Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2216-4882
Sulfur-Mediated ipso-Cyclization of 4-(p-Methoxyaryl)alk-1-ynes Leading to 3-Thiospiro[4.5]deca-1,6,9-trien-8-ones
This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (2202040).
Abstract
A new method for the intramolecular electrophilic ipso-cyclization of alkynes with triflic anhydride-activated sulfoxides, followed by demethylation with triethylamine in one pot, is described for the synthesis of 3-thiospiro[4.5]-decatrienones in moderate to good yields. This method provides a facile strategy for assembling the sulfur-substituted spirocyclic compounds.
#
Spirocyclic substructures are core synthetic targets for many carbocyclic skeletons.[1] Among the various spirocycles, the spiro[4.5]decane skeleton is widely found in many natural products and pharmacologically active compounds such as an ACAT inhibitor,[2] β-vetivone,[3] the alkaloids spirocalcaridine A and B,[4] the steroid carijodienone,[5] stepharine (with antihypertensive activity),[6] and the well-known antibiotic drug candidate platensimycin (Figure [1]).[7]
For these reasons, considerable efforts have been devoted to developing useful synthetic methods for the construction spiro[4.5]decatrienones.[8] In 2005, Zhang and Larock developed a general protocol for the construction of spiro[4.5]decatrienones by intramolecular ipso-cyclization of 4-(p-methoxyaryl)-1-alkynes using the ICl, I2/NaHCO3, or Br2 as competent electrophilic halogenating reagents (Scheme [1a]).[9] In recent years, inspired by Larock’s studies, great efforts have been devoted to developing electrophiles to construct a variety of 3-functionalized spiro[4.5]decatrienones through either a radical or an electrophilic cyclization process.[10] New additional functional groups, such as halo,[10d] [h] [i] [11] carbonyl,[10f,12] selenyl,[13] phosphoryl,[14] nitro,[15] or silyl,[10b] can be introduced onto an azaspiro[4.5]decatrienone framework.




Sulfur-containing molecules are extremely important in the pharmaceutical industry and natural-product chemistry,[16] as well as being useful synthetic intermediates.[17] Several strategies have been reported for using sulfur-containing reagents as electrophiles to construct various 3-thioazaspiro[4.5]trienones.[18] Li and co-workers developed a novel copper-catalyzed radical ipso-cyclization of propynamides to assemble 2-(arylsulfanyl)-1-azaspiro[4.5]deca-3,6,9-triene-2,8-diones with disulfides as the sulfur sources.[18c] Wang and co-workers describe a visible-light-mediated method, catalyzed by a metal-free organic dye, for the synthesis of 3-sulfonyl- and 3-sulfenyl-1-1azaspiro[4.5]decatrienones.[18e] Du and co-workers report an intramolecular electrophilic cyclization of N-arylpropynamides to selectively construct 3- methylthioquinolin-2-one and 3-methylthiospiro[4.5]trienone skeletons by using DMSO as a sulfur source and SOCl2 as an activating agent.[18f] We recently reported the reaction of 4-arylalkynes with triflic anhydride-activated sulfoxides for the synthesis of 3-sulfenyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalenes by intramolecular electrophilic cyclization (Scheme [1b]).[19] As part of our continued interest in the C–H functionalization of alkynes or alkenes,[19] [20] we report a convenient and efficient method for accessing a series of 3-thiospiro[4.5]trienones by the intramolecular electrophilic ipso-cyclization of 4-(p-methoxyaryl)-1-alkynes.
The reaction design involves the use of a triflic anhydride-activated sulfoxide as the sulfur source and takes advantage of the intramolecular ipso-cyclization reactivity of 4-(p-methoxyaryl)-1-alkynes for the construction of spiro[4.5]decatrienones (Scheme [1c]). First, the triflic anhydride-activated sulfoxides should react with the C≡C triple bond to generate a vinylic cation intermediate A, which could be captured by the tethered aryl ring through ipso-cyclization to give intermediates B. The desired product is then formed after demethylation with Et3N as a nucleophile by an SN2 process. Through this strategy, new C–S, C–C, and C=O bonds would all be formed in a single step. Therefore, should be able to construct spirocyclic or dihydronaphthalene skeletons selectively by ipso- or ortho-cyclization using different substituted alkyne substrates and a single sulfur source.
