Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1317706
Exploration of Versatile Geminal Bis(silane) Chemistry
Publication History
Received: 03 September 2012
Accepted after revision: 01 November 2012
Publication Date:
28 November 2012 (online)
Abstract
Geminal bis(silyl) compounds, a special type of organosilane, are attractive synthons because of their great potential for bifunctional reactivity. This article outlines our recent efforts to develop a practical method to synthesize geminal bis(silane) compounds and to explore their interesting bifunctionality.
#
Key words
organosilane - geminal bis(silane) - bifunctional reactivity - silyl migration - Prins cyclizationOrganosilane chemistry[ 1 ] has remained an active and important area of research for organic chemists in recent decades. Studies describing new organosilane species and exploring their unique reactivity and efficient use in natural product synthesis have led to many significant developments in this field. For example, some well-known name reactions such as the Brook rearrangement,[ 2 ] Danheiser cyclopentene annulation,[ 3 ] Fleming–Tamao oxidation,[ 4 ] Hiyama coupling,[ 5 ] Peterson olefination,[ 6 ] and Sakurai allylation[ 7 ] have been widely used in organic synthesis. Geminal bis(silane) compounds 1,[ 8 ] featuring the attachment of two silyl groups to one carbon center, are a special type of organosilane (Scheme [1]). Similar to other geminal bimetallic species,[ 9 ] which are useful coupling reagents, bis(silyl) compounds also possess great potential because of their bifunctional reactivity. For example, Lautens[ 10 ] and Williams[ 11 ] reported the Sakurai reaction of allyl bis(silane) 2 with aldehyde to generate homo allylic alcohols 3 (Scheme [1]). Elimination of one silyl group left the second group in the form of vinylsilane, which could be used as a functional group for the next transformation.


Despite their attractiveness as synthons, studies on geminal bis(silane) have been very limited, presumably as a result of steric considerations. Indeed, the attachment of two large silyl groups to one carbon center is quite challenging in such a sterically bulky system. In this SynPact article, we wish to outline our recent efforts to develop a practical method to synthesize geminal bis(silane) and to explore their interesting bifunctional reactivity.


Lu Gao (center) was born in Xinjiang Province, China, in 1987. She attended Sichuan University, where she received her BA in 2009. Currently she is pursuing doctoral studies with Prof. Zhenlei Song at West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University. Her research projects focus on silyl migration to form useful organosilane species.
Yuebao Zhang (right) was born in Henan Province, China, in 1988. He received his BA from Henan University in 2011. Currently he is a second-year master’s student in Prof. Zhenlei Song’s group at West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University. His research projects focus on the application of bis(silyl) chemistry in natural product synthesis.
In 1997, Mitchell developed a lithium amide induced retro-[1,4] Brook rearrangement[ 12 ] of 2-tributylstannyl-3-silyl allyloxysilane 4 to create 3,3-bis(trimethylsilyl) aldehyde 6a directly (Scheme [2]).[ 13 ] Nevertheless, the substrate containing a vinyl (n-Bu)3Sn group, which is required to facilitate the silyl migration, is toxic and difficult to prepare. In addition, the reaction is only feasible when the less bulky trimethylsilyl group is involved, which limits the usefulness of this approach.


Inspired by this work, our group developed an improved method in 2010.[ 14 ] Using s-BuLi as base, and HMPA as cosolvent to reduce aggregation of the initially formed allyl anion, a smooth silyl group migration of 3-silyl allyloxysilanes 5 was achieved (Scheme [3]). Through base-mediated hydrolysis of lithium enolate, a wide range of 3,3-bis(silyl) aldehydes 6 were formed in good to excellent yield, including products containing the much more sterically bulky geminal bis(silyl) group (6c and 6d) and compounds containing two different silyl groups (6e–g). The approach was also applicable to substrates with a substituent at the 1- or 2-position, which readily produced the corresponding 3,3-bis(silyl) ketone 6h and 2-substituted 3,3-bis(silyl) aldehydes 6i and 6j.


