Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1083346
Intermolecular Addition Reactions of N-Acyliminium Ions (Part II) [¹]
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 February 2009 (online)
Biographical Sketches


Abstract
This review highlights the advances in the literature up to July 2008 on the intermolecular reactions of acyclic and cyclic N-acyliminium ions. This is an update of an earlier review in 2000 on this topic and does not include intramolecular addition reactions to N-acyliminium ions which was recently reviewed. This review is presented in two parts, with the first part having dealt with acyclic and pyrrolidinone-based N-acyliminium ions. Part II continues with other five-membered heterocyclic derivatives and higher systems.
Part I
1 Introduction
2 Acyclic N-Acyliminium Ions
2.1 Synthesis of Acyclic N-Acyliminium Ion Precursors
2.2 Reactions of Acyclic N-Acyliminium Ions
2.2.1 Reactions with Nucleophiles
2.2.2 Cycloaddition Reactions
2.2.3 Cationic Carbohydroxylation Reactions
3 Cyclic N-Acyliminium Ions
3.1 Synthesis of Cyclic N-Acyliminium Ion Precursors
3.1.1 Preparation of Iminium Ions in situ by Anodic Oxidation
3.2 Five-Membered-Ring N-Acyliminium Ions
3.2.1 Reactions of Pyrrolidinone-Based N-Acyliminium Ions
Part II
3.2.2 Reactions of N-Acylpyrrolidine-Based N-Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.2.2.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
3.2.2.2 Aromatic Nucleophiles
3.2.2.3 Organostannanes
3.2.2.4 Organometallic Reagents
3.2.2.5 Carbonyl Compounds
3.2.2.6 Alkyl Radicals
3.2.2.7 Thiols
3.2.2.8 Active Methylene Compounds
3.2.3 Reactions of Oxazolidinone-Based N-Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.2.3.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
3.2.3.2 Organometallic Reagents
3.2.3.3 Active Methylene Compounds
3.2.4 Cyclocondensation Reaction of N-Aminidinyl Iminium Ions
3.3 Reactions of Six-Membered-Ring N-Acyliminium Ions
3.3.1 Reactions of Piperidinone-Based N-Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.1.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
3.3.1.2 Organostannanes
3.3.1.3 Organometallic Reagents
3.3.2 Reactions of N-Acylpiperidine-Based N-Acyliminium Ions
3.3.2.1 Reactions with Nucleophiles
3.3.2.2 Cycloaddition Reactions
3.3.3 Reactions of Piperazine-Based N-Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.3.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
3.3.3.2 Aromatic Nucleophiles
3.3.4 Reactions of Pyridine-Based N-Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.4.1 Organometallic Reagents
3.3.5 Reactions of N,O-Acetal Oxathiazinane N-Sulfonyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.5.1 Organometallic Reagents
3.4 Reactions of Seven-Membered-Ring N-Acyliminium Ions
3.4.1 Reactions with Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
3.4.2 Cycloaddition Reactions
3.5 Reactions of Bicyclic N-Acyliminium Ions
3.5.1 Reactions with Nucleophiles
3.5.1.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
3.5.1.2 Organometallic Reagents
3.5.1.3 Enamines
3.5.2 Cycloaddition Reactions
3.6 Other Systems
3.6.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
4 Stereochemical Outcomes
5 Conclusions
Key words
N-acyliminium ion - nucleophilic addition - cycloaddition - aromatic electrophilic substitution - radical addition - peptides - pyrrolidines - piperidines
3.2.2 Reactions of N -Acylpyrrolidine-Based N -Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.2.2.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
Treatment of the N-acyliminium ion 302 with benzyltrimethylsilanes afforded 2-benzylated pyrrolidines 303. 4-Fluorobenzyl-, benzyl-, and 2-methylbenzyltrimethylsilane did not react with the N-acyliminium ion. Reactions of 3,5-dimethylbenzyl-, 4-methylbenzyl-, 2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl-, 4-methoxybenzyl-, and 2,3,4,5,6-pentamethylbenzyltrimethylsilanes gave the corresponding products in 12-88% yields. Use of 4-methylbenzylstannanes (0.1 equiv), as an additive in the reactions of 4-fluorobenzyltrimethylsilane and 4-methylbenzyltrimethylsilane, resulted in 50% and 97% yields of 303, respectively (Scheme [¹¹7] ). [50]
The reaction of N-Boc-2-methoxypyrrolidine (304) with silicon nucleophiles in an ionic liquid, BMI.InCl4, led to the formation of 2-substituted pyrrolidines 305 in yields of 76-80% (Scheme [¹¹8] ). [8¹]

Scheme 117

Scheme 118
Treatment of pyrrolidinone 304 with similar silicon nucleophiles in the presence of indium(III) chloride under solvent-free conditions afforded the corresponding products 305 in 92-100% yields (Scheme [¹¹9] ). [8²a] The use of indium(IV) chloride in sodium dodecylsulfate and water has also been described for these reactions. [8²b]

Scheme 119
In a similar study, pyrrolidine 304 reacted with silicon nucleophiles under catalysis by zinc triflate to afford the desired adducts 305 in 68-80% yields (Scheme [¹²0] ). [5²]

Scheme 120
The reactions of silicon nucleophiles with pyrrolidine 304 in the presence of bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide or triisopropylsilyl triflate under solvent-free conditions afforded the corresponding adducts 305 in good to excellent yields (Scheme [¹²¹] ). It was found that 0.3 mol% of bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide catalysed the reaction of allyltrimethylsilane, while the silyl enol ether of acetophenone required 1.0 mol% of catalyst. The trimethylsilyl enol ether of cyclohexanone and the triisopropylsilyl ether of methyl isobutyrate and trimethylsiloxyfuran required 5 mol% of bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide. The use of 1 mol% of triisopropylsilyl triflate as a Lewis acid in these reactions gave the desired adducts in the same or similar yields. [6³]

Scheme 121
Chiral 2-methoxypyrrolidines 306a,b underwent addition reactions with 2-tert-butyldimethylsilyloxyfuran in the presence of a catalytic amount of titanium(IV) chloride or trimethylsilyl triflate in dichloromethane at -78 ˚C to form only two out of four possible diastereomeric products, 307a,b and 308a,b (Scheme [¹²²] ). The reactions of 306a and 306b with the silyloxyfuran in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride gave products in 60% and 55% yields, respectively. The use of trimethylsilyl triflate as a catalyst increased the yields to 84% and 75%, respectively. The diastereomeric ratios for 307a/308a and 307b/308b were found to be 75:25 and 67:33 after hydrogenation, and the stereochemistry of the major products 307 was determined as 2′R,5R by X-ray diffraction analysis. [8³]

Scheme 122
Silyloxyfurans 310 reacted with 2-alkoxypyrrolidines 309 upon exposure to trimethylsilyl triflate. The N-Boc-protected pyrrolidine derivative 309a gave the best yield of 82% and the highest diastereomeric ratio of 95:5 when R³ = H (Scheme [¹²³] ). [84]

Scheme 123
The reaction of allenyltrimethylsilane with the 2-ethoxypyrrolidine 313 in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex provided the 2-substituted pyrrolidine 314 in 49% yield (Scheme [¹²4] ). Treatment of N-tosyl-2-hydroxypyrrolidine under the same reaction conditions afforded the N-tosyl analogue of piperidine 314 in 74% yield. [³0a]

Scheme 124
N-Carbobenzyloxy-2-hydroxypyrrolidine (315) reacted with a silyl enol ether in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate (1.0 equiv) in dichloromethane to afford the 2-substituted pyrrolidine 316 in 96% yield (Scheme [¹²5] ). [85]

Scheme 125
The N-acyliminium ion which was generated by anodic oxidation of 317 was treated with silicon nucleophiles and afforded the corresponding alkylated products 318 (Scheme [¹²6] , equation 1). Similarly, the reactions of allyltrimethylsilane with the in situ generated N-acyliminium ion of amides and carbamates 319 under the same reaction conditions gave products 320 in 73-97% yields (Scheme [¹²6] , equation 2). [49]

Scheme 126
Treatment of the immobilised amines 321a,b with boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex led to the formation of N-acyliminium ions 322a,b which were trapped with allyltrimethylsilane to give the desired adducts 323 (Scheme [¹²7] ). Cleavage of the adduct from the resin with 1 M sodium methoxide in tetrahydrofuran-methanol gave the trans-2,4-disubstituted pyrrolidines 324a,b in 81% and 52% yields, respectively. [5]

Scheme 127
Decarboxylation and oxidation of the proline derivative 325 with (diacetoxyiodo)benzene and iodine gave the corresponding N-acyliminium ion. The reaction of allyltrimethylsilane with the the latter under boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex catalysis gave the 2-allylated product 326 in 91% yield (Scheme [¹²8] ). The reaction did not take place in the absence of the Lewis acid: only the corresponding 2-hydroxypyrrolidine was isolated. Treatment of 325 with (trimethylsilyloxy)cyclohexene and trimethylsilyloxyfuran under the same reaction conditions gave addition products in 68% and 81% yields, respectively. [46 ] In a similar study, treatment of 325 with isopropenyl acetate (5.0 equiv) in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex afforded the expected product in 58% yield. [47]

Scheme 128
When the one-pot decarboxylation-oxidation-alkylation methodology was applied to the 4-trimethylacetyloxy-l-proline derivative 167a, the desired allylated product 327 was isolated in 91% yield with a cis/trans ratio of 85:15 (Scheme [¹²9] ). [46] [47]

Scheme 129
The reaction of the N-acylprolines 328a and 328b with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride yielded the allylated products 329a and 329b in 80% and 53% yields, respectively (Scheme [¹³0] ). [86]

Scheme 130
The 3-substituted N-Cbz pyrrolidines 330a-e reacted with allyltrimethylsilane, cyanotrimethylsilane, and tert-butyl[(1-ethoxyvinyl)oxy]dimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give products 331a-e. 3-Carbamoyl-2-methoxypyrrolidines 330a-c and 3-iodo-2-methoxypyrrolidine 330d gave the adducts in moderate to excellent yields and with 2,3-trans selectivity (Scheme [¹³¹] , equation 1), while 3-azido-2-methoxypyrrolidine 330e gave the adduct 331e in 49% yield and with high 2,3-cis selectivity (88:12) (Scheme [¹³¹] , equation 2). The 2,3-trans selectivity in the reactions of 330a-d was suggested to arise from neighbouring-group participation of the R¹ group (R¹ = NHCO2R or I). [87] [88]

