Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1932-9717
A Consecutive Ring-Expansion Strategy towards the Macrocyclic Core of the Solomonamide Natural Products
The authors would like to thank the University of York for the provision of an Eleanor Dodson Fellowship (to W.P.U.) and the China Scholarship Council for a funding the PhD studentship of Z.Y.
Abstract
A synthetic strategy based on the application of three consecutive ring-expansion reactions has been used in the synthesis of analogues of the macrocyclic core of the solomonamide natural products. Starting from a simple, readily available tetrahydrocarbazole, oxidative ring expansion is followed by two further 3- and 4-atom ring-expansion reactions, enabling the insertion of amino acid and hydroxy acid derived linear fragments into 15- to 17-membered-ring-enlarged macrocyclic products.
#
Key words
macrocycles - medium-sized rings - ring expansion - natural product analogues - lactams - lactones - solomonamidesSolomonamides A and B were first isolated in 2011 by Zampella and coworkers from the marine sponge Theonella swinhoei.[2] Interest in their total synthesis is influenced by their anti-inflammatory properties and with natural supplies scarce, total synthesis is necessary to facilitate further biological studies. The original structural assignments of solomonamides A and B are depicted in Figure [1] (1a and 1b). However, following the first synthesis of 1b by Reddy and coworkers in 2016, a structural reassignment of solomonamide B was made (2b – with the highlighted stereogenic centres inverted) and this was confirmed unambiguously by total synthesis.[3] Reddy’s work also cast doubt on the original assignment of solomonamide A, and indeed, the Reddy group duly reported its total synthesis and structural reassignment as predicted (2a) in 2018.[4]


Various other synthetic and associated biological studies focused on the solomonamide natural products have also been reported, by Reddy[5] and others.[6] Assembly of the macrocyclic core is a key step in the synthesis,[7] and unsurprisingly, all syntheses to date have focused on end-to-end macrocyclisation strategies (Scheme [1a]). For example, in the seminal reports by Reddy and coworkers[3] [4] [5] a ligand-free Heck macrocyclisation strategy was adopted, typified by the conversion of linear precursor 3 into macrocycle 4 using Pd(OAc)2.[3] [8] In contrast, Sarabia and coworkers chose to perform the key macrocyclisation via a ring-closing metathesis reaction, using the Hoveyda–Grubbs second-generation (HG II) catalyst. This is typified by the high-yielding synthesis of macrocycle 6 from diene 5.[6d] [9] Notably, both of these impressive reactions are performed under relatively high dilution conditions, which is a common technique used in macrocyclisation reactions to reduce the impact of competing intermolecular coupling and other side reactions.[10]


To complement these previous approaches, we were inspired to adopt a completely different strategy, whereby end-to-end macrocyclisation is avoided entirely. Our synthetic strategy is based on the use of three consecutive ring-expansion reactions, to allow the solomonamide macrocyclic core to be ‘grown’ from a simple, readily available 6-membered ring precursor 7 (Scheme [1b]).[11] [12] [13] The idea was that following an initial oxidative ring-expansion reaction (7 → 8), the resulting lactam 8 could then undergo two further ring-expansion reactions, using our group’s Successive Ring Expansion (SuRE) methodology,[14] [15] thus enabling amino acid (when X = NR) or hydroxy acid (when X = O) derivatives of the type 9 and 11 to be inserted into ring-enlarged products (8 → 10 → 12). The main advantages to this strategy are: i) its overall brevity; ii) the divergent nature of the SuRE method, which means that different amino- and hydroxy acid fragments can be used to facilitate analogue synthesis; iii) as no direct macrocyclisation reactions are needed, high-dilution conditions should not be required. The application of this approach is reported herein. An oxidative ring expansion, followed by two consecutive SuRE reactions allows combinations of α- and β-amino and hydroxy acid derived acid chlorides to be inserted into the ring-expanded products. This is showcased through the successful synthesis of six macrocyclic (15- to 17-membered) solomonamide core analogues of the form 12.
