Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1087980
Stereoselective Transformations of meso Bicyclic Hydrazines: Versatile Access to Functionalized Aminocyclopentanes
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 March 2009 (online)
Biographical Sketches







Abstract
Bicyclic hydrazines, prepared by cycloaddition of cyclopentadiene and diazo compounds, have great synthetic potential. Numerous asymmetric transformations of these building blocks have been developed, involving the electrophilicity of their strained double bond, ring-opening reactions or skeletal rearrangements. All these transformations are fully diastereoselective, and, in some cases, enantioselective, enabling the preparation of a wide range of useful synthetic intermediates from a single precursor in a few synthetic steps.
1 Introduction
2 Preparation and Conformational Properties of Bicyclic
Hydrazines
3 Synthetic Transformations without Ring Fragmentation
3.1 Hydroboration
3.2 Hydroformylation and Halocarbomethoxylation
3.3 Dihydroxylation and Aminohydroxylation
3.4 Hydroarylation
3.5 Sequential Arylation-Alkynylation
3.6 Arylative Cyclization
3.7 Cyclopropanation
3.8 Pauson-Khand Reaction
3.9 Cycloaddition Reactions
4 Synthetic Transformations with Ring Fragmentation
4.1 Palladium-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Reactions
4.2 Copper-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Reactions
4.3 Rhodium-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Reactions
4.4 Ruthenium-Catalyzed Ring-Opening-Metathesis Reactions and Oxidative Cleavage
5 Rearrangements
5.1 Rearrangements Involving Allylic Cations
5.2 Rearrangements Involving Aziridiniums
6 Synthetic Applications
7 Conclusion
Key words
asymmetric synthesis - bicyclic hydrazines - ring-opening reactions - amines - asymmetric catalysis
1 Introduction
The original publication in 1928 by Diels and Alder of the now-classical Diels-Alder reaction [¹] is a well-known landmark for organic chemists and has probably outshined the report, published three years earlier, by Diels, Blom and Koll of a similar reaction between cyclopentadiene and azodicarbonyl derivatives. [²] This highly favored reaction can deliver, within a few hours, multigram quantities of cycloadducts 1, generally isolated in a quantitative manner by a simple precipitation from cyclohexane as stable solids (Figure [¹] ). Besides its historical importance, this textbook experiment enables straightforward access to pyridazine heterocyclic systems with the simultaneous formation of two carbon-nitrogen bonds from cyclopentadiene with perfect atom-economy. Surprisingly, most of the synthetic applications of this remarkable reaction have been restricted for a long time to the preparation of cyclic diazenes from cycloadducts 1, and subsequent diradical generation by nitrogen extrusion. [³] Although this approach proved to be very efficient for the preparation of complex carbo-polycyclic skeletons [4] and is still actively used for mechanistic investigations on diradical species, [5] the two carbon-nitrogen bonds are lost during this process. However, cycloadducts 1 can be expected to have a much broader synthetic potential:
(1) the strained double bond of this diaza analogue of norbornene should be very reactive towards electrophiles;
(2) ring fragmentations, via nitrogen-nitrogen bond reduction, carbon-carbon oxidative cleavage or ring-opening metathesis or allylic carbon-nitrogen cleavage are also expected to be thermodynamically favored; and
(3) skeletal rearrangements involving carbocationic intermediates, typically observed in the norbornene series, could also be observed with these cycloadducts.

Figure 1 General reactivity pattern of meso bicyclic hydrazines
The combination of all these transformations should provide a useful synthetic arsenal for a large-scale elaboration of various functionalized amino-, diamino- or hydrazinocyclopentanes, potentially valuable scaffolds for target- or diversity-oriented synthesis of biologically active compounds. [6] The control of the diastereoselectivity of these various transformations, known to be generally hampered by the conformational flexibility of monocyclic or acyclic cyclopentane precursors, should be favored on rigid bicyclic adducts. [7] Last but not least, the meso symmetry of these compounds enables the development of stoichiometric or catalytic desymmetrization reactions, with potential access to enantioenriched material. [8]
The aim of this review is to summarize all the stereoselective transformations performed on meso bicyclic hydrazines, most of them being reported in the last decade, and to highlight the great synthetic potential of these widely available versatile building blocks.
2 Preparation and Conformational Properties of Bicyclic Hydrazines
Cycloadducts 1 are commonly obtained within a few hours in nearby quantitative yield from cyclopentadiene and acyldiazenes (Table [¹] ). [9] Solvent or protective groups have little influence on the course of the reaction, which can be routinely performed on a 20 to 30 gram scale from commercially available dialkylazodicarboxylates. In limited cases, contamination of commercial diazenes by trace hydrogen chloride, resulting from their preparation by oxidation of the corresponding hydrazines with hypochlorite solution, can inhibit the cycloaddition and accelerate the gaseous decomposition of the dienophile. [¹0]
![]() | ||||
R | Reaction conditions | Compd | Yield (%) | Ref. |
Me | Et2O, 5 ˚C | 1a | 100 | [¹¹] |
Et | Et2O, 36 ˚C | 1b | 95 | [¹²] |
i-Pr | CH2Cl2, r.t. | 1c | 81 | [¹³] |
t-Bu | C6H6, r.t. | 1d | 91 | [¹4] |
Bn | Et2O, 10 ˚C | 1e | 100 | [¹5] |
(CH2)2Ts | 20 ˚C | 1f | >90 | [¹6] |
CH2CCl3 | CCl4 | 1g | 90 | [¹7] |
Acyldiazenes that are not commercially available or that are unstable can be generated by the in situ oxidation of the corresponding hydrazines. [¹8] This procedure is generally used for the preparation of polycyclic hydrazines such as 2, [¹9] 3, [²0] 4 [²¹] or cycloadducts from dialkoyldiazenes [²²] or alkoxyphosphinyldiazenes (Figure [²] ). [²³]

Figure 2 Examples of meso polycyclic hydrazines
Cycloaddition with cyclic diazenes can lead to endo, exo or ‘planar’ isomers. Compounds 2 are preferentially obtained as endo isomers, as demonstrated by X-ray crystallographic studies, the two lone pairs of the pyramidal nitrogens being pseudo equatorial. [²4] These isomers are configurationally stable, but it has been demonstrated that compound endo-2b can isomerize to exo-2b using photochemical activation in the presence of triethylamine. [²5] Similarly, reduction of the double bond of compounds 2 leads to saturated exo isomers. The nitrogen atoms of cycloadducts 4 are planar. The conformational behavior of simple cycloadducts 1 is more complex. In addition to the possible conformational equilibrium through nitrogen inversion, they can exist as two symmetrical (S1, S2) and one dissymmetrical (DS) rotamers (Figure [³] ).

Figure 3 Rotameric forms of bicyclic hydrazines
This dynamic behavior has been investigated by NMR and UV spectroscopic studies. Compound 1a gives a well-defined symmetrical ¹H NMR spectrum at 30 ˚C, but three different methyl signals of unequal intensities are observed at -58 ˚C, as a result of hindered rotation around the N-COOR bond at this temperature, and planar nitrogen atoms. [²6] This behavior is increasingly pronounced with the size of the R group, leading to non-equivalent ¹³C NMR signals for the two ethylenic carbons of compounds 1b-e at 20 ˚C as a result of interaction with non-equivalent inverting nitrogen lone pairs, and hindered carbamate rotations. [²7 ] This conformational equilibrium has several consequences: NMR studies of bicyclic hydrazines will always deliver spectra with very broad signals and require high-temperature experiments for correct structural assignments. Furthermore, the existence at ambient or lower temperature of several slowly equilibrating conformers with different symmetries can strongly complicate mechanistic interpretations of desymmetrization reactions of these ‘meso’ compounds. Finally, the pyramidal character of nitrogens ensures that the endo-face of these bicycles is permanently shielded by one carbamate group, preventing any addition from this face. As a result, it can be expected that all the intermolecular reactions of the double bond should be extremely exo diastereoselective.
3 Synthetic Transformations without Ring Fragmentation
The obvious structural analogy of compounds 1 with norbornene has been exploited to investigate the numerous asymmetric transformations described on this simple non-functional strained alkene. Diastereoselective or enantioselective transformations have been envisaged.
3.1 Hydroboration
The hydroboration of compound 1a was first described by Allred et al. [²8] This reaction has proved to be exclusively exo-selective, leading to alcohol 5a, with the concomitant formation of fragmentation compounds 6a and 7a (Scheme [¹] ). The formation of these by-products has been investigated, and can be explained by the β-anti elimination of the transient borane (leading to 6a) and subsequent hydroboration of the fragmentation product (leading to 7a after oxidative workup). This fragmentation is triggered by nucleophilic attack onto the borane, and is particularly important when generating the borane in situ from borohydrides. [²9 ] It can be circumvented by using diborane solutions, and performing the oxidation at 0 ˚C, with a premixed aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide. Under these conditions, compound 5a can be obtained in 85% yield from 1a on a 50 gram scale. [³0]

Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) BH3, THF, 0 ˚C; (ii) H2O2, HO-.
The structural analogy of adducts 1 with norbornene has led to the development of enantioselective versions of this reaction. The metal-catalyzed hydroboration with dialkoxyboranes [³¹] has been selected for this purpose among various desymmetrization strategies reported on norbornene. [³²] Under the best conditions (Table [²] , entry 4), the alcohols could be obtained with ee up to 84% and 90% yield. [³³] It is interesting to note that the stereochemical outcome of the reaction was the same as previously reported for the hydroboration of norbornene with this ligand. Similarly, the use of (S,S)-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphinomethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane [(S,S)-DIOP] led to the alcohol of opposite configuration, as already observed for norbornene. [³¹c] This reaction can be conducted on a scale of 5 to 10 grams. Dimethoxyethane proved to be the solvent of choice (entries 1-5), and the enantioselectivity was not affected by the nature of the carbamate moiety (entries 15-17) whereas compound 2b was hydroborated with lower enantioselectivity. Although several hydroboration reactions have been reported in dimethoxyethane at -78 ˚C, it is conducted preferentially at -50 ˚C in order to avoid the freezing of dimethoxyethane (mp -58 ˚C). Only a few ligands were evaluated in this reaction (entries 6-14), 2,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane (BDPP) seems to be the most appropriate among several P,P, [³²o] [³4] P,N [³5] or monodentate ligands. [³6] Other boranes can be used for this transformation, such as pinacolborane, but catecholborane seems to be the optimal reagent with these substrates. [³7]
The nature of the rhodium source has some influence on the reaction course (Table [³] ). Interestingly, the formation of compound 5e was observed in the absence of ligand, accompanied by the fully hydrogenated substrate 8e (entry 5). The lower selectivity obtained with [Rh(µCl)nbd]2 (entry 3) could thus be related to an incomplete formation of the chiral catalytic species under the reaction conditions. A lower metal loading also led to a decrease of conversion and enantioselectivity (entry 2). The use of cationic rhodium precatalyst only affected the hydroboration reaction slightly (entry 4).
Although iridium-catalyzed hydroboration of endocyclic alkenes is known to be sluggish, [³8] as bicyclic hydrazines are extremely reactive substrates towards electrophilic transformations, hydroboration with iridium catalysts was investigated. The use of electron-rich diphosphines such as Josiphos, [³9] P,N ligands, [40] monodentate phosphoramidites or phosphites [4¹] enabled the reaction to proceed smoothly in tetrahydrofuran (Scheme [²] ).

Scheme 2 Iridium-catalyzed asymmetric hydroboration: selected ligands
Interestingly, a complete reversal of the enantioselectivity was noticed when switching from rhodium to iridium, with the same ligands. [³9] This phenomenon was attributed to a mechanistic divergence in which a metal-hydride insertion is involved with rhodium, whereas a boryl migration is believed to occur with iridium. Although this reversal of enantioselectivity proved to be systematic with these meso substrates, it should be noted that the exact mechanism of metal-catalyzed hydroboration has been discussed for decades and seems to be highly dependent on substrate, metal and borane sources. [4²]
3.2 Hydroformylation and Halocarbomethoxylation
The asymmetric hydroformylation of norbornene has been reported by several groups, using platinum or rhodium precatalysts and various diphosphine ligands. [4³] Enantiomeric excesses were generally moderate, until a recent report from an Angem process team describing this reaction with the combination of Rh(CO)2(acac) and TangPhos affording 92% ee and 100% conversion starting from 753 grams of norbornene. [4³e]
The corresponding reaction on bicyclic hydrazines is less documented. One example of racemic hydroformylation of compound 2b has been described, [44] and two reports on asymmetric hydroformylation have been disclosed (Table [4] ). [4³e] [45]
Although the hydroformylation reaction always delivers the exo compounds 9 in a fully diastereoselective manner, these aldehydes are sensitive and easily epimerize or lead to fragmentation of the bicycle. [44] It is therefore more convenient to analyze this transformation after in situ reduction to the corresponding alcohols 10. The combination of Rh(CO)2(acac) and diphosphines L9-L11 enables the hydroformylation to proceed with excellent conversion and ee up to 60% with bicycles 1d,e (Table [4] ). The best results seem to be obtained at relatively low pressure and temperature for these substrates, but still need to be improved. More rigid substrates such as 4 are hydroformylated with higher enantioselectivity, but the general poor solubility of these planar compounds will probably complicate further optimization.
One example of halocarbomethoxylation of bicyclic hydrazines has been reported, with the concomitant formation of the meso diester 11 (Scheme [³] ). [46]

Scheme 3
3.3 Dihydroxylation and Aminohydroxylation
As for norbornene, the excellent reactivity of the double bond of bicyclic hydrazines enables a smooth dihydroxylation using a small amount of osmium tetroxide catalyst (Scheme [4] ). [47] This exclusively exo dihydroxylation can be conducted on a large scale (>10 grams), delivering excellent precursors for the preparation of hydroxylated diaminocyclopentanes (see above).

Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: (a) OsO4 (cat.), NMO (1.2 equiv), acetone-H2O (2:1); (b) OsO4 (cat.), Et3NO, t-BuOH, H2O, Py.
The Sharpless asymmetric aminohydroxylation reaction, scarcely reported for the desymmetrization of Z alkenes, [48] has been investigated on compound 1e (Table [5] ). [49]
Aminoalcohols 15 were obtained in 30-78% yield as single diastereomers, but with very low ee. This poor selectivity can be tentatively explained by the relative steric hindrance of the substrate, which barely fits into the binding pocket of the chiral catalyst. This phenomenon is corroborated by the unusually low turnover frequency of the catalytic cycle.
3.4 Hydroarylation
Norbornene is a substrate of choice for the study of metal-catalyzed reductive arylation since its metallo-arylation delivers a reactive species devoid of any hydride for the classical evolution to a Heck-type product by a β-hydride syn-elimination. Bicyclic hydrazines behave similarly, provided that the transient organometallic species is stable enough to undergo a second intra- or intermolecular reaction faster than a β-fragmentation of the strained carbon-nitrogen bond (Scheme [5] ).

Scheme 5
The palladium-catalyzed hydroarylation of hydrazine 1b has been reported. It delivers the hydroarylated hydrazine 16 with 17 as a side product (Table [6] ). [50] The arylation occurs exclusively in an exo manner. The proposed structure of 17 seems to be incorrect and it is probably the fragmentation product of general structure 18 (Table [7] ), as proposed by the same authors in a subsequent patent. [5¹] The fragmentation is more pronounced with electron-deficient aromatic systems (Table [6] , entries 2 and 4).
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
Entry | RX | Product | Yield (%)a | ||||||||||||||||
1 | PhI | 16a18a |
77 5 | ||||||||||||||||
2 |
![]() | 16b18b |
52 21 | ||||||||||||||||
3 |
![]() |
16c
18c |
77 6 | ||||||||||||||||
4 |
![]() |
16d
18d |
46 26 | ||||||||||||||||
5 |
![]() |
16e
18e |
86 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
a Isolated
yield. |
A similar transformation has been reported on polycyclic hydrazines 2b and 4 (Table [7] ).
In this case, the fragmentation products 20 and 22 are the major products of the reaction, especially if a fluoride source is added to the reaction mixture. [5¹] This preferential pathway has been explained by an acid-catalyzed fragmentation triggered by a nucleophilic attack of the fluoride onto the organopalladium intermediate. Structural assignment of fragmentation product 20a was secured by X-ray crystal structure analysis.
An important improvement of this method was described to occur when switching from palladium to rhodium. Diastereoselective and enantioselective hydroarylation of 1d was reported with several heterocycles using rhodium hydroxide as precatalyst and Josiphos as chiral ligand (Table [8] ). [5²]
The mechanism of this remarkable transformation has been investigated in detail (Scheme [6] ), using deuteration studies.

