay M. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2888
- 1o Schinkel M, Wallbaum J, Kozhushkov J, Kozhushkov SI, Marek I, Ackermann L. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 4482
- 2a Brownman RK, Johnson JS. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 573
- 2b Sumida Y, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 4677
- 2c Ikeda S.-I, Obata H, Tsuchida E, Shirai N, Odashima K. Organometallics 2008; 27: 1645
- 2d Li C.-F, Xiao W.-J, Alper H. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 888
- 2e Moran J, Smith AG, Carris RM, Johnson JS, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 18618
- 2f Tombe R, Kurahashi T, Matsubara S. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1791
- 3a Mori T, Nakamura T, Kimura M. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2266
- 3b Mori T, Nakamura T, Kimura M. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3552
- 3c Mori T, Nakamura T, Onodera G, Kimura M. Synthesis 2012; 44: 2333
- 4a Trost BM. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002; 50: 1
- 4b Trost BM. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 5813
- 4c Tsuji J In Palladium Reagents and Catalysts . John Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 2004
- 4d Tamaru Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 2647
- 4e Muzart J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 3077
- 4f Bras JL, Muzart J. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 1170
- 5a Horino Y, Naito M, Kimura M, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 3113
- 5b Kimura M, Horino Y, Mukai R, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 10401
- 5c Kimura M, Futamata M, Shibata K, Tamaru Y. Chem. Commun. 2003; 234
- 5d Kimura M, Mukai R, Tanigawa N, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron 2003; 59: 7767
- 5e Mukai R, Horino Y, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y, Kimura M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 11138
- 5f Kimura M, Fukasaka M, Tamaru Y. Heterocycles 2006; 67: 535
- 5g Kimura M, Fukasaka M, Tamaru Y. Synthesis 2006; 3611
- 5h Kimura M, Mukai R, Tamaki T, Horino Y, Tamaru Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 4122
- 5i Kimura M, Tamaki T, Nakata M, Tohyama K, Tamaru Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 5803
- 5j Kimura M, Kohno T, Toyoda K, Mori T. Heterocycles 2010; 82: 281
- 5k Fukushima M, Takushima D, Satomura H, Onodera G, Kimura M. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 8019
- 5l Takushima D, Fukushima M, Satomura H, Onodera G, Kimura M. Heterocycles 2012; 86: 171
- 6a Kimura M, Tomizawa T, Horino Y, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 3627
- 6b Kimura M, Shimizu M, Shibata K, Tazoe M, Tamaru Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 3392
- 6c Shimizu M, Kimura M, Tamaru Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2005; 11: 6629
- 6d Shimizu M, Kimura M, Watanabe T, Tamaru Y. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 637
- 6e Kimura M, Shimizu M, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 3709
- 6f Yamaguchi Y, Hashimoto M, Tohyama K, Kimura M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 913
- 7 See the Supporting Information.
- 8 In the absence of Zn cluster catalyst, no lactonization and lactamization proceeded at all. These cyclizations required Zn cluster catalyst as a promoter to provide lactones and lactams from homoallyl alcohols and homoallylamines, respectively. Simple lactonization or lactamization conditions using acid catalysts and dehydration–condensation agents were ineffective.
- 9a Iwasaki T, Maegawa Y, Hayashi Y, Ohshima T, Mashima K. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 5147
- 9b Ohshima T, Iwasaki T, Maegawa Y, Yoshiyama A, Mashima K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 2944
- 9c Sniady A, Durham A, Morreale MS, Marcinek A, Szafert S, Lis T, Brzezinska KR, Iwasaki T, Ohshima T, Mashima K, Dembinski R. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 5881
- 10a Hirabayashi R, Ogawa C, Sugiura M, Kobayashi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 9493
- 10b Kobayashi S, Ogawa C, Konishi H, Sugiura M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 6610
- 11 General Procedure for the Nucleophilic Allylation of Aldehyde with Vinylcyclopropane (Entry 1, Table 1): To a solution of Pd(acac)2 (15.2 mg, 0.05 mmol), and Ph3P (26.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in anhyd THF (2 mL) were successively added vinylcyclopropane (221.0 mg, 1.2 mmol), benzaldehyde (106.1 mg, 1 mmol), and diethylzinc (2.4 mmol, 1.0 M hexane solution) via syringe under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 48 h. The mixture was diluted with EtOAc (30 mL) and washed with 2 M HCl, and then brine. The extract was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo and the residual oil was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (hexane–EtOAc, 2:1) to give 1a (210.5 mg, 72%; Rf 0.63; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1) and 2a (54.8 mg, 21%; Rf 0.5; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1). Dimethyl 2-[2-(Hydroxyphenylmethyl)but-3-en-1-yl]malonate (1a): IR (neat): 3524 (br), 3064 (m), 3030 (m), 1750 (s), 1732 (s), 1640 (m), 921 (m), 765 (m) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.80 (ddd, J = 14.3, 11.8, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.94 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.0, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.11 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.38 (dddd, J = 11.8, 9.3, 7.1, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.38 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.67 (s, 6 H), 4.50 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.13 (dd, J = 17.5, 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.26 (dd, J = 10.2, 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.63 (ddd, J = 17.5, 10.2, 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.27–7.34 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 29.7, 30.9, 49.6, 50.3, 52.4, 52.5, 120.0, 126.8, 127.9, 128.4, 137.2, 141.7, 169.4, 169.9. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C16H20O5: 292.1311; found: 292.1311. Methyl Tetrahydro-2-oxo-6-phenyl-5-vinyl-2H-pyran-3-carboxylate (2a): obtained as a mixture of diastereomers in a 2:1 ratio. IR (neat): 3035 (w), 2954 (m), 1732 (s), 1643 (m), 1263 (m), 1070 (m), 1002 (m), 925 (m), 702 (s) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3: δ (major isomer) = 2.15 (ddd, J = 13.9, 9.8, 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.44 (ddd, J = 13.9, 11.3, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.80–2.89 (m, 1 H), 3.80 (dd, J = 7.3, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.83 (s, 3 H), 4.99 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.08 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.09 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.56 (ddd, J = 17.2, 10.5, 7.0 Hz, 1 H) 7.26–7.36 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (2:1 mixture of diastereomers) = 28.2, 29.4, 41.7, 43.6, 45.8, 47.8, 52.9, 85.9, 86.5, 118.2, 118.3, 127.1, 127.3, 128.5, 128.8, 128.9, 134.9, 135.1, 137.3, 137.6, 166.2, 166.7, 169.4, 169.5. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C15H16O4: 260.1049; found: 260.1047. Nucleophilic Allylation of Aldimine with Vinylcyclopropane (Entry 1, Table 2): A solution of benzaldehyde (106.1 mg, 1 mmol) and p-anisidine (129.3 mg, 1.05 mmol) in anhyd THF (1 mL) was refluxed for 30 min under nitrogen. The solvent was removed by distillation under atmospheric pressure of nitrogen (azeotropic removal of H2O). The azeotropic distillation of THF (1 mL)/H2O was repeated twice. A mixture of Pd(acac)2 (15.2 mg, 0.05 mmol) and triphenylphoshine (26.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in anhyd THF (2 mL) and vinylcyclopropane (221.0 mg, 1.2 mmol) dissolved in THF (1 mL) and diethylzinc (2.4 mmol, 1.0 M hexane solution) were successively added to the aldimine residue. The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 48 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (30 mL) and washed with sat. NaHCO3, and brine. The organic phase was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo to give a brown oil, which was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (hexane–EtOAc, 70:30) to give 3a (167 mg, 42%; Rf 0.5; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1) and 4a (172 mg, 47%; Rf 0.27; hexane–EtOAc, 2:1). Dimethyl 2-[(p-Methoxyphenylamino)phenylmethylbut-3-en-1-yl]malonate (3a): obtained as a mixture of diastereomers in a 4:1 ratio. IR (neat): 3404 (m), 3001 (m), 2953 (m), 2833 (m), 1750 (s), 1732 (s), 1508 (s), 1435 (s), 1159 (br), 1038 (s), 925 (m), 704 (s) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (major isomer) = 1.69 (ddd, J = 13.7, 11.3, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.32 (ddd, J = 13.7, 10.5, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.42–2.49 (m, 1 H), 3.37 (dd, J = 10.5, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.67 (s, 6 H), 3.72 (s, 3 H), 4.30 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.09 (dd, J = 17.1, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.17 (dd, J = 10.2, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.46 (ddd, J = 17.1, 10.2, 9.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.45 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.18–7.31 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (4:1 mixture of diastereomers) = 29.6, 30.4, 48.4, 49.1, 49.4, 49.5, 52.4, 52.5, 52.53, 55.56, 55.59, 51.0, 51.4, 114.6, 114.7, 114.74, 119.6, 127.8, 128.4, 128.6, 128.7, 128.8, 129.0, 132.8, 136.3, 137.2, 139.2, 140.5, 140.7, 141.1, 152.1, 152.3, 169.4, 169.6, 169.7, 169.8. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C23H27NO5: 397.1889; found: 397.1899. Methyl 1-(p-Methoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-6-phenyl-5-vinylpiperidine-3-carboxylate (4a): obtained as a mixture of diastereomers in a 2:1 ratio. IR (neat): 2955 (m), 2839 (m), 1738 (s), 1693 (s), 1514 (s), 1250 (s), 1033 (m), 833 (m) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (major isomer) = 2.09 (dt, J = 13.9, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.40–2.47 (m, 1 H), 2.74–2.84 (m, 1 H), 3.70 (s, 3 H), 3.76–3.81 (m, 1 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 4.69 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.18 (dt, J = 17.3, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.21 (dd, J = 10.5, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.92 (ddd, J = 17.3, 10.5, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.72 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.16–7.35 (m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3; 2:1 mixture of diastereomers): δ = 26.7, 29.1, 42.7, 45.3, 47.2, 49.5, 52.3, 52.5, 55.11, 55.14, 70.0, 70.5, 113.9, 114.1, 117.1, 117.2, 127.6, 127.7, 127.8, 127.9, 128.3, 128.35, 128.43, 128.7, 133.4, 134.3, 137.1, 137.3, 139.5, 140.1, 158.0, 158.1, 166.3, 167.1, 170.7, 171.8. HRMS: m/z [M] calcd for C22H23NO4: 365.1627; found: 366.1663.
For recent reviews, see:












