Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1083353
Cobalt(II) Chloride Hexahydrate-Diisopropylamine Catalyzed Mild and Chemoselective Reduction of Carboxylic Esters with Sodium Borohydride
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 February 2009 (online)
Abstract
The cobalt-catalyzed reduction of unsaturated α-cyano carboxylic esters using sodium borohydride (NaBH4) leads to the corresponding saturated cyano alcohols in high yields. In particular, the new catalytic system cobalt(II) chloride-diisopropylamine in combination with NaBH4 showed excellent activity in the chemoselective reduction of a variety of carboxylic esters to their corresponding alcohols in good to excellent yields under mild conditions.
Key words
reductions - amines - catalysis - esters - alcohols
Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) is a mild, inexpensive yet powerful reducing agent capable of reducing a wide range of functional groups, such as aldehydes, ketones, and imines. [¹] Despite its low reactivity towards carboxylic esters, [²] studies have indicated that the reactivity of NaBH4 and its derivatives towards these compounds and carboxylic acids can be enhanced by the addition of certain additives, resulting in the use of reagents such as NaBH4-MX (MX = LiCl, ZnCl2, AlCl3, LiBr, MgBr2, MgCl2, CaCl2), [³] KBH4-MX (MX = ZnCl2, AlCl3, MgCl2), [4] NaBH4-trifluoroacetic acid, [5] NaBH4-sulfuric acid, [6] NaBH4-iodine, [7] and borane-dimethyl sulfide complex. [8] However, some of the major disadvantages of the reported procedures on ester reduction include the lack of generality [9] and the use of harsh reaction conditions [¹0] and higher equivalents of NaBH4 and additives. [¹¹] The reduction of esters with hydroxy, amino, and cyano [¹²] substituents at the α-position and that of carbon-carbon double bonds in α,β-unsaturated esters using NaBH4 have also been reported. [¹³] In this paper, we report a simple procedure in which cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2˙6H2O) in combination with diisopropylamine catalyzes the chemoselective reduction of carboxylic esters to saturated alcohols using NaBH4 at ambient conditions.
In continuation of our work [¹³a] [b] on the cobalt-catalyzed reduction of carbon-carbon double bonds and phenyl esters using NaBH4, we became interested in subjecting (E)-ethyl 2-cyano-3-phenylacrylate (1a) to CoCl2-catalyzed reduction conditions. Surprisingly, we found that ethyl acrylate 1a underwent reduction using NaBH4 at the carbon-carbon double bond as well as at the ester carbonyl functionality to provide 2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-phenylpropanenitrile (2a) in 95% yield (Scheme [¹] and Table [¹] , entry 2). However, when the reaction was carried out without CoCl2˙6H2O in ethanol at 25 ˚C, only the reduction of the carbon-carbon double bond was observed to give ethyl 2-cyano-3-phenylpropanoate (Table [¹] , entry 1).

Scheme 1 Cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate catalyzed reduction of α-cyano-α,β-unsaturated esters using sodium borohydride
Entry | R | Product | Yieldb (%) | ||||||||||||||||
1 | Ph | -c | 80 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Ph | 2a | 95 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | 4-ClC6H4 | 2b | 90 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | 4-MeOC6H4 | 2c | 97 | ||||||||||||||||
5 | 4-Tol | 2d | 92 | ||||||||||||||||
6 | 3-F3CC6H4 | 2e | 85 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 3-O2NC6H4 | 2f | 80 | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 3,4-(MeO)2C6H3 | 2g | 96 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 3,4-(OCH2O)C6H3 | 2h | 99 | ||||||||||||||||
10 | n-C8H17 | 2i | 70 | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
a Reaction
conditions: cyano ester (10 mmol), NaBH4 (40 mmol), CoCl2˙6H2O
(1 mol%), EtOH (5 mL), 25 ˚C, 6 h. b Isolated yield after chromatographic purification. c Ethyl 2-cyano-3-phenylpropanoate was isolated when the reaction was carried out in the absence of CoCl2˙6H2O. |
The results of the reduction of several α-cyano-α,β-unsaturated esters are presented in Table [¹] ; those groups in the ester substrates capable of being reduced, such as nitro and cyano groups, were found to be unaffected under the reduction conditions. The high yields obtained, coupled with the use of ethanol as solvent over diglyme, makes this procedure straightforward and highly economical. It may be that the strong electron-withdrawing nature of the cyano group as well as that of the ester functionality results in the β-positions of the α-cyano esters being more electrophilic for carbon-carbon double bond reduction to occur.