Scheme 6 The chemodivergent pathway of a rhodium-catalyzed hydroarylation reaction
The formation of the hydroarylated compound under non-reducing conditions can be explained by a stereoselective carborhodation, leading to intermediate A. With heterocycles having an activated ortho hydrogen, the rhodium center undergoes an oxidative addition, leading to intermediate B. Reductive elimination followed by proto-demetalation with boronic acid delivers the hydroarylated species. This pathway is favored over the fragmentation process if the oxidative addition is faster than the fragmentation, explaining why only ‘activated’ heterocycles are efficient in this transformation. It is interesting to note that the first steps of this pathway are very similar to the first steps of the palladium-based Catellani reaction using norbornene as a catalyst. [5³]
![]() | ||||
Entry | Ar | Product | Yield (%) | ee (%) |
1 |
![]() | 23a | 89 | 62 |
2 |
![]() | 23b | 66 | 99 |
3 |
![]() | 23c | 47 | 98 |
4 |
![]() | 23d | 39 | 83 |
3.5 Sequential Arylation-Alkynylation
The relative stability of the organopalladium intermediate of the arylation reaction enables a tandem coupling process with alkynes (Table [9] ). This diastereoselective sequential functionalization opens the way to polysubstituted diaminocyclopentanes. [50]
![]() | |||
Entry | RX | Product | Yield (%) |
1 | PhI | 24a | 52 |
2 | PhCH=CH2Br | 24b | 18 |
3 | BnCl | 24c | 12 |
3.6 Arylative Cyclization
A variation of the tandem coupling process has been proposed using hydroxyrhodium species as a catalyst and bifunctional organoboron reagents (Scheme [7] ). [54] The use of t-Bu-amphos, an electron-rich, sterically bulky ligand, is essential for preventing the proto-deborylation of the organorhodium intermediate in water before the conjugate addition step. This reaction enables the creation of three asymmetric centers in only one step, in a fully diastereoselective manner.

Scheme 7
3.7 Cyclopropanation
The use of conjugated bifunctional vinylboron reagents instead of aromatic analogues is an extension of the preceding reaction. In this case, the initial carborhodation is followed by a rare 1,6-conjugate addition, leading to the formation of a cyclopropyl ring (Scheme [8] ). The exclusive formation of a Z-olefin is the result of the protodemetalation of an oxo-π-allyl rhodium intermediate complex. [55]

Scheme 8
A ruthenium-catalyzed cyclopropanation of hydrazine 1b was reported (Scheme [9] ). Interestingly, this reaction does not seem to involve a ruthenium vinylcarbenoid species (which could have favored ring-opening-metathesis side reactions), but proceeds instead via a ruthenocyclopentene, followed by two intramolecular carboxylate transfers. [56]

Scheme 9
In contrast, a metal vinylidene complex was evoked as a key intermediate in the alkylidenecyclopropanation of hydrazine 1e catalyzed by platinum(II)-coordinated phosphinous acid (Scheme [¹0] ). [57] The classical cyclopropanation of bicyclic hydrazines with diazomethane was also reported. [58]

Scheme 10
3.8 Pauson-Khand Reaction
The diastereoselective reaction of hydrazine 1b with cobaltcarbonyl acetylene complexes was first reported by Pauson and Khand. [59] The challenging enantioselective version of this intermolecular reaction has been evaluated on the same substrate with various chiral N-oxides as additives. [60] The modest levels of enantioselectivity parallel the results obtained with norbornene (Scheme [¹¹] ).

Scheme 11
3.9 Cycloaddition Reactions
Several [2+2], [6¹] [3+2] [¹³] [6²] or [4+2] [6³] cycloaddition reactions have been reported on bicyclic hydrazines (Figure [4] ). All occurred diastereoselectively, generally with excellent chemical yields.

Figure 4 Selected examples of cycloadducts from bicyclic hydrazines
4 Synthetic Transformations with Ring Fragmentation
Although sometimes circumvented, the β-fragmentation of metalated bicyclic hydrazines can be a favorable process, delivering functionalized hydrazinocyclopentenes of great synthetic value. Several methods have been designed in order to render this pathway synthetically useful.
4.1 Palladium-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Reactions
As already mentioned in reductive arylation studies (see section 3.4), the β-fragmentation of the transient organopalladium intermediate can be the main pathway following the carbopalladation step. This reactivity was first exploited in allylation reactions.
The palladium(II)-catalyzed allylation of bicyclic hydrazines was reported to deliver 1,2 disubstituted cyclopentenes in a diastereoselective manner (Table [¹0] ). Allyltributyltin is the reagent of choice in this transformation, whereas the use of allyltrimethylsilane leads to lower yields. This reaction is catalyzed by Lewis acids, and takes place faster when conducted in ionic liquids. [64] Similar reactivity was reported with phenyltributyltin as a nucleophile. [65]
A similar stereoselective ring opening was reported to take place with aryl- or alkenylboronic acids (Table [¹¹] ). [66] This palladium-catalyzed fragmentation is assisted by iodine, which proved to be superior than scandium triflate in this case. A large variety of racemic trans vicinal disubstituted hydrazinocyclopentenes have been prepared according to this procedure.
Another development of this palladium(II)-catalyzed transformation was reported to use organoindiums as nucleophiles. The use of these preformed organometallic species enables the stereoselective introduction not only of an allyl function, but also of benzyl groups (Table [¹²] ). [67]
All of the previous fragmentation reactions occur following a palladium(II) carbometalation step. A different fragmentation pathway, based on a palladium(0)-palladium(II) catalytic cycle, has been proposed. Although palladium-catalyzed allylic substitutions of allylic amines are quite uncommon, [68] the oxidative insertion of a palladium(0) species into the carbon-nitrogen bond of bicyclic hydrazines could be favored by strain release. Several ‘soft’ nucleophiles can indeed react with bicyclic hydrazines in the presence of palladium(0) precatalysts, leading to various 1,4-cis-hydrazinocyclopentenes in a diastereoselective manner (Table [¹³] ). [69]
As the oxidative insertion is assumed to be the stereodetermining step of this process, several chiral ligands were investigated in order to control the enantioselectivity of this fragmentation. The best results were obtained with phenyloxazoline (PHOX) ligands, leading to the 1,4-cis-hydrazinocyclopentenes with enantioselectivities of up to 58% ee (Table [¹4] ). Although this result is still to be improved, enantioenriched products (90% ee) were obtained after a single recrystallization. The regio-, diastereo- and enantioselectivities of this transformation have been assessed by X-ray crystallography.
4.2 Copper-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Reactions
Copper is generally considered to be an excellent catalyst for allylic substitutions involving ‘hard’ nucleophiles such as alkylzinc or alkylaluminum reagents. [70] The combination of copper salts and phosphoramidite ligand L15 has been reported to catalyze the nucleophilic fragmentation of bicyclic hydrazines. 1,2-trans-Hydrazinocyclopentenes were obtained with enantioselectivities up to 86% and excellent conversions (Table [¹5] ). [7¹]
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
Entry | Compd | R²M | Product | Conv (%) | ee (%)a | ||||||||||||||
1 | 2b | Et2Zn | 75 | 38 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
2 | 4 | Et2Zn | 75 | 22 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
3 | 4 | Bu2Zn | 76 | 34 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
4 | 2b | Et3Al | 75 | >98 | 66 (+) | ||||||||||||||
5 | 2b | Me3Al | 77 | >98 | 80 (+) | ||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | Et3Al | 75 | 94 | 78 (+) | ||||||||||||||
7 | 4 | Me3Al | 78 | >98 | 86 (+) | ||||||||||||||
8b | 4 | Me3Al | 78 | >98 | 64 (-) | ||||||||||||||
9 | 4 | (Pr)3Al | 79 | >98 | 54 (+) | ||||||||||||||
10 | 4 | (i-Bu)3Al | 80s | 95 | 14 (-) | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
a Determined
by chiral HPLC.
b With L16 as a preligand. |
The dramatic reactivity differences observed when changing dialkylzinc for trialkylaluminum nucleophiles (entries 2 and 6) and the unusual reversal of enantioselectivity obtained with L16 (entries 7 and 8) was later explained by the reaction of the phosphoramidite with trialkylaluminum, generating in situ a dialkyl phosphoramine which proved to be the real ligand in this asymmetric transformation (Scheme [¹²] ). [7²]

