Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1258356
Short Total Synthesis of (-)-Lupinine and (-)-Epiquinamide by Double Mitsunobu Reaction
Publication History
Publication Date:
08 December 2010 (online)
Abstract
Alternative total syntheses of (-)-lupinine (1) and (-)-epiquinamide (2) have been described via the key intermediate 3 obtained from the addition of 2-trialkylsilyloxyfuran 5 to N-acyliminium intermediate derived from 4. The major R,R-isomer 8 obtained from the Mannich reaction was converted into its R,S-isomer through Mitsunobu reaction. Then, a second Mitsunobu reaction of 3 led to cyano 9 and azido 11 derivatives, which were converted into 1 and 2 in 33 and 36% overall yield from 4, respectively. The synthetic route is amenable for the generation of several quinolizidine alkaloids.
Key words
quinolizidine alkaloids - azido reduction - nickel boride - microwave irradiation - Mitsunobu reaction
The search towards efficient stereoselective methodologies for the construction of organic molecules with enhanced complexity and functions continues to challenge chemists. Over the last few years 2-trialkylsilyloxyfurans [¹] have been used as versatile reagents for the preparation of several enantiomerically pure compounds of biological interest. [²] We have investigated the nucleophilic addition of carbon nucleophiles to cyclic N-acyliminium ions and found the relevant role played by the N-acyliminium ring size in the stereochemical outcome of the reaction. [³] As studies involving the intermolecular nucleophilic addition of 2-trialkylsilyloxyfurans to cyclic N-acyliminium ions are so far restricted to five-membered N-acyliminium ion rings and mainly to N-carbobenzyloxy derivatives, [²] it was decided to explore these studies for the construction of chiral quinolizidines based on 8-phenylmenthyl induction.
As part of our efforts in the field of biologically relevant quinolizidines, attention was turned toward an alternative synthetic route for (-)-lupinine [4] and (1R,9aR)-epiquinamide, [5] figured out through the addition of siloxyfuran 5 to key iminium intermediate derived from 4. Recently, we reported enantioselective total syntheses of arborescidine alkaloids, [6a] (-)-quinolactacin B antibiotic, [6b] PDE5 inhibitors, [6c] noscapine, bicuculline, and egenine, as well as capnoidine and corytensine alkaloids. [³e]
Structurally, compounds 1 and 2 comprise a common quinoline core. Our approach to lupinine (1) and epiquinamide (2) is based on the preparation of azabicyclo compound 3 through the addition of silyloxyfuran 5 to an N-acyliminium ion derived from 4, followed by the introduction of the CH2OH and NHAc groups based on double stereoselective Mitsunobu reactions (Scheme [¹] ). Although demonstrated as a useful synthetic method, these asymmetric additions remain to be fully explored in the arena of total syntheses of alkaloid natural products.

Scheme 1 Retrosynthetic analysis of (-)-lupinine and (1R,9aR)-epiquinamide based on the key intermediate 3
Our investigation began by examining the addition of different silyloxyfurans 5 (R = Me, Bu, i-Pr) to the N-acyliminium ion derived from chiral 2-methoxypiperidine carbamate 4 [²g] [³c] (Scheme [²] ). Previously, D’oca and co-workers reported the addition of 2-tributylsilyloxyfuran to 4 achieving a low diastereoselectivity of 6 (2:1, threo/erythro) in 73% yield. [²g] Furthermore, it was observed that the nature of solvent, Lewis acids, and additives have great influence on selectivities in this kind of reactions. [³] Thus, the scope of the addition of 5 to the N-acyliminium ion derived from carbamate 4 was investigated with and without additives in different conditions (Table [¹] ). First, TMSOTf as Lewis acid was used in a mixture of solvent (THF-CH2Cl2), which proved to improve selectivities for the addition of silyloxyfurans to cyclic N-acyliminium ions. [³] [6] Table [¹] shows the addition of nucleophiles 5a-c in the absence of additives affording threo-6 isomer in diastereoisomeric ratios ranging from 4.5-8.1:1 (threo/erythro) when TMSOTf was used as Lewis acid. The reactions proceeded in reaction times of around 7 hours in 75-76% yields (Table [¹] , entries 1-3). Then, 5c was selected as nucleophile and TiCl4 and TIPSOTf were used as Lewis acid (Table [¹] , entries 4, 5). After 7 hours of reaction, neither the diastereoselection was improved favoring the threo-isomer nor the yields. Finally, the addition of CsF [³e] (Table [¹] , entry 6) and butylmethylimidazolinium tetrafluoroborate [³e] (BMI˙BF4, Table [¹] , entry 7) as additive was tested in the reaction of TMSOTf with 5c. The diastereoselectivity of the reaction was significantly affected by the nature of the additive (BMI˙BF4), which improved yields and selectivities. In fact, in the presence of BMI˙BF4 the preference for the threo-isomer 6 increased to 9.7:1 (Table [¹] , entry 7) when compared with no additive. The diastereoisomeric ratios of threo/erythro 6 obtained were determined by capillary GC analysis.