Initially, we chose 1-methoxy-4-(4-phenylbut-3-yn-1-yl)benzene (1a) and methyl phenyl sulfoxide (2a) as model substrates to explore the reaction conditions (Table [1]). 1a and 2a were dissolved in CH2Cl2 and Tf2O was added at –78 °C. The mixture was then warmed to room temperature and Et3N was added. However, the desired 1-phenyl-2-(phenylsulfanyl)spiro[4.5]deca-1,6,9-trien-8-one (3aa-1), was not obtained, but instead, the two dihydronaphthalenes 3aa-2 and 3aa-3 were obtained in yields of 55 and 21%, respectively, as a mixture (Table [1], entry 1).
a Reaction conditions: A solution of 1a and 2a in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was treated with the base and Tf2O at –78 °C for 1 h under N2, and then Et3N was added.
b Isolated yield.
We suspected that the formation of byproduct 3aa-2 was due to the presence of triflic acid in the reaction, which initiated protonation–cyclization and electrophilic substitution. Therefore, we added 2-chloropyridine as an acid scavenger. This time, the pure byproduct 3aa-3 (see Scheme1b) was obtained in 72% yield (Table [1], entry 2). It turned out that the reaction temperature had a major influence. When we carried out the reaction at –78 °C, the target spirocyclic product 3aa-1 was obtained in 43% yield (entry 3). It seems that the intramolecular ipso-cyclization is a kinetically favored process, whereas the dihydronaphthalene might be the thermodynamic product at higher temperatures.
![]() |
|||
Entry |
Product |
R |
Yieldb (%) |
1 |
3ca |
H |
88 |
2 |
3cb |
NO2 |
83 |
3 |
3cc |
Br |
63 |
4 |
3cd |
CN |
83 |
5 |
3ce |
Me |
48 |
6 |
3cf |
OMe |
52 |
a Reaction conditions: 1c (0.15 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol), 2-chloropyridine (0.3 mmol), Tf2O (0.3 mmol), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), –78 °C, then Et3N (1.5 mmol), RT; N2 atmosphere.
b Isolated yield.
In addition, we attempted to obtain the target product 3aa-1 at –78 °C without an acid scavenger. However, the reaction efficiency was markedly lower in the absence of a base (Table [1], entry 4). The presence of an acid scavenger is therefore beneficial in improving the yield. A series of bases were examined for this reaction (entries 3–6), and 2-chloropyridine was found to be the best base for the formation of production 3aa-1 (entry 3). Subsequently, the amount of activated sulfoxide was tested. When we increased the amount of activated sulfoxide to 1.5, 1.8, or 2.0 equivalents, the yield increased to 52, 74, and 78%, respectively (entries 7–9). Other bases (2-fluoropyridine, 2,6-difluoropyridine, and 2,6-dichloropyridine) were tested again under the conditions of 2.0 equivalents activation of the sulfoxide, but none gave a better result than 2-chloropyridine (entries 10–12).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the effects of substituents on various aryl methyl sulfoxides 2 were investigated (Table [2]). The reaction of alkyne 3c proceeded well with various sulfoxides 2 containing various electron-withdrawing groups (NO2, Br, or CN) on the aromatic ring, giving the corresponding products 3cb–cd in moderate to good yields. For substrates bearing electron-donating groups (Me or OMe), the reaction gave the corresponding product 3ce and 3cf in lower yields of 48 and 52%, respectively.


In addition, the effect of substituents on the aromatic ring on the terminal alkyne was surveyed (Scheme [2]). For certain substrates, it was found that adding an appropriate amount of methanol and water was beneficial in improving the yield. Therefore, a series of spirocyclic products were synthesized under either conditions A or conditions B (Scheme [2]). Several electron-donating substituents (p-OMe, p-Me, p-Et) were compatible with the optimal conditions affording the corresponding spirocyclic products 3ba, 3ca, and 3fa in good yields. Substrates bearing a p-Cl or p-Br group gave the corresponding products 3da and 3ga in moderate yields. The 1-naphthyl alkyne 1e was also a viable substrate, furnishing product 3ea in 69% yield. The nitrogen-tethered alkyne 1h gave product 3ha in 57% yield. Notably, the corresponding six-membered-ring product 3ia was formed in 58% yield when using substrate 1i. When the o-Br- or o-I-substituted derivative was employed, the desired products 3ja and 3ka were obtained in low yields. The o-methyl- or p-methyl-substituted terminal alkynes gave the corresponding product 3la and 3ma in moderate to good yields. Substrate 1n could also be used in this reaction under the optimized conditions to give product 3na in 85% yield. However, none of the desired products were obtained from substrates bearing electron-withdrawing groups.