This catalytic procedure provides 3-aryl-2-(hydroxymethyl)propanenitriles 2a-h and 3-n-octyl derivative 2i in high yields; such compounds are potential intermediates in the synthesis of aminooxazolines. [¹¹c-e] We noticed that the reduction of α-cyano esters is more facile compared with that of alkyl carboxylic esters with an α-cyano group. To make the ester reduction procedure more general and practical, we became interested in enhancing the reactivity of NaBH4 by the addition of additives. [¹4] [¹5] Thus, the addition of various amines (i.e., Et3N, DMAP, Me2NPh, or i-Pr2NH) in catalytic amounts was shown to enhance the rate of reduction of carboxylic esters at 50 ˚C, for example the reduction of ethyl cinnamate (Scheme [²] and Table [²] , entries 1-6). After careful study, we found that the combination of CoCl2˙6H2O-i-Pr2NH in catalytic amounts is an effective catalytic system in the reduction of a variety of esters, including α,β-unsaturated, aliphatic, and aromatic ones and lactones, giving the corresponding saturated alcohols 4 in high yields.

Scheme 2 Cobalt-catalyzed reduction of ethyl cinnamate with sodium borohydride
The simultaneous reduction of the carbon-carbon double bond along with the carboxylic ester functionality was also observed in the case of (E)-ethyl 3-arylacrylates (Table [²] , entries 7-9). In addition, diethyl 2-benzylidenemalonate smoothly underwent reduction to provide 2-benzylpropane-1,3-diol (4e) in 94% yield (entry 10). Aromatic esters were reduced to the corresponding benzyl alcohols (entries 11 and 12). More interestingly, aliphatic esters and lactones were reduced to the corresponding alcohols in good yields under mild conditions (entries 13 and 14, respectively). The results of the CoCl2˙6H2O-i-Pr2NH/NaBH4 reduction clearly showed that esters can be reduced under mild conditions even when they contain various reducible groups, such as nitro and halo groups; such reactions are quite difficult with other strong reducing agents, e.g. lithium aluminum hydride. Mechanistically, the role of diisopropylamine is probably to enhance the nucleophilicity of the borohydride reagent by way of coordination. [¹5a]
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a simple catalytic combination comprising CoCl2˙6H2O-i-Pr2NH with stoichiometric NaBH4 that reduces both the carbon-carbon double bond and ester carbonyl functionality in unsaturated carboxylic esters containing other reducible groups, such as halo, cyano, and nitro groups. Mild reaction conditions, easy-to-handle reagents, and good chemoselectivity are distinct features of this methodology; this procedure is a promising alternative to those involving expensive and difficult-to-handle lithium aluminum hydride.
The IR spectra were collected on a Shimadzu FTIR-8400 spectrometer. The NMR spectroscopy was performed on Bruker AV-200 and AV-400 NMR spectrometers with TMS as an internal standard. Quantitative analyses were determined using a Carlo Erba CHNS-O apparatus. Melting points are uncorrected. Solvents were purified and dried by standard procedures before use; petroleum ether of boiling range 60-80 ˚C was used.