Scheme 2 Synthesis of 3 (R* denotes the 1-(1R,2S,5R)-8-phenylmenthylpiperidine part of the structure; cf. 4).
Entry | 5, R | Lewis acid | Additive | 6, threo/erythro b | Yield (%)c | ||||||||||||||
1 | 5a, Bu | TMSOTf | - | 5:1 | 75 | ||||||||||||||
2 | 5b, Me | TMSOTf | - | 4.5:1 | 76 | ||||||||||||||
3 | 5c, i-Pr | TMSOTf | - | 8:1 | 75 | ||||||||||||||
4 | 5c, i-Pr | TiCl4 | - | 5:1 | 72 | ||||||||||||||
5 | 5c, i-Pr | TIPSOTf | - | 8:1 | 74 | ||||||||||||||
6 | 5c, i-Pr | TMSOTf | CsF | 7.5:1 | 73 | ||||||||||||||
7 | 5c, i-Pr | TMSOTf | BMI˙BF4 | 9.7:1 | 80 | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
a All reactions
were performed in THF-CH2Cl2 (1:1)
as solvent at -78 ˚C for 7 h.
b Diastereomeric
ratio (dr) was calculated based on GC analysis. c Isolated yields. |
Then, compound 6 was converted into quinolizidinone (R,R)-8 in 92% overall yield according to previously studied methodologies. [²g] [³b] [c] Having prepared (R,R)-8, the next step was the inversion of configuration at C-10 in (R,R)-8 via Mitsunobu reaction (ClCH2CO2H, DEAD, Ph3P) to give the corresponding chloroacetate, which was hydrolyzed with K2CO3 in MeOH to afford the diastereomeric alcohol (R,S)-8 in 75% yield. Reduction of (R,S)-8 with alane (AlH3) gave after silica gel purification 3 in 97% yield. This route provides enantiomerically pure 1-azabicyclo[4.4.0]decane 3. [7] These results reveal the exclusive addition of silyloxyfuran 5 to the Si face of the N-acyliminium ions derived from 4, as depicted in Figure [¹] .

Figure 1 Facial selectivity for the addition of 5 to N-acyliminium precursor 4
Next, efforts were directed to the preparation of cyano compound 9. The first approach was to convert the alcohol 3 via the mesylate affording 9 in 71% overall yield using 18-crown-6 ether. In the absence of crown ether, the yields of the reaction were lower (15%). Furthermore, it was observed that temperatures higher than 70 ˚C caused epimerization at C-10 (Scheme [³] ). Then, it was attempted to carry out this transformation in one-step applying the synthetic versatility of the Mitsunobu reaction. First, KCN, DEAD, and Ph3P were tested, which afforded 9 in disappointing 31% yield, without epimerization. Then, 3 was subjected to Mitsunobu reaction by using acetone cyanohydrin, DEAD, and Ph3P in toluene-THF as solvent, [8] which converted the C-10 hydroxy group into the homologated nitrile group in 9 in 81% yield. The reaction proceeded very clean affording 9 with no epimerization as determined by GC analysis (Scheme [³] ).

Scheme 3 Synthesis of (-)-lupinine (1).
The cyano compound 9 was then hydrolyzed to acid 10 using 6 M HCl in refluxing CHCl3 in 93% yield. Interestingly, compound 10 showed differences in chemical shifts and coupling constants in CDCl3, probably due to the acid content of the solvent, for hydrogens on carbons 1, 4, 5 and 10, suggesting an equilibrium among the iminium, zwitterion and hydrochloride salt. [9] Finally, (-)-lupinine (1) was obtained in 91% yield by alane reduction of 10, as depicted in Scheme [³] .