Our synthesis started with the NaIO4-mediated oxidative ring expansion of commercially available tetrahydrocarbazole 7, which led to the formation of 9-membered ring lactam 8 in 98% yield, using a method adapted from that of Dolby and Booth (Scheme [2a]).[16] Attention then moved to applying our group’s SuRE methodology, starting with an Fmoc-based protecting group strategy. Thus, lactam 8 was reacted with acid chloride 13 in the presence of pyridine and DMAP, which resulted in the formation of imide 14 in 80% yield (Scheme [2a]). Then, the idea was that cleavage of the Fmoc protecting group under basic conditions (14 → 15) would initiate ring expansion (15 → 16).[14`] [d] [e] However, despite trialing this reaction under various basic conditions (see the Supporting Information for full details) only trace quantities of the desired macrocycle 16 were observed. The main problem was competing ring-opening reactions, promoted by intermolecular nucleophilic attack of the imide by the base used to cleave the Fmoc protecting group; for example, linear amides 17a and 17b were isolated when using diethylamine and piperidine, respectively. The deviation in reaction outcome here, compared with published SuRE reactions, is thought to be due to the increased electrophilicity of the imide carbonyl groups,[17] as a result of conjugation with the adjacent electron-deficient aromatic system.


To address this problem, we decided to avoid the use of nucleophilic reagents and switched to a Cbz-based protecting group strategy (Scheme [2b]). N-Acylation of lactam 8 was performed using Cbz-protected amino acid chloride 18 to form imide 19. Then, following hydrogenolysis, smooth conversion into macrocycle 21 was observed, which was isolated in 56% overall yield from 8, across the overall N-acylation, protecting group cleavage and ring-expansion sequence.


Attention then turned to the second SuRE reaction. Initially, we focused on using the same Cbz protecting group strategy as above. However, attempts to perform the N-acylation of lactam 21 with acid chloride 18 failed, with unreacted 21 as the major component of the reaction mixture under all the conditions tested (see the Supporting Information for details). It is clear that lactam 21 undergoes N-acylation less readily than lactam 8, and in previous work we have found Cbz-protected amino acid chlorides to be less stable than the analogous Fmoc derivatives. As a result, they tend to perform poorly in cases where the N-acylation step is slow. Therefore, we reverted to the Fmoc protecting group strategy. Using this method, N-acylation of 21 using the more stable Fmoc-protected amino acid chloride 22 proceeded well (based on full consumption of 21 by TLC analysis) to form imide 23 (Scheme [3]). Imide 23 was then taken directly onto the ring-expansion step; thus, following treatment with piperidine in THF, this promoted Fmoc cleavage and subsequent ring expansion to form of 15-membered macrocycle 25 in 30% overall yield from 21. The problems associated with unwanted intermolecular side reactions observed in the first SuRE reaction were less pronounced in this case, although notably they were still not wholly avoided, with 12-membered lactam 21 being recovered in 24% yield. Notably, 21 was not present after the N-acylation step and is therefore believed to result from cleavage of the exocyclic imide C–N bond, likely following nucleophilic attack of the exocyclic imide carbonyl by piperidine. Nonetheless, the successful isolation of 25 meant that the synthesis of the 15-membered solomonamide macrocyclic core had been completed, serving as proof of principle for our consecutive ring-expansion strategy.
One of the most valuable features of the SuRE method is the ability to vary the linear acid chloride to allow straightforward analogue synthesis. This idea is summarised in Scheme [4]. Thus, the SuRE of lactam 8 was tested using acid chlorides derived from various Cbz-protected α- and β-amino acids, including a proline derivative, to form 12–13-membered bislactams 21 and 26–28 (SuRE method A). The same starting material 8 could also be converted into macrocyclic lactone products 29 and 30, by acylating with an O-benzyl-functionalised acid chloride. In these cases, hydrogenolysis was used to cleave the benzyl protecting group to reveal an alcohol, and following stirring in chloroform with triethylamine at RT, ring expansion took place in the same manner as for the analogous amines (SuRE method C).[14d]


All products formed via SuRE are potentially viable starting materials for a second SuRE reaction. This is highlighted by the synthesis of 15- to 17-membered ring solomonamide analogues 25 and 31–35 (Scheme [4]; in these examples, the linear fragment inserted by the first SuRE reaction is highlighted in red, and the second SuRE reaction in blue). For the insertion of amino acid derivatives, the Fmoc protecting group strategy was used (SuRE method B), with both α- and β-amino acids again being compatible (25, 31–34).[18] The lactone-forming ring expansion (SuRE method C) was also successfully used in the synthesis of 16-membered bislactone macrocycle 35. In the lower-yielding cases, most of the mass balance is accounted for by side reactions of the types described in Scheme [2] and 3. Notably, all 12 of the novel macrocyclic products in Scheme [4] were isolated cleanly following column chromatography, and the quoted yields relate to the overall SuRE process of N-acylation, protecting group cleavage, and ring expansion.