2-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-phenylpropanenitrile (2a); Typical Procedure
To cyano ester 1a (2.01 g, 10 mmol) in a 10-mL round-bottomed flask was added a solution of CoCl2˙6H2O (0.024 g, 0.11 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere. Then, NaBH4 (1.51 g, 40 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at 25 ˚C for 6 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the mixture was transferred to a separating funnel containing EtOAc-H2O (1:1, 100 mL), diluted with ice water (25 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 300 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine soln (2 × 400 mL), dried (anhyd Na2SO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure. The product was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc-petroleum ether, 3:1) to afford 2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-phenylpropanenitrile (2a) as a colorless solid. Yield: 1.53 g (95%); mp 75-78 ˚C [following recrystallization from CHCl3 (91% yield)].
IR (CHCl3): 700, 750, 1070, 1218, 1454, 1496, 1602, 1641, 1718, 1955, 2245, 2887, 2935, 3028, 3064, 3421 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.94 (s, 3 H), 3.71 (m, 3 H), 7.26 (m, 5 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 34.1, 36.6, 61.1, 120.5, 127.0, 128.5, 128.8, 136.4.
Anal. Calcd for C10H11NO: C, 74.51; H, 6.88; N, 8.69. Found: C, 74.45; H, 6.85; N, 8.70.
3-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)propanenitrile (2b)
Yield: 90% (1.18 g); colorless solid; mp 118-120 ˚C (CHCl3).
IR (CHCl3): 669, 757, 1215, 1492, 2400, 3020, 3433 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.98 (s, 3 H), 3.78 (m, 3 H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.72 Hz, 2 H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.12 Hz, 2 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 34.2, 36.7, 61.2, 120.2, 122.3, 128.2, 128.5, 134.1, 136.0, 140.2.
Anal. Calcd for C10H10ClNO: C, 61.39; H, 5.15; N, 7.16. Found: C, 61.42; H, 5.11; N, 7.21.
2-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propanenitrile (2c)
Yield: 97% (1.22 g); gray solid; mp 122-124 ˚C (CHCl3).
IR (CHCl3): 667, 756, 837, 1033, 1068, 1111, 1180, 1249, 1301, 1442, 1463, 1514, 1612, 1660, 2244, 2837, 2935, 3014, 3448 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.70-3.10 (m, 4 H), 3.70-3.90 (m, 5 H), 6.8 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.12 Hz, 2 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 32.8, 38.0, 55.2, 61.1, 114.3, 114.4, 119.9, 130.2, 130.6, 131.4, 163.4.
Anal. Calcd for C11H13NO2: C, 69.09; H, 6.85; N, 7.32. Found: C, 69.10; H, 6.80; N, 7.28.
2-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-(4-tolyl)propanenitrile (2d)
Yield: 92% (1.46 g); colorless solid; mp 100-101 ˚C (CHCl3).
IR (CHCl3): 667, 757, 1070, 1214, 1381, 1446, 1516, 1625, 1903, 2245, 2887, 2927, 3018, 3444 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.35 (s, 3 H), 2.91 (s, 3 H), 3.35 (s, 2 H), 3.71 (m, 1 H), 7.14 (m, 4 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 20.7, 33.7, 36.5, 61.2, 120.5, 128.6, 129.1, 133.3, 136.3.
Anal. Calcd for C11H13NO: C, 75.40; H, 7.48; N, 7.99. Found: C, 75.32; H, 7.35; N, 8.00.
2-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]propanenitrile (2e)
Yield: 85% (1.48 g); colorless solid; mp 105-108 ˚C (CHCl3).
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.00 (s, 3 H), 3.54 (br s, 1 H), 3.76 (m, 2 H), 7.44-7.53 (m, 4 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 33.9, 36.4, 61.2, 120.2, 121.1, 124.0, 125.5, 129.2, 131.1, 132.4, 137.4.
Anal. Calcd for C11H10F3NO: C, 57.64; H, 4.40; N, 6.11. Found: C, 57.50; H, 4.45; N, 6.10.
2-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-(3-nitrophenyl)propanenitrile (2f)
Yield: 80% (1.43 g); yellowish solid; mp 182-184 ˚C (EtOH-CHCl3).