Scheme 12
This mechanistic investigation enabled the preparation of a new class of ligands (dialkyl or diarylphosphoramines, the ‘simplephos’ family) [7³ ] which proved very efficient for this copper-catalyzed transformation (Table [¹6] ).
4.3 Rhodium-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Reactions
Although palladium catalyzes the arylative fragmentation of bicyclic hydrazines with arylboronic acids, this transformation leads to racemic trans-1,2-hydrazino cyclopentenes. The use of rhodium as catalyst has, in contrast, been reported to enable an enantioselective arylative ring opening (Table [¹7] ). Thus, enantioselectivities up to 89% were obtained for this transformation using [Rh(C2H4)Cl]2 and TolBINAP as a ligand. [74]
A major improvement of this reaction was described recently, using t-Bu-Josiphos ligand and [Rh(cod)OH]2 as precatalyst (Table [¹8] ). The presence of water is important for minimizing the competitive pathway leading to the hydroarylated bicyclic hydrazine (see section 3.4). Under these conditions, the 1,2-hydrazinocyclopentenes can be obtained in excellent enantioselectivities. [5²]
Not only aromatic boronic acids, but also alkynylboronic esters can serve as nucleophiles in this transformation, leading to interesting alkynyl cyclopentenic hydrazines with enantiomeric excess values up to 66% (Table [¹9] ). [75]
The high affinity of rhodium for carbon monoxide and its reactivity with boronic acids has been exploited to increase the chemical diversity generated by the fragmentation of bicyclic hydrazines. When conducted under an atmosphere of carbon monoxide, a formal allylic substitution with acyl anion nucleophiles can be obtained, leading to cyclopentenic 1,2-hydrazino ketones in a diastereoselective manner and excellent chemical yields (Table [²0] ). An enantioselective version of this remarkable transformation is to be developed. [76]
4.4 Ruthenium-Catalyzed Ring-Opening-Metathesis Reactions and Oxidative Cleavage
By analogy with norbornene, the ring-opening metathesis of bicyclic hydrazines has been investigated. As expected, oligomerization of 1b is promoted by Grubbs’ catalyst whereas cross-metathesis product 97/98 is obtained as a Z/E mixture in the presence of a terminal aromatic alkene. [77]

Scheme 13
Several catalysts have been described for the asymmetric ring opening of bicyclic hydrazines (Table [²¹] ). Catalyst 99 delivers only the E isomer with enantiomeric excess values ranging from 68% to 92%; the enantioselectivity of this transformation varies with the steric requirements of the terminal alkene partner. [78] In contrast, catalysts 100 and 101 led to an olefinic mixture, in 68% ee for the major E isomer. [79]
The ruthenium tetroxide mediated oxidative cleavage of compound 102 can deliver cyclic hydrazoacetic ester 103 in an efficient manner (Scheme [¹4] ). [80]

Scheme 14 Reagents and conditions: (a) RuO2, NaIO4, EtOAc; (b) CH2N2, MeOH, 89% overall yield.
5 Rearrangements
Ring fragmentations accompanied by skeletal rearrangements have been frequently described on norbornene and related strained bicycles. [8¹] A similar behavior has been reported with bicyclic hydrazines.
5.1 Rearrangements Involving Allylic Cations
The thermal and/or catalyzed fragmentation of bicyclic hydrazines has been intensively investigated. [8²] A [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement has been proposed to explain the stereoselective formation of compound 104 from the corresponding bicyclic hydrazine (Scheme [¹5] ). The corresponding hydrazines 1 do not rearrange under similar thermal conditions. This transformation is also dramatically accelerated by acids. [8²d] The preference for a concerted pathway instead of a two-step process has been assessed by kinetic studies. [8²a]

Scheme 15 Reagents and conditions: (a) thermal activation (100 ˚C) or acidic activation.
On the other hand, the diastereoselective formation of compound 106 has been reported to involve a cationic intermediate (Scheme [¹6] ). The formation of the [5.5]bicyclic heterocycle 107 has been ruled out by analysis of spectral data. [8³]

Scheme 16 Reagents and conditions: (a) CF3COOH, CCl4, r.t., quant.
The acid-catalyzed rearrangement of hydrazines 1d,e has been reported. The diastereoselective formation of [5.6]bicycles 108 and 109 was first described under various acidic conditions. [69] These structures have recently been reassigned by X-ray crystallography to be the [5.5]bicyclic systems 110 and 111 (Table [²²] ). [84] This correct structural assignment rules out a concerted [3,3]-sigmatropic pathway for this transformation which can be conducted on a large scale (10 grams) using sulfuric acid in trifluoroethanol (entry 5). The use of copper as catalyst enables very fast and efficient access to these bicycles (entries 6 and 7).
This rearrangement can be coupled with a functionalization of the final hydrazine by N-arylation in a sequential manner, using the same copper source (Table [²³] ). [84] The overall transformation is highly efficient.
5.2 Rearrangements Involving Aziridiniums
As for norbornene, electrophilic additions onto bicyclic hydrazines can trigger interesting skeletal rearrangements. The transient secondary cation can indeed be stabilized by one nitrogen, leading to an aziridinium which can be attacked in a regioselective manner, affording the expected 1,2-adduct or a rearranged hydrazine (Scheme [¹7] ).

Scheme 17
This interesting rearrangement occurs under halogenation conditions (Table [²4] ). [85]
![]() | ||||
Entry | Compd | X2 | Product | Yield (%) |
1 | 1b | Br2 | 114 | 57 |
2 | 4 | Br2 | 115 | 84 |
3 | 1a | Cl2 | 116 | nd |
A similar transformation has been described from the epoxide 117. [86] A reactive aziridinium intermediate can indeed be generated from this compound under various acidic conditions, and trapped regioselectively by several nucleophiles, leading to polyfunctional bicycles (Table [²5] ) in a diastereoselective manner.
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
Entry | Reaction conditions | Nu | Product | Yield (%) | |||||||||||||||
1 | HBr, MeOH | Br | 118 | 49 | |||||||||||||||
2 | H2SO4, CF3CH2OH | OH | 119 | 45 | |||||||||||||||
3 | H2SO4, MeOH | OMe | 120 | 50 | |||||||||||||||
4 | Et2AlCl, CH2Cl2 | Cl | 121 | 68 | |||||||||||||||
5a | C5H11C≡CAlMe2, CH2Cl2 | C5H11C≡C | 122 | 59 | |||||||||||||||
6a | PhC≡CAlMe2, CH2Cl2 | PhC≡C | 123 | 63 | |||||||||||||||
7a | Cl(CH2)3C≡CAlMe2, CH2Cl2 | Cl(CH2)3C≡C | 124 | 63 | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
a Prepared
according to a literature method.
[87]
|
6 Synthetic Applications
Despite a plethora of reactivity studies and stereoselective transformations of bicyclic hydrazines, only a limited number of synthetic applications of these methods have been reported. Most of them have focused on obtaining polysubstituted cyclopentane-1,3-diamines.
Compound 129 was obtained from diol 14 in enantiomerically pure form during a general study toward the preparation of cyclic diaminopolyols. [47b] The meso 1,3-diamine 127 was obtained by hydrogenolysis of the corresponding diazo 126, itself prepared in three steps from 14. The final compound was obtained by enzymatic desymmetrization of compound 128, followed by acetylation (Scheme [¹8] ).

