Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1665-9220
Red-Light-Induced N,N′-Dipropyl-1,13-dimethoxyquinacridinium-Catalyzed [3+2] Cycloaddition of Cyclopropylamines with Alkenes or Alkynes
We are grateful to the University of Arizona and the ACS Petroleum Research Fund (grant no. 59631-DNI3) for financially supporting this work. All NMR data were collected in the NMR facility of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Arizona, and we thank Dr. Jixun Dai for his help. The purchase of the Bruker NEO 500 MHz spectrometer was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. 1920234) and by the University of Arizona.
Abstract
A red-light-mediated [3+2] annulation of cyclopropylamines with akenes or alkynes in the presence of N,N′-dipropyl-1,13-dimethoxyquinacridinium is reported. An array of cyclopentane or cyclopentene derivatives with diverse functional groups have been obtained in moderate to excellent yields under mild conditions.
#
Key words
photoredox catalysis - [3+2] cycloaddition - cyclopropylamines - alkenes - alkynes - dipropyldimethoxyquinacridiniumCyclopentyl functional group motifs are prevalent in a wide range of bioactive pharmaceuticals and natural products such as peramivir,[1] aristeromycin,[2] prostaglandin F2α,[3] and vibralactone[4] (Figure [1]). As a consequence, various strategies for their synthesis have been developed.[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] Representative examples include the Pauson–Khand reaction,[5] Nazarov cyclization,[6] [3+2] cycloaddition,[7] ring-closing metathesis,[8] and the intramolecular Henry reaction.[9] In particular, the visible-light-mediated [3+2] cycloaddition of cyclopropylamines caught our attention, because it not only represents an atom-economical process, but also takes advantage of readily available and environmentally friendly visible light.[10] During the reaction, cyclopropylamine serves as a three-carbon-atom precursor by generating a crucial distonic radical cation intermediate through a radical mechanism.[10]


Cha and co-workers pioneered this work by introducing a photomediated intramolecular [3+2] annulation of olefin-tethered cyclopropylamines,[10a] which built the foundation for future developments (Scheme [1a]). Nevertheless, its requirements for UV light and stoichiometric amounts of photosensitizer have rendered his protocol less than practical. Over the past decade, the renaissance of modern visible-light-induced photoredox catalysis has brought new life to this reaction because its milder conditions can address the previously noted drawbacks.[11] As a result, the Zheng group has reported several exquisite examples of visible-light-mediated intermolecular [3+2] annulations of cyclopropylamines with olefins, alkynes, enynes, or diynes in the presence of tris(2.2′-bipyrazyl)ruthenium(II) [Ru(bpz)3 2+] (Scheme [1b]).[10`] [d] [e] Afterwards, the Waser group presented a synthesis of bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes through a 1,3-dicyano-2,4,5,6-tetrakis(diphenylamino)benzene (4DPAIPN)-catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition of cyclopropenes with aminocyclopropanes under blue-light irradiation (Scheme [1c]).[10f] Later, the Jiang group disclosed an asymmetric version of Zheng’s original protocol by employing cooperative photoredox and chiral Brønsted acid catalysis in the presence of blue LEDs (Scheme [1d]).[10g] More recently, Aggarwal et al. introduced a diastereoselective blue-light-mediated 1,2,3,5-tetrakis(carbazol-9-yl)-4,6-dicyanobenzene (4CzIPN)-catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition of N‑sulfonyl cyclopropylamines with electron-deficient olefins, which further expanded the substrate scope of this reaction (Scheme [1e]).[10h] Despite the impressive progress to date, all the current protocols employ relatively high-energy blue or white light. In contrast, red light features a lower energy, greater penetration depth, fewer health risks, fewer side reactions, and more abundance from sunlight.[12] Therefore, developing a red-light-induced [3+2] cycloaddition of cyclopropylamine for the synthesis cyclopentane and cyclopentene derivatives is still highly desirable.


Recently, we demonstrated that the helicenium ion N,N′-dipropyl-1,13-dimethoxyquinacridinium (nPr-DMQA+) is an efficient organic photocatalyst for red-light-mediated reactions.[13] This photocatalyst has successful catalyzed a series of well-studied photocatalyzed reactions, as well as a novel red-right-mediated cascade trifluoromethylation/dearomatization of indole derivatives with Umemoto’s reagent for the synthesis of trifluoromethylated spirocyclic indolines.[13] [14] In the above-mentioned visible-light-mediated Ru(bpz)3 2+-catalyzed [3+2] cycloadditions,[10c–e] Ru(bpz)3 2+ {E1/2 [Ru(I)/Ru(II*)] = +1.45 V vs. the saturated calomel electrode (SCE)}[15] acted as a photooxidant by oxidizing cyclopropylamine to the corresponding nitrogen radical cation (ArRNH/ArRNH∙+ ≈ +1.0 V vs. SCE[16]) through reductive quenching. With E1/2(C+*/C∙) = +1.15 V and E1/2(C+/C∙) = –0.78 V vs. SCE[13] for nPr-DMQA+, along with E1/2 [Ru(I)/Ru(II)] = –0.80 V vs. SCE[15] for Ru(bpz)3 2+), nPr-DMQA+ should be competent to catalyze such transformation. We present an nPr-DMQA+-catalyzed [3+2] annulation of cyclopropylamines with olefins or alkynes in the presence of red light that provides a simple and more sustainable approach for the construction of functionalized cyclopentanes or cyclopentenes under mild conditions (Scheme [1f]).
For our initial examinations, we used N-cyclopropylaniline (1a) and styrene (2a) as model substrates in the presence of nPr-DMQA+ under red-light irradiation to screen the optimal conditions, and the results of these experiments are summarized in Table [1]. Delightfully, the desired product N-(2-phenylcyclopentyl)aniline (3a) was obtained in 95% NMR yield and a 1.1:1 (trans/cis) dr in nitromethane (MeNO2) when the reaction was run with 3.0 mol% of nPr-DMQA+ at r.t. for 18 hours (Table [1], entry 1). The use of MeNO2 as the solvent is consistent with other literature reports.[10] Solvents other than MeNO2, such as acetonitrile (MeCN) (entry 10), resulted in a lower yield. By decreasing the catalyst loading, we observed that 1.0 mol% of PC gave the best performance, furnishing 3a in 95% NMR yield and 1:1.1 dr (entry 2). An investigation of the reaction time revealed that six hours was sufficient to complete the reaction, giving 3a in 95% NMR yield and 1:1.1 dr in the presence of 1.0 mol% of nPr-DMQA+ (entries 4–6). Thus, MeNO2 as the solvent, 1.0 mol % of nPr-DMQA+ as the catalyst loading, and a reaction time of six hours are the optimal reaction conditions (entry 5). Furthermore, in the absence of red light or nPr-DMQA+, none of the desired product 3a was detected, with mainly the starting materials 1a and 2a being recovered, which suggested that both red light and nPr-DMQA+ are essential (entries 7 and 8). Running the reaction under air lowered the reaction yield significantly, which is consistent with Zheng’s work[10c] (entry 9).
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (1.0 mmol), nPr-DMQA+, MeNO2 (1 mL).
b Yield by 1H NMR with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.
c Determined by 1H NMR of the crude product.
d In darkness.
e nd = not detected.
f In the presence of air.
g In MeCN (1.0 mL)
With the optimal conditions in hand, we next sought to explore the substrate scope of this red-light-induced [3+2] cycloaddition (Scheme [2]). By using styrene (2a) as a model substrate, cyclopropylamines 1a–f with various aromatic groups were tested. The electronic properties or substitution patterns on the phenyl ring of 1 had little effect on the reaction outcome, and the corresponding cyclopentane derivatives 3a–f were obtained in yields of 60–93%. For example, substrate 1b with a phenyl group in the ortho-position gave the desired product 3b smoothly in 68% yield. Product 3c was isolated in 60% yield when styrene derivative 1c with a trifluoromethyl group at the meta-position reacted with 2a. In addition, 1d and 1e with methyl and chloro groups, respectively, in their para-positions provided the five-membered carbocycles 3d and 3e in moderate yields. Alkene 1f with a 3-pyridyl group was also suitable for this [3+2] annulation, furnishing 3f in 80% yield. Then, a wide range of alkenes 2b–i with diverse useful functional groups such as cyano (2b), ketone (2c), ester (2d), or halo (2e and 2f) were examined, and all reacted smoothly with N-cyclopropylaniline (1a). In detail, olefins 2b–d with strong electron-withdrawing groups afforded products 3g–i in yields of 61–95%. Products 3j–n were also obtained in yields of 62–91% when styrene derivatives 2e–i reacted with 1a. Although the reaction showed relatively poor diastereoselectivity, most pairs of trans- and cis-diastereomers were fully isolated by flash column chromatography, except for 3b, 3c, 3j, and 3m.