Scheme 131
The reaction of 2-ethoxy-4-butylpyrrolidine 332 with allylsilanes afforded the corresponding adducts 333 in 30-40% yields as isomeric mixtures (Scheme [¹³²] ). The diastereomeric ratios were not determined. However, when R = Me, the mixture was converted into a 80:20 mixture of indolizidines, with the major isomer having arisen from the initial 2,5-trans adduct. [89]

Scheme 132
The reaction of pyrrolidine 334 with silicon nucleophiles in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex provided the desired adduct 335 with complete 2,4-cis selectivity (Scheme [¹³³] ). [76]

Scheme 133
Treatment of pyrrolidine 336 with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex provided the 2,3-trans product 337 in 99% yield (Scheme [¹³4] ). [90]

Scheme 134
The cyano group was introduced into the N-Boc pyrrolidines 338a,b stereoselectively (Scheme [¹³5] ). The reaction of 338a with trimethylsilyl cyanide (3.0 equiv) in the presence of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (1.5 equiv) in acetonitrile at -40 ˚C resulted in the best yield (90%) and diastereomeric ratio (96:4). The use of tetrahydrofuran, toluene and dichloromethane as solvents in this reaction gave the product 339a in poor to good yields (19-60%) with reduced diastereoselectivities (dr = 87:13 to 90:10). Using trimethylsilyl triflate as catalyst gave product 339a in 67% yield with a diastereomeric ratio of 93:7. The reaction of 338b with trimethylsilyl cyanide in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex (1.5 equiv) in dichloromethane afforded product 339b in the highest yield (89%) and diastereomeric ratio of 92:8. The use of tin(IV) chloride and trimethylsilyl triflate as Lewis acids in toluene provided product 339b in 32% and 68% yields and with diastereomeric ratios of 66:33 and 75:25, respectively. The high diastereoselectivity was suggested to be the result of attack of the nucleophile from the face anti to the C-5 substituent. This substituent was proposed to adopt a pseudo-axial orientation to minimise A¹,² strain with the N-Boc group. [9¹]

Scheme 135
The 2,3-O-isopropylidene-protected pyrrolidine 340 reacted with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give the 2-allylated pyrrolidine 341 in 52% yield and with complete 2,3-trans selectivity (trans/cis = 100:0) (Scheme [¹³6] ). Magnesium bromide, tin(IV) chloride, dichlorodiisopropoxytitanium(IV), and ytterbium(III) triflate were found to be ineffective in this reaction. [9²]

Scheme 136
The 5-substituted 2,3-O-isopropylidene-protected pyrrolidines 342 and 344 gave allylated products 343 and 345, respectively, with exclusive 2,3-trans selectivity and good yields, when they were treated with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex (Scheme [¹³7] ). The allyltrimethylsilane attacked from the exo face of the bicyclic aminal, independent of the C-4 and C-5 substituents and their configurations. The lower diastereoselectivities observed when the stronger Lewis acid mixture of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex and trimethylsilyl triflate was employed was thought to be due to initial cleavage of the bicyclic aminal prior to nucleophilic attack. [9²]

Scheme 137
Treatment of pyrrolidinone 346 with Grignard reagents and then triethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex afforded adducts 347 and 348. This reaction sequence using methylmagnesium iodide gave adduct 347 in 80% yield and with high 3,5-cis selectivity, while that using of 4-benzyloxyphenylmagnesium bromide provided only the 3,5-trans adduct 348 in 58% yield (Scheme [¹³8] ). [7²]

Scheme 138
3.2.2.2 Aromatic Nucleophiles
Treatment of benzene derivatives with the proline derivatives 328a-d in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride or tin(IV) chloride gave the arylated adducts 349 in 31-71% yields. The prolines 328a,c (R¹ = CO2Me or Cbz) gave exclusively the 2,5-cis products (Scheme [¹³9] , equation 1), whereas the prolines 328b,d (R¹ = CHO or Bz) yielded the arylated adducts 349 as a mixture of isomers favouring the trans isomer (Scheme [¹³9] , equation 2). [86]

Scheme 139
3.2.2.3 Organostannanes
Treatment of benzyltributylstannane and 4-methylbenzyltributylstannane with the N-acyliminium ion 302 provided the 2-benzylated pyrrolidines 350 in 51% and 71% yields, respectively (Scheme [¹40] ). [50]

Scheme 140
A cinnamylstannane reacted with pyrrolidines 351a-c in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give adducts 352a-c. While pyrrolidine 351a gave the product 352a in 75% yield and as a single diastereomer, 351b and 351c gave the products 352b and 352c in yields of 73% and 54%, and with a diastereomeric ratio of 70:30 and 75:25, respectively (Scheme [¹4¹] , equation 1). When pyrrolidine 353 was treated under the same reaction conditions, the addition product 354 was obtained in 56% yield as a 50:50 mixture of diastereomers (Scheme [¹4¹] , equation 2). In contrast to the reactions reported in Schemes [¹³6] and [¹³7] , a ring-opened monocyclic iminium ion intermediate was proposed for the reactions of 351a-c. [9³]

Scheme 141
3.2.2.4 Organometallic Reagents
The N-acyliminium ion 302 underwent reactions with Grignard reagents to afford 2-substituted pyrrolidines 355 in moderate to good yields. The reaction took place with alkyl-, alkenyl-, alkynyl- and arylmagnesium halides (Scheme [¹4²] ). [³8]
Treatment of organozinc and organoaluminium reagents with the N-acyliminium ion 302 provided 2-ethylpyrrolidine 356 in 55-74% yields (Scheme [¹4³] ). The use of diethylzinc, ethylzinc iodide, triethylaluminium and diethylaluminium chloride gave the ethylated product in 74%, 65%, 72%, and 55% yields, respectively. [³8]
The reactions of zinc alkynylides, prepared in situ, with 2-methoxypyrrolidine 304 in the presence of zinc triflate afforded the corresponding 2-substituted products 357 (Scheme [¹44] ). [5²]
Alkynes reacted with 2-methoxypyrrolidines 309b,c in the presence of copper(I) bromide in water at 40-50 ˚C under sonication conditions to afford 2-substituted pyrrolidines 358 (Scheme [¹45] ). [94]

Scheme 142

Scheme 143

Scheme 144

Scheme 145
As an extension of an earlier study, [95a] the reaction of the racemic 2,3-dihydroxypyrrolidine 359 with an alkenylboronate led to the 2,3-cis product 360 in 99% yield and with high 2,3-cis selectivity (cis/trans = 98:2) (Scheme [¹46] ). [95b]

Scheme 146
Organocopper reagents were treated with 3-substituted 2-methoxypyrrolidines 361 in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to afford adducts 362 in 50-97% yields after Boc deprotection. These reactions showed 2,3-trans selectivity (trans/cis = 60:40 to 91:9) (Scheme [¹47] ). The trans selectivity increased with the use of bulky organocopper reagents. [96]

Scheme 147
The silylcuprate reagent PhMe2SiLi/CuCN underwent reaction with the 5-substituted 2-methoxypyrrolidine 363a and 2-phenylsulfonylpyrrolidine 363b in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex. 2-Methoxypyrrolidine 363a gave the desired 2,5-disubstituted adduct 364a in 8% yield, while the 2-phenylsulfonylpyrrolidine 363b gave adduct 364b in 71% yield (Scheme [¹48] ). The reaction took place between 2-phenylsulfonylpyrrolidine and the silylcuprate reagent even in the absence of the Lewis acid. It was postulated that either the copper behaves as a Lewis acid to generate the N-acyliminium ion, or the reaction follows an SN2 mechanism. [²4]

Scheme 148
The 3,5-disubstituted N-Boc proline 365 reacted with 2-methylpropenyllithium and trans-1-lithiopropene in the presence of copper bromide-dimethylsulfide complex and boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give the 2,5-trans products 366 (Scheme [¹49] ). [97]

Scheme 149
3.2.2.5 Carbonyl Compounds
The reaction of N-Boc-2-ethoxypyrrolidine 309a with the N,O-silylketene acetal, itself prepared in situ by treatment of N-propionyloxazolidin-2-one 367 with trimethylsilyl triflate and triethylamine, provided a 67:33 mixture of the 2-substituted pyrrolidines 368 and 369 in 45% yield (Scheme [¹50] ). [98]

Scheme 150
The 5-methoxyproline derivative 371 reacted with trimethylsilyloxyfuran compounds, themselves generated in situ by treatment of butenolides 370 with trimethylsilyl triflate under basic conditions, in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate at -78 ˚C to give a mixture of diastereomeric adducts. Addition of an excess amount of trimethylsilyl triflate to these adducts afforded deprotected pyrrolidines 372 as a mixture of four diastereomers (Scheme [¹5¹] ). [99]

Scheme 151
The titanium enolates of N-acyloxazolidinones 373a-d reacted with N-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-2-ethoxypyrrolidine (309a) to afford the corresponding 2-substituted pyrrolidines 374a-d and 375a-d. Treatment of pyrrolidine 309a with 373a and 373b in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride gave the desired products with 374/375 ratios of 93:7 and 90:10 and in 72% and 85% yields, respectively; while treatment of 309a with 373c afforded only product 374c in 46% yield. The reaction of pyrrolidine 309a with 373d gave the desired product in 70% yield with no selectivity (374d/375d = 50:50) (Scheme [¹5²] ). [98]

Scheme 152
The reaction of 2-alkoxypyrrolidine 309b with N-acyloxazolidinones 373a and 373b in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride provided the corresponding products in 67% and 57% yields, and with product ratios (376/377) of 91:9 and 83:17, respectively. Treatment of 309c with 373a and 373b under the same reaction conditions resulted in 33% and 50% yields, respectively and with product ratios (376/377) of 91:9 and 86:14, respectively (Scheme [¹5³] ). [98]

Scheme 153
The titanium enolates of 378a and 378b reacted with 2-alkoxypyrrolidines 309a and 309b to afford the N-Boc- and N-Cbz-2-substituted pyrrolidines 379 and 380. The reactions of 309a with 378a and 378b in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride and diisopropylethylamine gave products 379 and 380 with high selectivity >95:<5 in yields of 70% and 81%, respectively. Treatment of 309b with 378b under the same experimental conditions afforded 379 and 380 in 73% yield, with the same selectivity (Scheme [¹54] ). [98]

Scheme 154
The 2-alkoxypyrrolidines 304 and 309a, when treated with the titanium enolate of N-acyloxazolidinone 381a (X = O) or its thio analogue 381b (X = S), respectively, gave the addition products 382a,b as single isomers in 82-84% yields (Scheme [¹55] ). [¹00]