Scheme 18 Reagents and conditions: (a) Me2C(OMe)2, CH2Cl2, camphorsulfonic acid (cat.), r.t., 12 h, 95%; (b) 2 N KOH, 2-PrOH, reflux, 2 h, then HCl, CuCl2 (3 equiv), then NH3 (aq), 85%; (c) H2, Pt, AcOH, r.t., 12 h, then HCl (aq), 83%; (d) BnCOCl, NaHCO3, t-BuOH-H2O (1:1), 75-85%; (e) penicillin amidase, 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.6), 91% ee; then Ac2O, pyridine, DMAP, 82%.
The reduction of hydrazines has been investigated (Table [²6] ). Among various reduction conditions, the use of sodium in ammonia proved to be a general way to obtain various cyclopentanediamides. [47a] Interestingly, the epoxide was not affected during the reduction (entry 2).
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
Entry | Compd | X | Y | Product | Yield (%) | ||||||||||||||
1 | 130 | H | H | 134 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
2 | 131 |
-O- | 135 | 48 | |||||||||||||||
3 | 132 | OH | OH | 136 | 59 | ||||||||||||||
4 | 133 | OH | H | 137 | 65 |
The use of benzylcarbamate as protective group enables the one-pot reductive cleavage and protecting group removal of the hydrazines (Table [²7] ). This protocol is generally very efficient, and delivers the corresponding diamine as its bis-acetate salt. The use of platinum(IV) oxide instead of platinum black enables a reproducible reduction on a large amount of material (10 gram scale).
A similar reduction has been used to obtain meso diaminodicarboxylic acids of potential biological activity (Scheme [¹9] ). [80]

Scheme 19 Reagents and conditions: (a) 6 M HCl, AcOH, 100 ˚C, 98%; (b) PtO2, H2, 2 M HCl, 99%.
The reactivity of rearranged hydrazine 111 was exploited for the synthesis of several mannosidase inhibitors (Scheme [²0] ). [88] All the polar groups were successively introduced in a fully stereoselective manner, leading to aminocyclopentitols in a few steps. Both final compounds are low micromolar inhibitors of jack bean α-mannosidase.

Scheme 20 Reagents and conditions: (a) SeO2, KH2PO4, diglyme, 170 ˚C, 69%; (b) KH, MeI, THF, 75%; (c) OsO4, NMO, THF-H2O, 99%; (d) Li, NH3, -33 ˚C, 50%; (e) LiOH, THF-H2O, 99%.
The chemical diversity offered by the reactivity of bicyclic hydrazines has been exploited in a fragment-based strategy for the design of active compounds. Small libraries generated from bicyclic hydrazines using some of the above-mentioned transformations have been prepared and used in such an approach for the preparation of tRNA ligands such as 152 [89] and enzyme bisubstrate inhibitors such as 153 (Figure [5] ). [90]