For the synthesis of epiquinamide, the alcohol 3 was converted via the mesylate into azido 11 in 75% overall yield. [¹0] However, Cohen and Overman, in their synthesis of batzelladine F, used the Mitsunobu reaction with hydrazoic acid to install an azide group. [¹¹] Thus, testing Mitsunobu reaction of 3 with DEAD, Ph3P, and hydrazoic acid afforded 11 in yields of around 90-95%. Then, nickel boride (Ni2B) reduction of azide 11 afforded 12 [¹²] in 85% yield after two hours at 65 ˚C. [¹³] The nickel boride (amorphous fine black granules) was freshly prepared by mixing Ni(OAc)2 and NaBH4. [¹4] With the aim of increasing the yields along with shortening the reaction times, we decided to explore microwave irradiation in the reduction of 11. [¹5] The same reaction as described above was carried out under microwave-assisted conditions in a sealed vessel. Reaction times were reduced to two minutes for azide 11, the yields (93-95%) were better than using thermal heating. Further, it was also observed that by applying the described protocol, temperatures of the reaction mixture inside the reaction vessel reached values of 39 ˚C (2 min) for the microwave-assisted reductions at a power of 70 W. These temperatures were lower than used in the thermal conditions, preventing in this way degradation of reactants and products, and favoring the enhancement of yields. Finally, a mixture of acetic acid, Et3N and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) in silica gel using microwave irradiation converted crude 12 into (-)-epiquinamide (2) in 81% yield after two minutes [5] [¹6] (Scheme [4] ).

Scheme 4 Synthesis of (-)-equiquinamide (2)
In conclusion, these results reveal an attractive route to enantiomerically pure piperidine derivatives through quinolididinone 8, which is a potentially useful intermediate for the asymmetric synthesis of quinolizidine alkaloids. Although the Mitsunobu reaction is a classical one, its use continues to be interesting and should not be discarded when asymmetry is required in systems featuring chiral OH groups. An efficient microwave-assisted methodology employing Ni2B for the preparation of amine 12 is described. Ni2B reagent is easy to prepare, inexpensive, safe to handle, stable, does not require inert atmosphere, and not pyrophoric. Interestingly, the microwave-assisted irradiation reactions enhanced yields with very short reaction times in contrast to the conventional thermal reactions. The reaction conditions are particularly attractive and are an example of green chemistry approach.
Commercially available chemical reagents were used without further purification. HN3, DEAD, NaN3, DME, and acetone cyanohydrin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ph3P was purchased from Merck. Anhyd THF, CH2Cl2, MeOH, and DMF were prepared by distillation under N2 over Na/benzophenone, CaH2, Na/P2O5, and CaH2/molecular sieves, respectively. Solvents for extraction and column chromatography were distilled prior to use. NaN3 was handled with care by wearing safety glasses, facemask, gloves, and the reactions were performed in a fume hood. All the microwave reactions were performed in CEM Discover LabMate equipment in a closed vessel (built-in infrared sensor) with cooling system. IR spectra were recorded as film on KBr cells and the wave numbers are expressed in cm-¹. Melting points were measured with an Eletrothermal apparatus and are uncorrected. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker WH Avance 300, and Varian Unity 400 MHz spectrometers using TMS as the internal standard. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) downfield from TMS. Spin multiplicities are described as s (singlet), br s (broad singlet), d (doublet), dd (double doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), or m (multiplet). Coupling constants are reported in Hertz (Hz). Mass spectra were recorded on a Qtof Micro (Waters-Micromass). Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 100-200 mesh. TLC analyses were performed with silica gel plates using I2, KMnO4, or UV-lamp for visualization.
1-(1 R ,2 S ,5 R )-8-Phenylmenthylpiperidine
This compound was prepared following the experimental procedure according to reference 3c; mp 55.3-56.6 ˚C; R f = 0.5 (hexane-EtOAc, 1:1); [α]D ²0 -40 (c 1.07, CHCl3).
FTIR (KBr film): 2927, 2854, 1691, 1599, 1429, 1261, 1232, 1149, 1092, 1026, 764, 700 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.75-0.84 (m, 3 H), 0.85 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 0.87-0.93 (m, 1 H), 1.15-1.18 (m, 1 H), 1.21 (s, 3 H), 1.34 (s, 3 H), 1.37-1.67 (m, 9 H), 1.89-2.03 (m, 2 H), 3.03-3.09 (m, 4 H), 4.77 (dt, J = 4.5, 11.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.13-7.17 (m, 1 H), 7.21-7.32 (m, 4 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.3, 24.1, 25.3 (2C), 25.9 (2C), 26.4, 26.5, 31.1, 34.3, 39.3, 42.3, 43.9, 50.5, 75.0, 124.7, 125.3 (2C), 127.9 (2C), 151.9, 154.9.
HRMS (EI) m/z [M]+ ˙ calcd for C22H33NO2: 343.2511; found: 343.2515.
1-(1 R ,2 S ,5 R )-8-Phenylmenthyl-2-( R / S )-methoxypiperidine (4)
This compound was prepared following the experimental procedure according to reference 3c.