We obtained a particularly notable result when trapping 3,3-bis(silyl) enolate 8 with alkyl halides. All reactions proceeded through selective O-alkylation and provided the corresponding Z-enol ethers exclusively, with no C-alkylated products detected at all (Scheme [4]). This interesting selectivity provided a deeper mechanistic insight, especially into the unique properties of the 3,3-bis(silyl) enolate. We proposed that the enolate adopts the Z-configuration and that its most favorable conformation is that shown in 8, which minimizes allylic strain and nonbonded interactions and which benefits from a double-hyperconjugation effect between the two C–Si bonds and the enol double bond (Scheme [5]). This would prevent reverse silyl migration via the pentacoordinated silicate 9 to give allyl anion 10, as well as further C1- and C3-alkylation of 10. At the same time, the bulky geminal bis(silyl) moiety shields both sides of the 2-position in 8, making C2-alkylation more difficult. As a result, halides are forced to react with the oxygen anion, generating exclusively O-alkylated products 7.




The easy accessibility of 3,3-bis(silyl) aldehyde and enol derivatives allowed us to explore the more diverse reactivity of geminal bis(silanes). We discovered that bis(silyl) enal 11,[ 15 ] prepared by a Mannich reaction of aldehyde 6 with formaldehyde, proved to be a useful linchpin in an efficient three-component coupling process involving anion relay chemistry (Scheme [6]).[ 16 ] The reaction features a [1,4]-Brook rearrangement, which is triggered by the addition of organolithium to aldehyde, to generate the silicon-stabilized allyl anion 13. It is noteworthy that this process provides a new method for forming silyl allyl anions, which is generally accessed by deprotonation of allyl silane. Two transition states seem possible: endo-orientated endo-13 features tolerable A1,3 strain between the silyl group and γ-H, so it appears to be more favorable than exo-13, which involves severe A1,2 strain between the silyl group and the 2-substituent. Thus, addition of electrophiles to endo-13 at the more accessible γ-position gave various E-vinylsilanes 12 both regio- and stereoselectively in good yields.


As part of our studies on the reactivity of 3,3-bis(silyl) enol ethers, we focused on the deprotonation of the extremely bulky bis(silyl) group. Because initial attempts based on either intermolecular deprotonation or directed metalation proved unsuccessful, a conceptually new strategy was designed and verified using deuterium-labeling experiments (Scheme [7]).[ 17 ] The entire process is initiated by regioselective deprotonation of enol allyl ether 14-D to form allyl anion 15, which quickly undergoes a [1,5]-anion relay via a boat-shaped transition state with a six-membered ring to generate the thermodynamically more stable geminal bis(silyl) allyl anion 16. Next, [2,3]-Wittig rearrangement of 16 occurs to continuously drive the reaction to give bis(silyl) allylic alcohol 17-D. The reaction is generally suitable for enol allyl ethers with a substituted allyl chain, and it delivers the products in good yields. When a substrate with one substitution at the 3-position was used, the syn-isomer was obtained as a major product (17d and 17e). When enol allyl ether substituted at both the 2- and 3-positions was used, the anti-isomer formed predominantly (17f).


Geminal bis(silyl) allylic alcohols 17 can be further transformed into the more functionalized trisubstituted vinylsilanes 18 (Scheme [8]). The process features a sequential [1,4]-Brook rearrangement/alkylation reaction promoted by t-BuOLi/CuCN in THF and DMF as co-solvents.[ 18 ] The reaction is suitable for a wide range of allylic and propargyl electrophiles, and the leaving group can be one of several species, such as halides and tosylate.


Our latest investigations have shown that bis(silyl) chemistry may also play a key role in the synthesis of complex natural products such as bryostatins.[ 19 ] This family of molecules has shown remarkable biological activity against a range of cancers, and has been used extensively in clinical trials against these diseases. The main challenge presented by the bryostatins is the construction of cis-tetrahydropyran rings B and C containing geometrically defined exocyclic methyl enoates. Inspired by the bifunctionality of geminal bis(silyl) compounds, we developed a new strategy to form ring B of bryostatins.[ 20 ]
The key reaction lies in a TMSOTf-promoted Prins cyclization[ 21 ] of geminal bis(silyl) homoallylic alcohols 19 [ 22 ] with aldehydes to generate 2,6-cis-tetrahydropyrans 20 containing an exocyclic Z-vinylsilane (Scheme [9]). This approach is not only widely applicable to a variety of aldehydes and homo allylic alcohols, but is also remarkable in that configurational control of the exocyclic vinylsilane is independent of both the R1 and R2 groups. Thus, reliable Z-selectivity can be achieved when the silyl group falls on the same side as the incorporated aldehyde.