Figure 5 Selected examples of ligands or inhibitors prepared from bicyclic hydrazines
7 Conclusion
The reactivity of bicyclic hydrazines, first described in the late 1920s, has been investigated in depth, mainly in the last decade. Numerous synthetic transformations of these easily available building blocks have been disclosed, all of them delivering diastereomerically pure compounds using simple experimental conditions. In some, albeit still limited, cases, not only diastereoselective, but also enantioselective transformations have been set up, affording synthetically useful derivatives in a few steps. The functional and stereochemical diversity generated from these hydrazines will undoubtedly be improved upon and used in the future for the elaboration of more complex structures.
- 1
Diels O.Alder K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1928, 460: 98 - 2
Diels O.Blom JH.Koll W. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1925, 443: 242 - 3a
Roth WR.Martin M. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1967, 702: 1 - 3b
Roth WR.Martin M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 4695 - 3c
Allred EL.Smith RL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89: 7133 - 4
Little D. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86: 875 - 5a
Engel PS. Chem. Rev. 1980, 80: 99 - 5b
Simpson CJSM.Wilson GJ.Adam WJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113: 4728 - 5c
Reyes MB.Carpenter BK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122: 10163 - 5d
Khuong KS.Houk KN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 14867 - 5e
Adam W.Diedering M.Trofimov AV. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2004, 17: 643 - 5f
Abe M.Ishihara C.Kawanami S. . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 10 - 6
Spandl RJ.Bender A.Spring DR. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6: 1149 - 7
Eliel EL.Wilen SH. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds Wiley; New York: 1994. p.758 - 8
Hoffman RW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42: 1096 - 9
Houben-Weyl
Methods of Organic Synthesis
4th ed., Vol. E21:
Helmchen G.Hoffmann RW.Mulzer E. Thieme; Stuttgart: 1995. p.5451 - 10
Needleman SB.Kuo CC. Chem. Rev. 1962, 62: 405 - 11
MacKenzie JCJ.Rodgmen A.Wright GF. J. Org. Chem. 1952, 17: 1666 - 12
Gassman PG.Mansfield KT. Org. React. 1969, 49: 1 - 13
Stout DM.Takaya T.Meyers AI. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40: 563 - 14
Carpino LA.Terry PH.Crowley PJ. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26: 4336 - 15
Heyman ML.Snyder JP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 2859 - 16
Masamune S.Nakamura N.Spadaro J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97: 918 - 17
Adam W.Berkessel A. Chem. Ber. 1985, 118: 5018 - 18
Houben-Weyl
Methods of Organic Synthesis
4th ed., Vol. E21:
Helmchen G.Hoffmann RW.Mulzer E. Thieme; Stuttgart: 1995. p.5469 - 19a
Gillis BT.Hagarty JD. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32: 330 - 19b
Cookson RC.Gilani SSH.Stevens IDR. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 1905 - 19c
Moore JA.Muth R.Sorace R. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39: 3799 - 19d
Snyder JP.Bandurco VT.Darack F.Olsen H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96: 5158 - 19e
Warmhoff H.Kunz G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1981, 20: 797 - 20
Corey EJ.Snider BB. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38: 3632 - 21a
Nelsen SF.Hollinsed WC.Grezzo LA.Parmelee WP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101: 7347 - 21b
Kealy TJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84: 966 - 22
Campbell JA.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 1568 - 23
Miesel JL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 15: 3847 - 24
Agmon I.Kaftory M.Nelsen SF.Blackstock SC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108: 4477 - 25
Pandey B.Athawale AA.Reddy RS. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1173 - 26
Anderson JE.Lehn J.-M. Tetrahedron 1968, 24: 123 - 27a
Nomura Y.Masai N.Takeguchi Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 307 - 27b
Pérez Luna, A.; unpublished results.
- 28
Allred EL.Anderson CL.Smith RL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 9: 951 - 29
Allred EL.Smith RL. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31: 3498 - 30
Allred EL.Anderson CL.Smith RL. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31: 3493 - 31a
Burgess K.Ohlmeyer MJ. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91: 1179 - 31b
Beletskaya I.Pelter A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53: 4957 - 31c
Hayashi T. In Comprehensive Asymmetric CatalysisJacobsen EN.Pfaltz A.Yamamoto H. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1999. - 31d
Crudden CM.Edwards D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 4695 - 31e
Caroll A.-M.O’Sullivan TP.Guiry PJ. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347: 609 - 32a
Burgess K.Ohlmeyer MJ. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53: 5178 - 32b
Hayashi T.Matsumoto Y.Ito Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111: 3426 - 32c
Sato M.Miyaura N.Suzuki A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 231 - 32d
Brown JM.Lloyd-Jones GC. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 1: 869 - 32e
Hayashi T.Matsumoto Y.Ito Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2: 601 - 32f
Burgess K.Van der Donk WA.Ohlmeyer MJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2: 613 - 32g
Zhang J.Lou B.Guo G.Dai L. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56: 1670 - 32h
Brown JM.Hulmer DI.Langzell TP. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1673 - 32i
Togni A.Breutel C.Schnyder A.Spindler F.Landert H.Tijani A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116: 4062 - 32j
Schnyder A.Hintermann L.Togni A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34: 931 - 32k
Doucet H.Fernandez E.Layzell TP.Brown JM. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5: 1320 - 32l
Brunel J.-M.Buono G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40: 3561 - 32m
Fernandez E.Maeda K.Hooper MW.Brown JM. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6: 1840 - 32n
McCarthy M.Guiry P. Polyhedron 2000, 19: 541 - 32o
Demay S.Volant F.Knochel P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40: 1235 - 33
Pérez Luna A.Ceschi M.-A.Bonin M.Micouin L.Husson H.-P. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 3522 - 34
Bunlaksananusorn T.Polborn K.Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42: 3941 - 37
Bournaud C. Thesis Université Paris Descartes; France: 2006. a temperature-dependent inversion of enantioselectivity has been observed with pinacolborane in DME (but not in THF) - 38a
Evans DA.Fu GC.Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114: 6671 - 38b
Westcott SA.Marder TB. Organometallics 1993, 12: 975 - 39
Pérez Luna A.Bonin M.Micouin L.Husson H.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124: 12098 - 40
Bunlaksananusorn T.Pérez Luna A.Bonin M.Micouin L.Knochel P. Synlett 2003, 2240 - 41
Alexakis A.Polet D.Bournaud C.Bonin M.Micouin L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16: 3672 - 42a
Crudden CM.Hleba YB.Chen AC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 9200 - 42b
Black A.Brown JM.Pichon C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5284 - 42c
Edwards DR.Hleba YB.Lata CJ.Calhoun LA.Crudden CM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 7799 - 43a
Consiglio G.Morandini F.Scalone P.Pino P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 279: 195 - 43b
Parrinello G.Deschenaux R.Stille JK. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51: 4189 - 43c
Parrinello G.Stille JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109: 7122 - 43d
Lu S.Li X.Wang A. Catalysis Today 2000, 63: 531 - 43e
Huang J.Bunel E.Allgeier A.Tedrow J.Storz T.Preston J.Correl T.Manley D.Soukup T.Jensen R.Syed R.Moniz G.Larsen R.Martinelli M.Reider PJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 7831 - 44
Wilson RM.Schnapp KA.Merwin RK.Ranganathan R.Moats DL.Conrad TT. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51: 4028 - 45
Bournaud C.Lecourt T.Micouin L.Méliet C.Agbossou-Niedercorn F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2298 - 46
Ham S.-W.Chang W.Dowd P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111: 4130 - 47a
Mellor JM.Smith NM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2927 - 47b
Grabowski S.Armbruster J.Prinzbach H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38: 5485 - 47c
Micouin L,Dardel F,Tisné-Vicrobeck C,Maurice F,Bonin M,Bournaud C, andBégis G. inventors; WO 2006/024784 A2. - 48
Kolb HC.Sharpless BK. In Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis 2nd ed., Vol. 2:Beller M.Bolm C. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. p.309 - 50
Storsberg J.Nandakumar MV.Sankaranarayanan S.Kaufmann DE. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343: 177 - 51a
Kaufmann DE,Nandakumar MV, andStorsberg J. inventors; WO 02/36528 A2. ; Incorrect structural assignments have been reported several times in this area, mainly because of the low resolution of NMR spectra caused by several rotameric species - 51b
Yao M.-L.Adiwidjaja G.Kaufmann DE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41: 3375 - 52
Menard F.Lautens M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47: 2085 - 53
Catellani M.Motti E.Della Ca’ N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41: 1512 - 54
Lautens M.Mancuso J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69: 3478 - 55
Tseng N.-W.Mancuso J.Lautens M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128: 5338 - 56
Tenaglia A.Marc S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71: 3569 - 57
Bigeault J.Giordano L.de Riggi I.Gimbert Y.Buono G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9: 3567 - 58a
Allred EL.Hinshaw JC.Johnson AL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91: 3382 - 58b
Olsen H.Snyder JP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99: 1524 - 59
Pauson PL.Khand IU. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1977, 295: 2 - 60
Derdau V.Laschat S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 642: 131 - 61a
Warrener RN.Bina S.Butler DN.Pitt IG.Russel RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 7073 - 61b
Warrener RN.Pitt IG.Nunn EE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35: 621 - 62a
Huisgen R.Stangle H.Sturm HJ.Wagenhofer H. Angew. Chem. 1961, 73: 170 - 62b
Huisgen R.Moebius L.Mueller G.Stangl H.Szeimies G.Vernon JM. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98: 3992 - 62c
Wade PA.Hinney HR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101: 1319 - 62d
Rieber N,Boehm H,Platz R, andFuchs W. inventors; EP 0046188 A1. - 62e
Rieber N,Platz R, andFuchs W. inventors; EP 0046192 A1. - 62f
Aitken RA.Carcas K.Hill L.Massil T.Raut SV. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 53: 2261 - 63
Kuderna JG.Sims JW.Wikstrom JF.Soloway SB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81: 382 - 64
Sajisha VS.Smitha M.Anas S.Radhakrishnan KV. Tetrahedron 2006, 62: 3997 - 65a
Radhakrishnan KV.Sajisha VS.Anas S.Krishnan KS. Synlett 2005, 2273 - 65b
Sajisha VS.Radhakrishnan KV. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348: 924 - 66a
John J.Sajisha VS.Mohanlal S.Radhakrishnan KV. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3510 - 66b
Anas S.John J.Sajisha VS.John J.Rajan R.Suresh E.Radhakrishnan KV. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5: 4010 - 67
John J.Anas S.Sajisha VS.Viji S.Radhakrishnan KV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 7225 - For related examples, see:
- 68a
Bourgeois-Cury A.Doan D.Goré J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33: 1277 - 68b
Alonso DA.Bertilsson SK.Johnsson SY.Nordin SJM.Södergren MJ.Andersson PG. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64: 2276 - 68c
Miller A.Procter G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 1043 - 68d
Mulvihill MJ.Surman MD.Miller MJ. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63: 4874 - 68e
Surman MD.Miller MJ. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 519 - 68f
Cowart M.Bennett MJ.Kerwin JF. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64: 2240 - 69
Pérez Luna A.Cesario M.Bonin M.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 4771 - 70
Modern
Organocopper Chemistry
Krause N. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. - 71
Pineschi M.Del Moro F.Crotti P.Macchia F. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 3605 - 72
Bournaud C.Falciola C.Lecourt T.Rosset S.Alexakis A.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3581 - 73
Palais L.Mikhel IS.Bournaud C.Micouin L.Falciola CA.Vuagnoux-d’Augustin M.Rosset S.Bernardinelli G.Alexakis A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 7462 - 74
Bertolini F.Macchia F.Pineschi M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 9173 - 75
Crotti S.Bertolini F.Macchia F.Pineschi M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3127 - 76
Menard F.Weise CF.Lautens M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9: 5365 - 77
Ellis JM.King SB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 5833 - 78
Van Velduizen JJ.Gillingham DG.Garber SB.Kataoka O.Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 12502 - 79
Berlin JM.Goldberg SD.Grubbs RH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45: 7591 - 80a
Arakawa Y.Goto T.Kawase K.Yoshifuji S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43: 535 - 80b
Arakawa Y.Goto T.Kawase K.Yoshifuji S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1998, 46: 674 - 81
Frauenrath H. Houben-Weyl Methods of Organic Synthesis 4th ed., Vol. E21:Helmchen G.Hoffmann RW.Mulzer E. Thieme; Stuttgart: 1995. p.3671 - 82a
Mackay D.Campbell JA.Jennison CPR. Can. J. Chem. 1970, 48: 81 - 82b
Campbell JA.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 371 - 82c
Chung CY.-J.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 3315 - 82d
Chung CY.-J.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 1568 - 83
Dao LH.Mackay D. Can. J. Chem. 1978, 56: 1724 - 84
Martins A.Lemouzy S.Lautens M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11: 181 - 85a
Raasch MS. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40: 161 - 85b
Offereins B.Altona C.Romers C. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1973, 29: 2098 - 86
Bournaud C.Bonin M.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3041 - 87
Feuvrie C.Blanchet J.Bonin M.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 2333 - 88
Bournaud C.Robic D.Bonin M.Micouin L. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70: 3316 - 89
Chung F.Tisné C.Lecourt T.Dardel F.Micouin L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 4489 - 90
Lombès T.Bégis G.Maurice F.Turcaud S.Lecourt T.Dardel F.Micouin L. ChemBioChem 2008, 9: 1368
References
