Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1338551
Silver Acetate Mediated Acetoxylations of Alkyl Halides
Publication History
Received: 20 September 2013
Accepted after revision: 25 September 2013
Publication Date:
04 November 2013 (online)
Abstract
Silver acetate promotes the acetoxylation of alkyl halides under neutral reaction conditions. The reaction is applicable to primary and activated secondary alkyl halides, and 2,2-dibromoacetophenones for preparing the corresponding acetates in good yields. The presence of ester, amide, nitrile, hydroxy, and OTBDMS functions on the substrate is tolerated.
#


Acetates are cheap and efficient protecting groups of alcohols. One of their advantages is that they can be gently removed by enzymes, which in addition opens the opportunity to procure enantioenriched substrates.[1] Usually acetates are prepared starting from the corresponding alcohols;[1] however, when the free hydroxyl group is not directly available an alternative way to introduce this functionality is the replacement of a halogen by an acetoxy group. This second alternative has been less investigated, and typically is carried out by heating the corresponding alkyl halide in AcOH,[2] or treating the alkyl halide with KOAc or NaOAc in the presence of 18-crown-6,[3] or with KOAc in ionic liquids.[4] The first method is only suitable for substrates not sensitive to acid mediums, the second one gives good yields just when the alkyl halide is activated, and the third one suffers from the inconveniences associated to ionic liquids such as high cost and viscosity. Given the utility of acetates and in order to further develop methodologies that do not use alcohols as starting materials, we decided to explore the possibility of synthesizing them by using AgOAc as the acetoxy supplier under neutral conditions (Scheme [1]). Silver salts have been used in organic chemistry to facilitate substitution reactions thanks to their high affinity for halogens.[5] Nonetheless, there exits only a few reports where silver salts have been employed to promote the replacement of a halogen by an acetoxy group. In the major part of these reports the main interest is not synthetic but mechanistic and the transformation is achieved by adding AgOAc, Ag2O, or Ag2CO3 to a solution of the corresponding alkyl halide in acetic acid.[6] Closely related to these substitutions, the transformation of primary iodides and bromides into alcohols by oxygen transfer from bis(tributyltin)oxide with silver salts,[7] and the replacement of a secondary iodide by OMe, or ONO3 with AgOTf and AgNO3 have also been, respectively, described.[8] Taking into account these precedents we wanted to test the applicability of the substitution promoted by AgOAc under neutral conditions on a wide range of alkyl halides.
The difference in reactivity between AgOAc and NaOAc on an activated α-bromo ketone 1 was examined first in a polar aprotic solvent. Performing the reaction in acetonitrile at room temperature with 1 equivalent of AgOAc, the acetate 2 was cleanly obtained after 5 hours in 93% yield. Increasing the temperature to 50 °C reduced the reaction time to 1.5 hours and the isolated yield was almost 100% (Scheme [2]). Under these conditions, AcOH or less polar solvents gave lower yield,[9] whereas NaOAc instead of AgOAc led only to 30% of conversion.


With this result, the generality of the method was examined next on a variety of alkyl halides (Scheme [1, ]Table 1). In general, the reaction takes place very efficiently with yields ranging from 63 to 100% in acetonitrile or DMF for less reactive substrates (Table 1, entries 11–14). As in the case of 1, 2-bromoacetophenones 3a–d were converted into their acetoxy derivatives 4a–d in excellent yields (entries 1–4). α-Acetoxy ketones can be prepared by a variety of methods but most of them involve the direct oxidation of ketones[10] or the oxidation of an enol intermediate[11] using an excess of the oxidant. Interestingly, it was possible to perform a double substitution onto 2,2-dibromoacetophenones 3e–h to furnish the corresponding 1,1-diacetates (entries 5–8). 1,1-Diacetates are valuable protecting group of aldehydes under basic conditions,[12] they are usually synthesized from aldehydes[13] and to the best of our knowledge this is the first time that a substitution over a 1,1-dibromide has been used as method for their preparation. Secondary α-bromo ketones were also converted into α-acetoxy ketones, although higher temperatures were required (entries 11 and 12). As expected primary and secondary benzyl bromides were readily acetoxylated in good yields (entries, 9 and 10). Primary substrates like bromooctane or 3-phenylpropargyl bromide, were properly transformed into their acetoxy derivatives using DMF as solvent (entries 13 and 14). Nonetheless, cyclohexyl iodide and 3-bromocyclohexene, both secondary alkyl halides, gave mainly the elimination products under all the conditions examined.