Notably, under the optimal reaction conditions, the [3+2] addition of cyclopropylamine with alkynes could also be achieved with a broad range of substrates (Scheme [3]). The corresponding cyclopentene products 5a–d were obtained in yields of 71–81% when electron-neutral, electron-deficient, or electron-rich terminal alkynes 4a–d reacted with 1a. Moreover, the dialkyne substrate 4e was also compatible under the standard reaction conditions, affording the desired product 5e in 65% yield. When internal alkynes 4f and 4g were tested, the desired products 5f and 5g were smoothly obtained, albeit in somewhat lower yields, possibly due to steric effects. It is also noteworthy that 5e was obtained in a much higher yield compared with that reported in the literature,[10d] presumably due to the relatively milder condition with red light in this protocol.


On the basis of previous work,[10] [13] [14] we propose the reaction mechanism for these transformations that is shown in Scheme [4]. First, nPr-DMQA+*, formed by irradiation with red light, undergoes a single-electron-transfer process with the cyclopropylamine 1a to generate the nitrogen radical cation intermediate A. Due to the inherent torsional and angular strain of the cyclopropane ring, A undergoes β-scission of this ring to form the β-carbon radical iminium ion B, which attacks styrene (2a) to produce another stabilized distonic radical cation species C. Intramolecular addition of the in situ-formed radical to the iminium ion in intermediate C furnishes another nitrogen radical cation species D. Lastly, D is reduced by the nPr-DMQA∙ to form the final product 3a, together with ground-state nPr-DMQA+, completing the catalytic cycle.


In conclusion, we have developed an nPr-DMQA+-catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition of cyclopropylamines with alkenes or alkynes in the presence of red light that provides a facile and efficient route for the construction of functionalized five-membered carbocycles. A mechanism involving reductive quenching of a critical distonic radical cation species is proposed. The employment of low-energy red light permits this approach to serve as a complementary option to the current white- or blue-light-mediated protocols. Further investigations of this red-light-mediated [3+2] annulation of cyclopropylamines with other interesting substrates are underway in our laboratory.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi-org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/a-1665-9220.