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.10 (s, 3 H), 3.84 (m, 3 H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.72 Hz, 2 H), 8.14 (d, J = 6.19 Hz, 2 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 33.8, 36.2, 61.3, 119.7, 122.4, 123.9, 129.8, 135.4, 138.5, 148.3.
Anal. Calcd for C10H10N2O3: C, 58.25; H, 4.89; N, 13.59. Found: C, 58.22; H, 4.85; N, 13.60.
3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)propanenitrile (2g)
Yield: 96% (1.61 g); brown solid; mp 170-171 ˚C (CHCl3).
IR (CHCl3): 765, 812, 858, 1026, 1072, 1141, 1157, 1238, 1263, 1336, 1421, 1465, 1515, 1591, 1724, 2243, 2837, 2937, 3494 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.11 (s, 3 H), 3.48 (br s, 1 H), 3.71 (m, 2 H), 3.81 (s, 6 H), 6.58-6.72 (m, 3 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 33.7, 36.3, 56.3, 61.1, 114.7, 115.7, 132.2, 132.6, 138.2, 144.5, 147.1.
Anal. Calcd for C12H15NO3: C, 65.14; H, 6.83; N, 6.33. Found: C, 65.11; H, 6.80; N, 6.35.
3-Benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-2-(hydroxymethyl)propanenitrile (2h)
Yield: 99% (1.66 g); colorless solid; mp 190-192 ˚C (CHCl3).
IR (CHCl3): 771, 813, 864, 927, 1039, 1091, 1193, 1247, 1365, 1444, 1510, 1608, 1728, 1843, 2245, 2781, 2893, 3452 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.97 (s, 3 H), 3.44 (br s, 1 H), 3.62 (m, 2 H), 5.87 (s, 2 H), 6.53-6.62 (m, 3 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 34.1, 35.3, 61.1, 91.1, 115.3, 115.9, 132.3, 132.8, 138.4, 145.1, 146.8.
Anal. Calcd for C11H11NO3: C, 64.38; H, 5.40; N, 6.83. Found: C, 64.43; H, 5.36; N, 6.70.
2-(Hydroxymethyl)undecanenitrile (2i)
Yield: 70% (1.21 g); colorless solid; mp 50-53 ˚C (CHCl3).
IR (KBr): 667, 757, 1047, 1215, 1377, 1465, 1670, 1730, 2200, 2854, 2925, 3018, 3386 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.88 (t, J = 6.66 Hz, 3 H), 1.27-1.57 (m, 16 H), 1.90 (br s, 1 H), 3.88 (m, 2 H), 4.49 (m, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1, 17.8, 54.0, 59.2, 99.3, 126.3, 127.3, 128.4, 144.9, 148.4, 152.2, 165.4.
Anal. Calcd for C12H23NO: C, 73.04; H, 11.75; N, 7.10. Found: C, 73.98; H, 11.95; N, 7.60.
Cobalt(II) Chloride Hexahydrate-Diisopropylamine Catalyzed Reduction of Esters to Alcohols 4; General Procedure
To a solution of the appropriate carboxylic ester (2 mmol) and CoCl2˙6H2O (4.72 mg, 0.2 mmol) in distilled EtOH (8 mL) was added 1 M i-Pr2NH (20 mol%) in distilled EtOH (4 mL). To the stirred mixture was then added NaBH4 (156 mg, 4 mmol) portionwise. The mixture was stirred at 50 ˚C for 24 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the mixture was diluted with H2O (50 mL) and EtOAc (50 mL). The organic layer was separated, washed with brine soln (2 × 20 mL), dried (anhyd Na2SO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure to give the crude product. Flash column chromatography (silica gel, 230-400 mesh, petroleum ether-EtOAc, 3:2) afforded the saturated alcohol 4 in pure form.
The reaction of ethyl cinnamate without the use of i-Pr2NH resulted in the formation of the saturated ester 5a.
3-Phenylpropan-1-ol (4a)
Yield: 85% (300 mg); colorless liquid.