FTIR (KBr film): 3023, 2917, 2952, 2829, 1702, 1602, 1402, 1180, 1083, 755, 700 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.82-0.87 (m, 1 H), 0.91-1.20 (m, 2 H), 1.20 (s, 3 H), 1.22 (s, 3 H), 1.38 (s, 3 H), 1.39-1.81 (m, 9 H), 1.92-1.96 (m, 1 H), 2.01-2.10 (m, 2 H), 2.39, 2.43, 2.74, 2.80, and 2.94 (5 m, 1 H), 3.07, 3.19, 3.26, and 3.48 (4 s, 3 H), 4.70-4.92 (m, 1 H), 3.94, 4.45, 5.33, and 5.40 (4 m, 1 H), 7.10-7.17 (m, 1 H), 7.22-7.30 (m, 4 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 19.1, 21.9, 24.3, 26.0, 27.7, 30.5, 32.1, 35.1, 38.4, 39.4, 40.9, 42.7, 50.8, 54.8, 75.0, 82.0, 125.3, 125.6 (2C), 128.2 (2C), 152.3, 155.0.
HRMS (EI): m/z [M]+ ˙ calcd for C23H35NO3: 373.2617; found: 373.2601.
Compound 6
To a solution of methoxycarbamate 4 (672 mg, 1.80 mmol) in anhyd CH2Cl2-THF (1:1, 10.0 mL) at -78 ˚C was added BMI˙BF4 (0.020 mL, 1.80 mmol) and the mixture was stirred for 30 min under argon atmosphere, followed by slow addition of 2-triisopropylsilyloxyfuran (460 mg, 1.80 mmol) in CH2Cl2-THF (1:1, 1.00 mL). After 7 h, sat. aq NH4Cl (10.0 mL) was added and the layers were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 50 mL), and the combined organic phases were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude (9.7:1 diastereoisomeric mixture) was submitted to flash column chromatography purification (hexane-EtOAc, 2:1) affording pure threo-6 (557 mg, 1.31 mmol) in 73% yield and erythro-6 (61 mg, 0.144 mmol) in 8% yield.
threo-6
[α]D²0 -22 (c 1.05, CHCl3).
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.81 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 0.75-1.0 (m, 2 H), 1.07-1.65 (m, 10 H), 1.23 (s, 3 H), 1.39 (s, 3 H), 1.93-2.10 (m, 2 H), 2.68 (dt, J = 3.4, 12.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.35-3.42 (m, 1 H), 4.28 (q, J = 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (m, 1 H), 4.96 (dt, J = 4.5, 10.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.61 (br d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.99 (d, 1 H, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.00-7.38 (m, 5 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.8, 155.6, 155.3, 152.3, 151.7, 127.9, 125.3, 125.0, 121.4, 120.5, 88.2, 81.4, 75.8, 52.5, 51.9, 50.3, 42.1, 39.9, 34.5, 31.2, 27.3, 26.7, 24.7, 24.6, 21.8, 19.5.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C26H35NO4 + H]+: 426.2644; found: 426.2601.
Compound 7
To a solution of threo-6 (510 mg, 1.20 mmol) in EtOAc (12.0 mL) was added 10% Pd/C (38 mg) and the mixture was stirred under H2 (1 atm) for 4 h. The mixture was then filtered through Celite, and the pad was rinsed with EtOAc-MeOH (4:1, 200 mL). The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure to furnished pure 7 as a colorless oil; yield: 508 mg (99%, 1.19 mmol); [α]D ²0 -55 (c 1.5, CHCl3).
FTIR (KBr film): 1780, 1680 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.79-1.00 (m, 2 H), 0.89 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H), 1.12-1.29 (m, 3 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H), 1.39-1.81 (m, 12 H), 1.98-2.12 (m, 2 H), 2.22-2.28 (m, 1 H), 2.41-2.46 (m, 1 H), 2.48-2.54 (m, 1 H), 2.57-2.67 (m, 1 H), 2.89, 3.10 and 3.30 (3 m, 1 H), 4.14, 4.24, and 4.31 (3 m, 1 H), 4.60-4.67 (m, 1 H), 4.68-4.80 (m, 1 H), 7.10-7.17 (m, 1 H), 7.19-7.33 (m, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.0, 154.7, 154.2, 128.3, 127.6, 127.4, 126.4, 121.2, 80.0, 77.1, 52.2, 50.2, 42.9, 41.1, 39.5, 33.7, 33.0, 32.7, 26.0, 25.8, 24.8, 24.7, 24.1, 21.9 (2 × CH3), 19.7.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C26H37NO4 + H]+: 428.2801; found: 428.2811.
(1 R ,9a R )-1-Hydroxyoctahydro-4 H -quinolizin-4-one [( R , R )-8]
A solution of NaOMe in MeOH (1.1 mol/L, 5.2 mL) was added to 7 (384 mg, 0.90 mmol) at 0 ˚C, and the mixture was stirred at r.t. After 2 h, a 2 mol/L HCl-MeOH solution (10.0 mL) was carefully added. The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure, providing (R,R)-8 in 93% yield as a colorless oil; yield: 142 mg (93%, 0.84 mmol); [α]D ²0 +17 (c 1.5, MeOH).