a Reaction conditions: R–X (0.1 M); R–X/AgOAc = 1:1. Unless otherwise noted: R–X = R–Br.
b Reaction performed in the presence of Ph3P. R–X/AgOAc/Ph3P = 1:2:1; R–X = R–Cl.
e R–X/AgOAc = 1:2; R–X = R–Cl.
Aiming at studying the compatibility of the method over different functional groups, we tested the reaction in the presence of a hydroxyl, an OTBDMS, an ester, an amide, and a nitrile function. Satisfactorily the acetoxylation worked efficiently without affecting the different functionalities (entries 15–20). In the cases of ester 3r and amide 3s, the addition of 1 equivalent of Ph3P was necessary to accelerate the reaction (entries 18 and 19).
Finally we decided to examine the regioselectivity of the substitution onto primary allylic substrates. At first instance, the reaction of allylic substrates like cinnamyl or geranyl bromides with silver acetate furnished a mixture of linear and branched acetoxy derivatives (Scheme [3]). This is in line with an SN1 process where the silver ion undergoes an electrophilic attack on the halogen group to produce an allylic cation intermediate. Nonetheless it was possible to obtain solely the linear acetoxy derivatives either by adding 1 equivalent of Ph3P or with prolonged reaction times. The presence of Ph3P decreases the electrophilicity of the silver cation causing a milder interaction with the halogen group and thus inhibiting the formation of the allylic cation. Under these conditions the acetate anion likely replaces the halogen by an SN2 mechanism resulting in the exclusive formation of the linear derivative. On prolonged reaction times silver ion itself would promote an allylic isomerization reaction. This was supported by the observation that the addition of 1 equivalent of AgOAc to a 1:1 mixture of the linear 6 and branched 7 acetoxy derivatives of cinnamyl bromide furnished only the linear derivative 6 after 24 hours. As it has been previously reported mainly for palladium[14] and recently for gold carbenes[15] silver ions would promote the rearrangement by π coordination with the olefin.


In summary, we have found that silver acetate promotes the substitution reaction of primary and activated secondary alkyl halides under soft and neutral reaction conditions. The method described allows the preparation of 1,1-diacetates and linear allylic acetoxy compounds by careful tuning of the reaction conditions.
All reactions were carried out under a N2 atmosphere. Et2O and CHCl3 were dried by standard methods and freshly distilled prior to use. Anhydrous MeCN and DMF were purchased from Aldrich. Commercial reagents were used as received without further purification. Reactions containing AgOAc were protected from light in order to prevent its decomposition. NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a Jeol Eclipse 300 MHz spectrometer. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a Jeol JMS-SX-102A spectrometer.
#
Acetoxylation of Alkyl Halides 3; General Procedure
To a suspension of AgOAc (42 mg, 0.25 mmol) in MeCN or DMF (2 mL) was added the respective alkyl halide 3 (0.25 mmol) dissolved in the corresponding solvent (1 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at the temperature and time indicated in Table 1 until the starting material was consumed. After completion of the reaction, sat. aq NH4Cl (20 mL) was added and the crude mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). When necessary, the product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane–EtOAc).
#
2-Acetoxy-3′,4′-(methylenedioxy)acetophenone (4c)
Yield: 62.90 mg (98%); white solid; mp 75–77 °C.
IR (KBr): 1736, 1676, 1600 cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.47 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.36 (s, 1 H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.03 (s, 2 H), 5.24 (s, 2 H), 2.20 (s, 3 H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.25, 170.53, 152.47, 148.46, 128.95, 124.05, 108.19, 107.62, 102.09, 65.83, 20.66.
HRMS-FAB: m/z calcd for C11H11O5 [M + H]+: 222.0528; found: 222.0527.