IR (CHCl3): 698, 744, 968, 1029, 1060, 1454, 1495, 3325 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.44 (br s, 1 H), 1.84-1.95 (m, 2 H), 2.70 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.65 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.13-7.31 (m, 5 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 31.1, 33.7, 63.3, 126.7, 127.1, 128.1, 140.4.
Anal. Calcd for C9H12O: C, 79.37; H, 8.88. Found: C, 79.32; H, 8.82.
Ethyl 3-Phenylpropanoate (5a)
Yield: 95% (354 mg); colorless liquid.
IR (CHCl3): 698, 744, 968, 1029, 1060, 1454, 1495, 1747 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.25 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H), 2.65-2.72 (m, 2 H), 2.81-2.91 (m, 2 H), 4.15 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.15-7.33 (m, 5 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.9, 30.6, 35.3, 59.8, 125.9, 127.9, 128.1, 140.3, 172.6.
Anal. Calcd for C11H14O2: C, 74.13; H, 7.92. Found: C, 74.11; H, 7.95.
3-(4-Chlorophenyl)propan-1-ol (4b)
Yield: 87% (358 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 754, 968, 1029, 1060, 1454, 1495, 3325 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.76 (br s, 1 H), 1.78-1.92 (m, 2 H), 2.67 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.61 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 31.1, 33.7, 61.3, 128.1, 129.5, 131.2, 140.0.
Anal. Calcd for C9H11ClO: C, 63.35; H, 6.50. Found: C, 63.32; H, 6.52.
3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)propan-1-ol (4c)
Yield: 82% (320 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 745, 857, 968, 1029, 1060, 1460, 1495, 3498 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.64 (br s, 1 H), 1.61-1.95 (m, 2 H), 2.67 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.68 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.86 (s, 3 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 6.72-6.86 (m, 3 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 31.5, 34.2, 55.7, 55.8, 62.1, 111.2, 111.6, 120.1, 134.3, 147.0, 147.7.
Anal. Calcd for C11H16O3: C, 67.32; H, 8.22. Found: C, 67.28; H, 8.21.
3-(2-Nitrophenyl)propan-1-ol (4d)
Yield: 87% (326 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 857, 968, 1029, 1060, 1245, 1440, 1507, 3430 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.67 (br s, 1 H), 1.87-2.01 (m, 2 H), 1.99 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.72 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.31-7.60 (m, 3 H), 7.92 (dd, J = 1.2, 8.1 Hz, 1 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 29.1, 33.2, 61.6, 124.4, 126.8, 131.8, 132.8, 136.7, 149.1.
Anal. Calcd for C9H11NO3: C, 59.66; H, 6.12; N, 7.73. Found: C, 59.63; H, 6.10; N, 7.75.
2-Benzylpropane-1,3-diol (4e)
Yield: 94% (342 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 745, 857, 968, 1029, 1060, 1454, 1498, 3400 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.99-2.27 (m, 1 H, and br s, 2 H), 2.62 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.63-3.85 (m, 4 H), 7.17-7.36 (m, 5 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 34.1, 43.7, 64.9, 126.0, 128.9, 139.8.
Anal. Calcd for C10H14O2: C, 72.26; H, 8.49. Found: C, 72.23; H, 8.44.
Phenylmethanol (4f)
Yield: 87% (322 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 857, 968, 1495, 3498 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.99 (br s, 1 H), 4.66 (s, 2 H), 7.25-7.37 (m, 5 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 64.3, 126.7, 127.1, 128.1, 140.6.
Anal. Calcd for C7H8O: C, 77.75; H, 7.46. Found: C, 77.72; H, 7.45.
(4-Bromophenyl)methanol (4g)
Yield: 82% (332 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 968, 1029, 1060, 1501, 3390 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.88 (br s, 1 H), 4.64 (s, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 63.9, 121.1, 128.4, 131.3, 139.5.
Anal. Calcd for C7H7BrO: C, 44.95; H, 3.77. Found: C, 44.92; H, 3.73.