Scheme 155
The titanium enolate of 2-pyridylthio ester 384 was treated with 2-methoxypyrrolidine 383 in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride to give the 2,3-trans product 385 in 25% yield and with a diastereomeric ratio of 92:8 (Scheme [¹56] ). [¹0¹]

Scheme 156
The boron enolates of the oxazolidin-2-ones 373a,b were treated with N-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-2-ethoxypyrrolidine (309a) in the presence of dibutylboryl triflate (2.0 equiv) to afford the corresponding N-Boc-2-substituted pyrrolidines 374a,b and 375a,b. The reaction using 373a gave a mixture of 374a and 375a (dr = 93:7) in 50% yield, while the reaction with 373b under the same reaction conditions provided products 374b/375b in 55% yield (dr = 98:2) (Scheme [¹57] ). [98]

Scheme 157
3.2.2.6 Alkyl Radicals
The N-acyliminium ion 302 reacted with alkyl halides in the presence of hexabutyldistannane to give the 2-substituted pyrrolidine adducts 355 (Scheme [¹58] ). [4¹] [4²]

Scheme 158
3.2.2.7 Thiols
Anodic oxidation of pyrrolidine 386 in a 1 M lithium perchlorate/nitromethane electrolytic solution in the presence of 50 mM acetic acid gave an intermediate N-acyliminium ion, which was trapped with thiophenol to afford the 2-phenylsulfanyl pyrrolidine 317 in 91% yield (Scheme [¹59] ). [49]

Scheme 159
Treatment of amide or carbamate proline derivatives 319a and 319b with thiophenol under the same electrolytic oxidative conditions gave adducts 319c,d in 86% yield as a 50:50 mixture of diastereomers (Scheme [¹60] ). [49]

Scheme 160
3.2.2.8 Active Methylene Compounds
1,3-Dicarbonyl compounds were treated with α-methoxypyrrolidine 304 in the presence of indium(III) chloride under solvent-free conditions to afford the 2-substituted pyrrolidines 387 (Scheme [¹6¹] ). Use of ethyl acetylacetonate (R¹ = Me, R² = OEt), acetylacetonate (R¹ = R² = Me) and diethyl malonate (R¹ = R² = OEt) gave products in 92%, 94%, and 83% yields, respectively. [8²a ] The use of indium(IV) chloride in sodium dodecylsulfate and water has also been described for these reactions. [8²b]

Scheme 161
The reaction of 3-iodo-2-methoxypyrrolidine 330d with dimethyl malonate in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride afforded product 388 in 68% yield and high selectivity (trans/cis = 98:2) (Scheme [¹6²] ). [87]

Scheme 162
3.2.3 Reactions of Oxazolidinone-Based N -Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.2.3.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
Treatment of the chiral oxazolidinones 389 with allyltrimethylsilane and 2-bromoallyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex or titanium(IV) chloride afforded 4,5-trans products 390 with very high selectivity (trans/cis = 87:13 to 98:2) in 85-92% yields (Scheme [¹6³] ). [¹0²]

Scheme 163
The reaction of bisoxazolidinone 391 with silicon nucleophiles in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride gave disubstituted products 392 in yields of 17-59%, in favour of the di-trans products (Scheme [¹64] ). [¹0³]

Scheme 164
3.2.3.2 Organometallic Reagents
Treatment of oxazolidinone 393 with organocopper reagents in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex led to the formation of products 394 in 52-62% yields and good 4,5-trans diastereoselectivities (Scheme [¹65] ). [¹0²]

Scheme 165
The boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex catalysed reaction of oxazolidinones 389a and 393 with Grignard reagents provided products 395 in 58-78% yields with very high 4,5-trans selectivity (Scheme [¹66] ). [¹0²]

Scheme 166
Oxazolidinone 393 was treated with organocopper-zinc reagents in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give the 4,5-trans products 396 in 48-72% yields (Scheme [¹67] ). [¹0²]

Scheme 167
3.2.3.3 Active Methylene Compounds
Bisoxazolidinone 391 reacted with a titanium enolate, prepared in situ from the treatment of diethyl malonate with titanium(IV) chloride in the presence of triethylamine, to afford predominantly the di-trans product 397 (trans/cis = 94:6) in 57% yield (Scheme [¹68] ). [¹0³]

Scheme 168
3.2.4 Cyclocondensation Reaction of N -Aminidinyl Iminium Ions
The cyclocondensation reaction of 398 with alkenes and dienes provided the desired cycloadducts 399 in 37-83% yields (Scheme [¹69] ). [¹04]

Scheme 169
3.3 Six-Membered-Ring N -Acyliminium Ions
3.3.1 Reactions of Piperidinone-Based N -Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.1.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
The reaction of 6-ethoxypiperidinone (400) with but-2-ynyltrimethylsilane under catalysis by boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex yielded 6-methylallenepiperidinone 401 in 68% yield (Scheme [¹70] ). [5¹]

Scheme 170
6-Acetoxypiperidinone 402 underwent reaction with propargyltrimethylsilane to provide the allene product 403 in 90% yield (Scheme [¹7¹] ). [¹05]

Scheme 171
The addition reaction of silicon nucleophiles with 6-methoxypiperidinone 404 in the presence of zinc triflate provided the desired 6-substituted piperidinones 405 in 50-52% yields (Scheme [¹7²] ). [5²]

Scheme 172
The reaction of racemic 6-methoxypiperidinone 406 with silicon nucleophiles in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex in dichloromethane or acetonitrile afforded the corresponding racemic products 407 in 42-100% yields, in favour of the 4,6-trans isomer (trans/cis = 57:43 to 89:11) (Scheme [¹7³] ). In the same study, piperidinone 406 reacted with CH2=C(OTMS)(Ph) in the presence of scandium(III) triflate in acetonitrile to give product 407 in 88% yield and with a trans/cis ratio of 78:22. [¹06]

Scheme 173
3.3.1.2 Organostannanes
Treatment of racemic piperidinone 406 with allenyltributylstannane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex in acetonitrile afforded the racemic product 408 as a mixture of isomers (trans/cis = 51:49) in quantitative yield. The use of dichloromethane as a solvent decreased the yield to 85%, but increased the diastereoselectivity slightly (trans/cis = 59:41) (Scheme [¹74] ). [¹06]

Scheme 174
3.3.1.3 Organometallic Reagents
Treatment of piperidinone 404 with an in situ generated zinc alkynylide in the presence of zinc triflate yielded the propargylic adduct 409 in 42% yield (Scheme [¹75] ). [5²]

Scheme 175
Treatment of the chiral 5,6-dihydroxypiperidinone 410 with boronic acids in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex afforded the products 411 in 49-77% yields, with very good 5,6-cis selectivity (80:20 to >98:<2) (Scheme [¹76] ). In the same study the 5-methoxy analogue of piperidinone 410 reacted with potassium (E)-2-styryltrifluoroborate in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give the corresponding methoxy analogue of adduct 411 in 96% yield with a cis/trans ratio of 65:35. [64]

Scheme 176
3.3.2 Reactions of N -Acylpiperidine-Based N -Acyliminium Ions
3.3.2.1 Reactions with Nucleophiles
3.3.2.1.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
The zinc triflate mediated reaction of N-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-2-methoxypiperidine (412) with silicon nucleophiles afforded the expected 2-substituted piperidines 413 in 52-68% yields (Scheme [¹77] ). [5²]

Scheme 177
Treatment of piperidine 412 with similar silicon nucleophiles in the presence of indium(III) chloride under solvent-free conditions gave the desired 2-alkylated piperidines 413 in 79-92% yields (Scheme [¹78] ). [8²a] The use of indium(IV) chloride in sodium dodecylsulfate and water has also been described for these reactions. [8²b]

Scheme 178
Piperidine 412 also reacted with silicon nucleophiles in an ionic liquid (BMI.InCl4) to yield the corresponding 2-substituted piperidines 413 in 65-76% yields (Scheme [¹79] ). [8¹]

Scheme 179
The one-pot decarboxylation-oxidation-allylation reaction of N-methyloxycarbonyl piperidine 414 afforded 2-allylpiperidine 415 in 67% yield (Scheme [¹80] ). [47]

Scheme 180
Treatment of N-acylpiperidines 416a-c with 2-silyloxyfurans under trimethylsilyl triflate catalysis afforded products 417, 418 and 419 in 58-75% yields (Scheme [¹8¹] ). The reactions of 416a-c with 2-silyloxyfuran (R³ = H, R4 = TBS) gave products 417 and 418 in 58%, 63%, and 74% yields, and with product ratios (417/418) of 88:12, 67:33, and 75:25, respectively. The reaction of piperidines 416a-c with another silyloxyfuran (R³ = Me, R4 = TIPS) afforded products 417, 418, and 419 in 67%, 75%, and 70% yields, with 417/418/419 product ratios of 3:60:36, 33:67:0, and 16:84:0, respectively. The relative stereochemistry of 419 was not determined. [84]

Scheme 181
In a very similar study, piperidine 416a reacted with 2-[(triisopropyl)siloxy]-5-methylfuran in a tetrahydrofuran and dichloromethane solvent mixture in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate or boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to afford products 420, 421 and 422 in 67% and 40% yields, respectively with product ratios (420/421/422) of 60:4:36 and 58:4:38, respectively. The reaction of piperidine 416b with silyloxyfuran in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate, titanium(IV) chloride, and boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex in dichloromethane, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, and tetrahydrofuran-dichloromethane gave products 420 and 421 in 42-85% yields and with 420/421 product ratios of 52:48 to 67:33. The regioisomer 422 was not obtained from the reaction of piperidine 416b (Scheme [¹8²] ). [¹07]

Scheme 182
The reaction of chiral 2-methoxypiperidines 423a,b with 2-tert-butyldimethylsilyloxyfuran under titanium(IV) chloride or trimethylsilyl triflate catalysis provided the adducts 424a,b and 425a,b (Scheme [¹8³] ). Treatment of 423a with the silyloxyfuran in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride or trimethylsilyl triflate gave products 424a and 425a in 55% and 75% yields (424a/425a = 88:12). Reaction of 423b with the silyloxyfuran under trimethylsilyl triflate catalysis gave the adducts 424b and 425b in 73% yield, with a diastereomeric ratio of 67:33. [8³]

Scheme 183
The reaction of racemic 3-azido-2-methoxypiperidine 426 with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex provided the racemic 2-allylated piperidine 427 as a mixture of isomers with a cis/trans ratio of 88:12 in 50% yield (Scheme [¹84] ). [87] [88]