A rationalization of this interesting stereoselectivity is tentatively proposed in Scheme [10]. Two chair-like transition states (Z)-21- and (E)-21, in which both R1 and R2 groups lie in the pseudoequatorial position, could be expected to give (Z)-20 and (E)-20, respectively. Although both feature antiperiplanar arrangements, the second silyl group adopts a different orientation. Whereas transition state (E)-21 suffers from a steric interaction between the silyl group and H-2 in the pseudoaxial position, a similar interaction between the silyl group and H-6 in transition state (Z)-21 appears to be tolerated because H-6 points inward. Thus, transition state (Z)-21 should be energetically more favorable and should lead to the observed exclusive Z-selectivity.
This methodology was then applied to the synthesis of ring B of bryostatins to show the bifunctional role of the bis(silyl) group (Scheme [11]). Prins cyclization of bis-(silyl) homoallylic alcohol 22 with aldehyde 23 under standard conditions generated the desired cis-tetrahydropyran 24 in 92% yield with exclusive Z-selectivity. Bromination of the exocyclic vinylsilane in 24 with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) gave 25 in 88% yield and with retention of the Z-configuration. A final carbonylation step led to formation of methyl enoate and generated 26 as the C9–C19 fragment of bryostatins in 73% yield.


In summary, we have described our recent progress in studies of geminal bis(silane) chemistry. Our research has involved developing practical methods to synthesize functionalized geminal bis(silanes), discovering new reactions involving these compounds, and applying them to natural product synthesis. This interesting chemistry shows the attractive versatility of geminal bis(silyl) species, especially their bifunctional reactivity in several transformations. We are optimistic that research in this field will grow and some breakthroughs can be expected. For example, enantioselective silyl migration to generate chiral 3,3-bis(silyl) aldehydes containing two different silyl groups would be an extremely useful advance. These compounds should be useful in all kinds of asymmetric transformations involving selective desilylation. In addition, the steric bulk of the bis(silyl) group may be a unique way to achieve regio- and stereoselectivity under challenging circumstances. Encouraged by the construction of ring B of bryostatins, we expect that geminal bis(silane) chemistry will, as additional reactivities are discovered, play further key roles and find more efficient applications in natural product synthesis.
#
Acknowledgment
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21172150, 21021001), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2010CB833200), and Sichuan University (Distinguished Young Scientist Program, 2011SCU04A18; 985 project – Science and Technology Innovation Platform for Novel Drug Development) for financial support.
-
References and Notes
- 1a Overman LE, Blumenkopf TA. Chem. Rev. 1986; 86: 857
- 1b Panek M, Masse CE. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 1293
- 1c Langkopf E, Schinzer D. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 1375
- 1d Fleming I, Barbero A, Walter D. Chem. Rev. 1997; 97: 2063
- 2a Brook AG. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974; 7: 77
- 2b Moser WH. Tetrahedron 2001; 57: 2065
- 3a Danheiser RL, Carini DJ, Basak A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981; 103: 1604
- 3b Danheiser RL, Kwasigroch CA, Tsai YM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 7233
- 3c Danheiser RL, Fink DM, Tsai YM. Org. Synth. 1988; 66: 8
- 3d Danheiser RL, Stoner EJ, Koyama H, Yamashita DS, Klade CA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989; 111: 4407
- 3e Danheiser RL, Dixon BR, Gleason RW. J. Org. Chem. 1992; 57: 6094
- 4a Tamao K, Akita M, Kumada M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983; 254: 13
- 4b Fleming I, Henning R, Plaut H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984; 29
- 4c For the latest review on Fleming–Tamao oxidation, see: Jones GR, Landais Y. Tetrahedron 1996; 52: 7599