2-(4-Nitrophenyl)ethanol (4h)
Yield: 79% (319 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 857, 1063, 1245, 1498, 3450 cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.70 (br s, 1 H), 2.96 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.91 (m, 2 H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 67.2, 121.2, 128.6, 146.1, 147.1.
Anal. Calcd for C8H9NO3: C, 57.48; H, 5.43; N, 8.38. Found: C, 57.44; H, 5.40; N, 8.35.
Butane-1,4-diol (4i)
Yield: 85% (312 mg); gum.
IR (CHCl3): 837, 938, 1291, 3098, cm-¹.
¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.42-1.48 (m, 4 H), 1.94 (br s, 2 H), 3.51-3.58 (m, 4 H).
¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.1, 64.3.
Anal. Calcd for C4H10O2: C, 53.31; H, 11.18. Found: C, 53.61; H, 11.33.
Acknowledgment
A.R.J. and A.S.P. thank CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research), New Delhi, for the award of research fellowships. The authors are also thankful to Dr. B. D. Kulkarni, Head, CEPD (Chemical Engineering and Process Development), for his constant support and encouragement.
- 1a
Brown HC. Hydroboration W. A. Benjamin, Inc.; New York: 1962. - 1b
Carey FA.Sundberg RJ. Advanced Organic Chemistry 3rd ed., Part A: Plenum; New York: 1990. - 2 For a review, see:
Ganem B.Osby JO. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86: 763 - 3a
Yang C.Pittman CU. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28: 2027 - 3b
Narasimhan S.Balakumar R. Aldrichimica Acta 1998, 31: 19 - 3c
Narasimhan S.Madhavan S.Prasad KG. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60: 5314 - 4
Qiu Y.-C.Zhang F.-L.Zhang C.-N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 7595 - 5
Suseela Y.Periasamy M. Tetrahedron 1992, 48: 371 - 6
Abiko A.Masamune S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33: 5517 - 7
Kanth JVB.Periasamy M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56: 5964 - 8
Lane CF.Myatt HL.Daniels J.Hopps HB. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39: 3052 - 9 For a review, see:
Periasamy M.Thirumalaikumar M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 609: 137 - 10a
da Costa JCS.Pais KC.Fernandes EL.de Oliveira PSM.Mendonça JS.de Souza MVN.Peralta MA.Vasconcelos TRA. ARKIVOC 2006, (i): 128 - 10b
Boechat N.da Costa JCS.Mendonça JS.de Oliveira PSM.de Souza MVN. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 6021 - 10c
Zhu HJ.Pittman CU. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33: 1733 - 10d
Santaniello E.Ferraboschi P.Sozzani P. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46: 4584 - 10e
See also ref. 3a.
- 10f
Guida WC.Entreken EE.Guida AR. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49: 3024 - 11a
Das D.Roy S.Das PK. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 4133 - 11b
Kokotos G.Noula C. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61: 6994 - 11c
Meschino JA.Bond CH. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28: 3129 - 11d
Poos GI.Carson JR.Rosenau JD.Roszkowski AP.Kelley NM.McGowin J. J. Med. Chem. 1963, 6: 266 - 11e
Fodor G.Koczka K. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 850 - 12a
Li L.-C.Jiang J.-X.Ren J.Ren Yi.Pittman CU.Zhu H.-J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1981 - 12b
Patra A.Batra S.Bhaduri AP. Synlett 2003, 1611 - 12c
Corrêa IR.Moran JS. Tetrahedron 1999, 55: 14221 - 12d
Dalla V.Catteaua JP.Pale P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40: 5193 - 12e
Lanier M.Pastor R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36: 2491 - 13a
Jagdale AR.Sudalai A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 3790 - 13b
Paraskar AS.Sudalai A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62: 4907 - 13c
Geiger C.Kreitmeier P.Reiser O. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347: 249 - 13d
Ranu BC.Samanta S. Tetrahedron 2003, 59: 7901 - 13e
Ranu BC.Samanta S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68: 7130 - 13f
Matt PV.Pfaltz A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2: 691 - 13g
Leutenegger U.Madin A.Pfaltz A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28: 60 - 13h