Scheme 184
Treatment of racemic piperidine 428 with silicon nucleophiles 195a, 211a and 429 in the presence of scandium(III) triflate in acetonitrile yielded products 430 in 89%, 92%, and 86% yields, respectively, and with cis/trans ratios of 52:48, 54:46 and 74:26, respectively. When the reaction of piperidine 428 with 211a and 429 was performed under boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex catalysis in acetonitrile, products 430 were obtained in yields of 92% and 79%, respectively, in favour of the cis isomer (cis/trans = 72:28 and 61:39, respectively). The use of dichloromethane as a solvent in the reaction of 428 with 195a and 211a resulted in 22% (cis/trans = 75:25) and 65% (cis/trans = 83:17) yields, respectively (Scheme [¹85] ). [¹06]

Scheme 185
The boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex mediated reaction of allyltrimethylsilane with resin-bound racemic piperidine 431 gave racemic 2,4-trans isomers 432 in 71-86% yields after they were cleaved from the resin (Scheme [¹86] ). Piperidine 431, where R² = Ph, was treated with CH2=C(Me)(CH2TMS) to afford the corresponding racemic 2,4-trans adduct exclusively in 76% yield. [¹08]

Scheme 186
N-tert-Butyloxycarbonyl-6-acetoxypiperidine 433 reacted with propargyltrimethylsilane under boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex catalysis to afford the allene 434 in 62% yield, in favour of the cis isomer (cis/trans = 80:20) (Scheme [¹87] ). [¹05]

Scheme 187
The reaction of bN-Boc piperidine 435 with a silyl dienol ether in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate yielded exclusively the 2,3-trans isomer of adduct 436 in 86% yield (Scheme [¹88] ). [¹09]

Scheme 188
The N-acyl piperidines 437a,b were treated with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give exclusively the corresponding 2,3-trans adducts 438a and 438b in 95% and 97% yields, respectively (Scheme [¹89] ). [¹¹0]

Scheme 189
Treatment of the N-Fmoc piperidine 439 with silicon nucleophiles in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex provided the products 440 and 441 in a range of yields (78-96%), with good 2,6-cis selectivity. The reaction of 439 with CH2=CHCH(TMS)(CH2)8Me afforded the corresponding 2,6-cis adduct exclusively (Scheme [¹90] ). [¹¹¹]

Scheme 190
3.3.2.1.2 Aromatic Nucleophiles
The treatment of polymer-bound racemic piperidine 431 with furan in the presence of camphorsulfonic acid provided the racemic 2-furylpiperidine adduct 442 exclusively in 54% yield (Scheme [¹9¹] ). [¹08]

Scheme 191
3.3.2.1.3 Organostannanes
Treatment of racemic piperidine 428 with allenyltributylstannane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex afforded product 443 in 67% yield, in favour of the 2,4-cis isomer (Scheme [¹9²] ). [¹06]

Scheme 192
The reaction of the N-Boc piperidine 444 with allyltributylstannane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex gave products 445 and 446 and one other isomer in a ratio of 89:7:4, respectively, and in combined yield of 72% (Scheme [¹9³] ). The third isomer was suggested to be the result of partial epimerisation of the stereocentre in the N-acyliminium ion intermediate. [¹¹²]

Scheme 193
3.3.2.1.4 Organometallic Reagents
The N-acyliminium ion 447, generated in situ from the corresponding carbamate by electrochemical oxidation, reacted with Grignard reagents in diethyl ether to afford the 2-substituted piperidine products 448 in 50-57% yields (Scheme [¹94] ). [³8]

Scheme 194
Piperidine 412 reacted with an in situ generated zinc alkynylide to give the corresponding propargylic adduct 449 in 40% yield (Scheme [¹95] ). [5²]

Scheme 195
The polymer-bound racemic piperidine 431 was treated with diethylzinc in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give the racemic 2,4-trans isomer 450 exclusively in 14% yield (Scheme [¹96] ). [¹08]

Scheme 196
The reaction of piperidines 439 with diethylzinc in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex yielded products 451 and 452 in 63% and 27% yields, respectively (Scheme [¹97] , equation 1). Treatment of 453, a diastereomer of piperidine 439, with diethylzinc under the same reaction conditions afforded products 454 and 455 in yields of 40% and 27%, respectively (Scheme [¹97] , equation 2). [¹¹¹]

Scheme 197
3.3.2.1.5 Carbonyl Compounds
The reaction of N-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-2-ethoxypiperidine (416a) with an N,O-silylketene acetal, itself prepared in situ by treatment of N-propionyloxazolidine-2-one 367 with trimethylsilyl triflate and triethylamine, led to the formation of 2-substituted piperidines 456 and 457 in 36% combined yield (456/457 = 67:33) (Scheme [¹98] ). [98]

Scheme 198
Treatment of the 2-methoxypiperidines 458a,b with the titanium enolate of 381a led to the formation of 459a and 459b in 62% and 58% yields, respectively (Scheme [¹99] ), whereas treatment of the N-Boc analogue of piperidine 458 with titanium enolate of 381a under the same reaction conditions did not give the desired product. [¹¹³]

Scheme 199
The titanium enolates of 373a-d reacted with the N-acyl piperidines 416a-c to afford the diastereomeric products 460 and 461 in 60-73% yields (Scheme [²00] ). [98]

Scheme 200
In the same study the piperidines 416a-c reacted with the titanium enolates of 378a,b to give the corresponding products 462 and 463 in 60-73% yields (Scheme [²0¹] ). [98]

Scheme 201
3.3.2.1.6 Alkyl Radicals
The N-acyliminium ion 447 was treated with heptyl iodide in the presence of hexabutyldistannane to give the 2-heptyl-N-acylpiperidine derivative 464 in 35% yield (Scheme [²0²] ). [4¹] [4²]

Scheme 202
3.3.2.1.7 Alkenes
Treatment of piperidine 439 with methylenecyclohexane under catalysis by tin(IV) bromide yielded the 2,6-cis adduct 465 and the 2,6-trans adduct 466 in 80% and 10% yields, respectively (Scheme [²0³] ). [¹¹¹]

Scheme 203
Treatment of N-Cbz-protected 2-methoxypiperidine 416b with cyclopentenone or cyclohexenone and dimethyl sulfide in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate led to the formation of products 468 in 75-90% yields. The use of a chiral sulfide 467 resulted in 49-88% yields and enantioselectivities of 94-98% ee (Scheme [²04] ). [¹¹4]

Scheme 204
3.3.2.1.8 Active Methylene Compounds
The indium(III) chloride catalysed reaction of piperidine 412 with acetylacetonate (R¹ = Me, R² = OEt), acetylacetone (R¹ = R² = Me), and diethyl malonate (R¹ = R² = OEt) provided the products 469 in 53%, 38%, and 53% yields, respectively (Scheme [²05] ). [8²a] The use of indium(IV) chloride in sodium dodecylsulfate and water has also been described for these reactions. [8²b]

Scheme 205
The N-acylpiperidines 470 reacted with 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds in the presence of copper(II) triflate and bisoxazoline ligand 471 to give products 472 in yields ranging from 16% to 78%. The highest enantioselectivity (97% ee) was obtained from the reaction of piperidine 470 (R¹ = 4-MeOC6H4) and di(4-chlorophenyl)malonate (Scheme [²06] ). [¹¹5]

Scheme 206
3.3.2.2 Cycloaddition Reactions
The reaction of piperidine 473 with diene 474 in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex afforded cycloadduct 475 in 53% yield (Scheme [²07] , equation 1). Treatment of piperidines 476a and 476b with diene 477 in the presence of scandium(III) triflate afforded the corresponding cycloadducts 478a and 478b in 60% and 41% yields, respectively. Cycloadduct 478b was obtained in 68% yield from the reaction of 476a with 477 under catalysis by boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex (Scheme [²07] , equation 2). [¹¹6]

Scheme 207
3.3.3 Reactions of Piperazine-Based N -Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.3.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
Diketopiperazine 479 reacted with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to afford products 480 and 481 in 64% and 8% yields, respectively. The same product ratio was obtained from the reactions of diastereomerically pure 3,6-trans and 3,6-cis piperazines 479 with allyltrimethylsilane (Scheme [²08] ). [¹¹7]

Scheme 208
The boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex catalysed reaction of 3-methoxy-1,4-dimethylpiperazine-2,5-dione (482a) with allyltrimethylsilane provided allylated product 483 in 68% yield, whereas 482b with allyltrimethylsilane under the same reaction conditions provided allylated product 483 and product 484 in 66% and 33% yields, respectively. Treatment of 482c with allyltrimethylsilane under the same reaction conditions gave exclusively product 484 in 76% yield (Scheme [²09] ). [48] [¹¹8]

Scheme 209
3.3.3.2 Aromatic Nucleophiles
Treatment of 482a with 2-methoxynaphthalene in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex gave the corresponding arylated product 485 in 81% yield (Scheme [²¹0] ). [48]

Scheme 210
3.3.4 Reactions of Pyridine-Based N -Acyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.4.1 Organometallic Reagents
The reaction of pyridine with acyl chlorides generated the N-acyliminium ion salt 486 which was then treated with an organoaluminium reagent to yield the corresponding adducts 487 in 90-94% yields (Scheme [²¹¹] ). [¹¹9]

Scheme 211
3.3.5 Reactions of N , O -Acetal Oxathiazinane N -Sulfonyliminium Ions with Nucleophiles
3.3.5.1 Organometallic Reagents
The reactions of N,O-acetal oxathiazinane 488 and related heterocycles with alkynylzinc reagents gave adducts 489 in high yields and high diastreoselectivities (Scheme [²¹²] ). [¹²0]

Scheme 212
3.4 Seven-Membered-Ring N -Acyliminium Ions
3.4.1 Reactions with Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
Treatment of the N-acyl-2-ethoxyazepines 490a-c with 2-silyloxyfurans 491a,b in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate afforded products 492, 493, and 494 in 46-83% yields (Scheme [²¹³] ). The reactions of azepines 490a-c with 491a in the presence of trimethylsilyl triflate afforded products 492 and 493 in ratios of 93:7, 85:15 and 80:20, respectively, while the reactions with 491b yielded products 492, 493, and 494 in ratios of 13:45:42, 6:52:42, and 30:70:0, respectively. The regioisomer 494 was not obtained from the reaction of 490a-c with 491a. [84]

Scheme 213
3.4.2 Cycloaddition Reactions
Azepine 495 reacted with diene 474 in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex to give cycloadduct 496 in 78% yield (Scheme [²¹4] ). [¹¹6]