#
2-Acetoxy-2′,3′,4′-trimethoxyacetophenone (4d)
Yield: 53.30 mg (90%); orange oil.
IR (KBr): 1748, 1685, 1589 cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.60 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.67 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.14 (s, 2 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 3.35 (s, 3 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 2.14 (s, 3 H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 191.84, 170.69, 154.61, 149.67, 141.62, 126.21, 122.17, 107.53, 69.41, 61.32, 60.91, 56.26, 20.75.
HRMS-FAB: m/z calcd for C13H17O6 [M + H]+: 269.1025; found: 269.1028.
#
2,2-Bisacetoxy-4′-chloroacetophenone (4f)
Yield: 56.00 mg (93%); yellowish oil.
IR (KBr): 1767, 1706, 1588 cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (s, 1 H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.17 (s, 6 H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 187.96, 168.78, 141.03, 131.61, 130.39, 129.43, 129.37, 86.37, 20.72.
HRMS-ESI: m/z calcd for C12H11ClO5 + Na [M + Na]+: 293.0193; found: 293.0178.
#
2,2-Bisacetoxy-4′-phenylacetophenone (4g)
Yield: 60.90 mg (99%); orange oil.
IR (KBr): 1770, 1703, 1603 cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.02 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.82–757 (m, 5 H), 7.55–7.37 (m, 3 H), 2.02 (s, 6 H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 188.49, 168.87, 147.09, 139.57, 131.91, 129.59, 129.15, 128.67, 127.61, 127.40, 86.38, 20.76.
HRMS-FAB: m/z calcd for C18H17O5 [M + H]+: 313.1076; found: 313.1067.
#
2,2-Bisacetoxy-3′,4′-(methylenedioxy)acetophenone (4h)
Yield: 58.40 (96%); light brown oil.
IR (KBr): 1750, 1687, 1601 cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.54 (s, 1 H), 7.51 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.40 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.05 (s, 2 H), 2.16 (s, 6 H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 186.88, 168.81, 152.99, 148.56, 127.82, 125.70, 108.57, 108.35, 102.24, 86.17, 20.73.
HRMS-FAB: m/z calcd for C13H13O7 [M + H]+: 280.0583; found: 280.0591.
#
#
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by CONACyT (project No. 153523), DGAPA (project No.IB202212), and Instituto de Química (UNAM). The authors would like to thank DGAPA for undergraduate fellowship to Roberto Nolla-Saltiel, and Mª Angeles Peña-González and Elisabeth Huerta-Salazar for technical support (NMR).
Supporting Information
- for this article is available online at http://www.thieme-connect.com.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/ejournals/toc/synthesis.
- Supporting Information
-
References
- 1a Kocienski PJ. Protecting Groups . Thieme; Stuttgart: 2005. 3rd ed. 528
- 1b Greene TW, Wuts PG. M. Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis . 4th ed. Wiley; New York: 2006: 1082
- 2a Levin RH, Magerlein BJ, Mcintosh AV, Hanze Jr AR, Fonken GS, Thompson JL, Searcy AM, Scheri MA, Gutsell ES. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954; 76: 546
- 2b Warneboldt RB, Weiler L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971; 37: 3413
- 2c DeGraw JI. Tetrahedron 1972; 28: 967
- 2d Sakuragi H, Koyama T, Sakurazawa M, Yasui N, Tokumaru K, Ueno K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994; 67: 1769
- 2e Pei W, Li S, Nie X, Li Y, Pei J, Chen B, Wu J, Ye X. Synthesis 1998; 1298
- 3a Takadate A, Masuda T, Murata C, Tanaka T, Goya S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995; 68: 3105
- 3b Paizs C, Tosa M, Majdik C, Bódai V, Novák L, Irimie F.-D, Poppe L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002; 2400
- 4a Brinchi L, Germani R, Savelli G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003; 44: 2027
- 4b Kamal A, Chouhan G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 8801
- 5a Naodovic M, Yamamoto H. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 3132
- 5b Weibel J.-M, Blanc A, Pale P. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 3149
- 5c Álvarez-Corral M, Muñoz-Dorado M, Rodríguez-García I. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 3174
- 5d Yanagisawa A, Arai T. Chem. Commun. 2008; 1165
- 5e Harmata M. Silver in Organic Chemistry . Wiley; New York: 2010: 402
- 6a Meisenheimer J, Link J. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1930; 479: 211
- 6b Roberts JD, Young WG, Winstein S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942; 64: 2157
- 6c Young WG, Andrews LJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944; 66: 421
- 6d Kawada K, Kim M, Watt DS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989; 30: 5989
- 6e Iqbal R, Winterfeldt E. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2005; 42: 1079
- 7 Gingras M, Chan TH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989; 30: 279
- 8 Godina TA, Lubell WD. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 5846
- 9 See Supporting Information for results in other solvents.
- 10a Levine PA, Walti A. Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. II . Wiley; New York: 1943: 4843
- 10b Criegee R, Klonk K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1949; 564: 1
- 10c Reid EB, Fortenbauch RB, Patterson HR. J. Org. Chem. 1950; 15: 572
- 10d Cavill GW. K, Solomon DH. J. Chem. Soc. 1955; 4426
- 10e Shono T, Matsumura Y, Nakagawa Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975; 97: 6144
- 10f Williams GJ, Hunter NR. Can. J. Chem. 1976; 54: 3830
- 10g May GL, Pinhery JT. Aust J. Chem. 1982; 35: 1859
- 10h Creary X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 5568
- 10i Demir AS, Camkerten N, Akgun H, Tanyeli C, Mahasneh AS, Watt DS. Synth. Commun. 1990; 20: 2279
- 10j Moriarty RM, Berglund BA, Penmasta R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992; 33: 6065
- 10k Lee JC, Park C, Choi Y. Synth. Commun. 1997; 27: 4079
- 10l Watson CY, Whish WJ. D, Threadgill MD. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998; 6: 721
- 10m Demir AS, Hamamci H, Tanyeli C, Akhmedov IM, Dogane F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998; 9: 1673
- 10n Ochiai M, Takeuchi Y, Katayama T, Sueda T, Miyamoto K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 12244
- 10o Ley SV, Thomas AW, Finch H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999; 669
- 10p Tanyeli C, Turkut E, Akhmedov IM. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004; 15: 1729
- 11a Guertin KR, Chan T.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991; 32: 715
- 11b McCormick JP, Tomaski W, Johnson MW. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981; 22: 607
- 11c Rubottom GM, Mott RC, Juve HD. J. Org. Chem. 1981; 46: 2717
- 11d Marcos IS, Gonzalez JL, Sexmero MJ, Díez D, Basbe P, Williams DJ, Simmonds MS. J, Urones JG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 2553
- 12 Greene TW, Wuts PG. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis . 4th ed. Wiley; New York: 2007: 1110
- 13a Freeman F, Karcherski EM. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1977; 22: 355
- 13b Gregory MJ. J. Chem. Soc. B 1970; 1201
- 13c Kochhar KS, Bal BS, Deshpande RP, Rajadhyaksha SN, Pinnick HW. J. Org. Chem. 1983; 48: 1765
- 13d Deka N, Kalita DJ, Borah R, Sarma JC. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 1563
- 13e Ballini R, Bordoni M, Bosica G, Maggi R, Sartori G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 7587
- 13f Jin TS, Sun G, Li YW, Li TS. Green Chem. 2002; 4: 255
- 13g Nagy NM, Jakab MA, Konya J, Antus S. Appl. Clay Sci. 2002; 21: 213
- 13h Karimi B, Maleki J. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 4951
- 13i Chakraborti AK, Thilagavathi R, Kumar R. Synthesis 2004; 831
- 13j Azarifar D, Ghasemnejad H, Ramzanian-lehmali F. Mendeleev Commun. 2005; 15: 209
- 13k Heravi MM, Bakhtiari K, Bamoharram FF. Catal. Commun. 2006; 7: 499
- 13l Khan AT, Choudhury LH, Ghosh S. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006; 255: 230
- 13m Wang QY, Sheng SR, Wei MH, Xie ZL, Liu XL. Synth. Commun. 2007; 37: 1019
- 13n Wang M, Song Z, Gong H, Jiang H. Synth. Commun. 2008; 38: 961
- 13o Jermy BR, Pandurangan A. Catal. Commun. 2008; 9: 577
- 13p Niknam K, Saberi D, Nouri Sefat M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 4058
- 13q Wang M, Tian GF, Song ZG, Jiang H. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2009; 20: 1034 ; Chem. Abstr. 2009, 152, 286579