In summary, a new synthetic strategy towards the solomonamide natural products has been established, based on the use of three consecutive ring-expansion reactions.[19] Compared with previously published syntheses, advantages of this new approach are that it does not require high dilution conditions as end-to-end macrocyclisation is avoided, and its divergent nature. This is exemplified by the synthesis of a series of substituted macrocyclic derivatives, larger-ring homologues and lactone analogues.
The isolated yields in this study (especially those in the second SuRE reaction) are lower than those typically observed in our group’s published work;[13] this is likely due to the lactam nitrogen being an electron-deficient aniline, which promotes the competing side reactions described. Additional challenges that would need to be overcome to complete the total synthesis of 2a and 2b are the preparation of more functionalized, protected analogues of tetrahydrocarbazole 7, and cleavage of the amide N-alkyl groups; the latter would likely be achieved via NBn hydrogenolysis, as NBn substituents have been shown to work well in our earlier SuRE work,[14] as well as in this study (compound 26). Nonetheless, despite some challenges remaining, having validated the overall approach through the synthesis of series of 15- to 17-membered ring solomonamide analogues, the synthesis of the solomonamides A and B should be viable using this approach. Useful insight into additional selectivity challenges when using SuRE to expand electron-deficient amide systems has also been uncovered. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we hope that this study helps to inspire future syntheses of other macrocyclic target molecules using consecutive ring expansion as a synthetic strategy, as an alternative to end-to-end macrocyclisation.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/a-1932-9717.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1 Since completing this study, C. R. B. Swanson has relocated to a different institution: Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN (UK).
- 2 Festa C, De Marino S, Sepe V, D’Auria MV, Bifulco G, Débitus C, Bucci M, Vellecco V, Zampella A. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1532
- 3 Kashinath K, Jachak GR, Athawale PR, Marelli UK, Gonnade RG, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 3178
- 4 Jachak GR, Athawale PR, Agarwal H, Barthwal MK, Lauro G, Bifulco G, Reddy DS. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018; 16: 9138
- 5a Kashinath K, Vasudevan N, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 6222
- 5b Vasudevan N, Kashinath K, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 6148
- 5c Kashinath K, Dhara S, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2090
- 5d Jachak GR, Athawale PR, Choudhury R, Kashinath K, Reddy DS. Chem. Asian J. 2019; 14: 4572
- 6a Kavitha N, Kumar VP, Chandrasekhar S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 2128
- 6b Kavitha N, Chandrasekhar S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 6242
- 6c Cheng-Sánchez I, García-Ruiz C, Sarabia F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 3392
- 6d Cheng-Sánchez I, Carrillo P, Sánchez-Ruiz A, Martínez-Poveda B, Quesada AR, Medina M. Á, López-Romero JM, Sarabia F. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 5365
- 6e Carrillo P, Martínez-Poveda B, Cheng-Sánchez I, Guerra J, Tobia C, López-Romero JM, Sarabia F, Medina MA, Quesada AR. Mar. Drugs 2019; 17: 228
- 7 Saridakis I, Kaiser D, Maulide N. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020; 6: 1869
- 8 Practical Medicinal Chemistry with Macrocycles. Marsault E, Peterson ML. Wiley; Hoboken: 2017
- 9a Gradillas A, Pérez-Castells J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 6086
- 9b Lecourt C, Dhambri S, Allievi L, Sanogo Y, Zeghbib N, Ben Othman R, Lannou M.-I, Sorin G, Ardisson J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018; 35: 105