FTIR (KBr film): 1780, 1680 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.37-1.50 (m, 1 H), 1.51-1.58 (m, 1 H), 1.65 (br s, 1 H), 1.65-1.70 (m, 1 H), 1.70-1.77 (m, 1 H), 1.79-1.89 (m, 1 H), 1.89-2.03 (m, 1 H), 2.36 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.44 (dt, J = 11.5, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.60 (ddd, J = 17.1, 10.7, 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.30 (br dd, J = 11.5, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.04 (br s, 1 H), 4.73 (br d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 24.2, 25.3, 26.9, 27.2, 28.0, 42.8, 60.6, 66.4, 168.5.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C9H15NO2 + H]+: 170.1181; found: 170.1175.
(1 R ,9a S )-1-Hydroxyoctahydro-4 H -quinolizin-4-one [( R , S )-8]
Compound (R,R)-8 (135 mg, 0.80 mmol), Ph3P (378 mg, 1.45 mmol), and ClCH2CO2H (137 mg, 1.45 mmol) were dissolved in anhyd CH2Cl2 (10 mL). DEAD (0.23 mL, 1.45 mmol) was added dropwise to the solution and the resulting pale yellow solution was stirred at r.t. for 6 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (CHCl3-MeOH, 95:5) to give a mixture of chloroacetate contaminated with trace amounts of Ph3PO. The chloroacetate was hydrolyzed using K2CO3 (331 mg, 2.4 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL). The MeOH was evaporated and CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added to the residue. The mixture was filtered through a column of Celite and the filtrate was concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (CHCl3-MeOH-NH4OH, 95:4.5:0.5; R f = 0.42) to give (R,S)-8; yield: 102 mg (75%); [α]D ²0 -10.5 (c 1.0, CHCl3).
FTIR (KBr film): 3374, 2934, 2857, 1610, 1445, 1048 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.15-1.25 (m, 1 H), 1.31-1.43 (m, 1 H), 1.43-1.55 (m, 1 H), 1.67 (br d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.77-2.01 (m, 4 H), 2.31 (ddd, J = 17.1, 7.8, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.38 (dt, J = 12.8, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.54 (ddd, J = 17.1, 7.8, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.15 (ddd, J = 12.0, 4.5, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.19 (br s, 1 H), 3.68-3.74 (m, 1 H), 4.68-4.75 (m, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 24.4, 25.2, 26.9, 28.5, 31.5, 42.9, 63.7, 69.6, 168.4.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C9H15NO2 + H]+: 170.1181; found: 170.1188.
(1 R ,9a R )- 1-Hydroxyoctahydro-1 H -quinolizine (3)
To a solution of (R,S)-8 (220 mg, 1.30 mmol) in THF (10.0 mL) was added a solution of AlH3 (1.55 M, 2.50 mL, 3.90 mmol; previously prepared by mixing 1 equiv of AlCl3 and 3 equiv of LiAlH4 solution in THF) at r.t. After 10 min, the reaction was quenched with sat. aq Na2SO4 (3.0 mL) and filtered. The solids were washed with CH2Cl2 (200 mL) and acidified with HCl-MeOH (10%) to effect complete conversion into the hydrochloride salt. Evaporation at reduced pressure afforded crude 3, which was purified by flash chromatography eluting with CHCl3-MeOH-NH4OH (95:4.5:0.5, R f = 0.42) to afford pure 3 as an oil; yield: 196 mg (97%). The spectroscopic data are in accordance with previously described for 3 [7] ; [α]D ²0 -22.7 (c 1.05, CHCl3).
¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.24-1.39 (m, 10 H), 2.17-2.38 (m, 5 H), 3.48-3.56 (m, 1 H).
(1 R ,9a R )- 1-Cyanooctahydro-1 H -quinolizine (9)
To a stirred solution of 3 (105 mg, 0.68 mmol), acetone cyanohydrin (1.38 mL, 1.36 mmol) and Ph3P (232 mg, 0.88 mmol) in THF (5.0 mL) was added a 2.2 M solution of diethyl azodicarboxylate in toluene (0.372 mL, 0.82 mmol) over 1 h at 0 ˚C, and then the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. After stirring for 40 min, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with EtOAc (5.0 mL) and hexane (3.0 mL), and then filtered to remove Ph3PO. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give 9 containing some Ph3P=O as impurity; yield: 90 mg (81%). Further purification was not done at this stage; [α]D ²0 -18.8 (c 1.0, CHCl3).
¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.20-1.42 (m, 9 H), 2.15-2.45 (m, 5 H), 2.68-2.74 (m, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 20.2, 23.4, 24.5, 27.0, 28.4, 38.3, 54.5, 55.8, 63.0, 122.4.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C10H16N2 + H]+: 165.1392; found: 165.1398.
(1 R ,9a R )-Octahydro-1 H -quinolizine-1-carboxylic Acid (10)
Compound 9 (90 mg, 0.55 mmol) was dissolved in a 6 M HCl-CHCl3 solution (2.0 mL) and stirred under reflux (60 ˚C) for 2 h. The mixture was washed with sat. aq NaHCO3 (4.0 mL), and the organic extract separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with CHCl3 (2 × 10 mL). The solvents from the combined organic layers were evaporated under vacuum and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography to afford the amino acid 10 as a white solid; yield: 93 mg (93%); mp 242-244 ˚C (Lit. [¹7] mp 255 ˚C); R f = 0.3 (CHCl3-MeOH-NH4OH, 4:1:0.1); [α]D ²0 +9.0 (c 0.5, CHCl3).
FT-IR (KBr film): 3410 (br), 2940, 2868, 1593 cm-¹ .
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.33 (tq, J = 4.1, 12.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.60-1.80 (m, 6 H), 1.86 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.04 (dd, J = 4.7, 13.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.13 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.30 (dt, J = 2.8, 12.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.41 (dt, J = 2.3, 12.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.43 (m, 1 H), 2.62 (br s, 1 H), 3.20 (ddd, J = 2.0, 4.7, 12.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.30 (dd, J = 2.0, 12.1 Hz, 1 H), 8.0 (s, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.3, 63.9, 56.0, 54.7, 46.1, 29.4, 27.3, 24.2, 23.0, 20.9.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C10H17NO2 + H]+: 184.1338; found: 184.1338.
(-)-Lupinine (1)
To a solution of 10 (24 mg, 0.13 mmol) in THF (2.0 mL) was added a solution of AlH3 (1.55 M, 0.25 mL, 0.39 mmol, previously prepared by mixing 1 equiv of AlCl3 and 3 equiv of LiAlH4 solution in THF) at r.t. After 20 min, the reaction was quenched with sat. aq Na2SO4 (0.70 mL) and filtered. The solids were washed with CH2Cl2 and acidified with HCl-MeOH (10%) to effect complete conversion into the hydrochloride salt. Evaporation at reduced pressure afforded the crude 1, which was purified by flash chromatography eluting with MeOH-NH4OH (99.5:0.5, R f = 0.8) to afford pure 1; yield: 20 mg (91%). The spectroscopic data are in accordance with the data described previously; [¹8] mp 59-60 ˚C (Lit. [¹8] mp 58-59 ˚C); [α]D ²0 -21.5 (c 1.05, CHCl3) {Lit. [¹9] [α]D ²0 -21.0 (c 0.25, EtOH)}.
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.20-1.25 (m, 1 H), 1.43-1.91 (m, 10 H), 1.99-2.02 (m, 1 H), 2.13-2.16 (m, 2 H), 2.78-2.83 (m, 2 H), 3.66 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.14 (ddd, J = 10.5, 5.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 23.0, 24.5, 25.7, 29.8, 31.3, 38.3, 57.0, 57.2, 65.0, 65.9.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C10H19NO + H]+: 170.1545; found: 170.1551.
(1 R ,9a R )-1-Azidooctahydro-1 H -quinolizine (11)
Diethyl azodicarboxylate (DEAD, 0.20 mL, 1.25 mmol) was added dropwise to solution of 3 (50 mg, 0.32 mmol), H3N (0.53 mL, 2.7 M in toluene, 1.45 mmol), Ph3P (332 mg, 1.27 mmol), and THF (4.0 mL) at 0 ˚C over 15 min using a syringe pump. After an additional 30 min, hexanes (5.0 mL) were added, and Ph3PO was filtered off. The residue was purified by flash chromatography to provide 11; yield: 39.5-41.6 mg (90-95%); [¹0] [α]D ²0 -36.1 (c 1.5, CHCl3).
¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.20-1.42 (m, 10 H), 2.10-2.33 (m, 5 H), 3.35-3.39 (m, 1 H).
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C9H16N4 - N3]+: 138.1277; found: 138.1274.
(1 R ,9a R )-1-Aminooctahydro-1 H -quinolizine (12)
Compound 11 (13.7 mg, 0.10 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (2.0 mL), and then Ni2B (25 mg, 0.30 mmol) and aq 1 M HCl (0.4 mL) were added. The mixture was irradiated at 70 W using CEM Discover LabMate equipment in a closed vessel with the temperature monitored by a built-in infrared sensor for 2 min at 39 ˚C with cooling. The resulting mixture was filtered, and then the MeOH was evaporated under vacuum. Then, sat. aq NaHCO3 (2.0 mL) was added to the mixture and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 5.0 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), then evaporated under reduced pressure to afford crude compound 12; yield: 15 mg (95%).