- 13r Meshram GA, Patil VD. Synth. Commun. 2010; 40: 442
- 13s Wang YY, Xu YN, Wang ZZ, Dai LY. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2010; 21: 524 ; Chem. Abstr. 2010, 153, 36740
- 14a Henry PM. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971; 328
- 14b Henry PM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972; 94: 5200
- 14c Overman LE, Knoll FM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979; 4: 321
- 14d Overman LE. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984; 23: 579
- 14e Overman LE, Ziller J, Zipp GG. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 1449
- 14f Overman LE, Owen CE, Pavan MM, Richards CJ. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 1809
- 14g Amatore C, Jutand A, Mensah L, Meyer G, Fiaud J.-C, Legros J.-T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 1185
- 14h Shekhar S, Trantow B, Leitner A, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 11770
- 14i Watson MP, Overman LE, Bergman RG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 5031
-
References
- 1a Kocienski PJ. Protecting Groups . Thieme; Stuttgart: 2005. 3rd ed. 528
- 1b Greene TW, Wuts PG. M. Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis . 4th ed. Wiley; New York: 2006: 1082
- 2a Levin RH, Magerlein BJ, Mcintosh AV, Hanze Jr AR, Fonken GS, Thompson JL, Searcy AM, Scheri MA, Gutsell ES. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954; 76: 546
- 2b Warneboldt RB, Weiler L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971; 37: 3413
- 2c DeGraw JI. Tetrahedron 1972; 28: 967
- 2d Sakuragi H, Koyama T, Sakurazawa M, Yasui N, Tokumaru K, Ueno K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994; 67: 1769
- 2e Pei W, Li S, Nie X, Li Y, Pei J, Chen B, Wu J, Ye X. Synthesis 1998; 1298
- 3a Takadate A, Masuda T, Murata C, Tanaka T, Goya S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995; 68: 3105
- 3b Paizs C, Tosa M, Majdik C, Bódai V, Novák L, Irimie F.-D, Poppe L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002; 2400
- 4a Brinchi L, Germani R, Savelli G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003; 44: 2027
- 4b Kamal A, Chouhan G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 8801
- 5a Naodovic M, Yamamoto H. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 3132
- 5b Weibel J.-M, Blanc A, Pale P. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 3149
- 5c Álvarez-Corral M, Muñoz-Dorado M, Rodríguez-García I. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 3174
- 5d Yanagisawa A, Arai T. Chem. Commun. 2008; 1165
- 5e Harmata M. Silver in Organic Chemistry . Wiley; New York: 2010: 402
- 6a Meisenheimer J, Link J. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1930; 479: 211
- 6b Roberts JD, Young WG, Winstein S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942; 64: 2157
- 6c Young WG, Andrews LJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944; 66: 421
- 6d Kawada K, Kim M, Watt DS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989; 30: 5989
- 6e Iqbal R, Winterfeldt E. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2005; 42: 1079
- 7 Gingras M, Chan TH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989; 30: 279
- 8 Godina TA, Lubell WD. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 5846
- 9 See Supporting Information for results in other solvents.