Scheme 214
3.5 Bicyclic N -Acyliminium Ions
3.5.1 Reactions with Nucleophiles
3.5.1.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
Treatment of phthalimide 497 with silicon nucleophiles under triisopropylsilyl triflate catalysis afforded the desired products 498 in 45-89% yields (Scheme [²¹5] ). [54] In a similar study the phthalimide 497 reacted with CH2=C(OTIPS)CºCH (2 equiv) in the presence of bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (0.3 mol%) at room temperature under solvent-free conditions to give the corresponding α-substituted product in 82% yield. [6³]

Scheme 215
In the same study, the triisopropylsilyl triflate catalysed reactions of phthalimides 499 with 260 gave the products 500 and 501 in 45-76% yields and 13-17% yields, respectively (Scheme [²¹6] ). [54]

Scheme 216
Silicon nucleophiles reacted with phthalimide 502 in the presence of bismuth(III) triflate in acetonitrile to provide product 503 in yields of 64-84%. Lower yields were obtained when dichloromethane was used as a solvent (56-66%) (Scheme [²¹7] ). [6²]

Scheme 217
In the same study, chiral phthalimide 504 reacted with allyltrimethylsilane under bismuth(III) triflate catalysis to give product 505 in a trans/cis ratio of 75:25, and in 97% yield (Scheme [²¹8] ). [6²]

Scheme 218
Treatment of bicyclic imide 506 with sodium borohydride and then triethylsilane in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid afforded products 507 and 508 in 86% yield, in a 507/508 product ratio of 45:55 (Scheme [²¹9] ). [75]

Scheme 219
Isoquinoline derivative 509 reacted with silicon nucleophiles in an ionic liquid, BMI.InCl4, to give the corresponding α-substituted isoquinolines 510 in 78-89% yields (Scheme [²²0] ). [8¹]

Scheme 220
The zinc triflate mediated addition reactions of allyltrimethylsilane and 1-phenylvinyloxytrimethylsilane to the isoquinoline 509 led to the formation of the desired α-substituted adducts 510 in 72% and 80% yields, respectively (Scheme [²²¹] ). [5²]

Scheme 221
The reaction of 511 with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride afforded the desired α-allyl product 512 in 91% yield, as a single isomer. The stereochemistry of the product was suggested to be the result of exo-face attack on the intermediate N-acyliminium ion (Scheme [²²²] ). [¹²¹]

Scheme 222
The ring-opening reaction of tricyclic lactam 513a with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of titanium(IV) chloride, boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex, tin(IV) chloride and trimethylsilyl triflate yielded the allylated products 514 and 515 in 86% (514/515 = 50:50), 95% (514/515 = 61:39), 90% (514/515 = 60:40) and 90% (514/515 = 67:33) yields, respectively, in favour of product 514 (Scheme [²²³] ). Lactam 513b, however, afforded products 514b and 515b in a ratio of 2:98 and in 99% yield from the reaction with triethylsilane. [¹²²]

Scheme 223
In the same study, lactam 516 reacted with triethylsilane under catalysis by titanium(IV) chloride or trimethylsilyl triflate to provide 517 and 518 in a ratio of 98:2 and 80:20 and in 90% and 80% yields, respectively (Scheme [²²4] ). [¹²²]

Scheme 224
The reaction of tetraoxobispidine 519 with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex afforded product 520 as a single isomer in 77% yield. Treatment of 520 with lithium triethylborohydride and then allyltrimethylsilane under the same reaction conditions yielded the diallylated product 521 as a single isomer in 76% yield (Scheme [²²5] ). [¹²³]

Scheme 225
In a similar study, the boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex catalysed reactions of bispidine 522 with silicon nucleophiles yielded products 523 in yields of 70-90% (Scheme [²²6] ). [¹05]

Scheme 226
3.5.1.2 Organometallic Reagents
The addition reactions of in situ generated zinc alkynylides to isoquinoline derivative 509 gave the corresponding products 524 in yields of 60-69% (Scheme [²²7] ). [5²]

Scheme 227
The reaction of allylmagnesium bromide with a mixture of the α-methoxy and α-chloro benzamides 525 under boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex catalysis afforded the exo-allylated product 526 in 68% yield and also led to the removal of the N-benzoyl group (Scheme [²²8] ). [¹²¹]

Scheme 228
Treatment of the α-methoxy lactam 527 with an organocopper reagent, generated in situ from the corresponding Grignard reagent and copper(II) bromide-dimethyl sulfide complex, led to the formation of an 88:12 mixture of products 528 and 529 in 87% yield (Scheme [²²9] ). [¹²4]

Scheme 229
Treatment of 530 with 4-methoxybenzylmagnesium chloride under titanium(IV) chloride catalysis provided products 531 and 532 in a ratio of 55:45 and in 87% yield (Scheme [²³0] ). [¹²5]

Scheme 230
In the same study, compound 533 was treated with sodium cyanoborohydride in acetic acid to give the desired product 534 as a single isomer in 69% yield (Scheme [²³¹] ). [¹²4]

Scheme 231
The α-methoxy bispidine 535 underwent reaction with Grignard reagents to afford the corresponding α-substituted bispidines 536 in 61-89% yields (Scheme [²³²] ). [¹²6]

Scheme 232
Treatment of Grignard and zinc reagents with the chiral isoquinoline derivative 537 in the presence of Ph3C+BF4 - led to the formation of diastereomeric products 538 and 539 in 65-98% yields (Scheme [²³³] ). [¹²7]

Scheme 233
Treatment of quinolidine with acyl chlorides and then organoaluminium reagents gave products 540 in yields of 60-93% (Scheme [²³4] ). [¹¹9]

Scheme 234
Phthalimide 541 was treated with alkenylalanes, themselves generated by the hydrozirconation of alkynes and transmetallation to trimethylaluminium, to give products 542 in yields of 43-81% (Scheme [²³5] ). [¹²8]

Scheme 235
3.5.1.3 Enamines
Cyclic enamino ketones 543 reacted with N-acyliminium ion salts of 3,4-dihydroquinoline to provide the adducts 544 in 31-78% yields (Scheme [²³6] ). [¹²9]

Scheme 236
3.5.2 Cycloaddition Reactions
The [4+2]-cycloaddition reaction of phthalimide 545 with alkenes in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex led to the formation of cycloadducts 546 and 547 in yields of 45-94% as mixtures of cis and trans products in different ratios (Scheme [²³7] ). [¹³0]

Scheme 237
3.6 Other Systems
3.6.1 Silicon-Based Nucleophiles
The addition reaction of silicon nucleophiles to α-hydroxylactam 548 in the presence of boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex or titanium(IV) chloride yielded the α-substituted products 549 in yields of 69-95% (Scheme [²³8] ). [¹³¹]

Scheme 238
4 Stereochemical Outcomes
A recent paper by Woerpel [¹³²] on the stereochemical outcomes of the additions of nucleophiles to five-membered oxocarbenium ion intermediates are of relevance to our discussion here on the reactions of related five-membered-ring iminium ion intermediates. Woerpel has shown that the allylation reaction of dihydrofuran derivative 550 was cis selective (Scheme [²³9] ).

Scheme 239
This stereochemical outcome was consistent with nucleophilic attack on the oxocarbenium ion envelope conformation A from the ‘inside’ rather than on conformation B. Attack from the ‘inside’ gives rise to a more stable staggered product rather than an eclipsed product. Addition to the pseudo-equatorial conformation A is favoured over B due to stabilisation of the developing s* orbital at C-2 by the pseudo-axial sC-H orbital at C-3 (Cieplak effect). [¹³³] The sC-H bond is a better electron donor (more electron-rich) than the sC-OBu bond (Scheme [²40] ).

Scheme 240
A similar analysis on related five-membered-ring cyclic iminium ion intermediates is further complicated by the extra exocyclic or endocyclic carbonyl group, which further flattens the envelope conformation in the latter system. The N-substituent and its conformational preferences must also be considered in the latter. From a survey of the reactions in Section 3.2.1, it is clear that the nature of the O-substituent (OAc, OBn, OTBS), the N-substituent (NH, NBn, NPMB, N-allyl), the nucleophile and the Lewis acid can affect the diastereoselectivity and 4,5-cis to 4,5-trans selectivity. The examples that highlight the difference between a 4-OAc and 4-OTBS substituent in the N-unsubstituted case are shown in Scheme [²4¹] .

Scheme 241
Both reactions are highly diastereoselective; however, they show opposite trans/cis selectivity. The OAc derivative favours the 4,5-trans adduct while the OTBS derivative favours the 4,5-cis adduct. Thus, the OTBS derivative behaves similarly to the dihydrofuran 548 (Scheme [²³9] ) in its cis selectivity (Scheme [²4¹] ). Indeed, the reactive envelope conformation C with the OTBS group (R² = TBS) in the favourable pseudo-equatorial orientation (Cieplak effect), can be invoked to explain this cis selectivity. The trans selectivity in the case of the OAc derivative can be rationalised by the neighbouring-group participation of the OAc group to give the bridged bicyclic cationic intermediate E. SN2-like attack on this intermediate would provide the trans adduct (Scheme [²4²] ).

Scheme 242
In the case of the allylation reaction of the related N-substituted pyrrolidinones, [54] the same reverse-sense trans/cis selectivity is observed between 4-OAc and 4-OTBS derivatives; however, the diastereoselectivity is considerably reduced (Scheme [²4³] ). Clearly the N-substituent is responsible for this erosion of diastereoselectivity. The influence of the N-substituent in the reactions of N-heterocyclic compounds has been well documented. [¹³4] [¹³5]

Scheme 243
This trans/cis selectivity is also dependent upon the nucleophile, as illustrated in Scheme [²44] , in which the 4-OAc and 4-OTBS derivatives both favour formation of the trans adduct. It is possible that these reactions are under thermodynamic control.

Scheme 244
Titanium enolates are highly trans selective on 4-OTBS pyrrolidinone derivatives (Scheme 115). The addition of boronic acids to 4-OBn substituted pyrrolidinones are also trans selective (Schemes 111 and 112).
The reaction of 3,4-disubstituted pyrrolidinones 552 (R³ ¹ Ac) often gave 4,5-cis adducts (R4 = H) with high diastereoselectivities (Schemes 92, 93, 101, 102, and 103). 5,5-Disubstituted derivatives (R³ ¹ Ac, R4 ¹ H) gave products from nucleophilic addition cis to the C-4 OR³ group (Schemes 89, 94, and 105). This can be attributed to the effect of the C-4 OR³ group (Cieplak effect). In the cases where the C-3 and C-4 groups are acetate, a neighbouring-group effect by the C-3 acetate has been suggested to explain the 4,5-cis selectivity (Scheme [²45] ). [79]

Scheme 245
In the case of the aminals 229, reduction with triethylsilane and boron trifluoride-diethyl ether complex gave the 3,5-cis adducts (Scheme [²46] ).