Further transformations of the spirocyclic product 3aa-1 were carried out (Scheme [3]). The corresponding sulfoxide and sulfone were obtained in yields of 98 and 95%, respectively, by using 1.1 and 3.0 equivalents of m-CPBA as the oxidant, respectively.


In conclusion, a simple and convenient strategy has been established for the synthesis of various 3-thiospiro[4.5]decatrienones from 4-(p-methoxyaryl)-1-alkynes and triflic anhydride-activated sulfoxides as sulfur sources.[21] This method achieves alkyne difunctionalization through an ipso-cyclization process, which complements our previous synthesis of 3-sulfenyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalenes.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/a-2216-4882.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Chawla AS, Jackson AH. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1989; 6: 55
- 1b Yoneda K, Yamagata E, Nakanishi T, Nagashima T, Kawasaki I, Yoshida T, Mori H, Miura I. Phytochemistry 1984; 23: 2068
- 1c Antunes EM, Copp BR, Davies-Coleman MT, Samaai T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 62
- 1d Jin Z. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 111
- 1e Wu W.-T, Zhang L, You S.-L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 1570
- 2a D’Yakonov VA, Trapeznikova OA, de Meijere A, Dzhemilev UM. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 5775
- 2b Kotha S, Mandal K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 1391
- 3a Nakazaki A, Era T, Numada Y, Kobayashi S. Tetrahedron 2006; 62: 6264
- 3b Posner GH, Hamill TG. J. Org. Chem 2002; 53: 6031
- 4a Edrada RA, Stessman CC, Crews P. J. Nat. Prod. 2003; 66: 939
- 4b Koswatta PB, Das J, Yousufuddin M, Lovely CJ. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 2603
- 5 Díaz-Marrero AR, Porras G, Aragón Z, de la Rosa JM, Dorta E, Cueto M, D’Croz L, Mate J, Darias J. J. Nat. Prod. 2011; 74: 292
- 6 Honda T, Shigehisa H. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 657
- 7 Nicolaou KC, Li A, Edmonds DJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2006; 45: 7086
- 8a Aparece MD, Vadola PA. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 6008
- 8b Chiba S, Zhang L, Lee J.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 7266
- 8c Ciufolini M, Braun N, Canesi S, Ousmer M, Chang J, Chai D. Synthesis 2007; 3759
- 8d Lanza T, Minozzi M, Monesi A, Nanni D, Spagnolo P, Zanardi G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010; 352: 2275
- 8e Pigge FC, Coniglio JJ, Dalvi R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 3498
- 8f Pouységu L, Deffieux D, Quideau S. Tetrahedron 2010; 66: 2235
- 8g Quideau S, Pouységu L, Deffieux D. Synlett 2008; 467
- 8h Rousseaux S, García-Fortanet J, Del Aguila Sanchez MA, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 9282
- 9 Zhang X, Larock RC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 12230
- 10a Appel TR, Yehia NA. M, Baumeister U, Hartung H, Kluge R, Ströhl D, Fanghänel E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 47
- 10b Gao P, Zhang W, Zhang Z. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 5820
- 10c Hua H.-L, He Y.-T, Qiu Y.-F, Li Y.-X, Song B, Gao P, Song X.-R, Guo D.-H, Liu X.-Y, Liang Y.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 1468
- 10d Huang K, Li J.-N, Qiu G, Xie W, Liu J.-B. RSC Adv 2019; 9: 33460
- 10e Liang X.-W, Zheng C, You S.-L. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 11918
- 10f Nair AM, Shinde AH, Kumar S, Volla CM. R. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 12367
- 10g Reddy CR, Prajapti SK, Warudikar K, Ranjan R, Rao BB. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 3130
- 10h Tang B.-X, Tang D.-J, Tang S, Yu Q.-F, Zhang Y.-H, Liang Y, Zhong P, Li J.-H. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1063
- 10i Yu K, Kong X, Yang J, Li G, Xu B, Chen Q. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 917
- 10j Yuan J.-W, Mou C.-X, Zhang Y, Hu W.-Y, Yang L.-R, Xiao Y.-M, Mao P, Zhang S.-R, Qu L.-B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021; 19: 10348
- 11 Tang B.-X, Zhang Y.-H, Song R.-J, Tang D.-J, Deng G.-B, Wang Z.-Q, Xie Y.-X, Xia Y.-Z, Li J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 2837
- 12 Ouyang X.-H, Song R.-J, Li Y, Liu B, Li J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 4582
- 13a Hua J, Fang Z, Bian M, Ma T, Yang M, Xu J, Liu C, He W, Zhu N, Yang Z, Guo K. ChemSusChem 2020; 13: 2053
- 13b Sahoo H, Mandal A, Dana S, Baidya M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1099
- 14a Mo K, Zhou X, Wu J, Zhao Y. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 1306
- 14b Wang L.-J, Wang A.-Q, Xia Y, Wu X.-X, Liu X.-Y, Liang Y.-M. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 13998
- 14c Zeng F.-L, Chen X.-L, Sun K, Zhu H.-L, Yuan X.-Y, Liu Y, Qu L.-B, Zhao Y.-F, Yu B. Org. Chem. Front. 2021; 8: 760
- 15 Yang X.-H, Ouyang X.-H, Wei W.-T, Song R.-J, Li J.-H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015; 357: 1161
- 16a De Martino G, Edler MC, La Regina G, Coluccia A, Barbera MC, Barrow D, Nicholson RI, Chiosis G, Brancale A, Hamel E, Artico M, Silvestri R. J. Med. Chem. 2006; 49: 947
- 16b Jacob C. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006; 23: 851
- 16c Kondo T, Mitsudo T.-a. Chem. Rev. 2000; 100: 3205
- 16d McReynolds MD, Dougherty JM, Hanson PR. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 2239
- 16e Sizov AY, Kovregin AN, Ermolov AF. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2003; 72: 357
- 16f Wang N, Saidhareddy P, Jiang X. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020; 37: 246
- 16g Xiao F, Chen H, Xie H, Chen S, Yang L, Deng G.-J. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 50
- 16h Xiao F, Chen S, Chen Y, Huang H, Deng G.-J. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 652
- 17a Dénès F, Pichowicz M, Povie G, Renaud P. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 2587
- 17b Lee C.-F, Liu Y.-C, Badsara SS. Chem. Asian J. 2014; 9: 706
- 17c Li Y, Wang M, Jiang X. ACS Catal. 2017; 7: 7587
- 17d Liu H, Jiang X. Chem. Asian J. 2013; 8: 2546
- 17e Šiaučiulis M, Sapmaz S, Pulis AP, Procter DJ. Chem. Sci. 2018; 9: 754
- 18a Cui H, Wei W, Yang D, Zhang J, Xu Z, Wen J, Wang H. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 84657
- 18b Gao W.-C, Liu T, Cheng Y.-F, Chang H.-H, Li X, Zhou R, Wei W.-L, Qiao Y. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 13459
- 18c Qian P.-C, Liu Y, Song R.-J, Xiang J.-N, Li J.-H. Synlett 2015; 26: 1213
- 18d Qiao Z, Shao C, Gao Y, Liang K, Yin H, Chen F.-X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2022; 100: 153875
- 18e Wei W, Cui H, Yang D, Yue H, He C, Zhang Y, Wang H. Green Chem. 2017; 19: 5608
- 18f Li X, Wang Y, Ouyang Y, Yu Z, Zhang B, Zhang J, Shi H, Zuilhof H, Du Y. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 9490
- 19 Zhang Z, He P, Du H, Xu J, Li P. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 4517
- 20a An S, Zhang Z, Li P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 3059
- 20b Li P. Synlett 2021; 32: 1275
- 20c Pan T, Li P. J. Org. Chem. 2023; 88: 7564
- 21 1-Phenyl-2-(phenylsulfanyl)spiro[4.5]deca-1,6,9-trien-8-one (3aa-1); Typical Procedure A flame-dried Schlenk tube was charged with alkyne 1a (0.15 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and PhS(=O)Me (2; 0.3 mmol, 2.0 equiv). The reactants were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) under N2, and the solution was cooled to –78 °C (liquid N2–EtOAc bath), then 2-chloropyridine (28 μL, 0.3 mmol, 2.0 equiv) and Tf2O (50 μL, 0.3 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at –78 °C for 0.5 h and then Et3N (0.199 mL, 1.5 mmol, 10.0 equiv) was added. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phase was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel) to give a white solid; yield: 37.6 mg (74%); Rf = 0.2 (PE–EtOAc, 10:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.46–7.42 (m, 2 H), 7.37–7.30 (m, 3 H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 3 H), 7.23–7.19 (m, 2 H), 6.97 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 2 H), 6.25 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.66 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.19 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 185.2, 152.5, 139.8, 137.2, 134.2, 132.2, 132.0, 128.7, 128.3, 127.6, 127.5, 57.7, 35.5, 34.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C22H19OS: 331.1152; found: 331.1157.
Corresponding Author
Publication History
Received: 30 October 2023
Accepted after revision: 22 November 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
22 November 2023
Article published online:
11 January 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Chawla AS, Jackson AH. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1989; 6: 55
- 1b Yoneda K, Yamagata E, Nakanishi T, Nagashima T, Kawasaki I, Yoshida T, Mori H, Miura I. Phytochemistry 1984; 23: 2068
- 1c Antunes EM, Copp BR, Davies-Coleman MT, Samaai T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 62
- 1d Jin Z. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 111
- 1e Wu W.-T, Zhang L, You S.-L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 1570
- 2a D’Yakonov VA, Trapeznikova OA, de Meijere A, Dzhemilev UM. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 5775
- 2b Kotha S, Mandal K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 1391
- 3a Nakazaki A, Era T, Numada Y, Kobayashi S. Tetrahedron 2006; 62: 6264
- 3b Posner GH, Hamill TG. J. Org. Chem 2002; 53: 6031
- 4a Edrada RA, Stessman CC, Crews P. J. Nat. Prod. 2003; 66: 939
- 4b Koswatta PB, Das J, Yousufuddin M, Lovely CJ. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 2603
- 5 Díaz-Marrero AR, Porras G, Aragón Z, de la Rosa JM, Dorta E, Cueto M, D’Croz L, Mate J, Darias J. J. Nat. Prod. 2011; 74: 292
- 6 Honda T, Shigehisa H. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 657
- 7 Nicolaou KC, Li A, Edmonds DJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2006; 45: 7086
- 8a Aparece MD, Vadola PA. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 6008
- 8b Chiba S, Zhang L, Lee J.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 7266
- 8c Ciufolini M, Braun N, Canesi S, Ousmer M, Chang J, Chai D. Synthesis 2007; 3759
- 8d Lanza T, Minozzi M, Monesi A, Nanni D, Spagnolo P, Zanardi G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010; 352: 2275
- 8e Pigge FC, Coniglio JJ, Dalvi R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 3498
- 8f Pouységu L, Deffieux D, Quideau S. Tetrahedron 2010; 66: 2235
- 8g Quideau S, Pouységu L, Deffieux D. Synlett 2008; 467
- 8h Rousseaux S, García-Fortanet J, Del Aguila Sanchez MA, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 9282
- 9 Zhang X, Larock RC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 12230
- 10a Appel TR, Yehia NA. M, Baumeister U, Hartung H, Kluge R, Ströhl D, Fanghänel E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 47
- 10b Gao P, Zhang W, Zhang Z. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 5820
- 10c Hua H.-L, He Y.-T, Qiu Y.-F, Li Y.-X, Song B, Gao P, Song X.-R, Guo D.-H, Liu X.-Y, Liang Y.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 1468
- 10d Huang K, Li J.-N, Qiu G, Xie W, Liu J.-B. RSC Adv 2019; 9: 33460
- 10e Liang X.-W, Zheng C, You S.-L. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 11918
- 10f Nair AM, Shinde AH, Kumar S, Volla CM. R. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 12367
- 10g Reddy CR, Prajapti SK, Warudikar K, Ranjan R, Rao BB. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 3130
- 10h Tang B.-X, Tang D.-J, Tang S, Yu Q.-F, Zhang Y.-H, Liang Y, Zhong P, Li J.-H. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1063
- 10i Yu K, Kong X, Yang J, Li G, Xu B, Chen Q. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 917
- 10j Yuan J.-W, Mou C.-X, Zhang Y, Hu W.-Y, Yang L.-R, Xiao Y.-M, Mao P, Zhang S.-R, Qu L.-B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021; 19: 10348
- 11 Tang B.-X, Zhang Y.-H, Song R.-J, Tang D.-J, Deng G.-B, Wang Z.-Q, Xie Y.-X, Xia Y.-Z, Li J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 2837
- 12 Ouyang X.-H, Song R.-J, Li Y, Liu B, Li J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 4582
- 13a Hua J, Fang Z, Bian M, Ma T, Yang M, Xu J, Liu C, He W, Zhu N, Yang Z, Guo K. ChemSusChem 2020; 13: 2053
- 13b Sahoo H, Mandal A, Dana S, Baidya M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1099
- 14a Mo K, Zhou X, Wu J, Zhao Y. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 1306
- 14b Wang L.-J, Wang A.-Q, Xia Y, Wu X.-X, Liu X.-Y, Liang Y.-M. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 13998
- 14c Zeng F.-L, Chen X.-L, Sun K, Zhu H.-L, Yuan X.-Y, Liu Y, Qu L.-B, Zhao Y.-F, Yu B. Org. Chem. Front. 2021; 8: 760
- 15 Yang X.-H, Ouyang X.-H, Wei W.-T, Song R.-J, Li J.-H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015; 357: 1161
- 16a De Martino G, Edler MC, La Regina G, Coluccia A, Barbera MC, Barrow D, Nicholson RI, Chiosis G, Brancale A, Hamel E, Artico M, Silvestri R. J. Med. Chem. 2006; 49: 947
- 16b Jacob C. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006; 23: 851
- 16c Kondo T, Mitsudo T.-a. Chem. Rev. 2000; 100: 3205
- 16d McReynolds MD, Dougherty JM, Hanson PR. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 2239
- 16e Sizov AY, Kovregin AN, Ermolov AF. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2003; 72: 357
- 16f Wang N, Saidhareddy P, Jiang X. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020; 37: 246
- 16g Xiao F, Chen H, Xie H, Chen S, Yang L, Deng G.-J. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 50
- 16h Xiao F, Chen S, Chen Y, Huang H, Deng G.-J. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 652
- 17a Dénès F, Pichowicz M, Povie G, Renaud P. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 2587
- 17b Lee C.-F, Liu Y.-C, Badsara SS. Chem. Asian J. 2014; 9: 706
- 17c Li Y, Wang M, Jiang X. ACS Catal. 2017; 7: 7587
- 17d Liu H, Jiang X. Chem. Asian J. 2013; 8: 2546
- 17e Šiaučiulis M, Sapmaz S, Pulis AP, Procter DJ. Chem. Sci. 2018; 9: 754
- 18a Cui H, Wei W, Yang D, Zhang J, Xu Z, Wen J, Wang H. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 84657
- 18b Gao W.-C, Liu T, Cheng Y.-F, Chang H.-H, Li X, Zhou R, Wei W.-L, Qiao Y. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 13459
- 18c Qian P.-C, Liu Y, Song R.-J, Xiang J.-N, Li J.-H. Synlett 2015; 26: 1213
- 18d Qiao Z, Shao C, Gao Y, Liang K, Yin H, Chen F.-X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2022; 100: 153875
- 18e Wei W, Cui H, Yang D, Yue H, He C, Zhang Y, Wang H. Green Chem. 2017; 19: 5608
- 18f Li X, Wang Y, Ouyang Y, Yu Z, Zhang B, Zhang J, Shi H, Zuilhof H, Du Y. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 9490
- 19 Zhang Z, He P, Du H, Xu J, Li P. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 4517
- 20a An S, Zhang Z, Li P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 3059
- 20b Li P. Synlett 2021; 32: 1275
- 20c Pan T, Li P. J. Org. Chem. 2023; 88: 7564
- 21 1-Phenyl-2-(phenylsulfanyl)spiro[4.5]deca-1,6,9-trien-8-one (3aa-1); Typical Procedure A flame-dried Schlenk tube was charged with alkyne 1a (0.15 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and PhS(=O)Me (2; 0.3 mmol, 2.0 equiv). The reactants were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) under N2, and the solution was cooled to –78 °C (liquid N2–EtOAc bath), then 2-chloropyridine (28 μL, 0.3 mmol, 2.0 equiv) and Tf2O (50 μL, 0.3 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at –78 °C for 0.5 h and then Et3N (0.199 mL, 1.5 mmol, 10.0 equiv) was added. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phase was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel) to give a white solid; yield: 37.6 mg (74%); Rf = 0.2 (PE–EtOAc, 10:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.46–7.42 (m, 2 H), 7.37–7.30 (m, 3 H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 3 H), 7.23–7.19 (m, 2 H), 6.97 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 2 H), 6.25 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.66 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.19 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 185.2, 152.5, 139.8, 137.2, 134.2, 132.2, 132.0, 128.7, 128.3, 127.6, 127.5, 57.7, 35.5, 34.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C22H19OS: 331.1152; found: 331.1157.