- 10a Illuminati G, Mandolini L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981; 14: 95
- 10b Fastrez J. J. Phys. Chem. 1989; 93: 2635
- 10c Collins JC, James K. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012; 3: 1489
- 10d Kurouchi H, Ohwada T. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 876
- 10e Marsault E, Peterson ML. J. Med. Chem. 2011; 54: 1961
- 10f Yudin AK. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 30
- 10g Mortensen KT, Osberger TJ, King TA, Sore HF, Spring DR. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 10288
- 10h Appavoo SD, Huh S, Diaz DB, Yudin AK. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 9724
- 10i Smolyar IV, Yudin AK, Nenajdenko VG. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 10032
- 11 For a review on consecutive ring-expansion reactions, see: Stephens TC, Unsworth WP. Synlett 2020; 31: 133
- 12a Hesse M. In Ring Enlargement in Organic Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 1991
- 12b Unsworth WP, Donald JR. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 8780
- 12c Prantz K, Mulzer J. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 3741
- 12d Clarke AK, Unsworth WP. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 2876
- 13a Li L, Li Z.-L, Wang F.-L, Guo Z, Cheng Y.-F, Wang N, Dong X.-W, Fang C, Liu J, Hou C, Tan B, Liu X.-Y. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7: 13852
- 13b Mendoza-Sanchez R, Corless VB, Nguyen QN. N, Bergeron-Brlek M, Frost J, Adachi S, Tantillo DJ, Yudin AK. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 13319
- 13c Costil R, Lefebvre Q, Clayden J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 14602
- 13d Loya DR, Jean A, Cormier M, Fressigné C, Nejrotti S, Blanchet J, Maddaluno J, De Paolis M. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 2080
- 13e Lawer A, Rossi-Ashton JA, Stephens TC, Challis BJ, Epton RG, Lynam JM, Unsworth WP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 13942
- 13f Grintsevich S, Sapegin A, Reutskaya E, Peintner S, Erdélyi M, Krasavin M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 5664
- 13g Shang J, Thombare VJ, Charron CL, Wille U, Hutton C. Chem. Eur. J. 2021; 26: 1620
- 14a Kitsiou C, Hindes JJ, l’Anson P, Jackson P, Wilson TC, Daly EK, Felstead HR, Hearnshaw P, Unsworth WP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 15794
- 14b Baud LG, Manning MA, Arkless HL, Stephens TC, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 2225
- 14c Stephens TC, Lodi M, Steer A, Lin Y, Gill M, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 13314
- 14d Stephens TC, Lawer A, French T, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 13947
- 14e Lawer A, Epton RG, Stephens TC, Palate KY, Lodi M, Marotte E, Lamb KJ, Sangha JK, Lynam J, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2020; 26: 12674
- 14f Palate KY, Epton RG, Whitwood AC, Lynam JM, Unsworth WP. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021; 19: 1404
- 14g Palate KY, Yang Z, Whitwood AC, Unsworth WP. RSC Chem. Biol. 2022; 3: 334
- 15 For the application of SuRE reactions by another research group, see: Zhao C, Ye Z, Ma Z.-X, Wildman SA, Blaszczyk SA, Hu L, Guizei IA, Tang W. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 4015
- 16 Dolby LJ, Booth DL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966; 88: 1049
- 17a Liu C, Szostak M. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 7157
- 17b Li G, Ma S, Szostak M. Trends Chem. 2020; 2: 914
- 18 In the cases of products 28 and 33 (both prepared from enantiopure proteinogenic amino acids), the enantiopurity of the products was not measured in this study, but epimerisation is considered to be unlikely based on our previous studies (ref. 14), in which such epimerisation was not observed in related systems.