Scheme 246
In related oxocarbenium ions, the OR¹ substituent favoured the pseudo-axial orientation to help stabilise the cationic carbon of the oxocarbenium ion. A similar effect may be possible in conformation F; however, the OR¹ group may sterically impede the hydride nucleophile from attacking. In conformation F, 1,3-allylic strain may project the N-benzyl group to the β-face of the iminium ion thus more effectively blocking the face to nucleophilic attack. [65]
From a survey of the reactions in Section 3.2 on N-acylpyrrolidines, it is clear that 2,3-trans products are normally favoured in the case where the 3-substituent is I (Schemes [¹³¹] and [¹6²] ), NHCO2R (Scheme [¹³¹] ), alkyl (Scheme [¹47] ), aryl (Scheme [¹47] ) or allyl (Scheme [¹³4] ). The exceptions are when the 3-substituent is OH or N3, wherein cis products are formed almost exclusively (Schemes [¹46] and [¹³¹] , respectively). When the 3-substituent is I or NHCO2R, neighbouring-group participation can be used to explain the trans selectivity (compare with Scheme [²4¹] ). When the C-3 substituent is OH, formation of a boronate intermediate can be invoked to explain the high cis selectivity as reported in Scheme [¹46] . When the C-3 substituent is alkyl or N3, steric and stereoelectronic arguments can be used to account for the stereoselectivities (Scheme [²47] ).

Scheme 247
Because the hyperconjugative donating ability of a sC-H bond is similar to that of a sC-C bond, there would be little difference in electronic stabilisation of the transition states involving attack from the ‘inside’ on the pseudo-equatorial or pseudo-axial conformations H (X = alkyl) or I (Y = alkyl). Attack on conformation H, however, would result in unfavourable gauche butane interactions between the Nu and the X group, and thus attack would be expected to occur on compound I to give the trans product. When the C-3 substituent is N3 then attack on conformation H would be favoured stereoelectronically since the C-3 sC-H bond is a much stronger electron donor than the sC-N3 bond. Steric considerations are not important with the relatively smaller N3 group.
Iminium ions generated from 4-substituted N-acylpyrrolidines give 2,4-cis products (Schemes [¹²9] and [¹³³] ). A reactive conformation analogous to F (Scheme [²46] ) can explain the stereochemical outcome.
In general, reactions on the corresponding six-membered-ring N-acyliminium ion analogues have been less studied and often proceed with poorer diastereoselectivity. The stereochemical outcomes of the major products can often be rationalised as arising from axial attacks on a half-chair conformation. [¹³4a] [¹³5]
5 Conclusions
The intermolecular addition reactions of N-acyliminium ions have been a major area of investigation by synthetic chemists over the past eight years. New methods to generate these cationic intermediates have been developed, including the use of new Lewis acid catalysts, polymer-supported precursors and electrochemical methods. The latter method has been successfully extended to peptide systems and can be used to prepare N-acyliminium ions in the absence of a nucleophile.
The reactions of N-acyliminium ions include the addition of nucleophiles, especially silicon-based ones, cycloaddition reactions, free-radical additions and nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions. These latter reactions can be more selectively and efficiently performed using a micromixer. The applications of these methods to the synthesis of peptides, natural products and new pharmaceutical drugs will continue to grow over the next decade.
Acknowledgment
We thank the Australian Research Council for supporting our research in this area.
- 1 For Part I, see:
Yazici A.Pyne SG. Synthesis 2009, 339 - 2
Speckamp WN.Moolenaar MJ. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 3817 - 3
Maryanoff BE.Zhang HC.Cohen JH.Turchi IJ.Maryanoff CA. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104: 1431 - 4
Petrini M.Torregiani E. Synthesis 2007, 159 - 5
van Maarseveen JH.Meester WJN.Veerman JJN.Kruse CG.Hermkens PHH.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 994 - 6
Meester WJN.van Maarseveen JH.Kirchsteiger K.Hermkens PHH.Schoemaker HE.Hiemstra H.Rutjes FPJT. ARKIVOC 2004, (ii): 122 - 7
Suga S.Nagaki A.Yoshida J.-i. Chem. Commun. 2003, 354 - 8
Suga S.Tsutsui Y.Nagaki A.Yoshida J.-i. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78: 1206 - 9
Nagaki A.Togai M.Suga S.Aoki N.Mae K.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 11666 - 10
Petrini M.Torregiani E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 5999 - 11
Bergeot O.Corsi C.Qacemi ME.Zard SZ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4: 278 - 12
Mecozzi T.Petrini M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64: 8970 - 13
Pearson WH.Lindbeck AC.Kampf JW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115: 2622 - 14
Katritzky AR.Urogdi L.Mayence A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55: 2206 - 15
Katritzky AR.Manju K.Singh SK.Meher NK. Tetrahedron 2005, 61 2555 - 16
Shono T.Matsumura Y.Tsubata K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103: 1172 - 17
Chevallier F.Beaudet I.Le Grognec E.Toupet L.Quintard J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 761 - 18
Marshall JA.Gill K.Seletsky BM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39: 953 - 19
Wang D.-H.Hao X.-S.Wu D.-F.Yu J.-Q. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3387 - 20
Suh Y.-G.Shin D.-Y.Jung J.-K.Kim S.-H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1064 - 21
DeNinno MP.Eller C.Etienne JB. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 6988 - 22
Yaouancq L.Rene L.Dau M.-ETH.Badet B. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 76: 5408 - 23
Wim JN.van Dijk R.van Maarseveen JH.Rutjes FPJT.Hermkens PHH.Hiemstra H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2909 - 24
Sun H.Martin C.Kesselring D.Keller R.Moeller KD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128: 13761 - 25
Suga S.Nishida T.Yamada D.Nagaki A.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 14338 - 26
Nilson MG.Funk RL. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3833 - 27
Sun H.Moeller KD. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 3189 - 28
Sun H.Moeller KD. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 1547 - 29
Sugiura M.Hagio H.Hirabayashi R.Kobayashi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123: 12510 - 30a
Mentink G.Van Maarseveen JH.Hiemstra H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 3497 - 30b
Berkheij M.Dijkink J.David ORP.Sonke T.Ijzendoorn DR.Blaauw RH.Van Maarseveen JH.Schoemaker HE.Hiemstra H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 914 - 31
Giardina A.Mecozzi T.Petrini M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 8277 - 32
Shin D.-Y.Jung J.-K.Seo S.-Y.Lee Y.-S.Paek S.-M.Chung YK.Shin DM.Suh Y.-G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 3635 - 33
Marcantoni E.Mecozzi T.Petrini M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 2989 - 34
Ballini R.Palmeieri A.Petrini M.Torregiani E. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 4093 - 35
Kuhakarn C.Tangdenpaisal K.Kongsaeree P.Prabpai S.Tuchinda P.Pohmakotr M.Reutrakul V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 2467 - 36
Zhang Y.DeSchepper DJ.Gilbert TM.Kumar KSS.Klumpp DA. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4032 - 37
Mecozzi T.Petrini M.Profeta R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14: 1171 - 38
Suga S.Okajima M.Yoshida J.-i. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 2173 - 39
Roy B.Perez-Luna A.Ferreira F.Botuha C.Chemla F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 1534 - 40
Nagaki A.Kawamura K.Suga S.Ando T.Sawamoto M.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 14702 - 41
Maruyama T.Suga S.Yoshida J.-i. Tetrahedron 2006, 62: 6519 - 42
Maruyama T.Suga S.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 7324 - 43
Suga S.Nagaki A.Tsutsui Y.Yoshida J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 945 - 44
Suga S.Kageyama Y.Babu G.Itami K.Yoshida J.-I. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 2709 - 45
Koseki Y.Kusano S.Ichi D.Yoshida K.Nagasaka T. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 8855 - 46
Boto A.Hernandez R.Suarez E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 4930 - 47
Boto A.Hernandez R.Suarez E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 2899 - 48
Chai CLL.Elix JA.Huleatt PB. Tetrahedron 2005, 61: 8722 - 49
Kim S.Hayashi K.Kitano Y.Tada M.Chiba K. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 3735 - 50
Maruyama T.Mizuno Y.Shimizu I.Suga S.Yoshida J.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129: 1902 - 51
Karstens WFJ.Klomp D.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57: 5123 - 52
Ronaldo A.Robello LG. Synlett 2005, 2297 - 53
Godfrey CRA.Simpkins NS.Walker MD. Synlett 2000, 388 - 54
Ben Othman R.Bousquet T.Fousse A.Othman M.Dalla V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 2825 - 55
Ben Othman R.Bousquet T.Othman M.Dalla V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 5335 - 56
Baussanne I.Chiaroni A.Royer J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12: 1219 - 57
Kende AS.Hernando J. I. M.Milbank JBJ. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 61 - 58
Kende AS.Hernando JI. M.Milbank JB. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 2505 - 59
Oba M.Mita A.Kondo Y.Nishiyama K. Synth. Commun. 2005, 35: 2961 - 60
Lennartz M.Steckhan E. Synlett 2000, 319 - 61
Andrade CKZ.Rocha RO.Russowsky D.Godoy MN. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2005, 16: 535 - 62
Pin F.Comesse S.Garrigues B.Marchalin S.Daiech A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72: 1181 - 63
Tranchant M.-J.Moine C.Ben Othman R.Bousquet T.Othman M.Dalla V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 4477 - 64a
Morgan IR.Yazici A.Pyne SG. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 1409 - 64b
Unpublished results from these laboratories.
- 65a
Zhou X.Liu W.-J.Ye J.-L.Huang P.-Q. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72: 8904 - 65b
Zhou X.Huang P.-Q. Synlett 2006, 1235 - 66
Dai C.-F.Cheng F.Xu H.-C.Ruan Y.-P.Huang P.-Q. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9: 386 - 67
Jeong HJ.Lee JM.Kim MK.Lee S.-G. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2002, 39: 1019 - 68
Schuch CM.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13: 1973 - 69
Huang J.-M.Hong S.-C.Wu K.-L.Tsai Y.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 3047 - 70
Klitzke CF.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 5605 - 71
O ba M.Koguchi S.Nishiyama K. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 9359 - 72
Zhou X.Liu W.-J.Ye J.-L.Huang P.-Q. Tetrahedron 2007, 63: 6346 - 73
Schuch CM.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11: 753 - 74
Muramatsu T.Yamashita S.Nakamura Y.Suzuki M.Mase N.Yoda H.Takabe K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 8956 - 75
Ostendorf M.Dijkink J.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 115 - 76
Yoda H.Egawa T.Takabe K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 1643 - 77
Washburn DG.Heidebrecht R.Martin SF. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 3523 - 78
Huang P.-Q.Tang X.Chen AQ. Synth. Commun. 2000, 30: 2259 - 79
Vieira AS.Ferreira FP.Fiorante PF.Guadagnin RC.Stefani HA. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 3306 - 80
Morgan IR.Yazici A.Pyne SG.Skelton BW. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73: 2943 - 81
Pilli RA.Robello LG.Camilo NS.Dupont J.Lapis AAM.Da Silveira N.Brenno A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 1669 - 82a
de Godoy LAF.Camilo NS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 7853 - 82b
Camilo NS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 2821 - 83
D’Oca MGM.Pilli RA.Vencato I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 9709 - 84
de Oliveira MDCVF.Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6995 - 85
Coleman RS.Chen W. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 1141 - 86
Onomura O.Kirira PG.Tanaka T.Tsukada S.Matsumura Y.Demizu Y. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 7498 - 87
Norton Matos M.Afonso CAM.Batey RA. Tetrahedron 2005, 61: 1221 - 88
Norton Matos MRP.Afonso CAM.Batey RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 7007 - 89
Conchon E.Gelas-Mialhe Y.Remuson R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17: 1253 - 90
Boto A.Hernandez R.Suarez E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 2495 - 91
Barnes DM.Bhagavatula L.DeMattei J.Gupta A.Hill DR.Manna S.McLaughlin MA.Nichols P.Premchandran R.Rasmussen MW.Tian Z.Wittenberger SJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14: 3541 - 92
de Armas P.Garcia-Tellado F.Marrero-Tellado JJ. Org. Lett. 2000, 2: 3513 - 93
Coleman RS.Felpin F.-X.Chen W. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69: 7309 - 94
Zhang J.Wei C.Li C.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 5731 - 95a
Batey RA.MacKay DB.Santhakumar V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121: 5075 - 95b
Batey RA.MacKay DB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 9935 - 96
Buezo ND.Jimenez A.Pedregal C.Vidal P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 2489 - 97
Duan S.Moeller KD. Tetrahedron 2001, 57: 6407 - 98
Pilli RA.Bockelmann MA.Alves C. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2001, 12: 634 - 99
Reichelt A.Bur SK.Martin SF. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 6323 - 100
Pereira E.Alves C.Bockelmann MA.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 2691 - 101
Cooke JWB.Berry MB.Caine DM.Cardwell KS.Cook JS.Hodgson A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 334 - 102
Schierle-Arndt K.Kolter D.Danielmeier K.Steckhan E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2425 - 103
Zelgert M.Nieger M.Lennartz M.Steckhan E. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 2641 - 104
Overman LE.Wolfe JP. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 3167 - 105
Guo C.Reich S.Showalter R.Villafranca E.Dong L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 5307 - 106
Vink MKS.Schortinghuis CA.Luten J.Van Maarseveen JH.Schoemaker HE.Hiemstra H.Rutjes FPJT. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 7869 - 107
Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6999 - 108
Veerman JJN.Klein J.Aben RWM.Scheeren HW.Kruse ChG.Van Maarseveen JH.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3133 - 109
Maldaner AO.Pilli RA. Synlett 2004, 1343 - 110
Wijdeven MA.Botman PNM.Wijtmans R.Schoemaker HE.Rutjes FPJT.Blaauw RH. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 4005 - 111
Dransfield PJ.Gore PM.Prokes I.Shipman M.Slawin AMZ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1: 2723 - 112
Maldaner AO.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 7843 - 113
Pilli RA.Zanotto PR.Bockelmann MA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 7003 - 114
Myers EL.de Vries JG.Aggarwal VK. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 1893 - 115
Matsumura Y.Minato D.Onomura O. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692: 654 - 116
O’Connor PD.Korber K.Brimble MA. Synlett 2008, 1036 - 117
Bull SD.Davies SG.Garner AC.O’Shea MD.Savory ED.Snow EJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2442 - 118
Chai CLL.Elix JA.Huleatt PB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 263 - 119
Signore G.M .C .Menicagli R. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 197 - 120
Fleming JJ.Fiori KW.Bois JD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 2028 - 121
Han G.LaPorte MG.Folmer JJ.Werner KM.Weinreb SM. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 6293 - 122
Allin SM.Northfield CJ.Page MI.Slawin AMZ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1715 - 123
Blakemore PR.Norcros NR.Warriner SL.Astles PC. Heterocycles 2006, 70: 609 - 124
Sun P.Sun C.Weinreb SM. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 4337 - 125
Kropf JE.Meigh IC.Bebbington MWP.Weinreb SM. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71: 2046 - 126
Harrison JR.O’Brien P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 6167 - 127
Ludwig M.Polborn K.Wanner KT. Heterocycles 2003, 61: 299 - 128
Pierce JG.Waller DL.Wipf P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692: 4618 - 129
Statkova-Abeghe S.Angelov PA.Ivanov I.Nikolova S.Kochovska E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 6674 - 130
Zhang W.Zheng A.Liu Z.Yang L.Liu Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 5691 - 131
Osante I.Lete E.Sotomayor N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 1253 - 132
Larsen CH.Ridgway BH.Shaw JT.Smith DM.Woerpel KA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 10879 - 133
Cieplak AS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103: 4540 - 134a
Stevens RV. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17: 289 - 134b
Bull SD.Davies SG.Fox DJ.Sellers TGR. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9: 1483 - 134c
Hopman JCP.van den Berg E.Ollero O.Hiemstra H.Speckamp WN. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 36: 4315 - 134d
Craig D.McCague R.Potter GA.Williams MRV. Synlett 1998, 55 - 135
Huang P.-Q. Synlett 2006, 1133
References
- 1 For Part I, see:
Yazici A.Pyne SG. Synthesis 2009, 339 - 2
Speckamp WN.Moolenaar MJ. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 3817 - 3
Maryanoff BE.Zhang HC.Cohen JH.Turchi IJ.Maryanoff CA. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104: 1431 - 4
Petrini M.Torregiani E. Synthesis 2007, 159 - 5
van Maarseveen JH.Meester WJN.Veerman JJN.Kruse CG.Hermkens PHH.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 994 - 6
Meester WJN.van Maarseveen JH.Kirchsteiger K.Hermkens PHH.Schoemaker HE.Hiemstra H.Rutjes FPJT. ARKIVOC 2004, (ii): 122 - 7
Suga S.Nagaki A.Yoshida J.-i. Chem. Commun. 2003, 354 - 8
Suga S.Tsutsui Y.Nagaki A.Yoshida J.-i. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78: 1206 - 9
Nagaki A.Togai M.Suga S.Aoki N.Mae K.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 11666 - 10
Petrini M.Torregiani E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 5999 - 11
Bergeot O.Corsi C.Qacemi ME.Zard SZ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4: 278 - 12
Mecozzi T.Petrini M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64: 8970 - 13
Pearson WH.Lindbeck AC.Kampf JW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115: 2622 - 14
Katritzky AR.Urogdi L.Mayence A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55: 2206 - 15
Katritzky AR.Manju K.Singh SK.Meher NK. Tetrahedron 2005, 61 2555 - 16
Shono T.Matsumura Y.Tsubata K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103: 1172 - 17
Chevallier F.Beaudet I.Le Grognec E.Toupet L.Quintard J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 761 - 18
Marshall JA.Gill K.Seletsky BM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39: 953 - 19
Wang D.-H.Hao X.-S.Wu D.-F.Yu J.-Q. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3387 - 20
Suh Y.-G.Shin D.-Y.Jung J.-K.Kim S.-H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1064 - 21
DeNinno MP.Eller C.Etienne JB. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 6988 - 22
Yaouancq L.Rene L.Dau M.-ETH.Badet B. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 76: 5408 - 23
Wim JN.van Dijk R.van Maarseveen JH.Rutjes FPJT.Hermkens PHH.Hiemstra H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2909 - 24
Sun H.Martin C.Kesselring D.Keller R.Moeller KD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128: 13761 - 25
Suga S.Nishida T.Yamada D.Nagaki A.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 14338 - 26
Nilson MG.Funk RL. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 3833 - 27
Sun H.Moeller KD. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 3189 - 28
Sun H.Moeller KD. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 1547 - 29
Sugiura M.Hagio H.Hirabayashi R.Kobayashi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123: 12510 - 30a
Mentink G.Van Maarseveen JH.Hiemstra H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 3497 - 30b
Berkheij M.Dijkink J.David ORP.Sonke T.Ijzendoorn DR.Blaauw RH.Van Maarseveen JH.Schoemaker HE.Hiemstra H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 914 - 31
Giardina A.Mecozzi T.Petrini M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 8277 - 32
Shin D.-Y.Jung J.-K.Seo S.-Y.Lee Y.-S.Paek S.-M.Chung YK.Shin DM.Suh Y.-G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 3635 - 33
Marcantoni E.Mecozzi T.Petrini M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 2989 - 34
Ballini R.Palmeieri A.Petrini M.Torregiani E. Org. Lett. 2006, 8: 4093 - 35
Kuhakarn C.Tangdenpaisal K.Kongsaeree P.Prabpai S.Tuchinda P.Pohmakotr M.Reutrakul V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 2467 - 36
Zhang Y.DeSchepper DJ.Gilbert TM.Kumar KSS.Klumpp DA. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4032 - 37
Mecozzi T.Petrini M.Profeta R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14: 1171 - 38
Suga S.Okajima M.Yoshida J.-i. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 2173 - 39
Roy B.Perez-Luna A.Ferreira F.Botuha C.Chemla F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49: 1534 - 40
Nagaki A.Kawamura K.Suga S.Ando T.Sawamoto M.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 14702 - 41
Maruyama T.Suga S.Yoshida J.-i. Tetrahedron 2006, 62: 6519 - 42
Maruyama T.Suga S.Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 7324 - 43
Suga S.Nagaki A.Tsutsui Y.Yoshida J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 945 - 44
Suga S.Kageyama Y.Babu G.Itami K.Yoshida J.-I. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 2709 - 45
Koseki Y.Kusano S.Ichi D.Yoshida K.Nagasaka T. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 8855 - 46
Boto A.Hernandez R.Suarez E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 4930 - 47
Boto A.Hernandez R.Suarez E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 2899 - 48
Chai CLL.Elix JA.Huleatt PB. Tetrahedron 2005, 61: 8722 - 49
Kim S.Hayashi K.Kitano Y.Tada M.Chiba K. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 3735 - 50
Maruyama T.Mizuno Y.Shimizu I.Suga S.Yoshida J.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129: 1902 - 51
Karstens WFJ.Klomp D.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57: 5123 - 52
Ronaldo A.Robello LG. Synlett 2005, 2297 - 53
Godfrey CRA.Simpkins NS.Walker MD. Synlett 2000, 388 - 54
Ben Othman R.Bousquet T.Fousse A.Othman M.Dalla V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 2825 - 55
Ben Othman R.Bousquet T.Othman M.Dalla V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 5335 - 56
Baussanne I.Chiaroni A.Royer J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12: 1219 - 57
Kende AS.Hernando J. I. M.Milbank JBJ. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 61 - 58
Kende AS.Hernando JI. M.Milbank JB. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 2505 - 59
Oba M.Mita A.Kondo Y.Nishiyama K. Synth. Commun. 2005, 35: 2961 - 60
Lennartz M.Steckhan E. Synlett 2000, 319 - 61
Andrade CKZ.Rocha RO.Russowsky D.Godoy MN. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2005, 16: 535 - 62
Pin F.Comesse S.Garrigues B.Marchalin S.Daiech A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72: 1181 - 63
Tranchant M.-J.Moine C.Ben Othman R.Bousquet T.Othman M.Dalla V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 4477 - 64a
Morgan IR.Yazici A.Pyne SG. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 1409 - 64b
Unpublished results from these laboratories.
- 65a
Zhou X.Liu W.-J.Ye J.-L.Huang P.-Q. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72: 8904 - 65b
Zhou X.Huang P.-Q. Synlett 2006, 1235 - 66
Dai C.-F.Cheng F.Xu H.-C.Ruan Y.-P.Huang P.-Q. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9: 386 - 67
Jeong HJ.Lee JM.Kim MK.Lee S.-G. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2002, 39: 1019 - 68
Schuch CM.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13: 1973 - 69
Huang J.-M.Hong S.-C.Wu K.-L.Tsai Y.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 3047 - 70
Klitzke CF.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 5605 - 71
O ba M.Koguchi S.Nishiyama K. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 9359 - 72
Zhou X.Liu W.-J.Ye J.-L.Huang P.-Q. Tetrahedron 2007, 63: 6346 - 73
Schuch CM.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11: 753 - 74
Muramatsu T.Yamashita S.Nakamura Y.Suzuki M.Mase N.Yoda H.Takabe K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 8956 - 75
Ostendorf M.Dijkink J.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 115 - 76
Yoda H.Egawa T.Takabe K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 1643 - 77
Washburn DG.Heidebrecht R.Martin SF. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 3523 - 78
Huang P.-Q.Tang X.Chen AQ. Synth. Commun. 2000, 30: 2259 - 79
Vieira AS.Ferreira FP.Fiorante PF.Guadagnin RC.Stefani HA. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 3306 - 80
Morgan IR.Yazici A.Pyne SG.Skelton BW. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73: 2943 - 81
Pilli RA.Robello LG.Camilo NS.Dupont J.Lapis AAM.Da Silveira N.Brenno A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 1669 - 82a
de Godoy LAF.Camilo NS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 7853 - 82b
Camilo NS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 2821 - 83
D’Oca MGM.Pilli RA.Vencato I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 9709 - 84
de Oliveira MDCVF.Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6995 - 85
Coleman RS.Chen W. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 1141 - 86
Onomura O.Kirira PG.Tanaka T.Tsukada S.Matsumura Y.Demizu Y. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 7498 - 87
Norton Matos M.Afonso CAM.Batey RA. Tetrahedron 2005, 61: 1221 - 88
Norton Matos MRP.Afonso CAM.Batey RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 7007 - 89
Conchon E.Gelas-Mialhe Y.Remuson R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17: 1253 - 90
Boto A.Hernandez R.Suarez E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 2495 - 91
Barnes DM.Bhagavatula L.DeMattei J.Gupta A.Hill DR.Manna S.McLaughlin MA.Nichols P.Premchandran R.Rasmussen MW.Tian Z.Wittenberger SJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14: 3541 - 92
de Armas P.Garcia-Tellado F.Marrero-Tellado JJ. Org. Lett. 2000, 2: 3513 - 93
Coleman RS.Felpin F.-X.Chen W. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69: 7309 - 94
Zhang J.Wei C.Li C.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 5731 - 95a
Batey RA.MacKay DB.Santhakumar V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121: 5075 - 95b
Batey RA.MacKay DB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 9935 - 96
Buezo ND.Jimenez A.Pedregal C.Vidal P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 2489 - 97
Duan S.Moeller KD. Tetrahedron 2001, 57: 6407 - 98
Pilli RA.Bockelmann MA.Alves C. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2001, 12: 634 - 99
Reichelt A.Bur SK.Martin SF. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 6323 - 100
Pereira E.Alves C.Bockelmann MA.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 2691 - 101
Cooke JWB.Berry MB.Caine DM.Cardwell KS.Cook JS.Hodgson A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 334 - 102
Schierle-Arndt K.Kolter D.Danielmeier K.Steckhan E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2425 - 103
Zelgert M.Nieger M.Lennartz M.Steckhan E. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 2641 - 104
Overman LE.Wolfe JP. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 3167 - 105
Guo C.Reich S.Showalter R.Villafranca E.Dong L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 5307 - 106
Vink MKS.Schortinghuis CA.Luten J.Van Maarseveen JH.Schoemaker HE.Hiemstra H.Rutjes FPJT. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 7869 - 107
Santos LS.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 6999 - 108
Veerman JJN.Klein J.Aben RWM.Scheeren HW.Kruse ChG.Van Maarseveen JH.Rutjes FPJT.Hiemstra H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3133 - 109
Maldaner AO.Pilli RA. Synlett 2004, 1343 - 110
Wijdeven MA.Botman PNM.Wijtmans R.Schoemaker HE.Rutjes FPJT.Blaauw RH. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 4005 - 111
Dransfield PJ.Gore PM.Prokes I.Shipman M.Slawin AMZ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1: 2723 - 112
Maldaner AO.Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 7843 - 113
Pilli RA.Zanotto PR.Bockelmann MA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 7003 - 114
Myers EL.de Vries JG.Aggarwal VK. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46: 1893 - 115
Matsumura Y.Minato D.Onomura O. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692: 654 - 116
O’Connor PD.Korber K.Brimble MA. Synlett 2008, 1036 - 117
Bull SD.Davies SG.Garner AC.O’Shea MD.Savory ED.Snow EJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2442 - 118
Chai CLL.Elix JA.Huleatt PB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 263 - 119
Signore G.M .C .Menicagli R. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 197 - 120
Fleming JJ.Fiori KW.Bois JD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 2028 - 121
Han G.LaPorte MG.Folmer JJ.Werner KM.Weinreb SM. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 6293 - 122
Allin SM.Northfield CJ.Page MI.Slawin AMZ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1715 - 123
Blakemore PR.Norcros NR.Warriner SL.Astles PC. Heterocycles 2006, 70: 609 - 124
Sun P.Sun C.Weinreb SM. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 4337 - 125
Kropf JE.Meigh IC.Bebbington MWP.Weinreb SM. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71: 2046 - 126
Harrison JR.O’Brien P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 6167 - 127
Ludwig M.Polborn K.Wanner KT. Heterocycles 2003, 61: 299 - 128
Pierce JG.Waller DL.Wipf P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692: 4618 - 129
Statkova-Abeghe S.Angelov PA.Ivanov I.Nikolova S.Kochovska E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 6674 - 130
Zhang W.Zheng A.Liu Z.Yang L.Liu Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 5691 - 131
Osante I.Lete E.Sotomayor N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 1253 - 132
Larsen CH.Ridgway BH.Shaw JT.Smith DM.Woerpel KA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 10879 - 133
Cieplak AS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103: 4540 - 134a
Stevens RV. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17: 289 - 134b
Bull SD.Davies SG.Fox DJ.Sellers TGR. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9: 1483 - 134c
Hopman JCP.van den Berg E.Ollero O.Hiemstra H.Speckamp WN. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 36: 4315 - 134d
Craig D.McCague R.Potter GA.Williams MRV. Synlett 1998, 55 - 135
Huang P.-Q. Synlett 2006, 1133
References