The low reactivity and selectivity observed with the QUINAP ligand could arise from the lower stability of the catalytic species generated from neutral rhodium precatalyst (Prof. J. M. Brown, personal communication to L.M.). Cationic rhodium sources have not been evaluated with this ligand in this study.
36Pérez Luna, A.; unpublished results.
49Bournaud, C.; unpublished results.
- 1
Diels O.Alder K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1928, 460: 98 - 2
Diels O.Blom JH.Koll W. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1925, 443: 242 - 3a
Roth WR.Martin M. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1967, 702: 1 - 3b
Roth WR.Martin M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 4695 - 3c
Allred EL.Smith RL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89: 7133 - 4
Little D. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86: 875 - 5a
Engel PS. Chem. Rev. 1980, 80: 99 - 5b
Simpson CJSM.Wilson GJ.Adam WJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113: 4728 - 5c
Reyes MB.Carpenter BK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122: 10163 - 5d
Khuong KS.Houk KN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 14867 - 5e
Adam W.Diedering M.Trofimov AV. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2004, 17: 643 - 5f
Abe M.Ishihara C.Kawanami S. . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 10 - 6
Spandl RJ.Bender A.Spring DR. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6: 1149 - 7
Eliel EL.Wilen SH. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds Wiley; New York: 1994. p.758 - 8
Hoffman RW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42: 1096 - 9
Houben-Weyl
Methods of Organic Synthesis
4th ed., Vol. E21:
Helmchen G.Hoffmann RW.Mulzer E. Thieme; Stuttgart: 1995. p.5451 - 10
Needleman SB.Kuo CC. Chem. Rev. 1962, 62: 405 - 11
MacKenzie JCJ.Rodgmen A.Wright GF. J. Org. Chem. 1952, 17: 1666 - 12
Gassman PG.Mansfield KT. Org. React. 1969, 49: 1 - 13
Stout DM.Takaya T.Meyers AI. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40: 563 - 14
Carpino LA.Terry PH.Crowley PJ. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26: 4336 - 15
Heyman ML.Snyder JP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 2859 - 16
Masamune S.Nakamura N.Spadaro J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97: 918 - 17
Adam W.Berkessel A. Chem. Ber. 1985, 118: 5018 - 18
Houben-Weyl
Methods of Organic Synthesis
4th ed., Vol. E21:
Helmchen G.Hoffmann RW.Mulzer E. Thieme; Stuttgart: 1995. p.5469 - 19a
Gillis BT.Hagarty JD. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32: 330 - 19b
Cookson RC.Gilani SSH.Stevens IDR. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 1905 - 19c
Moore JA.Muth R.Sorace R. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39: 3799 - 19d
Snyder JP.Bandurco VT.Darack F.Olsen H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96: 5158 - 19e
Warmhoff H.Kunz G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1981, 20: 797 - 20
Corey EJ.Snider BB. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38: 3632 - 21a
Nelsen SF.Hollinsed WC.Grezzo LA.Parmelee WP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101: 7347 - 21b
Kealy TJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84: 966 - 22
Campbell JA.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 1568 - 23
Miesel JL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 15: 3847 - 24
Agmon I.Kaftory M.Nelsen SF.Blackstock SC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108: 4477 - 25
Pandey B.Athawale AA.Reddy RS. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1173 - 26
Anderson JE.Lehn J.-M. Tetrahedron 1968, 24: 123 - 27a
Nomura Y.Masai N.Takeguchi Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 307 - 27b
Pérez Luna, A.; unpublished results.
- 28
Allred EL.Anderson CL.Smith RL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 9: 951 - 29
Allred EL.Smith RL. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31: 3498 - 30
Allred EL.Anderson CL.Smith RL. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31: 3493 - 31a
Burgess K.Ohlmeyer MJ. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91: 1179 - 31b
Beletskaya I.Pelter A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53: 4957 - 31c
Hayashi T. In Comprehensive Asymmetric CatalysisJacobsen EN.Pfaltz A.Yamamoto H. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1999. - 31d
Crudden CM.Edwards D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 4695 - 31e
Caroll A.-M.O’Sullivan TP.Guiry PJ. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347: 609 - 32a
Burgess K.Ohlmeyer MJ. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53: 5178 - 32b
Hayashi T.Matsumoto Y.Ito Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111: 3426 - 32c
Sato M.Miyaura N.Suzuki A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 231 - 32d
Brown JM.Lloyd-Jones GC. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 1: 869 - 32e
Hayashi T.Matsumoto Y.Ito Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2: 601 - 32f
Burgess K.Van der Donk WA.Ohlmeyer MJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2: 613 - 32g
Zhang J.Lou B.Guo G.Dai L. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56: 1670 - 32h
Brown JM.Hulmer DI.Langzell TP. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1673 - 32i
Togni A.Breutel C.Schnyder A.Spindler F.Landert H.Tijani A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116: 4062 - 32j
Schnyder A.Hintermann L.Togni A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34: 931 - 32k
Doucet H.Fernandez E.Layzell TP.Brown JM. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5: 1320 - 32l
Brunel J.-M.Buono G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40: 3561 - 32m
Fernandez E.Maeda K.Hooper MW.Brown JM. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6: 1840 - 32n
McCarthy M.Guiry P. Polyhedron 2000, 19: 541 - 32o
Demay S.Volant F.Knochel P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40: 1235 - 33
Pérez Luna A.Ceschi M.-A.Bonin M.Micouin L.Husson H.-P. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 3522 - 34
Bunlaksananusorn T.Polborn K.Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42: 3941 - 37
Bournaud C. Thesis Université Paris Descartes; France: 2006. a temperature-dependent inversion of enantioselectivity has been observed with pinacolborane in DME (but not in THF) - 38a
Evans DA.Fu GC.Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114: 6671 - 38b
Westcott SA.Marder TB. Organometallics 1993, 12: 975 - 39
Pérez Luna A.Bonin M.Micouin L.Husson H.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124: 12098 - 40
Bunlaksananusorn T.Pérez Luna A.Bonin M.Micouin L.Knochel P. Synlett 2003, 2240 - 41
Alexakis A.Polet D.Bournaud C.Bonin M.Micouin L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16: 3672 - 42a
Crudden CM.Hleba YB.Chen AC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 9200 - 42b
Black A.Brown JM.Pichon C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5284 - 42c
Edwards DR.Hleba YB.Lata CJ.Calhoun LA.Crudden CM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 7799 - 43a
Consiglio G.Morandini F.Scalone P.Pino P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 279: 195 - 43b
Parrinello G.Deschenaux R.Stille JK. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51: 4189 - 43c
Parrinello G.Stille JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109: 7122 - 43d
Lu S.Li X.Wang A. Catalysis Today 2000, 63: 531 - 43e
Huang J.Bunel E.Allgeier A.Tedrow J.Storz T.Preston J.Correl T.Manley D.Soukup T.Jensen R.Syed R.Moniz G.Larsen R.Martinelli M.Reider PJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 7831 - 44
Wilson RM.Schnapp KA.Merwin RK.Ranganathan R.Moats DL.Conrad TT. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51: 4028 - 45
Bournaud C.Lecourt T.Micouin L.Méliet C.Agbossou-Niedercorn F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2298 - 46
Ham S.-W.Chang W.Dowd P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111: 4130 - 47a
Mellor JM.Smith NM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2927 - 47b
Grabowski S.Armbruster J.Prinzbach H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38: 5485 - 47c
Micouin L,Dardel F,Tisné-Vicrobeck C,Maurice F,Bonin M,Bournaud C, andBégis G. inventors; WO 2006/024784 A2. - 48
Kolb HC.Sharpless BK. In Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis 2nd ed., Vol. 2:Beller M.Bolm C. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. p.309 - 50
Storsberg J.Nandakumar MV.Sankaranarayanan S.Kaufmann DE. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343: 177 - 51a
Kaufmann DE,Nandakumar MV, andStorsberg J. inventors; WO 02/36528 A2. ; Incorrect structural assignments have been reported several times in this area, mainly because of the low resolution of NMR spectra caused by several rotameric species - 51b
Yao M.-L.Adiwidjaja G.Kaufmann DE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41: 3375 - 52
Menard F.Lautens M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47: 2085 - 53
Catellani M.Motti E.Della Ca’ N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41: 1512 - 54
Lautens M.Mancuso J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69: 3478 - 55
Tseng N.-W.Mancuso J.Lautens M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128: 5338 - 56
Tenaglia A.Marc S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71: 3569 - 57
Bigeault J.Giordano L.de Riggi I.Gimbert Y.Buono G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9: 3567 - 58a
Allred EL.Hinshaw JC.Johnson AL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91: 3382 - 58b
Olsen H.Snyder JP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99: 1524 - 59
Pauson PL.Khand IU. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1977, 295: 2 - 60
Derdau V.Laschat S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 642: 131 - 61a
Warrener RN.Bina S.Butler DN.Pitt IG.Russel RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 7073 - 61b
Warrener RN.Pitt IG.Nunn EE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35: 621 - 62a
Huisgen R.Stangle H.Sturm HJ.Wagenhofer H. Angew. Chem. 1961, 73: 170 - 62b
Huisgen R.Moebius L.Mueller G.Stangl H.Szeimies G.Vernon JM. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98: 3992 - 62c
Wade PA.Hinney HR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101: 1319 - 62d
Rieber N,Boehm H,Platz R, andFuchs W. inventors; EP 0046188 A1. - 62e
Rieber N,Platz R, andFuchs W. inventors; EP 0046192 A1. - 62f
Aitken RA.Carcas K.Hill L.Massil T.Raut SV. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 53: 2261 - 63
Kuderna JG.Sims JW.Wikstrom JF.Soloway SB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81: 382 - 64
Sajisha VS.Smitha M.Anas S.Radhakrishnan KV. Tetrahedron 2006, 62: 3997 - 65a
Radhakrishnan KV.Sajisha VS.Anas S.Krishnan KS. Synlett 2005, 2273 - 65b
Sajisha VS.Radhakrishnan KV. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348: 924 - 66a
John J.Sajisha VS.Mohanlal S.Radhakrishnan KV. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3510 - 66b
Anas S.John J.Sajisha VS.John J.Rajan R.Suresh E.Radhakrishnan KV. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5: 4010 - 67
John J.Anas S.Sajisha VS.Viji S.Radhakrishnan KV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 7225 - For related examples, see:
- 68a
Bourgeois-Cury A.Doan D.Goré J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33: 1277 - 68b
Alonso DA.Bertilsson SK.Johnsson SY.Nordin SJM.Södergren MJ.Andersson PG. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64: 2276 - 68c
Miller A.Procter G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 1043 - 68d
Mulvihill MJ.Surman MD.Miller MJ. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63: 4874 - 68e
Surman MD.Miller MJ. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 519 - 68f
Cowart M.Bennett MJ.Kerwin JF. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64: 2240 - 69
Pérez Luna A.Cesario M.Bonin M.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 4771 - 70
Modern
Organocopper Chemistry
Krause N. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. - 71
Pineschi M.Del Moro F.Crotti P.Macchia F. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 3605 - 72
Bournaud C.Falciola C.Lecourt T.Rosset S.Alexakis A.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3581 - 73
Palais L.Mikhel IS.Bournaud C.Micouin L.Falciola CA.Vuagnoux-d’Augustin M.Rosset S.Bernardinelli G.Alexakis A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 7462 - 74
Bertolini F.Macchia F.Pineschi M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 9173 - 75
Crotti S.Bertolini F.Macchia F.Pineschi M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3127 - 76
Menard F.Weise CF.Lautens M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9: 5365 - 77
Ellis JM.King SB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 5833 - 78
Van Velduizen JJ.Gillingham DG.Garber SB.Kataoka O.Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 12502 - 79
Berlin JM.Goldberg SD.Grubbs RH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45: 7591 - 80a
Arakawa Y.Goto T.Kawase K.Yoshifuji S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43: 535 - 80b
Arakawa Y.Goto T.Kawase K.Yoshifuji S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1998, 46: 674 - 81
Frauenrath H. Houben-Weyl Methods of Organic Synthesis 4th ed., Vol. E21:Helmchen G.Hoffmann RW.Mulzer E. Thieme; Stuttgart: 1995. p.3671 - 82a
Mackay D.Campbell JA.Jennison CPR. Can. J. Chem. 1970, 48: 81 - 82b
Campbell JA.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 371 - 82c
Chung CY.-J.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 3315 - 82d
Chung CY.-J.Mackay D.Sauer TD. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50: 1568 - 83
Dao LH.Mackay D. Can. J. Chem. 1978, 56: 1724 - 84
Martins A.Lemouzy S.Lautens M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11: 181 - 85a
Raasch MS. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40: 161 - 85b
Offereins B.Altona C.Romers C. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1973, 29: 2098 - 86
Bournaud C.Bonin M.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3041 - 87
Feuvrie C.Blanchet J.Bonin M.Micouin L. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 2333 - 88
Bournaud C.Robic D.Bonin M.Micouin L. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70: 3316 - 89
Chung F.Tisné C.Lecourt T.Dardel F.Micouin L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 4489 - 90
Lombès T.Bégis G.Maurice F.Turcaud S.Lecourt T.Dardel F.Micouin L. ChemBioChem 2008, 9: 1368
References
The low reactivity and selectivity observed with the QUINAP ligand could arise from the lower stability of the catalytic species generated from neutral rhodium precatalyst (Prof. J. M. Brown, personal communication to L.M.). Cationic rhodium sources have not been evaluated with this ligand in this study.
36Pérez Luna, A.; unpublished results.
49Bournaud, C.; unpublished results.