Included are general information, substrate synthesis and characterization, mechanistic
investigation, experimental procedures, as well as NMR spectroscopy data.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Babu YS, Chand P, Bantia S, Kotian P, Dehghani A, El-Kattan Y, Lin TH, Hutchison TL, Elliott AJ, Parker CD, Ananth SL, Horn LL, Laver GW, Montgomery JA. J. Med. Chem. 2000; 43: 3482
- 1b Jia F, Hong J, Sun P.-H, Chen J.-X, Chen W.-M. Synth. Commun. 2013; 43: 2641
- 2a Trost BM, Kuo GH, Benneche T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 621
- 2b Bestmann HJ, Roth D. Synlett 1990; 751
- 2c Boyer SJ, Leahy JW. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 3976
- 3a Corey EJ, Schaaf TK, Huber W, Koelliker U, Weinshenker NM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970; 92: 397
- 3b Das S, Chandrasekhar S, Yadav JS, Grée R. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 3286
- 4a Zhou Q, Snider BB. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1401
- 4b Nistanaki SK, Boralsky LA, Pan RD, Nelson HM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 1724
- 4c Liang Y, Li Q, Wei M, Chen C, Sun W, Gu L, Zhu H, Zhang Y. Bioorg. Chem. 2020; 99: 103760
- 6a Vaidya T, Eisenberg R, Frontier AJ. ChemCatChem 2011; 3: 1531
- 6b Fradette RJ, Kang M, West FG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 6335
- 7a Trost BM. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986; 25: 1
- 7b Zhang C, Lu X. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 2906
- 7c Mei L.-y, Wei Y, Xu Q, Shi M. Organometallics 2012; 31: 7591
- 7d Gicquel M, Zhang Y, Aillard P, Retailleau P, Voituriez A, Marinetti A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 5470
- 7e Kuang Y, Ning Y, Zhu J, Wang Y. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2693
- 8 Kurteva VB, Afonso CA. M. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 6809
- 9a Boyce GR, Johnson JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 8930
- 9b Boyce GR, Liu S, Johnson JS. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 652
- 10a Ha JD, Lee J, Blackstock SC, Cha JK. J. Org. Chem. 1998; 63: 8510
- 10b Lee HB, Sung MJ, Blackstock SC, Cha JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 11322
- 10c Maity S, Zhu M, Shinabery RS, Zheng N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 222
- 10d Nguyen TH, Morris SA, Zheng N. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014; 356: 2831
- 10e Nguyen TH, Maity S, Zheng N. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014; 10: 975
- 10f Muriel B, Gagnebin A, Waser J. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 10716
- 10g Yin Y, Li Y, Gonçalves TP, Zhan Q, Wang G, Zhao X, Qiao B, Huang K.-W, Jiang Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 19451
- 10h White DH, Noble A, Booker-Milburn KI, Aggarwal VK. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 3038
- 11a Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
- 11b Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10075
- 11c Skubi KL, Blum TR, Yoon TP. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10035
- 11d Shang TY, Lu LH, Cao Z, Liu Y, He WM, Yu B. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 5408
- 11e Vega-Peñaloza A, Mateos J, Companyó X, Escudero-Casao M, Dell’Amico L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 1082
- 12a Ravetz BD, Pun AB, Churchill EM, Congreve DN, Rovis T, Campos LM. Nature 2019; 565: 343
- 12b Ravetz BD, Tay NE. S, Joe CL, Sezen-Edmonds M, Schmidt MA, Tan Y, Janey JM, Eastgate MD, Rovis T. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020; 6: 2053
- 13a Mei L, Veleta JM, Gianetti TL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 12056
- 13b Mei L, Gianetti T. Synlett 2021; 32: 337
- 14 Mei L, Moutet J, Stull SM, Gianetti TL. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 10640
- 15a Crutchley RJ, Lever AB. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 7128
- 15b Rillema DP, Allen G, Meyer TJ, Conrad D. Inorg. Chem. 1983; 22: 1617
- 16 Roth HG, Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Synlett 2016; 27: 714
- 17 Red-Light-Induced nPr-DMQA+-Catalyzed [3+2] Cycloaddition of N-Cyclopropylanilines 1 with Alkenes 2; General Procedure In a N2 glove box, an oven-dried (overnight) Schlenk tube containing a stirring bar was charged with the appropriate substrate 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and alkene 2 (1.0 mmol, 1.2 equiv). This was followed by the addition of [nPr-DMQA+][BF4 –] (1.0 mg, 0.002 mmol, 1.0 mol%) in degassed MeNO2 (1 mL), transferred from a stock solution of the catalyst (10.0 mg) in degassed MeNO2 (10 mL). The Schlenk tube was then sealed and removed from the glove box, and the solution was stirred at rt under red LED (λmax = 640 nm) irradiation until the reaction was complete. The mixture was then concentrated under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator, and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography (FC) [silica gel, hexanes–Et2O or EtOAc (200:1 to 6:1)]. trans-N-(2-Phenylcyclopentyl)aniline (3a-I) 10c Colorless oil; yield: 20 mg (42%). Rf = 0.3 (hexanes–EtOAc, 20:1). FC: hexanes–Et2O (99:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31 (dd, J = 8.0, 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.25–7.21 (m, 3 H, ArH), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.0, 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.65 (dd, J = 8.0, 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.48 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 4.01 (dd, J = 12.0, 6.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 3.46 (dd, J = 15.0, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 3.37 (bs, 1 H, NH), 2.22–2.07 (m, 3 H, CH2), 2.02–1.94 (m, 1 H, CH2), 1.89–1.76 (m, 2 H, CH2). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.91, 140.84, 129.18, 128.77, 128.43, 126.59, 117.01, 113.32, 57.57, 48.15, 32.01, 28.94, 22.19. cis-N-(2-Phenylcyclopentyl)aniline (3a-II) 10c Colorless oil; yield: 2 mg, 46%; Rf = 0.2 (hexanes–EtOAc, 20:1). FC: hexanes–Et2O (99:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.34–7.28 (m, 4 H, ArH), 7.22 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.13 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.67 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.55 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 3.80 (bs, 1 H, NH), 3.80 (dd, J = 13.0, 7.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 2.93 (dd, J = 17.0, 8.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 2.38 (ddd, J = 21.0, 14.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, CH2), 2.26–2.19 (m, 1 H, CH2), 1.94–1.82 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.81–1.75 (m, 1 H, CH2), 1.66–1.58 (m, 1 H, CH2). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.16, 143.83, 129.25, 128.69, 127.48, 126.54, 117.19, 113.47, 61.58, 53.27, 33.59, 33.55, 23.46.
Corresponding Author
Publication History
Received: 26 August 2021
Accepted after revision: 10 October 2021
Accepted Manuscript online:
10 October 2021
Article published online:
12 November 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Babu YS, Chand P, Bantia S, Kotian P, Dehghani A, El-Kattan Y, Lin TH, Hutchison TL, Elliott AJ, Parker CD, Ananth SL, Horn LL, Laver GW, Montgomery JA. J. Med. Chem. 2000; 43: 3482
- 1b Jia F, Hong J, Sun P.-H, Chen J.-X, Chen W.-M. Synth. Commun. 2013; 43: 2641
- 2a Trost BM, Kuo GH, Benneche T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 621
- 2b Bestmann HJ, Roth D. Synlett 1990; 751
- 2c Boyer SJ, Leahy JW. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 3976
- 3a Corey EJ, Schaaf TK, Huber W, Koelliker U, Weinshenker NM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970; 92: 397
- 3b Das S, Chandrasekhar S, Yadav JS, Grée R. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 3286
- 4a Zhou Q, Snider BB. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1401
- 4b Nistanaki SK, Boralsky LA, Pan RD, Nelson HM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 1724
- 4c Liang Y, Li Q, Wei M, Chen C, Sun W, Gu L, Zhu H, Zhang Y. Bioorg. Chem. 2020; 99: 103760
- 6a Vaidya T, Eisenberg R, Frontier AJ. ChemCatChem 2011; 3: 1531
- 6b Fradette RJ, Kang M, West FG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 6335
- 7a Trost BM. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986; 25: 1
- 7b Zhang C, Lu X. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 2906
- 7c Mei L.-y, Wei Y, Xu Q, Shi M. Organometallics 2012; 31: 7591
- 7d Gicquel M, Zhang Y, Aillard P, Retailleau P, Voituriez A, Marinetti A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 5470
- 7e Kuang Y, Ning Y, Zhu J, Wang Y. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2693
- 8 Kurteva VB, Afonso CA. M. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 6809
- 9a Boyce GR, Johnson JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 8930
- 9b Boyce GR, Liu S, Johnson JS. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 652
- 10a Ha JD, Lee J, Blackstock SC, Cha JK. J. Org. Chem. 1998; 63: 8510
- 10b Lee HB, Sung MJ, Blackstock SC, Cha JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 11322
- 10c Maity S, Zhu M, Shinabery RS, Zheng N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 222