Scheme 117

Scheme 118

Scheme 119

Scheme 120

Scheme 121

Scheme 122

Scheme 123

Scheme 124

Scheme 125

Scheme 126

Scheme 127

Scheme 128

Scheme 129

Scheme 130

Scheme 131

Scheme 132

Scheme 133

Scheme 134

Scheme 135

Scheme 136

Scheme 137

Scheme 138

Scheme 139

Scheme 140

Scheme 141

Scheme 142

Scheme 143

Scheme 144

Scheme 145

Scheme 146

Scheme 147

Scheme 148

Scheme 149

Scheme 150

Scheme 151

Scheme 152

Scheme 153

Scheme 154

Scheme 155

Scheme 156

Scheme 157

Scheme 158

Scheme 159

Scheme 160

Scheme 161

Scheme 162

Scheme 163

Scheme 164

Scheme 165

Scheme 166

Scheme 167

Scheme 168

Scheme 169

Scheme 170

Scheme 171

Scheme 172

Scheme 173

Scheme 174

Scheme 175

Scheme 176

Scheme 177

Scheme 178

Scheme 179

Scheme 180

Scheme 181

Scheme 182

Scheme 183

Scheme 184

Scheme 185

Scheme 186

Scheme 187

Scheme 188

Scheme 189

Scheme 190

Scheme 191

Scheme 192

Scheme 193

Scheme 194

Scheme 195

Scheme 196

Scheme 197

Scheme 198

Scheme 199

Scheme 200

Scheme 201

Scheme 202

Scheme 203

Scheme 204

Scheme 205

Scheme 206

Scheme 207

Scheme 208

Scheme 209

Scheme 210

Scheme 211

Scheme 212

Scheme 213

Scheme 214

Scheme 215

Scheme 216

Scheme 217

Scheme 218

Scheme 219

Scheme 220

Scheme 221

Scheme 222

Scheme 223

Scheme 224

Scheme 225

Scheme 226

Scheme 227

Scheme 228

Scheme 229

Scheme 230

Scheme 231

Scheme 232

Scheme 233

Scheme 234

Scheme 235

Scheme 236

Scheme 237

Scheme 238

Scheme 239

Scheme 240

Scheme 241

Scheme 242

Scheme 243

Scheme 244

Scheme 245

Scheme 246

Scheme 247