- 5a Hatanaka Y, Hiyama T. J. Org. Chem. 1988; 53: 918
- 5b For the latest review on Hiyama coupling, see: Denmark S, Regens CS. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008; 41: 1486
- 6a Peterson DJ. J. Org. Chem. 1968; 33: 780
- 6b For the latest review on Peterson olefination, see: van Staden LF, Gravestock D, Ager DJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002; 31: 195
- 7a Hosomi A, Endo M, Sakurai H. Chem. Lett. 1976; 941
- 7b Fleming I. Allylsilanes, Allylstannanes and Related Systems . In Comp. Org. Synth. . Vol. 6. Trost BM, Fleming I. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991: 563-593
- 7c Schinzer D. Synthesis 1988; 263
- 7d Fleming I, Dunogues J, Smithers R. Org. React. 1989; 37: 57
- 8a Fleming I, Floyd CD. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981; 969
- 8b Ahlbrecht H, Farnung W, Simon H. Chem. Ber. 1984; 117: 2622
- 8c Brook AG, Chrusciel JJ. Organometallics 1984; 3: 1317
- 8d Klumpp GW, Mierop AJ. C, Vrielink JJ, Brugman A, Schakel M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 6740
- 8e Lautens M, Delanghe PH. M, Goh JB, Zhang CH. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 4213
- 8f Lautens M, Ben RN, Delanghe PH. M. Tetrahedron 1996; 52: 7221
- 8g Princet B, Anselme G, Pornet J. Synth. Commun. 1999; 29: 3326
- 8h Princet B, Gariglio HG, Pornet J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000; 604: 186
- 8i Hodgson DM, Barker SF, Mace LH, Moran JR. Chem. Commun. 2001; 153
- 8j Onyeozili EN, Maleczka RE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 6565
- 9a Marek I, Normant JF. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 3241
- 9b Marshall JA. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 31
- 9c Marek I. Chem. Rev. 2000; 100: 2887
- 10 Lautens M, Ben RN, Delanghe PH. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994; 33: 2448
- 11 Williams DR, Morales-Ramos ÁI, Williams CM. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 4393
- 12a Simpkins SM. E, Kariuki BM, Arico CS, Cox LR. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 3971
- 12b Nahm MR, Xin LH, Potnick JR, Yates CM, White PS, Johnson JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 2377
- 12c Yamago S, Fujita K, Miyoshi M, Kotani M, Yoshida J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 909
- 12d Mori H, Matsuo T, Yoshioka Y, Katsumura S. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 9004
- 12e Mori Y, Futamura Y, Horisaki K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 1091
- 13a Mitchell TN, Schütze M, Giebelmann F. Synlett 1997; 187
- 13b Mitchell TN, Schütze M. Tetrahedron 1999; 55: 1285
- 14 Song ZL, Lei Z, Gao L, Wu X, Li LJ. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 5298
- 15 Gao L, Lin XL, Lei J, Song ZL, Lin Z. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 158
- 16a Smith AB. III, Adams CM. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004; 37: 365
- 16b Smith AB. III, Wuest WM. Chem. Commun. 2008; 5883
- 16c Smith AB. III, Kim WS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011; 108: 6787
- 16d Smith AB. III, Tong RB, Kim WS, Maio WA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 8904
- 16e Smith AB. III, Han H, Kim WS. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3328
- 16f Smith AB. III, Hoye AT, Martinez-Solorio D, Kim W.-S, Tong RB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 4533
- 17 Sun XW, Lei J, Sun CZ, Song ZL, Yan LJ. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 1094
- 18a Taguchi H, Ghoroku K, Tadaki M, Tsubouchi A, Takeda T. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 3811
- 18b Smith AB. III, Kim WS, Tong RB. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 588
- 19a Hale KJ, Hummersone MG, Manaviazar S, Frigerio M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002; 19: 413
- 19b Kortmansky J, Schwartz GK. Cancer Invest. 2003; 21: 924
- 19c Wender PA, Baryza JL, Hilinski MK, Horan JC, Kan C, Verma VA. Beyond Natural Products: Synthetic Analogues of Bryostatin 1 . In Drug Discovery Research: New Frontiers in the Post-Genomic Era . Huang Z. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2007: 127-162