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C9H18N2 + H]+: 155.1548; found: 155.1552.
(-)-Epiquinidine (2)
The crude amine 12 (11 mg, 0.07 mmol) was mixed with silica gel (100 mg, 100-200 mesh). To the mixture was added in the following order: DME (0.09 mL, 1.25 equiv), Et3N (0.50 mL, 51 equiv), and AcOH (0.0135 mL, 0.176 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated by microwave-assisted irradiation at 70 W using a CEM Discover LabMate equipment in a closed vessel with the temperature monitored by a built-in infrared sensor for 2 min at 39 ˚C with cooling. The resulting mixture was diluted with CHCl3 (4.0 mL) and filtered; then the organic solvent evaporated under vacuum to afford the pure compound 2 as a colorless solid; yield: 11.1 mg (81%). The spectroscopic data were in accordance with the data described previously; [5] [¹6] mp 133-135 ˚C (Lit. [9] mp 131-133 ˚C; [α]D ²0 -22 (c 0.5, CHCl3) {Lit. [¹0] for (+)-2: [α]D ²² +26.2 (c 0.25, CHCl3)}.
¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.18-1.62 (m, 7 H), 1.73 (br d, J = 13.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.85 (br d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.91-1.95 (m, 3 H), 2.02 (s, 3 H), 2.74-2.80 (m, 2 H), 3.90-3.95 (br dd, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.25 (br s, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 20.3, 23.4, 24.0, 25.4, 28.8, 29.5, 47.9, 56.6, 56.7, 64.3, 168.9.
HRMS (ESI-MS): m/z calcd for [C11H20N2O + H]+: 197.1654; found: 197.1650.
Acknowledgment
L.S.S. thanks FONDECYT (Project 1085308) for support of research activity. Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Mención Investigación y Desarrollo de Productos Bioactivos (Universidad de Talca) is also acknowledged for financial support to Y.M.G.
- For reviews on the use of silyloxyfurans, see:
- 1a
Casiraghi G.Rassu G. Synthesis 1995, 607 - 1b
Rassu G.Zanardi F.Battistini L.Casiraghi G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29: 109 - 2a
Martin SF.Corbett JW. Synthesis 1992, 55 - 2b
Morimoto Y.Nishida K.Hayashi Y.Shirahama H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34: 5773 - 2c
Pichon M.Figadere B.Cave A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37: 7963 - 2d
Morimoto Y.Iwahashi M. Synlett 1995, 12 - 2e
Zanardi F.Battistini L.Rassu G.Pinna L.Mor M.Culeddu N.Casiraghi G. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63: 1368 - 2f
Martin SF.Barr KJ.Smith DW.Bur SK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121: 6990 - 2g
D’Oca MGM.Pilli RA.Vencato I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 9709 - 3a
de Oliveira MCF.Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6995 - 3b
Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6999 - 3c
Santos LS.Pilli RA. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2003, 14: 982 - 3d
Shankaraiah N.Pilli RA.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 5098 - 3e
Soriano MDPC.Shankaraiah N.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51: 1770 - 4
Airiau E.Spangenberg T.Girard N.Breit B.Mann A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12: 528 - 5
Fitch RW.Garraffo HM.Spande TF.Yeh HJC.Daly JW. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66: 1345 - 6a
Santos LS.Pilli RA.Rawal VH. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69: 1283 - 6b
Shankaraiah N.da Silva WA.Andrade CKZ.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 4289 - 6c
Shankaraiah N.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50: 520 - The spectroscopic data obtained are in accordance with the previously described data for (R,S)-8:
- 7a
Aaron HS.Wicks GE.Rader CP. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29: 2248 - 7b
Aaron HS.Wicks GE.Rader CP. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29: 2252 - 7c
Moehrle H.Karl C.Scheidegger U. Tetrahedron 1968, 24: 6813 - 7d
Srivastava AK.Das SK.Panda G. Tetrahedron 2009, 65: 5322 - 8
Uchida K.Yokoshima S.Kan T.Fukuyama T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 5311 - 9
Fitch RW.Sturgeon GD.Patel SR.Spande TF.Garraffo HM.Daly JW.Blaauw RH. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72: 243 - 10
Tong ST.Barker D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 5017 - 11
Cohen F.Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128: 2594 - 12
Collicutt AR.Jones G. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 4101 - 13
Santos LS.Pilli RA. Synthesis 2002, 87 - 14a
Schlessinger HI.Brown HC.Finholt AE.Gil-breath JE.Hoestra HR.Hyde EK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75: 215 - 14b