- 19 Representative Procedure for SuRE Method A (Synthesis of 28) 3,4,5,6-Tetrahydro-1H-(1)-benzazonin-2,7-dione 8 (406.4 mg, 2.00 mmol), DMAP (24.4 mg, 0.200 mmol), and pyridine (0.970 mL, 12.0 mmol) in dry DCM (10 mL) under an argon atmosphere were stirred at RT for 30 min. Next, a solution of acid chloride (6.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv., prepared from Cbz-proline using the procedure described in the Supporting Information) in dry DCM (10 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was heated at reflux (50 °C) for 18 h. The solvent was then concentrated in vacuo, loaded onto a short silica plug and eluted with ethyl acetate, to remove majority of excess carboxylic acid and pyridine residues, and concentrated in vacuo. This material was redissolved in MeOH (20 mL) and placed under an argon atmosphere. Palladium on carbon (200 mg, 10% Pd on carbon) was added, and the reaction vessel was backfilled with hydrogen (via balloon) several times, then stirred at RT under a slight positive pressure of hydrogen (balloon) for 1 h. The reaction was then purged with argon, filtered through Celite, washed with methanol, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (SiO2, ethyl acetate) afforded the title compound as a colorless oil (414 mg, 69% over 2 steps from 8) which exists as a 5:1 mixture of rotamers in solution in CDCl3; [α]D 23 –312.13 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); Rf = 0.23 (ethyl acetate). IR (neat) νmax = 3252, 2948, 2242, 1691, 1672, 1602, 1505, 1442, 1299, 1238, 910, 756, 725, 644, 580 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.43 (s, 1 H, NH, major rotamer), 9.34 (s, 1 H, NH, minor rotamer), 7.77–7.73 (m, 1 H, PhCH, major rotamer), 7.42–7.28 (m, 2 H, PhCH, both rotamers), 7.20–7.14 (m, 1 H, PhCH, minor rotamer), 7.07 (td, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, PhCH, major rotamer), 4.31–4.20 (m, 1 H, NCHCO, both rotamers), 3.78 (dt, J = 10.1, 7.0 Hz, 1 H, NCH2, major rotamer), 3.60 (ddd, J = 11.5, 7.3, 4.3 Hz, 1 H, NCH2, minor rotamer), 3.55–3.44 (m, 1 H, NCH2, both rotamers), 3.07–2.78 (m, 2 H, CH2, both rotamers), 2.68–2.49 (m, 1 H, CH2, major rotamer), 2.36–2.01 (m, 4 H, CH2, both rotamers), 2.02–1.61 (m, 5 H, CH2, both rotamers). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) for the major rotamer only: δ = 207.2 (CO), 173.4 (CO), 172.8 (CO), 134.8 (PhC), 133.0 (PhC), 131.4 (PhCH), 126.9 (PhCH), 124.5 (PhCH), 124.1 (PhCH), 62.6 (COCHN), 47.0 (CH2), 41.8 (CH2), 35.1 (CH2), 28.4 (CH2), 25.3 (CH2), 22.6 (CH2), 22.1 (CH2). Diagnostic 13C NMR resonances for the minor rotamer: δ = 204.8 (CO), 172.6 (CO), 172.3 (CO), 135.9 (PhC), 133.6 (PhC), 127.9 (PhCH), 126.0 (PhCH), 125.5 (PhCH), 61.4 (COCHN), 38.5 (CH2), 31.9 (CH2), 31.6 (CH2), 23.6 (CH2), 23.0 (CH2), 21.2 (CH2). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C17H20N2NaO3: 323.1366; found [MNa]+: 323.1362 (1.3 ppm error). For spectroscopic data and procedures for all novel compounds prepared in this manuscript, see the Supporting Information.
For papers discussing the influence of ring size on end-to-end cyclisation reactions, see:
For general perspective on macrocycle synthesis, see:
For reviews on ring expansion, see:
For selected recent examples, see:
For useful perspective on how resonance and conformation can affect the reactivity of amide derivatives, see:
Corresponding Author
Publication History
Received: 21 July 2022
Accepted after revision: 29 August 2022
Accepted Manuscript online:
29 August 2022
Article published online:
30 September 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1 Since completing this study, C. R. B. Swanson has relocated to a different institution: Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7DN (UK).