- 19d Hale KJ, Manaviazar S. Chem.–Asian J. 2010; 5: 704
- 20 Lu J, Song ZL, Zhang YB, Gan ZB, Li HZ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 5367
- 21 For the latest review on Prins cyclization, see: Crane EA, Scheidt KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 8316
- 22 The geminal bis(silyl) homoallylic alcohols 19 were synthesized in 55–60% yield by a zinc-promoted Barbier reaction of aldehyde with bis(silyl) allyl bromide, which was prepared from bis(silyl) enal 11 in three steps. See the Supporting Information of ref. 15 for details.
For selective reviews on organosilanes, see:
For reviews on the Brook rearrangement, see:
For reviews on Sakurai allylation, see:
For studies on geminal bis(silyl) species, see:
For reviews on geminal bimetallic species, see:
For recent studies on the retro-[1,4] Brook rearrangement, see:
For reviews on anion relay chemistry (ARC), see:
For the latest advances, see:
For reviews on the bryostatins, see:
-
References and Notes
- 1a Overman LE, Blumenkopf TA. Chem. Rev. 1986; 86: 857
- 1b Panek M, Masse CE. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 1293
- 1c Langkopf E, Schinzer D. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 1375
- 1d Fleming I, Barbero A, Walter D. Chem. Rev. 1997; 97: 2063
- 2a Brook AG. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974; 7: 77
- 2b Moser WH. Tetrahedron 2001; 57: 2065
- 3a Danheiser RL, Carini DJ, Basak A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981; 103: 1604
- 3b Danheiser RL, Kwasigroch CA, Tsai YM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 7233
- 3c Danheiser RL, Fink DM, Tsai YM. Org. Synth. 1988; 66: 8
- 3d Danheiser RL, Stoner EJ, Koyama H, Yamashita DS, Klade CA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989; 111: 4407
- 3e Danheiser RL, Dixon BR, Gleason RW. J. Org. Chem. 1992; 57: 6094
- 4a Tamao K, Akita M, Kumada M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983; 254: 13
- 4b Fleming I, Henning R, Plaut H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984; 29
- 4c For the latest review on Fleming–Tamao oxidation, see: Jones GR, Landais Y. Tetrahedron 1996; 52: 7599
- 5a Hatanaka Y, Hiyama T. J. Org. Chem. 1988; 53: 918
- 5b For the latest review on Hiyama coupling, see: Denmark S, Regens CS. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008; 41: 1486
- 6a Peterson DJ. J. Org. Chem. 1968; 33: 780
- 6b For the latest review on Peterson olefination, see: van Staden LF, Gravestock D, Ager DJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002; 31: 195
- 7a Hosomi A, Endo M, Sakurai H. Chem. Lett. 1976; 941
- 7b Fleming I. Allylsilanes, Allylstannanes and Related Systems . In Comp. Org. Synth. . Vol. 6. Trost BM, Fleming I. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991: 563-593
- 7c Schinzer D. Synthesis 1988; 263
- 7d Fleming I, Dunogues J, Smithers R. Org. React. 1989; 37: 57
- 8a Fleming I, Floyd CD. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981; 969
- 8b Ahlbrecht H, Farnung W, Simon H. Chem. Ber. 1984; 117: 2622
- 8c Brook AG, Chrusciel JJ. Organometallics 1984; 3: 1317
- 8d Klumpp GW, Mierop AJ. C, Vrielink JJ, Brugman A, Schakel M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 6740
- 8e Lautens M, Delanghe PH. M, Goh JB, Zhang CH. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 4213
- 8f Lautens M, Ben RN, Delanghe PH. M. Tetrahedron 1996; 52: 7221
- 8g Princet B, Anselme G, Pornet J. Synth. Commun. 1999; 29: 3326
- 8h Princet B, Gariglio HG, Pornet J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000; 604: 186
- 8i Hodgson DM, Barker SF, Mace LH, Moran JR. Chem. Commun. 2001; 153
- 8j Onyeozili EN, Maleczka RE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 6565
- 9a Marek I, Normant JF. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 3241
- 9b Marshall JA. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 31
- 9c Marek I. Chem. Rev. 2000; 100: 2887