Brown CA. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35: 1900 - 14c
Hoffer LJE.Schultz J.Panson RD.Anderson RB. Inorg. Chem. 1964, 3: 1783 - 14d
Seltzman HH.Berrang B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34: 3083 - 15
Shankaraiah N.Markandeya N.Espinoza-Moraga N.Arancibia C.Kamal A.Santos LS. Synthesis 2009, 2163 - 16
Suyama TL.Gerwick WH. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 4541 - 17
Willstatter R.Fourneau E. Chem. Ber. 1902, 35: 1910 - 18
Wanner MJ.Koomen GJ. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61: 5581 - 19
Ma S.Ni B. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10: 3286
References
- For reviews on the use of silyloxyfurans, see:
- 1a
Casiraghi G.Rassu G. Synthesis 1995, 607 - 1b
Rassu G.Zanardi F.Battistini L.Casiraghi G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29: 109 - 2a
Martin SF.Corbett JW. Synthesis 1992, 55 - 2b
Morimoto Y.Nishida K.Hayashi Y.Shirahama H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34: 5773 - 2c
Pichon M.Figadere B.Cave A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37: 7963 - 2d
Morimoto Y.Iwahashi M. Synlett 1995, 12 - 2e
Zanardi F.Battistini L.Rassu G.Pinna L.Mor M.Culeddu N.Casiraghi G. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63: 1368 - 2f
Martin SF.Barr KJ.Smith DW.Bur SK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121: 6990 - 2g
D’Oca MGM.Pilli RA.Vencato I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 9709 - 3a
de Oliveira MCF.Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6995 - 3b
Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6999 - 3c
Santos LS.Pilli RA. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2003, 14: 982 - 3d
Shankaraiah N.Pilli RA.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 5098 - 3e
Soriano MDPC.Shankaraiah N.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51: 1770 - 4
Airiau E.Spangenberg T.Girard N.Breit B.Mann A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12: 528 - 5
Fitch RW.Garraffo HM.Spande TF.Yeh HJC.Daly JW. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66: 1345 - 6a
Santos LS.Pilli RA.Rawal VH. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69: 1283 - 6b
Shankaraiah N.da Silva WA.Andrade CKZ.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 4289 - 6c
Shankaraiah N.Santos LS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50: 520 - The spectroscopic data obtained are in accordance with the previously described data for (R,S)-8:
- 7a
Aaron HS.Wicks GE.Rader CP. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29: 2248 - 7b
Aaron HS.Wicks GE.Rader CP. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29: 2252 - 7c
Moehrle H.Karl C.Scheidegger U. Tetrahedron 1968, 24: 6813 - 7d
Srivastava AK.Das SK.Panda G. Tetrahedron 2009, 65: 5322 - 8
Uchida K.Yokoshima S.Kan T.Fukuyama T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 5311 - 9
Fitch RW.Sturgeon GD.Patel SR.Spande TF.Garraffo HM.Daly JW.Blaauw RH. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72: 243 - 10
Tong ST.Barker D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 5017 - 11
Cohen F.Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128: 2594 - 12
Collicutt AR.Jones G. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 4101 - 13
Santos LS.Pilli RA. Synthesis 2002, 87 - 14a
Schlessinger HI.Brown HC.Finholt AE.Gil-breath JE.Hoestra HR.Hyde EK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75: 215 - 14b
Brown CA. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35: 1900 - 14c
Hoffer LJE.Schultz J.Panson RD.Anderson RB. Inorg. Chem. 1964, 3: 1783 - 14d
Seltzman HH.Berrang B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34: 3083 - 15
Shankaraiah N.Markandeya N.Espinoza-Moraga N.Arancibia C.Kamal A.Santos LS. Synthesis 2009, 2163 - 16
Suyama TL.Gerwick WH. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 4541 - 17
Willstatter R.Fourneau E. Chem. Ber. 1902, 35: 1910 - 18
Wanner MJ.Koomen GJ. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61: 5581 - 19
Ma S.Ni B. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10: 3286
References

Scheme 1 Retrosynthetic analysis of (-)-lupinine and (1R,9aR)-epiquinamide based on the key intermediate 3

Scheme 2 Synthesis of 3 (R* denotes the 1-(1R,2S,5R)-8-phenylmenthylpiperidine part of the structure; cf. 4).

Figure 1 Facial selectivity for the addition of 5 to N-acyliminium precursor 4

Scheme 3 Synthesis of (-)-lupinine (1).

Scheme 4 Synthesis of (-)-equiquinamide (2)