- 2 Festa C, De Marino S, Sepe V, D’Auria MV, Bifulco G, Débitus C, Bucci M, Vellecco V, Zampella A. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1532
- 3 Kashinath K, Jachak GR, Athawale PR, Marelli UK, Gonnade RG, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 3178
- 4 Jachak GR, Athawale PR, Agarwal H, Barthwal MK, Lauro G, Bifulco G, Reddy DS. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018; 16: 9138
- 5a Kashinath K, Vasudevan N, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 6222
- 5b Vasudevan N, Kashinath K, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 6148
- 5c Kashinath K, Dhara S, Reddy DS. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2090
- 5d Jachak GR, Athawale PR, Choudhury R, Kashinath K, Reddy DS. Chem. Asian J. 2019; 14: 4572
- 6a Kavitha N, Kumar VP, Chandrasekhar S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 2128
- 6b Kavitha N, Chandrasekhar S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 6242
- 6c Cheng-Sánchez I, García-Ruiz C, Sarabia F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 3392
- 6d Cheng-Sánchez I, Carrillo P, Sánchez-Ruiz A, Martínez-Poveda B, Quesada AR, Medina M. Á, López-Romero JM, Sarabia F. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 5365
- 6e Carrillo P, Martínez-Poveda B, Cheng-Sánchez I, Guerra J, Tobia C, López-Romero JM, Sarabia F, Medina MA, Quesada AR. Mar. Drugs 2019; 17: 228
- 7 Saridakis I, Kaiser D, Maulide N. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020; 6: 1869
- 8 Practical Medicinal Chemistry with Macrocycles. Marsault E, Peterson ML. Wiley; Hoboken: 2017
- 9a Gradillas A, Pérez-Castells J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 6086
- 9b Lecourt C, Dhambri S, Allievi L, Sanogo Y, Zeghbib N, Ben Othman R, Lannou M.-I, Sorin G, Ardisson J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018; 35: 105
- 10a Illuminati G, Mandolini L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981; 14: 95
- 10b Fastrez J. J. Phys. Chem. 1989; 93: 2635
- 10c Collins JC, James K. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012; 3: 1489
- 10d Kurouchi H, Ohwada T. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 876
- 10e Marsault E, Peterson ML. J. Med. Chem. 2011; 54: 1961
- 10f Yudin AK. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 30
- 10g Mortensen KT, Osberger TJ, King TA, Sore HF, Spring DR. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 10288
- 10h Appavoo SD, Huh S, Diaz DB, Yudin AK. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 9724
- 10i Smolyar IV, Yudin AK, Nenajdenko VG. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 10032
- 11 For a review on consecutive ring-expansion reactions, see: Stephens TC, Unsworth WP. Synlett 2020; 31: 133
- 12a Hesse M. In Ring Enlargement in Organic Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 1991
- 12b Unsworth WP, Donald JR. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 8780
- 12c Prantz K, Mulzer J. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 3741
- 12d Clarke AK, Unsworth WP. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 2876
- 13a Li L, Li Z.-L, Wang F.-L, Guo Z, Cheng Y.-F, Wang N, Dong X.-W, Fang C, Liu J, Hou C, Tan B, Liu X.-Y. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7: 13852
- 13b Mendoza-Sanchez R, Corless VB, Nguyen QN. N, Bergeron-Brlek M, Frost J, Adachi S, Tantillo DJ, Yudin AK. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 13319
- 13c Costil R, Lefebvre Q, Clayden J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 14602
- 13d Loya DR, Jean A, Cormier M, Fressigné C, Nejrotti S, Blanchet J, Maddaluno J, De Paolis M. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 2080
- 13e Lawer A, Rossi-Ashton JA, Stephens TC, Challis BJ, Epton RG, Lynam JM, Unsworth WP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 13942
- 13f Grintsevich S, Sapegin A, Reutskaya E, Peintner S, Erdélyi M, Krasavin M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 5664
- 13g Shang J, Thombare VJ, Charron CL, Wille U, Hutton C. Chem. Eur. J. 2021; 26: 1620
- 14a Kitsiou C, Hindes JJ, l’Anson P, Jackson P, Wilson TC, Daly EK, Felstead HR, Hearnshaw P, Unsworth WP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 15794
- 14b Baud LG, Manning MA, Arkless HL, Stephens TC, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 2225
- 14c Stephens TC, Lodi M, Steer A, Lin Y, Gill M, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 13314
- 14d Stephens TC, Lawer A, French T, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 13947
- 14e Lawer A, Epton RG, Stephens TC, Palate KY, Lodi M, Marotte E, Lamb KJ, Sangha JK, Lynam J, Unsworth WP. Chem. Eur. J. 2020; 26: 12674
- 14f Palate KY, Epton RG, Whitwood AC, Lynam JM, Unsworth WP. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021; 19: 1404
- 14g Palate KY, Yang Z, Whitwood AC, Unsworth WP. RSC Chem. Biol. 2022; 3: 334
- 15 For the application of SuRE reactions by another research group, see: Zhao C, Ye Z, Ma Z.-X, Wildman SA, Blaszczyk SA, Hu L, Guizei IA, Tang W. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 4015
- 16 Dolby LJ, Booth DL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966; 88: 1049
- 17a Liu C, Szostak M. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 7157
- 17b Li G, Ma S, Szostak M. Trends Chem. 2020; 2: 914
- 18 In the cases of products 28 and 33 (both prepared from enantiopure proteinogenic amino acids), the enantiopurity of the products was not measured in this study, but epimerisation is considered to be unlikely based on our previous studies (ref. 14), in which such epimerisation was not observed in related systems.