- 10d Nguyen TH, Morris SA, Zheng N. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014; 356: 2831
- 10e Nguyen TH, Maity S, Zheng N. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014; 10: 975
- 10f Muriel B, Gagnebin A, Waser J. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 10716
- 10g Yin Y, Li Y, Gonçalves TP, Zhan Q, Wang G, Zhao X, Qiao B, Huang K.-W, Jiang Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 19451
- 10h White DH, Noble A, Booker-Milburn KI, Aggarwal VK. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 3038
- 11a Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
- 11b Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10075
- 11c Skubi KL, Blum TR, Yoon TP. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10035
- 11d Shang TY, Lu LH, Cao Z, Liu Y, He WM, Yu B. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 5408
- 11e Vega-Peñaloza A, Mateos J, Companyó X, Escudero-Casao M, Dell’Amico L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 1082
- 12a Ravetz BD, Pun AB, Churchill EM, Congreve DN, Rovis T, Campos LM. Nature 2019; 565: 343
- 12b Ravetz BD, Tay NE. S, Joe CL, Sezen-Edmonds M, Schmidt MA, Tan Y, Janey JM, Eastgate MD, Rovis T. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020; 6: 2053
- 13a Mei L, Veleta JM, Gianetti TL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 12056
- 13b Mei L, Gianetti T. Synlett 2021; 32: 337
- 14 Mei L, Moutet J, Stull SM, Gianetti TL. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 10640
- 15a Crutchley RJ, Lever AB. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 7128
- 15b Rillema DP, Allen G, Meyer TJ, Conrad D. Inorg. Chem. 1983; 22: 1617
- 16 Roth HG, Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Synlett 2016; 27: 714
- 17 Red-Light-Induced nPr-DMQA+-Catalyzed [3+2] Cycloaddition of N-Cyclopropylanilines 1 with Alkenes 2; General Procedure In a N2 glove box, an oven-dried (overnight) Schlenk tube containing a stirring bar was charged with the appropriate substrate 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and alkene 2 (1.0 mmol, 1.2 equiv). This was followed by the addition of [nPr-DMQA+][BF4 –] (1.0 mg, 0.002 mmol, 1.0 mol%) in degassed MeNO2 (1 mL), transferred from a stock solution of the catalyst (10.0 mg) in degassed MeNO2 (10 mL). The Schlenk tube was then sealed and removed from the glove box, and the solution was stirred at rt under red LED (λmax = 640 nm) irradiation until the reaction was complete. The mixture was then concentrated under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator, and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography (FC) [silica gel, hexanes–Et2O or EtOAc (200:1 to 6:1)]. trans-N-(2-Phenylcyclopentyl)aniline (3a-I) 10c Colorless oil; yield: 20 mg (42%). Rf = 0.3 (hexanes–EtOAc, 20:1). FC: hexanes–Et2O (99:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31 (dd, J = 8.0, 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.25–7.21 (m, 3 H, ArH), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.0, 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.65 (dd, J = 8.0, 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.48 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 4.01 (dd, J = 12.0, 6.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 3.46 (dd, J = 15.0, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 3.37 (bs, 1 H, NH), 2.22–2.07 (m, 3 H, CH2), 2.02–1.94 (m, 1 H, CH2), 1.89–1.76 (m, 2 H, CH2). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.91, 140.84, 129.18, 128.77, 128.43, 126.59, 117.01, 113.32, 57.57, 48.15, 32.01, 28.94, 22.19. cis-N-(2-Phenylcyclopentyl)aniline (3a-II) 10c Colorless oil; yield: 2 mg, 46%; Rf = 0.2 (hexanes–EtOAc, 20:1). FC: hexanes–Et2O (99:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.34–7.28 (m, 4 H, ArH), 7.22 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.13 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.67 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.55 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 3.80 (bs, 1 H, NH), 3.80 (dd, J = 13.0, 7.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 2.93 (dd, J = 17.0, 8.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 2.38 (ddd, J = 21.0, 14.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, CH2), 2.26–2.19 (m, 1 H, CH2), 1.94–1.82 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.81–1.75 (m, 1 H, CH2), 1.66–1.58 (m, 1 H, CH2). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.16, 143.83, 129.25, 128.69, 127.48, 126.54, 117.19, 113.47, 61.58, 53.27, 33.59, 33.55, 23.46.