Figure 1 General reactivity pattern of meso bicyclic hydrazines


Figure 2 Examples of meso polycyclic hydrazines

Figure 3 Rotameric forms of bicyclic hydrazines

Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) BH3, THF, 0 ˚C; (ii) H2O2, HO-.



Scheme 2 Iridium-catalyzed asymmetric hydroboration: selected ligands


Scheme 3

Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: (a) OsO4 (cat.), NMO (1.2 equiv), acetone-H2O (2:1); (b) OsO4 (cat.), Et3NO, t-BuOH, H2O, Py.


Scheme 5











Scheme 6 The chemodivergent pathway of a rhodium-catalyzed hydroarylation reaction







Scheme 7

Scheme 8

Scheme 9

Scheme 10

Scheme 11

Figure 4 Selected examples of cycloadducts from bicyclic hydrazines



















Scheme 12






Scheme 13


Scheme 14 Reagents and conditions: (a) RuO2, NaIO4, EtOAc; (b) CH2N2, MeOH, 89% overall yield.

Scheme 15 Reagents and conditions: (a) thermal activation (100 ˚C) or acidic activation.

Scheme 16 Reagents and conditions: (a) CF3COOH, CCl4, r.t., quant.



Scheme 17



Scheme 18 Reagents and conditions: (a) Me2C(OMe)2, CH2Cl2, camphorsulfonic acid (cat.), r.t., 12 h, 95%; (b) 2 N KOH, 2-PrOH, reflux, 2 h, then HCl, CuCl2 (3 equiv), then NH3 (aq), 85%; (c) H2, Pt, AcOH, r.t., 12 h, then HCl (aq), 83%; (d) BnCOCl, NaHCO3, t-BuOH-H2O (1:1), 75-85%; (e) penicillin amidase, 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.6), 91% ee; then Ac2O, pyridine, DMAP, 82%.



Scheme 19 Reagents and conditions: (a) 6 M HCl, AcOH, 100 ˚C, 98%; (b) PtO2, H2, 2 M HCl, 99%.

Scheme 20 Reagents and conditions: (a) SeO2, KH2PO4, diglyme, 170 ˚C, 69%; (b) KH, MeI, THF, 75%; (c) OsO4, NMO, THF-H2O, 99%; (d) Li, NH3, -33 ˚C, 50%; (e) LiOH, THF-H2O, 99%.

Figure 5 Selected examples of ligands or inhibitors prepared from bicyclic hydrazines