Misun M.Pfaltz A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1996, 79: 961 - 13i
Brown MS.Rapoport H. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28: 3261 - 14
Kadin SB. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31: 620 - 15a
Yamakawa T.Masaki M.Nohira H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64: 2730 - 15b
Lane CF. Aldrichimica Acta 1973, 6: 51
References
- 1a
Brown HC. Hydroboration W. A. Benjamin, Inc.; New York: 1962. - 1b
Carey FA.Sundberg RJ. Advanced Organic Chemistry 3rd ed., Part A: Plenum; New York: 1990. - 2 For a review, see:
Ganem B.Osby JO. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86: 763 - 3a
Yang C.Pittman CU. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28: 2027 - 3b
Narasimhan S.Balakumar R. Aldrichimica Acta 1998, 31: 19 - 3c
Narasimhan S.Madhavan S.Prasad KG. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60: 5314 - 4
Qiu Y.-C.Zhang F.-L.Zhang C.-N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 7595 - 5
Suseela Y.Periasamy M. Tetrahedron 1992, 48: 371 - 6
Abiko A.Masamune S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33: 5517 - 7
Kanth JVB.Periasamy M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56: 5964 - 8
Lane CF.Myatt HL.Daniels J.Hopps HB. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39: 3052 - 9 For a review, see:
Periasamy M.Thirumalaikumar M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 609: 137 - 10a
da Costa JCS.Pais KC.Fernandes EL.de Oliveira PSM.Mendonça JS.de Souza MVN.Peralta MA.Vasconcelos TRA. ARKIVOC 2006, (i): 128 - 10b
Boechat N.da Costa JCS.Mendonça JS.de Oliveira PSM.de Souza MVN. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 6021 - 10c
Zhu HJ.Pittman CU. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33: 1733 - 10d
Santaniello E.Ferraboschi P.Sozzani P. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46: 4584 - 10e
See also ref. 3a.
- 10f
Guida WC.Entreken EE.Guida AR. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49: 3024 - 11a
Das D.Roy S.Das PK. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 4133 - 11b
Kokotos G.Noula C. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61: 6994 - 11c
Meschino JA.Bond CH. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28: 3129 - 11d
Poos GI.Carson JR.Rosenau JD.Roszkowski AP.Kelley NM.McGowin J. J. Med. Chem. 1963, 6: 266 - 11e
Fodor G.Koczka K. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 850 - 12a
Li L.-C.Jiang J.-X.Ren J.Ren Yi.Pittman CU.Zhu H.-J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1981 - 12b
Patra A.Batra S.Bhaduri AP. Synlett 2003, 1611 - 12c
Corrêa IR.Moran JS. Tetrahedron 1999, 55: 14221 - 12d
Dalla V.Catteaua JP.Pale P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40: 5193 - 12e
Lanier M.Pastor R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36: 2491 - 13a
Jagdale AR.Sudalai A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 3790 - 13b
Paraskar AS.Sudalai A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62: 4907 - 13c
Geiger C.Kreitmeier P.Reiser O. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347: 249 - 13d
Ranu BC.Samanta S. Tetrahedron 2003, 59: 7901 - 13e
Ranu BC.Samanta S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68: 7130 - 13f
Matt PV.Pfaltz A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2: 691 - 13g
Leutenegger U.Madin A.Pfaltz A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28: 60 - 13h
Misun M.Pfaltz A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1996, 79: 961 - 13i
Brown MS.Rapoport H. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28: 3261 - 14
Kadin SB. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31: 620 - 15a
Yamakawa T.Masaki M.Nohira H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64: 2730 - 15b
Lane CF. Aldrichimica Acta 1973, 6: 51
References

Scheme 1 Cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate catalyzed reduction of α-cyano-α,β-unsaturated esters using sodium borohydride

Scheme 2 Cobalt-catalyzed reduction of ethyl cinnamate with sodium borohydride