- 10a Levine PA, Walti A. Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. II . Wiley; New York: 1943: 4843
- 10b Criegee R, Klonk K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1949; 564: 1
- 10c Reid EB, Fortenbauch RB, Patterson HR. J. Org. Chem. 1950; 15: 572
- 10d Cavill GW. K, Solomon DH. J. Chem. Soc. 1955; 4426
- 10e Shono T, Matsumura Y, Nakagawa Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975; 97: 6144
- 10f Williams GJ, Hunter NR. Can. J. Chem. 1976; 54: 3830
- 10g May GL, Pinhery JT. Aust J. Chem. 1982; 35: 1859
- 10h Creary X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 5568
- 10i Demir AS, Camkerten N, Akgun H, Tanyeli C, Mahasneh AS, Watt DS. Synth. Commun. 1990; 20: 2279
- 10j Moriarty RM, Berglund BA, Penmasta R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992; 33: 6065
- 10k Lee JC, Park C, Choi Y. Synth. Commun. 1997; 27: 4079
- 10l Watson CY, Whish WJ. D, Threadgill MD. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998; 6: 721
- 10m Demir AS, Hamamci H, Tanyeli C, Akhmedov IM, Dogane F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998; 9: 1673
- 10n Ochiai M, Takeuchi Y, Katayama T, Sueda T, Miyamoto K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 12244
- 10o Ley SV, Thomas AW, Finch H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999; 669
- 10p Tanyeli C, Turkut E, Akhmedov IM. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004; 15: 1729
- 11a Guertin KR, Chan T.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991; 32: 715
- 11b McCormick JP, Tomaski W, Johnson MW. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981; 22: 607
- 11c Rubottom GM, Mott RC, Juve HD. J. Org. Chem. 1981; 46: 2717
- 11d Marcos IS, Gonzalez JL, Sexmero MJ, Díez D, Basbe P, Williams DJ, Simmonds MS. J, Urones JG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 2553
- 12 Greene TW, Wuts PG. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis . 4th ed. Wiley; New York: 2007: 1110
- 13a Freeman F, Karcherski EM. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1977; 22: 355
- 13b Gregory MJ. J. Chem. Soc. B 1970; 1201
- 13c Kochhar KS, Bal BS, Deshpande RP, Rajadhyaksha SN, Pinnick HW. J. Org. Chem. 1983; 48: 1765
- 13d Deka N, Kalita DJ, Borah R, Sarma JC. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 1563
- 13e Ballini R, Bordoni M, Bosica G, Maggi R, Sartori G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 7587
- 13f Jin TS, Sun G, Li YW, Li TS. Green Chem. 2002; 4: 255
- 13g Nagy NM, Jakab MA, Konya J, Antus S. Appl. Clay Sci. 2002; 21: 213
- 13h Karimi B, Maleki J. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 4951
- 13i Chakraborti AK, Thilagavathi R, Kumar R. Synthesis 2004; 831
- 13j Azarifar D, Ghasemnejad H, Ramzanian-lehmali F. Mendeleev Commun. 2005; 15: 209
- 13k Heravi MM, Bakhtiari K, Bamoharram FF. Catal. Commun. 2006; 7: 499
- 13l Khan AT, Choudhury LH, Ghosh S. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006; 255: 230
- 13m Wang QY, Sheng SR, Wei MH, Xie ZL, Liu XL. Synth. Commun. 2007; 37: 1019
- 13n Wang M, Song Z, Gong H, Jiang H. Synth. Commun. 2008; 38: 961
- 13o Jermy BR, Pandurangan A. Catal. Commun. 2008; 9: 577
- 13p Niknam K, Saberi D, Nouri Sefat M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 4058
- 13q Wang M, Tian GF, Song ZG, Jiang H. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2009; 20: 1034 ; Chem. Abstr. 2009, 152, 286579
- 13r Meshram GA, Patil VD. Synth. Commun. 2010; 40: 442
- 13s Wang YY, Xu YN, Wang ZZ, Dai LY. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2010; 21: 524 ; Chem. Abstr. 2010, 153, 36740
- 14a Henry PM. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971; 328
- 14b Henry PM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972; 94: 5200
- 14c Overman LE, Knoll FM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979; 4: 321
- 14d Overman LE. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984; 23: 579
- 14e Overman LE, Ziller J, Zipp GG. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 1449
- 14f Overman LE, Owen CE, Pavan MM, Richards CJ. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 1809
- 14g Amatore C, Jutand A, Mensah L, Meyer G, Fiaud J.-C, Legros J.-T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 1185
- 14h Shekhar S, Trantow B, Leitner A, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 11770
- 14i Watson MP, Overman LE, Bergman RG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 5031


