- 10 Lautens M, Ben RN, Delanghe PH. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994; 33: 2448
- 11 Williams DR, Morales-Ramos ÁI, Williams CM. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 4393
- 12a Simpkins SM. E, Kariuki BM, Arico CS, Cox LR. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 3971
- 12b Nahm MR, Xin LH, Potnick JR, Yates CM, White PS, Johnson JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 2377
- 12c Yamago S, Fujita K, Miyoshi M, Kotani M, Yoshida J. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 909
- 12d Mori H, Matsuo T, Yoshioka Y, Katsumura S. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 9004
- 12e Mori Y, Futamura Y, Horisaki K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 1091
- 13a Mitchell TN, Schütze M, Giebelmann F. Synlett 1997; 187
- 13b Mitchell TN, Schütze M. Tetrahedron 1999; 55: 1285
- 14 Song ZL, Lei Z, Gao L, Wu X, Li LJ. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 5298
- 15 Gao L, Lin XL, Lei J, Song ZL, Lin Z. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 158
- 16a Smith AB. III, Adams CM. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004; 37: 365
- 16b Smith AB. III, Wuest WM. Chem. Commun. 2008; 5883
- 16c Smith AB. III, Kim WS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011; 108: 6787
- 16d Smith AB. III, Tong RB, Kim WS, Maio WA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 8904
- 16e Smith AB. III, Han H, Kim WS. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3328
- 16f Smith AB. III, Hoye AT, Martinez-Solorio D, Kim W.-S, Tong RB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 4533
- 17 Sun XW, Lei J, Sun CZ, Song ZL, Yan LJ. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 1094
- 18a Taguchi H, Ghoroku K, Tadaki M, Tsubouchi A, Takeda T. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 3811
- 18b Smith AB. III, Kim WS, Tong RB. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 588
- 19a Hale KJ, Hummersone MG, Manaviazar S, Frigerio M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002; 19: 413
- 19b Kortmansky J, Schwartz GK. Cancer Invest. 2003; 21: 924
- 19c Wender PA, Baryza JL, Hilinski MK, Horan JC, Kan C, Verma VA. Beyond Natural Products: Synthetic Analogues of Bryostatin 1 . In Drug Discovery Research: New Frontiers in the Post-Genomic Era . Huang Z. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2007: 127-162
- 19d Hale KJ, Manaviazar S. Chem.–Asian J. 2010; 5: 704
- 20 Lu J, Song ZL, Zhang YB, Gan ZB, Li HZ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 5367
- 21 For the latest review on Prins cyclization, see: Crane EA, Scheidt KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 8316
- 22 The geminal bis(silyl) homoallylic alcohols 19 were synthesized in 55–60% yield by a zinc-promoted Barbier reaction of aldehyde with bis(silyl) allyl bromide, which was prepared from bis(silyl) enal 11 in three steps. See the Supporting Information of ref. 15 for details.
For selective reviews on organosilanes, see:
For reviews on the Brook rearrangement, see:
For reviews on Sakurai allylation, see:
For studies on geminal bis(silyl) species, see:
For reviews on geminal bimetallic species, see:
For recent studies on the retro-[1,4] Brook rearrangement, see:
For reviews on anion relay chemistry (ARC), see:
For the latest advances, see:
For reviews on the bryostatins, see:




Lu Gao (center) was born in Xinjiang Province, China, in 1987. She attended Sichuan University, where she received her BA in 2009. Currently she is pursuing doctoral studies with Prof. Zhenlei Song at West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University. Her research projects focus on silyl migration to form useful organosilane species.
Yuebao Zhang (right) was born in Henan Province, China, in 1988. He received his BA from Henan University in 2011. Currently he is a second-year master’s student in Prof. Zhenlei Song’s group at West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University. His research projects focus on the application of bis(silyl) chemistry in natural product synthesis.



