- 19 Representative Procedure for SuRE Method A (Synthesis of 28) 3,4,5,6-Tetrahydro-1H-(1)-benzazonin-2,7-dione 8 (406.4 mg, 2.00 mmol), DMAP (24.4 mg, 0.200 mmol), and pyridine (0.970 mL, 12.0 mmol) in dry DCM (10 mL) under an argon atmosphere were stirred at RT for 30 min. Next, a solution of acid chloride (6.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv., prepared from Cbz-proline using the procedure described in the Supporting Information) in dry DCM (10 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was heated at reflux (50 °C) for 18 h. The solvent was then concentrated in vacuo, loaded onto a short silica plug and eluted with ethyl acetate, to remove majority of excess carboxylic acid and pyridine residues, and concentrated in vacuo. This material was redissolved in MeOH (20 mL) and placed under an argon atmosphere. Palladium on carbon (200 mg, 10% Pd on carbon) was added, and the reaction vessel was backfilled with hydrogen (via balloon) several times, then stirred at RT under a slight positive pressure of hydrogen (balloon) for 1 h. The reaction was then purged with argon, filtered through Celite, washed with methanol, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. Purification by flash column chromatography (SiO2, ethyl acetate) afforded the title compound as a colorless oil (414 mg, 69% over 2 steps from 8) which exists as a 5:1 mixture of rotamers in solution in CDCl3; [α]D 23 –312.13 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); Rf = 0.23 (ethyl acetate). IR (neat) νmax = 3252, 2948, 2242, 1691, 1672, 1602, 1505, 1442, 1299, 1238, 910, 756, 725, 644, 580 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.43 (s, 1 H, NH, major rotamer), 9.34 (s, 1 H, NH, minor rotamer), 7.77–7.73 (m, 1 H, PhCH, major rotamer), 7.42–7.28 (m, 2 H, PhCH, both rotamers), 7.20–7.14 (m, 1 H, PhCH, minor rotamer), 7.07 (td, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, PhCH, major rotamer), 4.31–4.20 (m, 1 H, NCHCO, both rotamers), 3.78 (dt, J = 10.1, 7.0 Hz, 1 H, NCH2, major rotamer), 3.60 (ddd, J = 11.5, 7.3, 4.3 Hz, 1 H, NCH2, minor rotamer), 3.55–3.44 (m, 1 H, NCH2, both rotamers), 3.07–2.78 (m, 2 H, CH2, both rotamers), 2.68–2.49 (m, 1 H, CH2, major rotamer), 2.36–2.01 (m, 4 H, CH2, both rotamers), 2.02–1.61 (m, 5 H, CH2, both rotamers). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) for the major rotamer only: δ = 207.2 (CO), 173.4 (CO), 172.8 (CO), 134.8 (PhC), 133.0 (PhC), 131.4 (PhCH), 126.9 (PhCH), 124.5 (PhCH), 124.1 (PhCH), 62.6 (COCHN), 47.0 (CH2), 41.8 (CH2), 35.1 (CH2), 28.4 (CH2), 25.3 (CH2), 22.6 (CH2), 22.1 (CH2). Diagnostic 13C NMR resonances for the minor rotamer: δ = 204.8 (CO), 172.6 (CO), 172.3 (CO), 135.9 (PhC), 133.6 (PhC), 127.9 (PhCH), 126.0 (PhCH), 125.5 (PhCH), 61.4 (COCHN), 38.5 (CH2), 31.9 (CH2), 31.6 (CH2), 23.6 (CH2), 23.0 (CH2), 21.2 (CH2). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C17H20N2NaO3: 323.1366; found [MNa]+: 323.1362 (1.3 ppm error). For spectroscopic data and procedures for all novel compounds prepared in this manuscript, see the Supporting Information.
For papers discussing the influence of ring size on end-to-end cyclisation reactions, see:
For general perspective on macrocycle synthesis, see:
For reviews on ring expansion, see:
For selected recent examples, see:
For useful perspective on how resonance and conformation can affect the reactivity of amide derivatives, see:









