Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2158-9726
Addition of a Phosphinoboronate Ester to Borole and Borafluorene
We are grateful to the Welch Foundation (Grant No. AA-1846) and the National Science Foundation (Award No. 1753025) for their generous support of this work.
Dedicated to Professor Donald Matteson and in memory of the late Professor Stephen Westcott in recognition of their contributions to organoboron chemistry.
Abstract
The additions of the phosphinoboronate ester Ph2PBpin to an antiaromatic borole and a borafluorene is reported. The Lewis acid/base adducts are obtained in excellent yields and represent the first P-donor adducts of Ph2PBpin.
#
Key words
pinacol diphenylphosphinoboronate - boroles - borafluorenes - antiaromaticity - Lewis acidPhosphinoboranes[1] [2] [3] (R2P–BR2) feature trivalent and tricoordinate P and B atoms linked covalently and are valence isoelectronic with aminoboranes (R2N–BR2; Scheme [1a]).[1] [3] [4] In species with alkyl or aryl substituents on boron, dimerization typically occurs;[1] [5] [6] [7] however, if there is sufficient steric bulk or the boron atom is disubstituted with alkoxy groups, dimerization is precluded. These monomers can be viewed as frustrated Lewis pairs. In 2014, phosphinoboronate esters R2PBpin (R = Ph, Cy; pin = pinacolato) (Scheme [1b]) were disclosed;[8] these enabled effective phosphinoborations in which a phosphine and a borane moiety are introduced onto a substrate through addition across an unsaturated bond. This single-step transformation is effective for an array of organic substrates that includes aldehydes, ketones, aldimines, α,β-unsaturated carbonyls, heteroallenes, diazobenzenes, diazomethanes, pyridines, and CO2 (Scheme [1c]).[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]


Despite the phosphinoboration reaction gaining attraction in synthesis, its mechanism is not well understood. The coordination chemistry of phosphinoboranes presents insight into whether they act as Lewis acids, Lewis bases, or ambiphiles. In phosphinoboranes, three Lewis acid/base binding modes are possible: binding of a Lewis base to the boron center (Mode A; Scheme [1d]), binding of the phosphorus atom to a Lewis acid (Mode B), and a combination of both types of interaction (Mode C). Within these, Modes A and C, in which the boron atom acts as a Lewis acid, have been widely explored,[7] , [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] whereas reports on the phosphorus atom acting as a Lewis base (Mode B) are scarce.[6,21,37]
Proposed mechanisms for the phosphinoboration addition to organic substrates have been in line with the aforementioned coordination chemistry of boron acting as a Lewis acid. In the literature, it has been suggested that the substrate acts as a nucleophile to coordinate to the boron center to form an activated borate intermediate. In the borate intermediate, the phosphorus center is rendered more nucleophilic and the B–P bond is weakened, enabling it to rupture and add across an unsaturated bond (Scheme [1c]). Recently, it was demonstrated that tributylphosphine can catalyze phosphinoboration across C≡C triple bonds, further suggesting that boron activation is occurring.[38] In Ph2PBpin, despite the presence of tricoordinate boron and phosphorus centers, there is negligible π-dative interaction between the phosphorus lone pair and the p-orbital on the boron.[8] X-ray diffraction confirmed that the phosphorus atom is pyramidal [sum of angles = 310.0(6)°], in accordance with calculations. To date, neither the nucleophilicity nor the coordination chemistry of the phosphorus atom has been investigated.
Because the donor ability of the phosphine in Ph2PBpin is diminished, we hypothesized that reactions with strong Lewis acids might furnish stable adducts (Mode B). Boroles and 9-borafluorenes both contain a central unsaturated BC4 ring that is rendered highly Lewis acidic due to its antiaromatic state.[39] [40] [41] [42] To understand the coordination chemistry of phosphinoboranes and to provide insight into possible reaction mechanisms, we report the reactions of Ph2PBpin with pentaphenyl-1H-borole and 9-phenyl-9-borafluorene.
Treatment of Ph2PBpin with pentaphenyl-1H-borole or 9-phenyl-9-borafluorene at 23 °C in dichloromethane led to P–B adducts 1 and 2, respectively, in excellent yields (Scheme [2]). The reaction progress could be monitored by the immediate color change from dark blue (borole) or yellow (9-phenyl-9-borafluorene) to colorless, indicating the consumption of the central unsaturated BC4 ring.
In the 11B{1H} NMR spectra of the reaction mixtures, the broad peaks for tricoordinate boron centers of pentaphenyl-1H-borole (δ = 64.5 ppm) and 9-phenyl-9-borafluorene (δ = 65.4 ppm) disappeared while new peaks emerged in the tetracoordinate region at δ = –5.2 and –9.3 ppm, respectively. The chemical shifts for the Bpin moiety appeared at δ = 30.8 and 30.9 ppm, respectively, shifted slightly upfield from that of Ph2PBpin (δ = 34.0 ppm). The 31P{1H} NMR signals for 1 and 2 appeared at δ = –34.2 and –35.2 ppm, respectively, shifted downfield from that of Ph2PBpin (δ = –63.5 ppm). Furthermore, the molecular structures of these B–P adducts were unambiguously determined from X-ray diffraction studies on single crystals;[43] that is, the phosphorus atom of Ph2PBpin coordinated to the boron center of the borole ring (Figure [1]). Upon coordination, the P(1)–B(2) bonds of the Ph2PBpin elongate slightly [1: 1.953(2) Å, 2: 1.9432(18) Å, cf. free Ph2PBpin: 1.9274(14) Å]. The dative P(1)–B(1) bonds were slightly longer than the P–B bond in the phosphinoboronate diester [1: 2.001(2) Å, 2: 2.0047(19) Å]. Phosphine adducts of borafluorene or boroles have rarely been reported in the literature.[44] [45] The analogous P(1)–B(1) bond length in pentaphenylborole·PH2Ph is 1.983(3) Å, slightly shorter than donor bonds in 1 and 2.[46] In the bulkier adduct of PCy3 with 1-bromotetraphenyl-1H-borole, the P(1)–B(1) bond length is comparable [2.0156(19) Å].[45]




The results of these studies provide insight into the mechanism of phosphinoboration reactions in which Lewis acid–base adducts are proposed to be formed by coordination of oxygen to Ph2PBpin (i.e., O→B),[8] [38] increasing the P–B bond length and activating it for subsequent phosphorus transfer. Because of the high reactivity of these intermediates, characterization by NMR or X-ray crystallography has been elusive. In the current study, reversing the polarity (P→B in 1 and 2) forms the complementary tetracoordinate boron and reveals a concomitant increase in the P–B bond length of Ph2PBpin, which is consistent with P–B bond activation in phosphinoboration reactions.
Boroles have diverse reactivity modes due to the presence of a Lewis acidic boron center, diene groups, and an antiaromatic state. In reactions with polar substrates, 1,4-addition across a diene or B–C bond rupture of the endocyclic bond can occur.[46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] To investigate the potential for these reactivity modes in addition to adduct formation, 1 and 2 were heated to 70 °C in C6D6 for 24 hours, with no change in their NMR spectra. Further heating at 100 °C in toluene for 16 hours resulted in a complex mixture. Therefore, our studies indicate selective P–B adduct formation.
In conclusion, we report the reaction of Ph2PBpin with antiaromatic pentaphenyl-1H-borole and 9-phenyl-9-borafluorene, providing the first example of the synthesis of P-donor adducts that do not have a donor bound to boron.[53] The products are obtained in high yields and are stable up to 70 °C. In addition, the unique coordination chemistry of Ph2PBpin provides insight into a potential new reactivity mode.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr. John R. Tidwell for the assistance with X-ray crystallography.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/a-2158-9726.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1 Paine RT, Noeth H. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 343
- 2 Gaumont AC, Carboni B. In Science of Synthesis, Vol. 6, Chap. 6.1.16. Kaufmann DE. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2005: 485
- 3 Bailey JA, Pringle PG. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015; 297: 77
- 4 Power PP. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990; 29: 449
- 5 Geier SJ, Gilbert TM, Stephan DW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 12632
- 6 Ordyszewska A, Szynkiewicz N, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Inorg. Chem. 2022; 61: 4361
- 7 Geier SJ, Gilbert TM, Stephan DW. Inorg. Chem. 2011; 50: 336
- 8 Daley EN, Vogels CM, Geier SJ, Decken A, Doherty S, Westcott SA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 2121
- 9 Breunig JM, Hübner A, Bolte M, Wagner M, Lerner H.-W. Organometallics 2013; 32: 6792
- 10 Geier SJ, Vogels CM, Mellonie NR, Daley EN, Decken A, Doherty S, Westcott SA. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 14485
- 11 Zhu D, Qu Z.-W, Stephan DW. Dalton Trans. 2020; 49: 901
- 12 Geier SJ, LaFortune JH. W, Zhu D, Kosnik SC, Macdonald CL. B, Stephan DW, Westcott SA. Dalton Trans. 2017; 46: 10876
- 13 Trofimova A, LaFortune JH. W, Qu Z.-W, Westcott SA, Stephan DW. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 12100
- 14 LaFortune JH. W, Trofimova A, Cummings H, Westcott SA, Stephan DW. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 12521
- 15 Szynkiewicz N, Ordyszewska A, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. RSC Adv. 2019; 9: 27749
- 16 Szynkiewicz N, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Inorg. Chem. 2020; 59: 6332
- 17 Murphy MC, Trofimova A, LaFortune JH. W, Vogels CM, Geier SJ, Binder JF, Macdonald CL. B, Stephan DW, Westcott SA. Dalton Trans. 2020; 49: 5092
- 18 Szynkiewicz N, Ordyszewska A, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Inorg. Chem. 2021; 60: 3794
- 19 Dou D, Westerhausen M, Wood GL, Duesler EN, Paine RT, Linti G, Nöth H. Chem. Ber. 1993; 126: 379
- 20 Linti G, Nöth H, Paine RT. Chem. Ber. 1993; 126: 875
- 21 Chen T, Jackson J, Jasper SA, Duesler EN, Nöth H, Paine RT. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999; 582: 25
- 22 Vogel U, Hoemensch P, Schwan K.-C, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Chem. Eur. J. 2003; 9: 515
- 23 Vogel U, Schwan K.-C, Hoemensch P, Scheer M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005; 2005: 1453
- 24 Vogel U, Timoshkin AY, Schwan K.-C, Bodensteiner M, Scheer M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006; 691: 4556
- 25 Schwan K.-C, Timoskin AY, Zabel M, Scheer M. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 4900
- 26 Adolf A, Zabel M, Scheer M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007; 2007: 2136
- 27 Adolf A, Vogel U, Zabel M, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008; 2008: 3482
- 28 Schwan K.-C, Adolf A, Thoms C, Zabel M, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Dalton Trans. 2008; 5054
- 29 Schwan K.-C, Vogel U, Adolf A, Zabel M, Scheer M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009; 694: 1189
- 30 Tian R, Mathey F. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 11210
- 31 Amgoune A, Ladeira S, Miqueu K, Bourissou D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 6560
- 32 Kubo K, Kawanaka T, Tomioka M, Mizuta T. Organometallics 2012; 31: 2026
- 33 Morris LJ, Rajabi NA, Hill MS, Manners I, McMullin CL, Mahon MF. Dalton Trans. 2020; 49: 14584
- 34 Moussa ME, Marquardt C, Hegen O, Seidl M, Scheer M. New J. Chem. 2021; 45: 14916
- 35 Moussa ME, Kahoun T, Marquardt C, Ackermann MT, Hegen O, Seidl M, Timoshkin AY, Virovets AV, Bodensteiner M, Scheer M. Chem. Eur. J. 2023; 29: e202203206
- 36 Lehnfeld F, Hegen O, Balázs G, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2023; 649: e202200265
- 37 Ordyszewska A, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Dalton Trans. 2023; 52: 4161
- 38 Fritzemeier RG, Nekvinda J, Vogels CM, Rosenblum CA, Slebodnick C, Westcott SA, Santos WL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 14358
- 39 Braunschweig H, Kupfer T. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 10903
- 40 Barnard JH, Yruegas S, Huang K, Martin CD. Chem. Commun. 2016; 52: 9985
- 41 Su X, Bartholome TA, Tidwell JR, Pujol A, Yruegas S, Martinez JJ, Martin CD. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 4147
- 42 Nguyen MT, van Trang N, Dung TN, Nguyen HM. T. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry IV, Vol. 3, Chap. 3.18. Black DS, Cossy J, Stevens CV. Elsevier; Oxford: 2022: 833
- 43 CCDC 2279046 and 2279047 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 1 and 2. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
- 44 Berger CJ, He G, Merten C, McDonald R, Ferguson MJ, Rivard E. Inorg. Chem. 2014; 53: 1475
- 45 Braunschweig H, Chiu C.-W, Damme A, Ferkinghoff K, Kraft K, Radacki K, Wahler J. Organometallics 2011; 30: 3210
- 46 Yruegas S, Huang K, Wilson DJ. D, Dutton JL, Martin CD. Dalton Trans. 2016; 45: 9902
- 47 Caputo BC, Manning ZJ, Barnard JH, Martin CD. Polyhedron 2016; 114: 273
- 48 Biswas S, Oppel IM, Bettinger HF. Inorg. Chem. 2010; 49: 4499
- 49 Müller M, Maichle-Mössmer C, Bettinger HF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 9380
- 50 Zhang Z, Edkins RM, Haehnel M, Wehner M, Eichhorn A, Mailänder L, Meier M, Brand J, Brede F, Müller-Buschbaum K, Braunschweig H, Marder TB. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 5922
- 51 Yruegas S, Wilson C, Dutton JL, Martin CD. Organometallics 2017; 36: 2581
- 52 Laperriere LE, Yruegas S, Martin CD. Tetrahedron 2019; 75: 937
- 53 Adducts 1 and 2: General Procedure A solution of PPh2Bpin (0.50 mmol, 156 mg) in benzene (4 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of pentaphenyl-1H-borole or 9-phenyl-9-borafluorene (0.5 mmol) in benzene (4 mL) at rt. The solution instantly became colorless, and the mixture was stirred for 10 min at rt. The solvent was then removed in vacuo and the residue was washed with cold pentane (2 × 5 mL) and dried in vacuo. 1 Pale-yellow powder; yield: 319 mg (84%,); mp 216–219 °C. FTIR (neat): (ranked intensity) 1593 (11), 1483 (8), 1438 (9), 1340 (12), 1245 (5), 1129 (2), 1028 (13), 958 (14), 841 (4), 792 (6), 741 (7), 693 (1), 542 (10), 505 (3), 460 (15) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.77 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.43–7.38 (m, 6 H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 3 H), 7.24–7.22 (m, 4 H), 6.90–6.85 (m, 6 H), 6.82–6.78 (m, 6 H), 6.75–6.74 (m, 4 H), 6.59 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 4 H), 1.01 (s, 12 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 154.5, 153.5, 153.4, 143.5, 140.5, 135.4 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 135.2 (d, J = 12.8 Hz), 130.4 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 130.3 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 129.7, 127.7, 127.6, 127.3, 126.9, 126.8, 125.9, 125.4, 125.2, 125.0, 124.3, 86.5, 86.5, 24.6. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –34.2. 11B NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 30.8, –5.2. HRMS (ESI): the adduct peak was not observed in the HRMS. Anal. Calcd for C52H47B2O2P: C, 82.56; H, 6.26. Found: C 82.36, H 6.32. Single crystals of 1 for X-ray diffraction studies were grown from a CH2Cl2 solution by vapor diffusion into toluene. 2 White powder; yield: 256 mg (93%,); mp 189–191 °C. FTIR (neat): (ranked intensity) 1483 (14), 1435 (8), 1373 (12), 1348 (10), 1244 (6), 1128 (4), 1103 (13), 961 (11), 836 (5), 734 (1), 696 (3), 647 (9), 616 (15), 506 (2), 427 (7) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.65 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.41 (td, J = 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.30–7.15 (m, 13 H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.15 (s, 12 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 153.0, 149.4, 134.6 (d, J = 7.5 Hz), 134.2, 132.9, 130.5 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 128.3 (d, J = 9.5 Hz), 127.5, 126.5, 126.2, 125.8, 125.6, 125.6, 86.6, 86.6, 24.7. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –35.2. 11B NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 30.9, –9.3. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H] calcd for C36H36B2O2P: 553.2634; found: 553.2610. Anal. Calcd for C36H35B2O2P: C, 78.29; H, 6.39. Found: C, 78.54; H, 6.55. Single crystals for X-ray diffraction studies were grown from a CH2Cl2 solution of 2 by vapor diffusion into toluene.
Corresponding Author
Publication History
Received: 27 July 2023
Accepted after revision: 22 August 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
23 August 2023
Article published online:
22 September 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1 Paine RT, Noeth H. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 343
- 2 Gaumont AC, Carboni B. In Science of Synthesis, Vol. 6, Chap. 6.1.16. Kaufmann DE. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2005: 485
- 3 Bailey JA, Pringle PG. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015; 297: 77
- 4 Power PP. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990; 29: 449
- 5 Geier SJ, Gilbert TM, Stephan DW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 12632
- 6 Ordyszewska A, Szynkiewicz N, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Inorg. Chem. 2022; 61: 4361
- 7 Geier SJ, Gilbert TM, Stephan DW. Inorg. Chem. 2011; 50: 336
- 8 Daley EN, Vogels CM, Geier SJ, Decken A, Doherty S, Westcott SA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 2121
- 9 Breunig JM, Hübner A, Bolte M, Wagner M, Lerner H.-W. Organometallics 2013; 32: 6792
- 10 Geier SJ, Vogels CM, Mellonie NR, Daley EN, Decken A, Doherty S, Westcott SA. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 14485
- 11 Zhu D, Qu Z.-W, Stephan DW. Dalton Trans. 2020; 49: 901
- 12 Geier SJ, LaFortune JH. W, Zhu D, Kosnik SC, Macdonald CL. B, Stephan DW, Westcott SA. Dalton Trans. 2017; 46: 10876
- 13 Trofimova A, LaFortune JH. W, Qu Z.-W, Westcott SA, Stephan DW. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 12100
- 14 LaFortune JH. W, Trofimova A, Cummings H, Westcott SA, Stephan DW. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 12521
- 15 Szynkiewicz N, Ordyszewska A, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. RSC Adv. 2019; 9: 27749
- 16 Szynkiewicz N, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Inorg. Chem. 2020; 59: 6332
- 17 Murphy MC, Trofimova A, LaFortune JH. W, Vogels CM, Geier SJ, Binder JF, Macdonald CL. B, Stephan DW, Westcott SA. Dalton Trans. 2020; 49: 5092
- 18 Szynkiewicz N, Ordyszewska A, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Inorg. Chem. 2021; 60: 3794
- 19 Dou D, Westerhausen M, Wood GL, Duesler EN, Paine RT, Linti G, Nöth H. Chem. Ber. 1993; 126: 379
- 20 Linti G, Nöth H, Paine RT. Chem. Ber. 1993; 126: 875
- 21 Chen T, Jackson J, Jasper SA, Duesler EN, Nöth H, Paine RT. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999; 582: 25
- 22 Vogel U, Hoemensch P, Schwan K.-C, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Chem. Eur. J. 2003; 9: 515
- 23 Vogel U, Schwan K.-C, Hoemensch P, Scheer M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005; 2005: 1453
- 24 Vogel U, Timoshkin AY, Schwan K.-C, Bodensteiner M, Scheer M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006; 691: 4556
- 25 Schwan K.-C, Timoskin AY, Zabel M, Scheer M. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 4900
- 26 Adolf A, Zabel M, Scheer M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007; 2007: 2136
- 27 Adolf A, Vogel U, Zabel M, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008; 2008: 3482
- 28 Schwan K.-C, Adolf A, Thoms C, Zabel M, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Dalton Trans. 2008; 5054
- 29 Schwan K.-C, Vogel U, Adolf A, Zabel M, Scheer M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009; 694: 1189
- 30 Tian R, Mathey F. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 11210
- 31 Amgoune A, Ladeira S, Miqueu K, Bourissou D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 6560
- 32 Kubo K, Kawanaka T, Tomioka M, Mizuta T. Organometallics 2012; 31: 2026
- 33 Morris LJ, Rajabi NA, Hill MS, Manners I, McMullin CL, Mahon MF. Dalton Trans. 2020; 49: 14584
- 34 Moussa ME, Marquardt C, Hegen O, Seidl M, Scheer M. New J. Chem. 2021; 45: 14916
- 35 Moussa ME, Kahoun T, Marquardt C, Ackermann MT, Hegen O, Seidl M, Timoshkin AY, Virovets AV, Bodensteiner M, Scheer M. Chem. Eur. J. 2023; 29: e202203206
- 36 Lehnfeld F, Hegen O, Balázs G, Timoshkin AY, Scheer M. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2023; 649: e202200265
- 37 Ordyszewska A, Chojnacki J, Grubba R. Dalton Trans. 2023; 52: 4161
- 38 Fritzemeier RG, Nekvinda J, Vogels CM, Rosenblum CA, Slebodnick C, Westcott SA, Santos WL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 14358
- 39 Braunschweig H, Kupfer T. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 10903
- 40 Barnard JH, Yruegas S, Huang K, Martin CD. Chem. Commun. 2016; 52: 9985
- 41 Su X, Bartholome TA, Tidwell JR, Pujol A, Yruegas S, Martinez JJ, Martin CD. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 4147
- 42 Nguyen MT, van Trang N, Dung TN, Nguyen HM. T. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry IV, Vol. 3, Chap. 3.18. Black DS, Cossy J, Stevens CV. Elsevier; Oxford: 2022: 833
- 43 CCDC 2279046 and 2279047 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 1 and 2. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
- 44 Berger CJ, He G, Merten C, McDonald R, Ferguson MJ, Rivard E. Inorg. Chem. 2014; 53: 1475
- 45 Braunschweig H, Chiu C.-W, Damme A, Ferkinghoff K, Kraft K, Radacki K, Wahler J. Organometallics 2011; 30: 3210
- 46 Yruegas S, Huang K, Wilson DJ. D, Dutton JL, Martin CD. Dalton Trans. 2016; 45: 9902
- 47 Caputo BC, Manning ZJ, Barnard JH, Martin CD. Polyhedron 2016; 114: 273
- 48 Biswas S, Oppel IM, Bettinger HF. Inorg. Chem. 2010; 49: 4499
- 49 Müller M, Maichle-Mössmer C, Bettinger HF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 9380
- 50 Zhang Z, Edkins RM, Haehnel M, Wehner M, Eichhorn A, Mailänder L, Meier M, Brand J, Brede F, Müller-Buschbaum K, Braunschweig H, Marder TB. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 5922
- 51 Yruegas S, Wilson C, Dutton JL, Martin CD. Organometallics 2017; 36: 2581
- 52 Laperriere LE, Yruegas S, Martin CD. Tetrahedron 2019; 75: 937
- 53 Adducts 1 and 2: General Procedure A solution of PPh2Bpin (0.50 mmol, 156 mg) in benzene (4 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of pentaphenyl-1H-borole or 9-phenyl-9-borafluorene (0.5 mmol) in benzene (4 mL) at rt. The solution instantly became colorless, and the mixture was stirred for 10 min at rt. The solvent was then removed in vacuo and the residue was washed with cold pentane (2 × 5 mL) and dried in vacuo. 1 Pale-yellow powder; yield: 319 mg (84%,); mp 216–219 °C. FTIR (neat): (ranked intensity) 1593 (11), 1483 (8), 1438 (9), 1340 (12), 1245 (5), 1129 (2), 1028 (13), 958 (14), 841 (4), 792 (6), 741 (7), 693 (1), 542 (10), 505 (3), 460 (15) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.77 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.43–7.38 (m, 6 H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 3 H), 7.24–7.22 (m, 4 H), 6.90–6.85 (m, 6 H), 6.82–6.78 (m, 6 H), 6.75–6.74 (m, 4 H), 6.59 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 4 H), 1.01 (s, 12 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 154.5, 153.5, 153.4, 143.5, 140.5, 135.4 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 135.2 (d, J = 12.8 Hz), 130.4 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 130.3 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 129.7, 127.7, 127.6, 127.3, 126.9, 126.8, 125.9, 125.4, 125.2, 125.0, 124.3, 86.5, 86.5, 24.6. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –34.2. 11B NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 30.8, –5.2. HRMS (ESI): the adduct peak was not observed in the HRMS. Anal. Calcd for C52H47B2O2P: C, 82.56; H, 6.26. Found: C 82.36, H 6.32. Single crystals of 1 for X-ray diffraction studies were grown from a CH2Cl2 solution by vapor diffusion into toluene. 2 White powder; yield: 256 mg (93%,); mp 189–191 °C. FTIR (neat): (ranked intensity) 1483 (14), 1435 (8), 1373 (12), 1348 (10), 1244 (6), 1128 (4), 1103 (13), 961 (11), 836 (5), 734 (1), 696 (3), 647 (9), 616 (15), 506 (2), 427 (7) cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.65 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.41 (td, J = 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.30–7.15 (m, 13 H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.15 (s, 12 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 153.0, 149.4, 134.6 (d, J = 7.5 Hz), 134.2, 132.9, 130.5 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 128.3 (d, J = 9.5 Hz), 127.5, 126.5, 126.2, 125.8, 125.6, 125.6, 86.6, 86.6, 24.7. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –35.2. 11B NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 30.9, –9.3. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H] calcd for C36H36B2O2P: 553.2634; found: 553.2610. Anal. Calcd for C36H35B2O2P: C, 78.29; H, 6.39. Found: C, 78.54; H, 6.55. Single crystals for X-ray diffraction studies were grown from a CH2Cl2 solution of 2 by vapor diffusion into toluene.





